Editing the body of an already-released installer migration drifts its computed checksum (it hashes plan.toString()). The integrity guard then hard-aborted every prior install on upgrade with "applied migration checksum changed" — a 100% reproducible blocker (v1.3.0, all platforms). Already-applied migrations are filtered out of `pending` and never re-run, so a drifted checksum is functionally inert. ADR-0008 anticipates checksum-mismatch state as something the install-state layer must handle gracefully (plan -> apply -> recover/report), not abort on. This supersedes the published-checksum allowlist merged in #674 (per-release maintenance debt — every historical checksum hand-pinned, still throws for any unregistered value) with a general, self-healing recovery: - Replace the throwing guard with non-fatal `collectAppliedChecksumDrift`, surfaced on `plan.checksumDrift`. - Reconcile drifted stored checksums durably on the next state write (`reconcileDriftedChecksums`), idempotently (no perpetual writes). - Relocate the "shipped migration bodies are immutable" rule to a CI baseline test that locks every shipped migration's checksum and fails on body drift — where #615 should have been caught, instead of blocking users. Removes #674's legacyChecksums field, per-migration checksum pins, published-checksums.json fixture, and compat test. Fixes #670 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,18 +56,9 @@ describe('ci-test-scope.cjs', () => {
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(result.code_changed, true);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(result.full_matrix, true);
|
||||
assert.ok(result.targeted_tests.includes('tests/install.test.cjs'));
|
||||
assert.ok(result.targeted_tests.includes('tests/installer-migration-checksum-compat.test.cjs'));
|
||||
assert.ok(result.targeted_tests.includes('tests/release-tarball-smoke.install.test.cjs'));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('ADR-457 installer source changes wake scoped CI and checksum compatibility guard', () => {
|
||||
const result = scopeFor(['src/installer-migrations/000-first-time-baseline.cts']);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(result.code_changed, true);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(result.full_matrix, true);
|
||||
assert.ok(result.targeted_tests.includes('tests/installer-migration-checksum-compat.test.cjs'));
|
||||
assert.ok(result.windows_tests.includes('tests/installer-migration-checksum-compat.test.cjs'));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('missing required CLI values fail with usage', () => {
|
||||
const r = spawnSync(process.execPath, [SCRIPT, '--files'], {
|
||||
cwd: ROOT,
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,49 +0,0 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"_comment": "Published installer migration checksums that must remain accepted by future releases. If an existing migration implementation changes, preserve compatibility here via legacyChecksums or create a new fix-forward migration id.",
|
||||
"migrations": {
|
||||
"2026-05-11-first-time-baseline-scan": {
|
||||
"published": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.2.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:34608ea4e2f4e1c53b069604892860e603600d8573cc6a5584e4194044b48e67"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.3.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:4ec58d35b30dbf39cc56e3972146086d8d31861ecd800cf0b37a7aa94fe74c2a"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"2026-05-11-legacy-orphan-files": {
|
||||
"published": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.2.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:4488e38c127a5225b31016918bcbc85ba3fd3139291ad407b94e76c03c0b89d3"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.3.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:e492698748a2436a12a55f0940f539b9bf651d8ffcac6f60cd856a6dabd6788c"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"2026-05-11-codex-legacy-hooks-json": {
|
||||
"published": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.2.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:41f1545704dc72dfc3ab019207677a8652e389b200e8c450d52317df5bc198da"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.3.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:5ce55294aa02f25758f604a569c899a6d2d060299189f5f447f68d8033157058"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"2026-06-02-rename-get-shit-done-to-gsd-core": {
|
||||
"published": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"version": "1.3.0",
|
||||
"checksum": "sha256:3a9f1d97f64097fb313203d19c6d93a187a38df61dd299afa5eef73e16124e95"
|
||||
}
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
|
||||
'use strict';
|
||||
|
||||
const test = require('node:test');
|
||||
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
||||
const fs = require('node:fs');
|
||||
const os = require('node:os');
|
||||
const path = require('node:path');
|
||||
|
||||
const {
|
||||
computeInstallerMigrationChecksum,
|
||||
discoverInstallerMigrations,
|
||||
planInstallerMigrations,
|
||||
} = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/installer-migrations.cjs');
|
||||
const { cleanup } = require('./helpers.cjs');
|
||||
|
||||
const FIXTURE = require('./fixtures/installer-migrations/published-checksums.json');
|
||||
const MIGRATIONS_DIR = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib', 'installer-migrations');
|
||||
|
||||
function createConfigDir() {
|
||||
const configDir = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'gsd-migration-checksum-compat-'));
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(
|
||||
path.join(configDir, 'gsd-file-manifest.json'),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({ version: 'compat-fixture', timestamp: '2026-06-04T00:00:00.000Z', mode: 'full', files: {} }, null, 2),
|
||||
'utf8'
|
||||
);
|
||||
return configDir;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function writeAppliedState(configDir, migration, checksum, version) {
|
||||
fs.writeFileSync(
|
||||
path.join(configDir, 'gsd-install-state.json'),
|
||||
JSON.stringify({
|
||||
schemaVersion: 1,
|
||||
appliedMigrations: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: migration.id,
|
||||
checksum,
|
||||
appliedAt: '2026-06-04T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
packageVersion: version,
|
||||
journal: 'gsd-migration-journal/published-compat-fixture.json',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
}, null, 2),
|
||||
'utf8'
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
function planContextFor(migration) {
|
||||
return {
|
||||
runtime: Array.isArray(migration.runtimes) && migration.runtimes.length > 0 ? migration.runtimes[0] : 'claude',
|
||||
scope: Array.isArray(migration.scopes) && migration.scopes.length > 0 ? migration.scopes[0] : 'global',
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test('shipped installer migration checksums remain accepted for upgrade compatibility', () => {
|
||||
const migrations = discoverInstallerMigrations({ migrationsDir: MIGRATIONS_DIR });
|
||||
const byId = new Map(migrations.map((migration) => [migration.id, migration]));
|
||||
const fixtureIds = new Set(Object.keys(FIXTURE.migrations));
|
||||
|
||||
for (const migration of migrations) {
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
fixtureIds.has(migration.id),
|
||||
`current migration must be pinned in published-checksums.json: ${migration.id}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (const [migrationId, fixture] of Object.entries(FIXTURE.migrations)) {
|
||||
const migration = byId.get(migrationId);
|
||||
assert.ok(migration, `published migration fixture no longer exists: ${migrationId}`);
|
||||
|
||||
const currentChecksum = computeInstallerMigrationChecksum(migration);
|
||||
assert.ok(
|
||||
fixture.published.some((entry) => entry.checksum === currentChecksum),
|
||||
`${migrationId} current checksum ${currentChecksum} is not pinned in published-checksums.json`
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
for (const { version, checksum } of fixture.published) {
|
||||
const configDir = createConfigDir();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
writeAppliedState(configDir, migration, checksum, version);
|
||||
assert.doesNotThrow(
|
||||
() => planInstallerMigrations({
|
||||
configDir,
|
||||
migrations: [migration],
|
||||
...planContextFor(migration),
|
||||
}),
|
||||
`${migrationId} must accept checksum ${checksum} from ${version}`
|
||||
);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
cleanup(configDir);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ const {
|
||||
classifyArtifact,
|
||||
discoverInstallerMigrations,
|
||||
INSTALL_STATE_NAME,
|
||||
migrationChecksum,
|
||||
planInstallerMigrations,
|
||||
readInstallState,
|
||||
runInstallerMigrations,
|
||||
@@ -482,6 +483,46 @@ test('computes each migration checksum once per planned migration', (t) => {
|
||||
assert.equal(checksumReads, 1);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('tolerates an applied-migration checksum drift instead of aborting the upgrade', (t) => {
|
||||
const configDir = createTempInstall();
|
||||
t.after(() => cleanup(configDir));
|
||||
|
||||
// A migration that a prior release recorded as applied under a DIFFERENT body,
|
||||
// so the stored checksum no longer matches the current computed checksum.
|
||||
const migration = migrationRecord({ id: '2026-05-11-remove-old-hook' });
|
||||
writeInstallState(configDir, {
|
||||
schemaVersion: 1,
|
||||
appliedMigrations: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: '2026-05-11-remove-old-hook',
|
||||
appliedAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
journal: null,
|
||||
checksum: 'sha256:stale-pre-1-3-0-value',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Planning must NOT throw, must skip the already-applied migration, and must
|
||||
// surface the drift on the plan for downstream reconciliation.
|
||||
let plan;
|
||||
assert.doesNotThrow(() => {
|
||||
plan = planInstallerMigrations({
|
||||
configDir,
|
||||
migrations: [migration],
|
||||
scope: 'global',
|
||||
now: () => '2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(plan.pendingMigrationIds, []);
|
||||
assert.equal(plan.actions.length, 0);
|
||||
assert.ok(Array.isArray(plan.checksumDrift));
|
||||
const drift = plan.checksumDrift.find((d) => d.id === '2026-05-11-remove-old-hook');
|
||||
assert.ok(drift, 'expected checksum drift to be reported for the applied migration');
|
||||
assert.equal(drift.storedChecksum, 'sha256:stale-pre-1-3-0-value');
|
||||
assert.match(drift.currentChecksum, /^sha256:/);
|
||||
assert.notEqual(drift.currentChecksum, drift.storedChecksum);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('classifies large files without loading the whole file through readFileSync', (t) => {
|
||||
const configDir = createTempInstall();
|
||||
const originalReadFileSync = fs.readFileSync;
|
||||
@@ -1063,7 +1104,7 @@ test('marks zero-action pending migrations as applied', () => {
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('refuses to plan an already-applied migration whose checksum changed', () => {
|
||||
test('surfaces checksum drift for an already-applied migration without aborting', () => {
|
||||
const configDir = createTempInstall();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
writeManifest(configDir, {});
|
||||
@@ -1079,8 +1120,9 @@ test('refuses to plan an already-applied migration whose checksum changed', () =
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
assert.throws(
|
||||
() => planInstallerMigrations({
|
||||
let plan;
|
||||
assert.doesNotThrow(() => {
|
||||
plan = planInstallerMigrations({
|
||||
configDir,
|
||||
migrations: [
|
||||
migrationRecord({
|
||||
@@ -1089,9 +1131,14 @@ test('refuses to plan an already-applied migration whose checksum changed', () =
|
||||
}),
|
||||
],
|
||||
scope: 'global',
|
||||
}),
|
||||
/applied migration checksum changed/
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
assert.deepEqual(plan.pendingMigrationIds, []);
|
||||
assert.ok(Array.isArray(plan.checksumDrift));
|
||||
const drift = plan.checksumDrift.find((d) => d.id === '2026-05-11-remove-old-hook');
|
||||
assert.ok(drift, 'expected drift entry for the applied migration');
|
||||
assert.equal(drift.storedChecksum, 'sha256:old-definition');
|
||||
assert.equal(drift.currentChecksum, 'sha256:new-definition');
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
cleanup(configDir);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1385,3 +1432,146 @@ test('skips runtime-specific migration records for other runtimes', () => {
|
||||
cleanup(configDir);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
// Checksum-baseline guardrail (issue #670)
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Shipped installer-migration bodies are immutable: editing a released body
|
||||
// breaks the stored checksum for any user who has already applied that
|
||||
// migration, which was the root cause of issue #670.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// This test locks every shipped migration to its committed checksum so that CI
|
||||
// catches accidental body edits. When you INTENTIONALLY change the behaviour
|
||||
// of a migration you must add a NEW fix-forward migration id instead; if for
|
||||
// some extraordinary reason you truly need to update an existing baseline, add
|
||||
// the new checksum here with a comment explaining why.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Mechanism: compute each migration's checksum directly via the exported
|
||||
// migrationChecksum() (scope-independent) and assert it matches the committed
|
||||
// baseline. This is simpler and more robust than the previous plan()-based
|
||||
// approach because it doesn't depend on runtime/scope filtering.
|
||||
// ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
test('shipped installer-migration checksums are locked to a committed baseline (issue #670 guardrail)', () => {
|
||||
// Committed baseline — update ONLY when adding a new migration or performing an
|
||||
// extraordinary intentional body change (add a comment explaining why). Editing a
|
||||
// shipped migration body breaks the stored checksum for everyone who already applied
|
||||
// it (root cause of #670) — add a NEW fix-forward migration id instead.
|
||||
const EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS = {
|
||||
'2026-05-11-first-time-baseline-scan':
|
||||
'sha256:4ec58d35b30dbf39cc56e3972146086d8d31861ecd800cf0b37a7aa94fe74c2a',
|
||||
'2026-05-11-legacy-orphan-files':
|
||||
'sha256:e492698748a2436a12a55f0940f539b9bf651d8ffcac6f60cd856a6dabd6788c',
|
||||
'2026-05-11-codex-legacy-hooks-json':
|
||||
'sha256:5ce55294aa02f25758f604a569c899a6d2d060299189f5f447f68d8033157058',
|
||||
'2026-06-02-rename-get-shit-done-to-gsd-core':
|
||||
'sha256:3a9f1d97f64097fb313203d19c6d93a187a38df61dd299afa5eef73e16124e95',
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
const { DEFAULT_MIGRATIONS_DIR, migrationChecksum: computeChecksum } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/installer-migrations.cjs');
|
||||
const migrations = discoverInstallerMigrations({ migrationsDir: DEFAULT_MIGRATIONS_DIR });
|
||||
const discoveredIds = new Set(migrations.map((m) => m.id));
|
||||
|
||||
// No stale baseline entries.
|
||||
for (const id of Object.keys(EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS)) {
|
||||
assert.ok(discoveredIds.has(id),
|
||||
`EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS has a stale entry for '${id}' — that migration no longer exists; remove it`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Every discovered migration has a committed baseline entry.
|
||||
for (const id of discoveredIds) {
|
||||
assert.ok(Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS, id),
|
||||
`new migration '${id}' has no committed checksum baseline — add it to EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS in tests/installer-migrations.test.cjs`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Core lock: each shipped migration's current checksum must match its committed baseline,
|
||||
// computed directly (scope-independent).
|
||||
for (const m of migrations) {
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(computeChecksum(m), EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS[m.id],
|
||||
`'${m.id}' body changed — its checksum drifted from the committed baseline; ` +
|
||||
`add a NEW fix-forward migration id instead of editing a shipped migration body, ` +
|
||||
`or intentionally update the baseline in EXPECTED_CHECKSUMS`);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
test('reconciles a drifted applied-migration checksum into install state on apply', () => {
|
||||
const configDir = createTempInstall();
|
||||
try {
|
||||
// Set up: one already-applied migration with a stale checksum, one pending migration
|
||||
// that will produce an action (so applyInstallerMigrationPlan writes state).
|
||||
const alreadyAppliedMigration = migrationRecord({
|
||||
id: '2026-05-11-already-applied-with-drift',
|
||||
title: 'Already applied with drift',
|
||||
description: 'Already applied with drift',
|
||||
scopes: ['global'],
|
||||
destructive: false,
|
||||
plan: () => [],
|
||||
});
|
||||
const pendingMigration = migrationRecord({
|
||||
id: '2026-05-11-pending-to-trigger-apply',
|
||||
title: 'Pending migration',
|
||||
description: 'Pending migration',
|
||||
scopes: ['global'],
|
||||
destructive: true,
|
||||
plan: () => [
|
||||
{
|
||||
type: 'remove-managed',
|
||||
relPath: 'hooks/old-hook.js',
|
||||
reason: 'retiring hook',
|
||||
ownershipEvidence: 'test fixture manifest-managed hook',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
writeFile(configDir, 'hooks/old-hook.js', 'managed hook\n');
|
||||
writeManifest(configDir, {
|
||||
'hooks/old-hook.js': sha256('managed hook\n'),
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Seed install state: alreadyAppliedMigration recorded with a STALE checksum.
|
||||
writeInstallState(configDir, {
|
||||
schemaVersion: 1,
|
||||
appliedMigrations: [
|
||||
{
|
||||
id: alreadyAppliedMigration.id,
|
||||
appliedAt: '2026-01-01T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
journal: null,
|
||||
checksum: 'sha256:stale-old',
|
||||
},
|
||||
],
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
const plan = planInstallerMigrations({
|
||||
configDir,
|
||||
migrations: [alreadyAppliedMigration, pendingMigration],
|
||||
scope: 'global',
|
||||
now: () => '2026-05-11T00:00:00.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// The already-applied migration should appear in checksumDrift.
|
||||
const drift = plan.checksumDrift.find((d) => d.id === alreadyAppliedMigration.id);
|
||||
assert.ok(drift, 'expected checksumDrift entry for the already-applied migration');
|
||||
assert.equal(drift.storedChecksum, 'sha256:stale-old');
|
||||
|
||||
// Apply the plan (the pending migration has an action, so this writes state).
|
||||
applyInstallerMigrationPlan({
|
||||
configDir,
|
||||
plan,
|
||||
now: () => '2026-05-11T00:00:01.000Z',
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Re-read install state and assert the stale checksum was reconciled.
|
||||
const stateAfter = readInstallState(configDir);
|
||||
const reconciledEntry = stateAfter.appliedMigrations.find(
|
||||
(entry) => entry.id === alreadyAppliedMigration.id
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.ok(reconciledEntry, 'expected the already-applied entry to still be in install state');
|
||||
const expectedChecksum = migrationChecksum(alreadyAppliedMigration);
|
||||
assert.strictEqual(
|
||||
reconciledEntry.checksum,
|
||||
expectedChecksum,
|
||||
`expected checksum to be reconciled to current value (${expectedChecksum}), not the stale 'sha256:stale-old'`
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert.notEqual(reconciledEntry.checksum, 'sha256:stale-old',
|
||||
'stale checksum must not remain after apply');
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
cleanup(configDir);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user