Introduces `/gsd-spec-phase <phase>` as an optional pre-step before discuss-phase.
Clarifies WHAT a phase delivers (requirements, boundaries, acceptance criteria) with
quantitative ambiguity scoring before discuss-phase handles HOW to implement.
- `commands/gsd/spec-phase.md` — slash command routing to workflow
- `get-shit-done/workflows/spec-phase.md` — full Socratic interview loop (up to 6
rounds, 5 rotating perspectives: Researcher, Simplifier, Boundary Keeper, Failure
Analyst, Seed Closer) with weighted 4-dimension ambiguity gate (≤ 0.20 to write SPEC.md)
- `get-shit-done/templates/spec.md` — SPEC.md template with falsifiable requirements
(Current/Target/Acceptance per requirement), Boundaries, Acceptance Criteria,
Ambiguity Report, and Interview Log; includes two full worked examples
- `get-shit-done/workflows/discuss-phase.md` — new `check_spec` step detects
`{padded_phase}-SPEC.md` at startup; displays "Found SPEC.md — N requirements
locked. Focusing on implementation decisions."; `analyze_phase` respects `spec_loaded`
flag to skip "what/why" gray areas; `write_context` emits `<spec_lock>` section
with boundary summary and canonical ref to SPEC.md
- `docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` — update command/workflow counts (74→75, 71→72)
Closes #2213
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
62
commands/gsd/spec-phase.md
Normal file
62
commands/gsd/spec-phase.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: gsd:spec-phase
|
||||
description: Socratic spec refinement — clarify WHAT a phase delivers with ambiguity scoring before discuss-phase. Produces a SPEC.md with falsifiable requirements locked before implementation decisions begin.
|
||||
argument-hint: "<phase> [--auto] [--text]"
|
||||
allowed-tools:
|
||||
- Read
|
||||
- Write
|
||||
- Bash
|
||||
- Glob
|
||||
- Grep
|
||||
- AskUserQuestion
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<objective>
|
||||
Clarify phase requirements through structured Socratic questioning with quantitative ambiguity scoring.
|
||||
|
||||
**Position in workflow:** `spec-phase → discuss-phase → plan-phase → execute-phase → verify`
|
||||
|
||||
**How it works:**
|
||||
1. Load phase context (PROJECT.md, REQUIREMENTS.md, ROADMAP.md, STATE.md)
|
||||
2. Scout the codebase — understand current state before asking questions
|
||||
3. Run Socratic interview loop (up to 6 rounds, rotating perspectives)
|
||||
4. Score ambiguity across 4 weighted dimensions after each round
|
||||
5. Gate: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimensions meet minimums → write SPEC.md
|
||||
6. Commit SPEC.md — discuss-phase picks it up automatically on next run
|
||||
|
||||
**Output:** `{phase_dir}/{padded_phase}-SPEC.md` — falsifiable requirements that lock "what/why" before discuss-phase handles "how"
|
||||
</objective>
|
||||
|
||||
<execution_context>
|
||||
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/spec-phase.md
|
||||
@~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/spec.md
|
||||
</execution_context>
|
||||
|
||||
<runtime_note>
|
||||
**Copilot (VS Code):** Use `vscode_askquestions` wherever this workflow calls `AskUserQuestion`. They are equivalent.
|
||||
</runtime_note>
|
||||
|
||||
<context>
|
||||
Phase number: $ARGUMENTS (required)
|
||||
|
||||
**Flags:**
|
||||
- `--auto` — Skip interactive questions; Claude selects recommended defaults and writes SPEC.md
|
||||
- `--text` — Use plain-text numbered lists instead of TUI menus (required for `/rc` remote sessions)
|
||||
|
||||
Context files are resolved in-workflow using `init phase-op`.
|
||||
</context>
|
||||
|
||||
<process>
|
||||
Execute the spec-phase workflow from @~/.claude/get-shit-done/workflows/spec-phase.md end-to-end.
|
||||
|
||||
**MANDATORY:** Read the workflow file BEFORE taking any action. The workflow contains the complete step-by-step process including the Socratic interview loop, ambiguity scoring gate, and SPEC.md generation. Do not improvise from the objective summary above.
|
||||
</process>
|
||||
|
||||
<success_criteria>
|
||||
- Codebase scouted for current state before questioning begins
|
||||
- All 4 ambiguity dimensions scored after each interview round
|
||||
- Gate passed: ambiguity ≤ 0.20 AND all dimension minimums met
|
||||
- SPEC.md written with falsifiable requirements, explicit boundaries, and acceptance criteria
|
||||
- SPEC.md committed atomically
|
||||
- User knows they can now run /gsd-discuss-phase which will load SPEC.md automatically
|
||||
</success_criteria>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user