test(#3090): stop exempting violations under categories that do not fit

An allow-test-rule annotation citing a category that does not apply is worse
than no annotation, because it reads as reviewed. Eight were confirmed by
reading the assertions each one covered, and auditing the rest found five more
plus one refutation — a converter test whose wording described the wrong
mechanism while the covered assertion genuinely was deployed-text.

The instructive one used the CANONICAL string for the same mistake: STATE.md
command output labelled as a deployed artifact. A canonical string is not
evidence the category fits, which is why normalising strings alone would have
laundered the problem rather than fixed it. Every mapping the audit had inferred
rather than code-verified was spot-checked before rewriting, and the ones that
turned out not to fit were re-annotated rather than relabelled.

Fourteen STATE.md assertions had a typed extractor available all along and now
use it; their annotations came out because nothing needs exempting. Eight
assertions genuinely need a production change first — CLI stdout and stderr with
no structured mode — and are tagged pending-migration-to-typed-ir citing #3090,
which is what that category is for. It had zero real uses before this, while one
file carried a real citation to migration issue #2974 under a non-canonical tag.

Six annotations covered assertions that do no text matching at all. An exemption
for a violation that does not exist is noise that makes the real ones harder to
audit; those are removed.

atomic-write-coverage gains the annotation it always warranted — its own
docstring describes a structural-regression-guard while the file carried none.

Fifty-nine non-canonical strings across roughly thirty files are normalised, and
the allow-test-rule allowlist is regenerated to match. 472 annotations became
463: every one now uses a canonical category, and the two remaining
non-canonical strings are ESLint RuleTester fixtures, not annotations.

Refs #3057

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
sim
2026-08-05 17:20:56 -04:00
parent 9723d2b7e0
commit 7dd9e59f6b
69 changed files with 365 additions and 256 deletions

View File

@@ -1742,14 +1742,14 @@ describe('bug-967 verify key-links strict file-path contract', () => {
// This test reads the canonical docs file and asserts the example is consistent
// with the strict-path contract.
//
// allow-test-rule: <runtime-contract-is-the-product> the plan-md.md reference (see #967)
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product the plan-md.md reference (see #967)
// example IS the documented authoring surface for key_links; asserting it uses
// a file path (not an endpoint) directly tests the documented contract.
test('docs/reference/plan-md.md key_links example uses a relative file path for to:, not an HTTP endpoint', () => {
// Locate plan-md.md relative to this test file's repo root
const docPath = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'docs', 'reference', 'plan-md.md');
assert.ok(fs.existsSync(docPath), `plan-md.md not found at ${docPath}`);
const content = fs.readFileSync(docPath, 'utf-8'); // allow-test-rule: <runtime-contract-is-the-product> the plan-md.md reference example IS the documented authoring surface for key_links; asserting it uses a file path (not an endpoint) directly tests the documented contract. (see #967)
const content = fs.readFileSync(docPath, 'utf-8'); // allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product the plan-md.md reference example IS the documented authoring surface for key_links; asserting it uses a file path (not an endpoint) directly tests the documented contract. (see #967)
// Find the key_links block in the annotated example (the first YAML frontmatter fence)
// The bad old value was: to: "/api/feed"