golem15/msd-core
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 1 Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(#3194): verify source-grounded lane evidence from review output (#3436)

Browse Source 
* fix(#3194): verify source-grounded lane evidence from review output

* chore(#3194): fill changeset pr number

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
This commit is contained in:
Tom Boucher
2026-08-14 00:29:42 -04:00
committed by GitHub
parent 1d5d77951c
commit 483083aea6
7 changed files with 252 additions and 9 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
gsd-core/workflows/review.md
View File

@@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ trimmed_reviewers: # only present if at least one reviewer was trimmed
## Consensus Summary
{synthesize common concerns across all reviewers. CodeRabbit is a diff-only reviewer (it never received the source-grounding prompt), so do not weight its verdict as a grounded plan review — fold in its diff findings, but base plan-level consensus on the prompt-fed reviewers. A reviewer output carrying the `[reviewed-without-repo-access]` marker (or beginning with `REVIEWED-WITHOUT-REPO-ACCESS`) ran without repo access (#2176) — treat it the same way: note its concerns, but do not count its verdict at full consensus weight.}
{synthesize common concerns across all reviewers. CodeRabbit is a diff-only reviewer (it never received the source-grounding prompt), so do not weight its verdict as a grounded plan review — fold in its diff findings, but base plan-level consensus on the prompt-fed reviewers. A reviewer output carrying the `[reviewed-without-repo-access]` marker (or beginning with `REVIEWED-WITHOUT-REPO-ACCESS`) ran without repo access (#2176) — treat it the same way: note its concerns, but do not count its verdict at full consensus weight. A reviewer output carrying the `[reviewed-without-source-citations]` marker (#3194) declared source-grounded evidence but cited no `file:line` evidence, so it reviewed the plan text only — treat it the same way: note its concerns, but do not count its verdict at full consensus weight.}
### Agreed Strengths
{strengths mentioned by 2+ reviewers}