* test(#3806): add parity tests for the Review Dispositions Ledger contract Failing-first: asserts references/planner-reviews.md, workflows/plan-phase.md, and agents/gsd-plan-checker.md agree on a single canonical "Review Dispositions Ledger" heading, its round-scoping, L##@{sha} anchor format, and append-only supersession rule. These fail until the canon and its two references are added. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(#3806): canonize the Review Dispositions Ledger contract Promote the existing planner-reviews.md Step 4 return-payload tables (Review Feedback Addressed/Deferred) into a canonical `## Review Dispositions Ledger` PLAN.md section, stated once in planner-reviews.md and referenced (not restated) from plan-phase.md's <review_incorporation_contract> and gsd-plan-checker.md's Review Incorporation dimension. Adds round-scoping (`### Round {N} — {REVIEWS_sha}`), a `L##@{sha}` line-anchor format so a REVIEWS.md reference survives the file being rewritten each round, and an append-only supersession rule. Scoped to part 1 only per the maintainer's approved-feature verdict — the deterministic lint/check verb (part 2) is explicitly deferred to a follow-up. Also: ADR-3806 recording the decision, a docs/features/ fragment (FEATURES.md is generated), and a changeset fragment. Closes #3806 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3806): fenced-example count bug and lint findings from review - tests/plan-review-convergence.test.cjs: the "heading exactly once" test counted the canonical heading text globally, so it also matched the illustrative fenced-code example in planner-reviews.md that shows the same heading as sample content, always failing 2 !== 1. Rewritten as a bounded line scanner that skips fenced blocks (found by an isolated adversarial review pass). Also bounded an unbounded regex quantifier over readFileSync content flagged by local/no-unbounded-quantifier. - docs/features/review-dispositions-ledger.md: match house fragment style (bold-lead paragraphs, not #### headings) per the Standards-axis review; regenerated docs/FEATURES.md. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3806): fit reference-cite fix within size hard caps; ack growth Trims the plan-phase.md / gsd-plan-checker.md reference-cite text to a single short clause pointing at gsd-core/references/planner-reviews.md (also fixes the bare `references/planner-reviews.md` cite the #3576 shipped-reference-cites gate rejects), bringing both files back under their SIZE hard caps and the plan-phase.md phase6 shrink-only baseline. Both files still grow slightly versus origin/next, acknowledged below per ADR-2719's emitted-drift-ack contract. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-plan-checker.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing Review Incorporation bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays within the LARGE hard cap. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing review_incorporation_contract bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays under the XL hard cap and the phase6 shrink-only baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3806): correct malformed Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth trailer block The previous commit's two Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth trailers were separated from the Co-Authored-By trailer by a blank line, so git's own trailer parser (which tests/helpers/emitted-runtime.cjs reads via `%(trailers:key=...)`) only recognized the last contiguous block (Co-Authored-By) and treated the Ack-Growth lines as ordinary body text — invisible to the emitted-attribution gate, not malformed data. Restating them here as one contiguous trailer block, git log over the PR range aggregates trailers from every commit, so this is additive. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-plan-checker.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing Review Incorporation bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays within the LARGE hard cap. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing review_incorporation_contract bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays under the XL hard cap and the phase6 shrink-only baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3806): isolate the ack-trailer paragraph as its own trailer block Git's trailer parser requires the trailer paragraph to be the message's final paragraph, preceded by a blank line, and to contain nothing but trailer-shaped lines. The prior commit's blank line before the trailer lines was missing, which folded the leading Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth lines into an ordinary prose paragraph. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-plan-checker.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing Review Incorporation bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays within the LARGE hard cap. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — adds a short pointer (in the existing review_incorporation_contract bullet) to the canonical Review Dispositions Ledger location (#3806); stays under the XL hard cap and the phase6 shrink-only baseline. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#3806): backfill PR #4345 into changeset and ADR Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tom Boucher
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ ${AGENT_SKILLS_PLANNER}
|
||||
|
||||
For each current actionable finding in REVIEWS.md, the planner MUST either:
|
||||
- incorporate it into a PLAN.md task, `<action>`, `<acceptance_criteria>`, `<verify>`, `must_haves`, threat model, or artifact list; or
|
||||
- explicitly document a deferral/rejection rationale in the relevant PLAN.md so the executor and reviewer can see the decision.
|
||||
- explicitly document a deferral/rejection rationale in the relevant PLAN.md, using the Review Dispositions Ledger in `gsd-core/references/planner-reviews.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
Historical findings already incorporated, explicitly deferred/rejected in PLAN.md, or marked fully resolved do not require new plan changes.
|
||||
</review_incorporation_contract>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user