* feat(#163): tighten gsd-roadmapper granularity defaults to reduce thin-phase fragmentation Tighten the Granularity Calibration buckets in gsd-roadmapper (Coarse 3-5->2-4, Standard 5-8->4-6, Fine 8-12->6-10) and append inline Key guidance naming the thin-phase failure pattern (single requirement / internal-quality goal / task-shaped success criteria) with instruction to fold into a neighbor rather than create a standalone phase. Implements the maintainer-approved proposal verbatim. Update the canonical English docs that hardcoded the old phase-count numbers: docs/CONFIGURATION.md and docs/FEATURES.md. Translated docs are community-maintained and are not updated per-PR (CONTRIBUTING.md language policy). Prompt/doc text only; no code, format, or downstream-consumer changes. Agent size-budget and skills-awareness tests pass; full suite green. Closes #163 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#163): add Changed changeset for roadmapper granularity tightening Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#163): lock tightened gsd-roadmapper granularity buckets source-text-is-the-product test asserting the Granularity Calibration table holds the tightened ranges (Coarse 2-4, Standard 4-6, Fine 6-10), that no row maps to an old bucket, and that the Key paragraph carries the thin-phase folding guidance. Would fail if the values regress. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -215,11 +215,11 @@ Read granularity from config.json. Granularity controls compression tolerance.
|
||||
|
||||
| Granularity | Typical Phases | What It Means |
|
||||
|-------------|----------------|---------------|
|
||||
| Coarse | 3-5 | Combine aggressively, critical path only |
|
||||
| Standard | 5-8 | Balanced grouping |
|
||||
| Fine | 8-12 | Let natural boundaries stand |
|
||||
| Coarse | 2-4 | Combine aggressively, critical path only |
|
||||
| Standard | 4-6 | Balanced grouping (tightened from 5-8 in 2026-05; downstream observation that the prior baseline encouraged ~15-20% over-fragmentation, often manifesting as thin "maintenance" phases that would have been better folded into a neighbor) |
|
||||
| Fine | 6-10 | Let natural boundaries stand |
|
||||
|
||||
**Key:** Derive phases from work, then apply granularity as compression guidance. Don't pad small projects or compress complex ones.
|
||||
**Key:** Derive phases from work, then apply granularity as compression guidance. Don't pad small projects or compress complex ones. When a phase you are about to write would have a single requirement, an internal-quality goal ("improve X", "refactor Y", "add tests for Z"), or success criteria that read as tasks rather than user-observable outcomes, prefer to fold it into the most-related neighbor instead of creating a standalone phase.
|
||||
|
||||
## Good Phase Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user