* enhance(#4836): prefer the graphify CLI for planner and researcher graph queries The planner gets one knowledge-graph query per phase and the researcher two or three, and that single shot decides which modules the plan treats as related — and therefore how tasks are ordered into waves. It was spent on the built-in reader, which seeds by case-insensitive substring match over a node's label and description and then expands a hardcoded two hops. The phase "User Authentication" seeds on `author`, `authoring` and `unauthorized` with the same weight as `authenticate`, and when the inflated payload exceeds `--budget` the trimmer drops edges by confidence tier — so the highest-confidence tier can be discarded to fit a payload that bad seeding inflated in the first place. The graphify CLI is already a hard dependency of /gsd-graphify build, and it ranks seeds (IDF weighting, trigram fuzzy matching) and applies context filters before traversal. Both prompts now prefer it and fall back to the built-in reader, branching on `command -v graphify` — the same degradation shape the repo already uses for Context7 to ctx7. Binary presence is a self-satisfying gate: a graph can only exist if the binary built it, so the fallback covers edge cases (a CI checkout with a committed graph, a binary since removed), not the common path. No new config key and no new tool grant — both agents already have Bash. The planner additionally runs `graphify affected`. The reference states its own goal as "which subsystems may be affected by changes in this phase", which is literally reverse traversal by relation; the built-in reader only approximates it with undirected two-hop expansion and has no equivalent verb, so `affected` is skipped on the fallback path. `graphify status` now reports `graph_path`, the resolved absolute graph location, on both the present and the missing branch. The CLI takes the graph location as `--graph`, and the prompts must not re-derive `.planning/graphs/graph.json` for it: that would point the CLI at a non-existent local mirror in exactly the umbrella multi-repo setup `graphify.graph_path` (#1825) exists to serve. For the same reason the presence gate in both prompts is now the `status` call itself rather than a bare `ls` of the default location, which was already blind to the override. Known limit, stated in both prompts rather than implied: the two paths return different shapes. `graphify query` emits prose and has no `--json` flag; the built-in emits JSON with per-edge confidence tiers and budget_met/budget_estimate. `--budget` also counts rendered output on one and estimated payload bytes on the other (#2738) — same flag name, different unit. Both are read by a model and nothing machine-parses the injected block. With graphify absent from PATH the injected context is byte-identical to before. Closes #4836 Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-phase-researcher.md — the CLI-first branch, the reason it is preferred, and the output-shape warning are the deliverable; a pointer to a part would not be read at the decision point. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-planner.md — one sentence in the load_graph_context step pointer, so it stops naming the default graph path the reference no longer assumes. * docs(#4836): record the CLI-first graph query in the planner and researcher entries * chore(#4836): add changeset fragment * enhance(#4836): name the full domain word in the planner's query-term examples The reference's own example — phase "User Authentication" → term "auth" — is the exact collision the CLI-first path exists to avoid, and it stays a collision whenever the fallback path runs, since that path matches the term as a substring of label and description. * fix(#4836): surface graph_path on the unparseable-graph status branch graphifyStatus() returned graph_path on the exists:true and exists:false outcomes but not on the third, error, outcome (graph.json present but unparseable). The planner/researcher prompts gate CLI-first dispatch on exists, not on this outcome, so a corrupt graph file made them fall through to the CLI-first branch with the literal <graph> placeholder and no real path to substitute. * docs(#4836): note graph_path's trust boundary at the --graph interpolation graph_path is reflected verbatim into a double-quoted --graph argument the agent executes via Bash. It comes from graphify.graph_path, a config surface already trusted elsewhere, so this isn't a new trust boundary -- but it is a new injection site (no --graph flag existed on this call before). One-line caution for anyone hardening this later. --------- Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1139,6 +1139,28 @@ A CI-built graph rebuilt minutes ago against an old checkout will read as
|
||||
fresh on mtime but `commit_stale: true`. Surface both when answering
|
||||
architecture questions.
|
||||
|
||||
#### Who reads the graph: the `graphify` CLI is preferred
|
||||
|
||||
`gsd-planner` and `gsd-phase-researcher` query the graph through the `graphify`
|
||||
CLI when it is on `PATH`, and fall back to the built-in reader
|
||||
(`gsd-tools graphify query`) otherwise. The CLI ranks seeds (IDF weighting,
|
||||
fuzzy matching) and applies context filters before traversal; the built-in
|
||||
reader seeds by case-insensitive substring over label and description and
|
||||
expands a fixed two hops, so a term like `auth` seeds equally on `author`. The
|
||||
planner also runs `graphify affected` for reverse traversal, which the built-in
|
||||
reader has no equivalent for.
|
||||
|
||||
There is **no config key for this** — the binary has to be installed to produce
|
||||
a graph in the first place, so its presence is the gate. The two paths return
|
||||
different shapes (the CLI emits prose, the built-in emits JSON with confidence
|
||||
tiers and budget accounting) and `--budget` counts rendered output on one and
|
||||
estimated payload bytes on the other; both are read by a model, and nothing
|
||||
machine-parses the injected block.
|
||||
|
||||
`graphify status` reports `graph_path`, the resolved absolute graph location
|
||||
after `graphify.graph_path` is applied. That is the value passed to the CLI as
|
||||
`--graph`, which is how the umbrella override keeps working on the CLI path.
|
||||
|
||||
<a id="refactor-trigger-settings"></a>
|
||||
### Refactor-Trigger Settings
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user