feat(#1494): add workflow.mvp_mode to VALID_CONFIG_KEYS; document code_review_command and plan_chunked in planning-config.md (#1500)
* feat(#1494): add workflow.mvp_mode to VALID_CONFIG_KEYS; document code_review_command, plan_chunked, mvp_mode in planning-config.md Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore: backfill PR number 1500 in changeset Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
118
tests/enh-1494-workflow-config-key-docs.test.cjs
Normal file
118
tests/enh-1494-workflow-config-key-docs.test.cjs
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
|
||||
'use strict';
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Parity assertions for #1494: workflow config keys that are consumed by
|
||||
* planning-pipeline code must be (a) accepted by VALID_CONFIG_KEYS and
|
||||
* (b) documented in references/planning-config.md.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Per DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX: a shared constant / key-list that spans two
|
||||
* surfaces requires a parity assertion that fails when the surfaces diverge.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
const { describe, test, before, afterEach } = require('node:test');
|
||||
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
||||
const fs = require('fs');
|
||||
const path = require('path');
|
||||
|
||||
const { createTempProject, cleanup, runGsdTools } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
||||
|
||||
const CONFIG_SCHEMA_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib', 'config-schema.cjs');
|
||||
const PLANNING_CONFIG_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'references', 'planning-config.md');
|
||||
|
||||
describe('VALID_CONFIG_KEYS parity — #1494 orphan-undocumented keys', () => {
|
||||
const { VALID_CONFIG_KEYS } = require(CONFIG_SCHEMA_PATH);
|
||||
|
||||
test('workflow.mvp_mode is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.mvp_mode'),
|
||||
'workflow.mvp_mode is read by config-loader.cts and plan-phase.md but was missing from VALID_CONFIG_KEYS (#1494)'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('workflow.code_review_command is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.code_review_command'),
|
||||
'workflow.code_review_command must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('workflow.plan_chunked is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.plan_chunked'),
|
||||
'workflow.plan_chunked must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('workflow.test_command is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.test_command'),
|
||||
'workflow.test_command must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('workflow.build_command is in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS', () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.build_command'),
|
||||
'workflow.build_command must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
describe('config-set accepts workflow.mvp_mode (#1494)', () => {
|
||||
let tmpDir;
|
||||
afterEach(() => { if (tmpDir) cleanup(tmpDir); });
|
||||
|
||||
test('config-set workflow.mvp_mode true succeeds and stores the value', () => {
|
||||
tmpDir = createTempProject();
|
||||
const result = runGsdTools(['config-set', 'workflow.mvp_mode', 'true'], tmpDir);
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
result.success,
|
||||
`config-set workflow.mvp_mode must succeed; got:\nstdout: ${result.output}\nstderr: ${result.error}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(parsed.updated, true, 'response must have updated:true');
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(parsed.key, 'workflow.mvp_mode', 'response must echo the key');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('config-set workflow.mvp_mode false succeeds', () => {
|
||||
tmpDir = createTempProject();
|
||||
const result = runGsdTools(['config-set', 'workflow.mvp_mode', 'false'], tmpDir);
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
result.success,
|
||||
`config-set workflow.mvp_mode false must succeed; got:\nstdout: ${result.output}\nstderr: ${result.error}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
const parsed = JSON.parse(result.output);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(parsed.updated, true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product — planning-config.md is the deployed reference contract (#1494)
|
||||
describe('planning-config.md documents #1494 keys', () => {
|
||||
let content;
|
||||
before(() => { content = fs.readFileSync(PLANNING_CONFIG_PATH, 'utf-8'); });
|
||||
|
||||
const KEYS = [
|
||||
'workflow.mvp_mode',
|
||||
'workflow.code_review_command',
|
||||
'workflow.plan_chunked',
|
||||
'workflow.test_command',
|
||||
'workflow.build_command',
|
||||
];
|
||||
|
||||
for (const key of KEYS) {
|
||||
test(`planning-config.md documents \`${key}\``, () => {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
content.includes(`\`${key}\``),
|
||||
`planning-config.md must document \`${key}\` (#1494)`
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test(`\`${key}\` appears in the Complete Field Reference section`, () => {
|
||||
const refSection = content.slice(content.indexOf('## Complete Field Reference'));
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
refSection.includes(`\`${key}\``),
|
||||
`planning-config.md Complete Field Reference must include \`${key}\` (#1494)`
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user