* test(#1995): regression test for agent-<id> branch namespace Add failing-first tests proving that normalizeCleanupManifestEntry and planWorktreeRecordAgent reject Claude Code's current agent-<id> isolation branches (only worktree-agent-<id> is accepted). Boundary tests cover both namespaces plus rejection cases. * fix(#1995): widen worktree branch regex to accept agent-<id> namespace Claude Code's isolation="worktree" branch naming changed from worktree-agent-<id> to agent-<id>. Widen the regex in all 7 locations from ^worktree-agent-[A-Za-z0-9._/-]+$ to ^(worktree-)?agent-[A-Za-z0-9._/-]+$ so both namespaces are accepted. Introduce a shared WORKTREE_AGENT_BRANCH_RE constant in src/worktree-safety.cts to prevent future drift. Closes #1995 * fix(#1995): update workflow guards, test assertions, and baselines Widen the branch-check regex in execute-phase.md and execute-plan.md. Update all test assertions that checked for ^worktree-agent- to expect the widened ^(worktree-)?agent- pattern. Regenerate golden-install-parity fixtures, agent-size-baseline, and workflow-size-baseline. Closes #1995 * fix(#1995): update extractCwdGuardBash sanity check for widened regex The e2e test's sanity check verified the extracted bash block contained 'worktree-agent-'. After widening to '(worktree-)?agent-', update the check to match the new pattern. * fix(#1995): widen missed workflow-guard branch check + changeset + lint fixes - hooks/gsd-workflow-guard.js: widen startsWith('worktree-agent-') to /^(worktree-)?agent-/ regex — same defect class, was missed in prior commit - tests/worktree.test.cjs: fix indentation regression from prior edit - Add .changeset/1995-worktree-agent-branch-namespace.md (pr:0 placeholder) Found by orthogonal code review (Step 4). * fix(#1995): regenerate golden + size baselines for workflow-guard change * docs(#1995): backfill changeset PR number (2548)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -167,9 +167,9 @@ describe('canonical worktree-branch-check fragment is the single source of truth
|
||||
assert.ok(/\brelease\b/.test(block), 'fragment protected-ref alternation must include release');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('fragment block positive allow-list matches ^worktree-agent- pattern', () => {
|
||||
const allowListRe = /grep\s+-Eq?\s+'\^worktree-agent-/;
|
||||
assert.ok(allowListRe.test(block), 'fragment block must enforce a positive allow-list matching ^worktree-agent-');
|
||||
test('fragment block positive allow-list matches ^(worktree-)?agent- pattern', () => {
|
||||
const allowListRe = /grep\s+-Eq?\s+'\^\(worktree-\)\?agent-/;
|
||||
assert.ok(allowListRe.test(block), 'fragment block must enforce a positive allow-list matching ^(worktree-)?agent-');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('fragment block contains update-ref prohibition text', () => {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user