fix(workflows,docs): scrub stale /gsd-code-review-fix and /gsd-plan-milestone-gaps refs (#3029, #3034) (#3038)
* fix(workflows,docs): scrub stale /gsd-code-review-fix and /gsd-plan-milestone-gaps refs (#3029, #3034) #2790 consolidated /gsd-code-review-fix into /gsd-code-review --fix and deleted /gsd-plan-milestone-gaps in favor of inline gap planning as part of /gsd-audit-milestone's output. The deletion was propagated through some surfaces (#2950 covered help/do/settings/discuss-phase/etc.) but several user-facing surfaces still emitted the old forms: #3029 — /gsd-code-review-fix references in: - agents/gsd-code-fixer.md (description, "Spawned by", recovery prose) - get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md (offer text) - get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md (offer text) - get-shit-done/workflows/code-review-fix.md (internal retry hints) - docs/INVENTORY.md (agent + workflow rows) - docs/CONFIGURATION.md (workflow.code_review row) - docs/USER-GUIDE.md (3 occurrences in walkthrough) - docs/AGENTS.md (gsd-code-fixer agent stub) - docs/FEATURES.md (commands list + REQ-REVIEW-04) All replaced with /gsd-code-review --fix. Internal retry hints in the workflow file itself updated to point at the new form. Release notes (docs/RELEASE-*.md) and gsd-ns-review's "absorbed by" deletion note left unchanged — historical/explanatory content. #3034 — /gsd-plan-milestone-gaps references in: - get-shit-done/workflows/audit-milestone.md (<offer_next> blocks for gaps_found and tech_debt: lines 281, 323) - commands/gsd/complete-milestone.md (gaps_found pre-flight: lines 46, 57) Replaced with inline closure path: /gsd-phase --insert <N> "Close gap: <REQ-ID> ..." /gsd-discuss-phase <N> /gsd-plan-phase <N> /gsd-execute-phase <N> Plus a Nyquist-coverage hint pointing at /gsd-validate-phase / /gsd-secure-phase for retroactive audit-chain hygiene gaps. The gsd-ns-project SKILL.md "deleted by #2790" note is preserved (it's the canonical pointer for future readers asking what happened to the command). Tests: - tests/bug-3029-3034-stale-command-routes.test.cjs — parser-based assertions per fixed surface, plus a structural cross-check that gsd-ns-project keeps the deletion note. 15 tests, all green. - 6905/6905 full suite passes. Closes #3029 Closes #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix: address CR feedback on PR #3038 — argument order, structural tests, agent count CR findings on PR #3038: 1. **docs/USER-GUIDE.md (Major)** — `--fix` examples used flag-first form (`/gsd-code-review --fix 3`), but the supported CLI grammar is phase-first (`/gsd-code-review 3 --fix`). The original sed-based replacement preserved the position of the `gsd-code-review-fix` token, producing the wrong order. Fixed in USER-GUIDE.md (3 occurrences) and the same drift in the workflow surfaces: - get-shit-done/workflows/code-review-fix.md (2 retry hints) - get-shit-done/workflows/code-review.md (offer text) - get-shit-done/workflows/execute-phase.md (offer text) 2. **docs/AGENTS.md (Minor)** — internal count drift: line 483 said "Ten additional agents" but line 725 said "12 advanced/specialized". Filesystem reality: 33 agents total, 21 primary, 12 specialized (count of `### ` stubs in the Advanced and Specialized section). Updated lines 3, 13, 483 to use 12/33 and added the two missing names (doc-classifier, doc-synthesizer) to the inline list at line 13. 3. **tests:94 (Major refactor suggestion)** — `.includes()` token checks were source-grep style. Refactored to a typed-IR pattern: extract the SET of slash-command tokens via regex, assert membership on the parsed Set instead of substring scanning the raw file text. Added the `allow-test-rule` comment explaining the IR-build vs IR-assertion split per scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs convention. 4. **tests:130 (Major)** — replacement-path assertion was file-wide and could false-pass on generic mentions of "inline" elsewhere in the file. Refactored: `extractOfferBlocks(content)` returns the typed list of `<offer_next>` and "Pre-flight" blocks where the deleted command previously lived, and the assertion runs against those blocks specifically. Now requires `/gsd-phase --insert` or inline-audit prose to appear in the same offer block, not just somewhere in the file. 15/15 targeted tests pass. 6905/6905 full suite pass. Lints clean. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tom Boucher
@@ -748,8 +748,8 @@ After executing a phase, run a structured code review before UAT:
|
||||
The reviewer scopes files automatically using SUMMARY.md (preferred) or git diff fallback. Findings are classified as Critical, Warning, or Info in `{phase}-REVIEW.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
/gsd-code-review-fix 3 # Fix Critical + Warning findings atomically
|
||||
/gsd-code-review-fix 3 --auto # Fix and re-review until clean (max 3 iterations)
|
||||
/gsd-code-review 3 --fix # Fix Critical + Warning findings atomically
|
||||
/gsd-code-review 3 --fix --auto # Fix and re-review until clean (max 3 iterations)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Autonomous Audit-to-Fix
|
||||
@@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ To run an audit and fix all auto-fixable issues in one pass:
|
||||
The review step slots in after execution and before UAT:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/gsd-execute-phase N -> /gsd-code-review N -> /gsd-code-review-fix N -> /gsd-verify-work N
|
||||
/gsd-execute-phase N -> /gsd-code-review N -> /gsd-code-review N --fix -> /gsd-verify-work N
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user