enhance(#2229): add three-way claim disposition (admit/refute/abstain) to /gsd-explore research pass (#2543)

Closes #2229.

Each claim surfaced by /gsd-explore's research pass is dispositioned admit, refute, or abstain, with abstentions routed to a visible ledger instead of being smoothed into confident prose. Refute and abstain are separated by whether the disagreeing source is authoritative for that claim; a strong prior is never authoritative alone.

Two guards ride with it: conflict-abstention, and a tier floor that presents a would-be admit as an abstain when the researcher's resolved tier is the budget tier or cannot be determined.

To make that floor enforceable, resolve-model now emits the effective tier (--pick tier). It was already computed above the resolve_model_ids omit gate but was unreachable from a workflow, which left the floor inert on every non-Claude install - the model id is blank under omit and runtime-substituted where a tier map exists, and the profile defaults to balanced. The tier signal mirrors every resolution step that can change which tier runs, including the model_policy preset, and reports unknown rather than guessing. Output is additive; model, profile and effort are unchanged.

Two residuals are disclosed in the workflow rather than papered over: a raw-model-id model_overrides pin reports unknown and is floored (fails closed), and a model_profile_overrides entry repointing a tier at another tier's model can under-report (fails open, and predates this change).

Admin merge used only to satisfy the missing secondary reviewer on a single-maintainer PR. No CI failure and no conflict were bypassed: 38 checks green, remote runner 32255/32255 on both Node lanes.
This commit is contained in:
Rezolv
2026-08-09 23:05:41 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 693f12ad56
commit 2dbee3ebdd
12 changed files with 1079 additions and 25 deletions

View File

@@ -788,6 +788,8 @@ Socratic ideation session — guide an idea through probing questions, optionall
/gsd-explore authentication strategy # Explore a specific topic
```
When the optional research pass runs, each surfaced claim is dispositioned three ways — **admit** (survives a prompted-to-refute pass and is grounded in a source, shown with the source), **refute** (a source *authoritative for that claim* contradicts it, dropped or corrected), or **abstain** (unverifiable, non-authoritative disagreement, or a source-vs-prior conflict). Abstained claims are listed in a separate **Unresolved** ledger rather than smoothed into the narrative. (Claims-side analogue of the honest verifier, #1154.)
---
### `/gsd-undo`