* test(#3304): add failing-first suite for the convergence evidence gate Content-assertion suite for the Step 7 re-verification evidence gate (agents/gsd-verifier.md / gsd-core/references/verifier-evidence-gate.md). Committed before the implementation to prove RED via gsd-test. * enhance(#3304): gate re-verification blockers on deterministic evidence Step 7's anti-pattern scan re-runs at full, unbounded scope on every re-verification pass, independent of the must-haves established in Step 2. A blocker it finds — other than the self-evidencing debt-marker check — previously reverted a completed gap-closure round and started another --gaps cycle on nothing more than the verifier's own new judgment call, with no bound on how many times that could repeat. A Step 7 blocker now blocks unconditionally in re-verification mode only if it is a carried-forward gap (present in the prior VERIFICATION.md's gaps: list) or the flagged file was git-modified since the prior pass (a regression; fails closed toward blocking when history is unresolvable). Otherwise it predates the gap-closure round unflagged and needs deterministic evidence — a named test run red, or another concrete reproducible artifact — to stay blocking. Unevidenced, it downgrades to a new advisory: frontmatter list and report section instead of setting status: gaps_found, and never reverts a completed must-have. Maintainer approval was narrowed to this evidence condition only, explicitly rejecting the broader "advisory whenever untraceable to a requirement/decision/prior-gap" proposal — implemented and pinned by tests/verifier-evidence-gate.test.cjs and documented as rejected in gsd-core/references/verifier-evidence-gate.md so it can't silently re-expand. Closes #3304 * fix(#3304): correct window-truncation and indentation bugs in evidence-gate tests gsd-test's GREEN checkpoint caught 3 real bugs in the test file itself (not the production prose): a {0,600} match window was shorter than the 724-char paragraph it was scanning (the "exclude from Step 9 Rule 1" phrase starts at offset 662), and two regexes assumed no indentation after a markdown list-continuation line break. All three phrases are confirmed unique across agents/gsd-verifier.md, so the windowed submatches are replaced with direct whole-string assertions instead of just widening the window. Also acknowledges the deliberate byte growth in agents/gsd-verifier.md that the differential-attribution check (ADR-2719) correctly flagged. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-verifier.md — adds the #3304 re-verification evidence gate (Step 7 rule, Advisory bucket, advisory: frontmatter, report section); 1488 bytes, still within the LARGE-tier 48 KiB cap (48751/49152). * docs(#3304): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ Three further dimensions carry no number: **Verify Command Format Sanity**,
|
||||
- **Coincidental-reliance advisory (#1955):** a truth that reaches `✓ VERIFIED` is additionally asked *why* it holds. When the recorded evidence shows the truth holding for an incidental reason — `undeclared-precondition`, `incidental-ordering`, or `fixture-only` — the verdict is qualified as `✓ VERIFIED (coincidental-reliance)` and the truth is listed in the `coincidental_reliance_items` frontmatter field with what to harden. This is **advisory**: the base `✓ VERIFIED` token is unchanged, the truth still counts toward `verified_truths`, the overall `status` is unaffected, and no human-verification item is emitted — a passing phase still passes. It classifies evidence the verifier already gathered rather than asking it to rate its own confidence — but it is honestly an **endogenous** check, and `gsd-core/references/honest-verifier.md` records that endogenous gates are measurably weaker than the exogenous `backstop` tag it routes on. Advisory status is the consequence, not a coincidence: a miss costs exactly today's behaviour (a plain `✓ VERIFIED`) and a false positive costs one line of prose, never a failed phase, so a weaker mechanism is affordable here in a way it would not be on a pass/fail axis. Its precision is unmeasured. It complements the two existing axes: `PRESENT_BEHAVIOR_UNVERIFIED` is *no* behavioral evidence, `insufficient_spec` is an under-specified truth, and this is evidence that exists and passes for the wrong reason.
|
||||
|
||||
The advisory is carried by two surfaces. `agents/gsd-verifier.md` (Step 3, sub-step 5c) holds the detection rule, and the verifier's eagerly-imported `gsd-core/references/verifier-phase-gates.md` points at the canonical report template `@~/.claude/gsd-core/templates/verification-report.md`, whose `## Guidelines` carry the same instruction. (The former third surface, the retired `verify-phase` workflow, was deleted as an orphan in #1892 — every verification path is subagent-shaped today.)
|
||||
- **Convergence evidence gate (#3304):** during re-verification (after a `/gsd-plan-phase --gaps` cycle), Step 7's anti-pattern scan re-runs at full, unbounded scope — by design — but a 🛑 Blocker it finds no longer auto-reverts a completed gap-closure round on its own judgment alone. A blocker other than the self-evidencing debt-marker check (`TBD`/`FIXME`/`XXX`) blocks unconditionally only if it is a carried-forward gap from the prior `VERIFICATION.md` or its file was git-modified since the prior pass (a regression, fail-closed toward blocking when history is unresolvable); otherwise it predates the gap-closure round unflagged and needs deterministic evidence — a named test run red, or another concrete reproducible artifact — to stay blocking. Unevidenced, it downgrades to the `advisory:` frontmatter list and the report's "Advisory (New Scope, Unevidenced)" section instead of setting `status: gaps_found`. Full algorithm in `gsd-core/references/verifier-evidence-gate.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -301,6 +301,7 @@
|
||||
"user-story-template.md",
|
||||
"verification-overrides.md",
|
||||
"verification-patterns.md",
|
||||
"verifier-evidence-gate.md",
|
||||
"verifier-phase-gates.md",
|
||||
"verifier-wiring-patterns.md",
|
||||
"verify-command-path-resolvability.md",
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ Full roster at `gsd-core/references/*.md`. References are shared knowledge docum
|
||||
| `verification-patterns.md` | How to verify different artifact types. |
|
||||
| `verification-overrides.md` | Per-artifact verification override rules. |
|
||||
| `verifier-phase-gates.md` | Verifier-time gates eagerly imported by `gsd-verifier` (migrated from the retired `verify-phase` workflow, #1892): decision-coverage validation (#2492), test-quality audit, and infrastructure-phase human-verification scoping (#2504). |
|
||||
| `verifier-evidence-gate.md` | Re-verification convergence gate loaded by `gsd-verifier` (#3304): a Step 7 anti-pattern blocker that is neither a carried-forward gap nor a regression needs deterministic evidence to stay blocking, else it downgrades to advisory. |
|
||||
| `planning-config.md` | Full config schema and behavior. |
|
||||
| `security-asvs-levels.md` | OWASP ASVS level definitions for GSD threat modeling — per-level planner disposition rigor and auditor verification depth (L1 opportunistic, L2 standard, L3 comprehensive). |
|
||||
| `git-integration.md` | Git commit, branching, and history patterns. |
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ actuals:
|
||||
|
||||
| | |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| **Purpose** | Phase goal verification report. Checks `must_haves.truths`, `must_haves.artifacts`, and `must_haves.key_links` from all plans against the actual codebase after execution. Records `status: passed \| gaps_found \| human_needed`. A truth whose correctness depends on runtime behaviour — a state transition or a cancellation/cleanup/ordering invariant — is marked `⚠️ PRESENT_BEHAVIOR_UNVERIFIED` (not `VERIFIED`) when no test exercises it: it is excluded from `score`, counted in the `behavior_unverified` frontmatter field, and routed to `human_needed`, so a behaviour-dependent gap can no longer count toward a clean N/N. A truth that *does* reach `✓ VERIFIED` but holds for an incidental reason (`undeclared-precondition`, `incidental-ordering`, `fixture-only`) is qualified `✓ VERIFIED (coincidental-reliance)` and listed in `coincidental_reliance_items` — **advisory only**: it still counts toward `score`, does not change `status`, and emits no human-verification item (#1955). |
|
||||
| **Purpose** | Phase goal verification report. Checks `must_haves.truths`, `must_haves.artifacts`, and `must_haves.key_links` from all plans against the actual codebase after execution. Records `status: passed \| gaps_found \| human_needed`. A truth whose correctness depends on runtime behaviour — a state transition or a cancellation/cleanup/ordering invariant — is marked `⚠️ PRESENT_BEHAVIOR_UNVERIFIED` (not `VERIFIED`) when no test exercises it: it is excluded from `score`, counted in the `behavior_unverified` frontmatter field, and routed to `human_needed`, so a behaviour-dependent gap can no longer count toward a clean N/N. A truth that *does* reach `✓ VERIFIED` but holds for an incidental reason (`undeclared-precondition`, `incidental-ordering`, `fixture-only`) is qualified `✓ VERIFIED (coincidental-reliance)` and listed in `coincidental_reliance_items` — **advisory only**: it still counts toward `score`, does not change `status`, and emits no human-verification item (#1955). During re-verification (after a `/gsd-plan-phase --gaps` cycle), an anti-pattern blocker that is neither a carried-forward gap nor found in a file modified since the prior pass, and carries no deterministic evidence (a test run red, or another concrete reproducible artifact), is downgraded to the `advisory:` frontmatter list instead of reopening `status: gaps_found` — it does not revert a completed must-have (#3304). |
|
||||
| **Produced by** | `/gsd-verify-work` (or the verify step within `/gsd-execute-phase`). |
|
||||
| **Consumed by** | `plan-phase` closed-phase gate (a `status: passed` VERIFICATION.md marks the phase `Complete` and blocks replanning without `--force`); `/gsd-progress`; human review. |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user