* test(#3581): pin init.progress's frontier to roadmap order over stray artifacts Failing-first regression for #3581: a stray out-of-order phase directory (a phase-9 UAT evidence file while roadmap phase 8 was pending and unscaffolded) made init.progress report next_phase 09, skipping Phase 8 and disagreeing with roadmap.analyze. Rows pin the issue shape, the aligned-tree control, and the all-complete boundary. * fix(#3581): derive init.progress's next_phase from roadmap order, not artifact presence The frontier is re-derived from the sorted phase union after the disk and roadmap loops: the first not-yet-begun, not-roadmap-complete phase wins. Artifacts still feed status and completion per entry, but a stray out-of-order directory can no longer drag the frontier past a pending unscaffolded roadmap phase, and init.progress agrees with roadmap.analyze. * fix(#3581): frontier = first not-complete phase in roadmap order (resume semantics) Review-of-own-control refinement: a begun-but-unfinished phase (in_progress, executed, researched) is the frontier — the next thing to execute is to resume it — so the frontier predicate is simply 'not complete and not roadmap-complete', first in the sorted union. * fix(#3581): preserve the pinned pending-only frontier contract; repair the boundary fixture Review findings: the resume-semantics refinement broke the suite-pinned contract that an in-progress phase is currentPhase's lane, not nextPhase's (tests/init.test.cjs 'multiple phases with mixed statuses') — reverted to first pending-or-not_started; the control row now pins the pure ordering property (roadmap-only pending beats a later pending directory); the boundary fixture gains passing verification reports so disk status reaches complete under the #3168 disk-strict bar. * chore(#3581): add changeset fragment * chore(#3581): backfill changeset pr number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
This commit is contained in:
19
src/init.cts
19
src/init.cts
@@ -3069,6 +3069,25 @@ function cmdInitProgress(cwd: string, raw: boolean, options: Record<string, unkn
|
||||
(a, b) => parseInt(a['number'] as string, 10) - parseInt(b['number'] as string, 10),
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
// #3581: the frontier is ROADMAP ORDER, not artifact presence. The disk loop
|
||||
// above could claim nextPhase from a stray out-of-order artifact directory
|
||||
// (a phase-9 UAT evidence dir while roadmap phase 8 was pending and
|
||||
// unscaffolded), silently skipping 8 — and init.progress then disagreed with
|
||||
// roadmap.analyze on the same tree. Re-derive from the sorted union: the
|
||||
// first phase that has not begun ('pending' | 'not_started') and is not
|
||||
// roadmap-complete wins; artifacts still feed each entry's status and
|
||||
// completion (corroborating evidence) but no longer outrank the ordering.
|
||||
// Aligned trees derive the identical frontier as the loops above; an
|
||||
// all-complete milestone finds none and keeps nextPhase null for the
|
||||
// completion flow.
|
||||
{
|
||||
const frontier = phases.find((p) => {
|
||||
const st = p['status'];
|
||||
return (st === 'pending' || st === 'not_started') && p['roadmap_complete'] !== true;
|
||||
});
|
||||
if (frontier) nextPhase = frontier;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let pausedAt: string | null = null;
|
||||
const state = platformReadSync(path.join(planningDir(cwd), 'STATE.md'));
|
||||
if (state !== null) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user