* test(#3034): failing-first coverage for opt-in parallel reviewer lanes Executes the real invoke_reviewers dispatch block from review.md against a stubbed gsd_run seam rather than pattern-matching the workflow text, so the two properties that actually carry risk are observable: that every lane is joined before aggregation, and that concurrent lanes cannot tear a line in gsd-review-lane-results.jsonl. Concurrency is proven by a barrier fixture, not by elapsed time -- each stub lane blocks until all lanes have checked in, which can only complete if they overlap. Red against the current sequential dispatch, by design. Refs #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(#3034): add opt-in parallel reviewer lanes Reviewer lanes within one review pass inspect the same immutable plan snapshot and have no dependency on one another, but were dispatched strictly one at a time, so a multi-reviewer pass cost roughly the sum of its lanes. The serialization is a deliberate protection against provider rate limits, so it stays the default; review.parallel_lanes opts a project out of it. The loop body is hoisted into run_review_lane so the sequential and concurrent paths share one body -- two hand-synced dispatch bodies is the divergence class ADR-2782 spent a phase deleting. Each lane writes a slug-scoped result file, concatenated in selection order after the join: concurrent O_APPEND is atomic only below PIPE_BUF, and write_reviews parses that JSONL to render the models:/model_sources: frontmatter, so a torn line is a broken REVIEWS.md rather than a cosmetic log defect. Aggregating in selection order also keeps the artifact byte-identical between the two paths. The guard is strict equality on "true" and falls back to sequential when config-get fails -- the opposite polarity from the commit_docs guard, because failing open here fires the very requests the default prevents. Also corrects docs/COMMANDS.md and its four locale mirrors, which described --all as running every configured reviewer in parallel when dispatch was in fact sequential. Closes #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3034): de-duplicate dispatch slugs and scope lane locals Review finding (Standards axis): a slug repeated in SELECTED_REVIEWERS would put two concurrent background jobs on the same > -truncated per-lane result file. The shared-append form this replaced could not corrupt itself that way, so de-duplicating is what keeps the concurrent path no worse than the sequential one. Selection de-dupes today -- the roster is a Set and review.default_reviewers normalizes lowercase-unique -- but reachability analysis is not a contract, which is the same reason the roster derivation itself is guarded. Splitting once into DISPATCH_SLUGS also removes the duplicated tr-split the same review flagged: the dispatch and aggregation loops now share one list, which is what guarantees they walk the same slugs in the same order. A plain string accumulator rather than an array, because zsh and bash disagree on array indexing and this block runs under both. Also scopes run_review_lane's locals. Not a live fix -- each dispatched call already forks its own subshell -- but it makes the isolation a property of the function rather than of the dispatch mechanism happening to fork. Refs #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#3034): acknowledge review.md growth, drop spent 2295 ack The differential attribution gate reported review.md growing 4173 bytes (30712 -> 34885) with no live acknowledgment. Adds the per-PR fragment it asks for, naming only the one path it reported. Deleting tests/emitted-drift-acks/2295-resolved-model.json is required, not opportunistic. That fragment declared review.md and nothing else, and its ripple is already absorbed into the base, so it is spent -- it can no longer clear anything, which is why the gate still reported review.md as unacknowledged. It could not simply be left alone either: two ack sources may never name the same path, so it blocked this PR's fragment outright. CONTRIBUTING is explicit that a fragment whose last entry is removed gets deleted with it, because an empty fragment signals nothing while its presence reads as a live alarm. Refs #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3034): backfill changeset PR number Refs #3034 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tom Boucher
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ WebSearch에서 가져온 패키지는 `[ASSUMED]`(`[VERIFIED]`가 아님)로
|
||||
|-----------------|----------|-------------|
|
||||
| `N` | **예** | 계획 및 리뷰할 단계 번호 |
|
||||
| 리뷰어 플래그 | 아니요 | 모든 리뷰어 레인 플래그를 그대로 전달: `--gemini`, `--claude`, `--codex`, `--coderabbit`, `--opencode`, `--qwen`, `--cursor`, `--agy` / `--antigravity`, `--ollama`, `--lm-studio`, `--llama-cpp`, `--kimi-code` |
|
||||
| `--all` | 아니요 | 구성된 모든 리뷰어를 병렬로 실행 |
|
||||
| `--all` | 아니요 | 구성된 모든 리뷰어를 실행합니다. 레인은 기본적으로 **순차적으로** 디스패치되며, `review.parallel_lanes`를 `true`로 설정하면 단일 리뷰 패스 내에서 동시에 디스패치됩니다 |
|
||||
| `--max-cycles N` | 아니요 | 사이클 상한 재정의 (기본값 3) |
|
||||
|
||||
**종료 동작:** HIGH 카운트가 0이 되면 루프 종료. 사이클 간 HIGH 카운트가 감소하지 않을 때 정체 감지 경고. `--max-cycles`에 도달해도 HIGH 우려사항이 남아 있으면 에스컬레이션 게이트가 계속 진행하거나 수동 리뷰를 요청합니다.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user