* test(#3642): failing-first single-section leak rows * fix(#3642): gate the unbounded total on any-milestone-section, not >=2 * test(#3642): rewrite the 3185 wrapper row to the withhold contract * docs(#3642): glossary amendment for the >=1 sibling; changeset * chore(#3642): backfill changeset pr number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -728,11 +728,18 @@ describe('#3204 buildStateFrontmatter total_phases — negative space / boundari
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('a single milestone section cannot conflate siblings', () => {
|
||||
// Row 6 — exactly ONE '## v2.0' section owning phases, with the asserted
|
||||
// milestone ('v9.9') absent from the roadmap entirely. One milestone
|
||||
// heading can never satisfy hasMilestoneSectioning's >=2 threshold, so
|
||||
// this is NOT sectioned and the roadmap-declared count is still used.
|
||||
test('a single milestone section that is not the asserted one withholds the total (#3642)', () => {
|
||||
// Row 6, REWRITTEN by #3642 (maintainer-confirmed bug; the old contract
|
||||
// here was the bug). Exactly ONE '## v2.0' section owning phases, with
|
||||
// the asserted milestone ('v9.9') absent from the roadmap entirely. The
|
||||
// old row pinned that hasMilestoneSectioning's >=2 threshold reads this
|
||||
// as flat, so the roadmap-declared count (4) was used for v9.9 — which
|
||||
// IS the leak #3642 reports: the v2.0 section's phases became a
|
||||
// different milestone's total. The #3354 withhold doctrine governs both
|
||||
// faces now: neither the whole-document count (it is the foreign
|
||||
// section's phases) NOR the on-disk dir count is authoritative for a
|
||||
// milestone absent from the roadmap, so the STORED value (99, chosen to
|
||||
// differ from every substitute) must be preserved.
|
||||
const roadmap = [
|
||||
'# Roadmap',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
@@ -746,15 +753,29 @@ describe('#3204 buildStateFrontmatter total_phases — negative space / boundari
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmap);
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(
|
||||
path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'STATE.md'),
|
||||
buildStateMd({ milestone: 'v9.9', milestoneName: 'Absent', totalPhases: 4 }),
|
||||
buildStateMd({ milestone: 'v9.9', milestoneName: 'Absent', totalPhases: 99 }),
|
||||
);
|
||||
seedPhaseDirs(tmpDir, [1, 2]);
|
||||
|
||||
const out = recordSessionAndReadTotalPhases(tmpDir);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
Number(out.progress.total_phases),
|
||||
4,
|
||||
`a single milestone section cannot conflate siblings; expected the roadmap count (4), got ${out.progress && out.progress.total_phases}`,
|
||||
99,
|
||||
`#3642: a single non-matching section must not leak its phases into the asserted milestone's total; stored 99 expected, got ${out.progress && out.progress.total_phases}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
// The clobber must also be SURFACED, not silent: drive the seam directly
|
||||
// (runGsdTools discards stderr on success) and require the #3642 warning
|
||||
// naming the asserted milestone.
|
||||
const { runNode } = require('./helpers/process-seam.cjs');
|
||||
const { TOOLS_PATH, TEST_ENV_BASE } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
||||
const rec = runNode(
|
||||
[TOOLS_PATH, 'state', 'json', '--raw'],
|
||||
{ cwd: tmpDir, env: { ...process.env, ...TEST_ENV_BASE }, timeoutMs: 60000 },
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.ok(rec.exitCode === 0, `state json --raw failed: ${rec.stderr}`);
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
(rec.stderr || '').includes('v9.9') && (rec.stderr || '').includes('#3642'),
|
||||
`#3642: expected a stderr warning naming the asserted milestone and the issue, got stderr=${JSON.stringify(rec.stderr)}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1052,16 +1073,19 @@ describe('#3185 review — hasMilestoneSectioning shapes the original suite miss
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('MAJOR: wrapper + single nested milestone keeps the roadmap count', () => {
|
||||
// Adversarial review MAJOR (#3204 reintroduction): every ancestor in a
|
||||
// nesting chain was counted as its own candidate section under the
|
||||
// #3184 rewrite, so a generic wrapper heading with only ONE real
|
||||
// milestone nested under it was misclassified as sectioned. Mirrors
|
||||
// this repo's own bundled template shape (gsd-core/templates/roadmap.md:
|
||||
// '## Phases' -> '### 🚧 v1.1 [Name] (In Progress)' -> '#### Phase N:').
|
||||
// The asserted milestone ('v9.9') is deliberately unbound so the
|
||||
// assertion exercises hasMilestoneSectioning itself, not
|
||||
// isMilestoneBoundedInRoadmap.
|
||||
test('MAJOR: wrapper + single nested milestone, asserted elsewhere, withholds the total (#3642)', () => {
|
||||
// Adversarial review MAJOR (#3204 reintroduction), REWRITTEN by #3642
|
||||
// (maintainer-confirmed bug). The row's original purpose survives: a
|
||||
// generic wrapper ('## Phases') with ONE real milestone nested under it
|
||||
// (bundled template shape: '### 🚧 v1.1 [Name]' -> '#### Phase N:') is
|
||||
// NOT milestone-SECTIONED — hasMilestoneSectioning's >=2 still says
|
||||
// false, pinned by the #3642 seam rows. But the row's old ASSERTION
|
||||
// pinned the leak #3642 reports: with the asserted milestone ('v9.9')
|
||||
// deliberately unbound, the roadmap count (4) — which IS the v1.1
|
||||
// section's phases — was written as v9.9's total. Pre-#3354 that arm
|
||||
// existed to stop a clobber to the disk count (2); the #3354/#3642
|
||||
// withhold doctrine supersedes it: preserve the stored value (8, chosen
|
||||
// to differ from every substitute) and warn.
|
||||
const roadmap = [
|
||||
'# Roadmap',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
@@ -1078,15 +1102,15 @@ describe('#3185 review — hasMilestoneSectioning shapes the original suite miss
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), roadmap);
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(
|
||||
path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'STATE.md'),
|
||||
buildStateMd({ milestone: 'v9.9', milestoneName: 'Unbound', totalPhases: 2 }),
|
||||
buildStateMd({ milestone: 'v9.9', milestoneName: 'Unbound', totalPhases: 8 }),
|
||||
);
|
||||
seedPhaseDirs(tmpDir, [1, 2]);
|
||||
|
||||
const out = recordSessionAndReadTotalPhases(tmpDir);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
Number(out.progress.total_phases),
|
||||
4,
|
||||
`wrapper + single nested milestone must keep the roadmap-declared count (4), not clobber to the disk count of 2. Got ${out.progress && out.progress.total_phases}`,
|
||||
8,
|
||||
`#3642: a single real section's phases must not become an absent milestone's total; stored 8 expected. Got ${out.progress && out.progress.total_phases}`,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -1597,3 +1621,122 @@ describe('#3573 total_phases — roadmap absent with an asserted milestone', ()
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// #3642: hasMilestoneSectioning's >=2 threshold let a single non-matching
|
||||
// milestone section's phases leak into an unrelated asserted milestone's
|
||||
// total_phases. Fix: the >=1 sibling (hasAnyMilestoneSection) governs the
|
||||
// unbounded branch's flat test, so the single-section shape takes the #3354
|
||||
// withhold (stored value preserved + warning) instead of substituting the
|
||||
// whole-document count. Controls pin what must NOT change.
|
||||
// Matrix: .gsd/bug/fix-3642-milestone-sectioning-leak/50-test-matrix.md
|
||||
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
describe('#3642 — single-section leak controls and seam pins', () => {
|
||||
const { test, beforeEach, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
||||
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
||||
const fs = require('fs');
|
||||
const path = require('path');
|
||||
const { runGsdTools, createTempProject, cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
||||
|
||||
// Compact local builders (this file's sections are deliberately
|
||||
// self-contained; the #3204 suite's identical builders live in its own
|
||||
// scope).
|
||||
function seedDirs(tmpDir, nums) {
|
||||
for (const n of nums) {
|
||||
const padded = String(n).padStart(2, '0');
|
||||
const dir = path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'phases', `${padded}-phase-${n}`);
|
||||
fs.mkdirSync(dir, { recursive: true });
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(dir, `${padded}-01-PLAN.md`), '# Plan\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function stateMd({ milestone, totalPhases }) {
|
||||
return [
|
||||
'---',
|
||||
'gsd_state_version: 1.0',
|
||||
`milestone: ${milestone}`,
|
||||
'milestone_name: M',
|
||||
'current_phase: "01"',
|
||||
'status: executing',
|
||||
'progress:',
|
||||
` total_phases: ${totalPhases}`,
|
||||
' completed_phases: 0',
|
||||
' total_plans: 0',
|
||||
' completed_plans: 0',
|
||||
' percent: 0',
|
||||
'---',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
'# GSD State',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
'## Current Position',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
'**Current Phase:** 01',
|
||||
'**Status:** Executing',
|
||||
'',
|
||||
].join('\n');
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function writeTotalAfterRecord(tmpDir) {
|
||||
const recordResult = runGsdTools(
|
||||
['state', 'record-session', '--stopped-at', 'Phase 1, Plan 1', '--resume-file', 'none'],
|
||||
tmpDir,
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.ok(recordResult.success, `state record-session failed: ${recordResult.error}`);
|
||||
const jsonResult = runGsdTools(['state', 'json', '--raw'], tmpDir);
|
||||
assert.ok(jsonResult.success, `state json --raw failed: ${jsonResult.error}`);
|
||||
return Number(JSON.parse(jsonResult.output).progress.total_phases);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let tmpDir;
|
||||
|
||||
beforeEach(() => {
|
||||
tmpDir = createTempProject('gsd-3642-');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
afterEach(() => {
|
||||
cleanup(tmpDir);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('control: a single section that MATCHES the assert keeps its own count', () => {
|
||||
// Bounded arm unchanged: asserted v2.0 IS bound to the one heading, so
|
||||
// the section's own count (4) is used — neither the stored (7) nor the
|
||||
// disk count (2).
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
||||
'# Roadmap', '', '## v2.0', '## Phase 1: One', '## Phase 2: Two',
|
||||
'## Phase 3: Three', '## Phase 4: Four', '',
|
||||
].join('\n'));
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'STATE.md'), stateMd({ milestone: 'v2.0', totalPhases: 7 }));
|
||||
seedDirs(tmpDir, [1, 2]);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(writeTotalAfterRecord(tmpDir), 4,
|
||||
'bounded single section keeps its own count (4)');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('control: a FLAT roadmap with an unbounded assert keeps the roadmap count (#2828 doctrine)', () => {
|
||||
// Zero vocabulary headings → genuinely flat → the whole-document count
|
||||
// is correct (no milestone section exists to conflate with).
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'ROADMAP.md'), [
|
||||
'# Roadmap', '', '## Phase 1: One', '## Phase 2: Two',
|
||||
'## Phase 3: Three', '## Phase 4: Four', '',
|
||||
].join('\n'));
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tmpDir, '.planning', 'STATE.md'), stateMd({ milestone: 'v9.9', totalPhases: 7 }));
|
||||
seedDirs(tmpDir, [1, 2]);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(writeTotalAfterRecord(tmpDir), 4,
|
||||
'flat roadmap + unbounded assert keeps the roadmap count (4)');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('seam pins: hasAnyMilestoneSection counts >=1; hasMilestoneSectioning stays >=2', () => {
|
||||
const roadmapParser = require(path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib', 'roadmap-parser.cjs'));
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(typeof roadmapParser.hasAnyMilestoneSection, 'function',
|
||||
'hasAnyMilestoneSection must be exported for buildStateFrontmatter (#3642)');
|
||||
const one = ['# Roadmap', '', '## v2.0', '## Phase 1: One'].join('\n');
|
||||
const two = ['# Roadmap', '', '## v1.0', '## Phase 1: One', '', '## v2.0', '## Phase 2: Two'].join('\n');
|
||||
const flat = ['# Roadmap', '', '## Phase 1: One'].join('\n');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(roadmapParser.hasAnyMilestoneSection(one), true, 'one signal heading is a section');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(roadmapParser.hasAnyMilestoneSection(two), true, 'two signal headings is a section');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(roadmapParser.hasAnyMilestoneSection(flat), false, 'zero signal headings is flat');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(roadmapParser.hasMilestoneSectioning(one), false, '>=2 predicate unchanged: one heading is NOT sectioning');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(roadmapParser.hasMilestoneSectioning(two), true, '>=2 predicate unchanged: two headings is sectioning');
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user