* test(#4724): add failing-first coverage for Surefire XML RED evidence * fix(#4724): classify Surefire/Failsafe XML as RED evidence check tdd-red-evidence parsed only node:test TAP, so a JVM project's genuine Maven red scored INVALID_RED while hand-written synthetic TAP scored RED_EVIDENCE_OK — the gate was passable only by fabricating its input (issue #4724's measured repro). classifyRedEvidence detects Surefire/Failsafe XML (a <testsuite> element) and parses it by TAG-BOUNDARY scanning: each <testcase> owns its own tag (self-closing) or the segment up to its </testcase> closer, so the issue's warned-about spanning trap (a lazy lazy match from a green self-closing case to the next closing tag) cannot misreport names. A <failure> or <error> child marks the case failing; the target matches at class granularity (exact classname, dotted-suffix, or method name). Any parse anomaly degrades to not-failing — the module stays fail-closed and PURE (no fs/clock; report freshness remains the workflow's run-start check per the issue's implementation notes). TAP classification is byte-identical: all existing fixtures stay green. * test(#4724): pin the scanner hardening — truncation, TAP-message flip, CDATA phantom * docs(#4724): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -46,9 +46,12 @@ export interface RedEvidenceInput {
|
||||
command: unknown;
|
||||
/** The command's exit code. */
|
||||
exitCode: unknown;
|
||||
/** The command's combined stdout (TAP for node --test). */
|
||||
/** The command's combined stdout (TAP for node --test; Surefire/Failsafe XML for Maven). */
|
||||
output: unknown;
|
||||
/** Identity of the target test named by the plan (its `test('...')` name). */
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Identity of the target the plan named: the `test('...')` name for
|
||||
* node:test runs, or the target CLASS for Surefire/Failsafe runs (#4724).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
targetTest: unknown;
|
||||
/** Path of the test file the target test lives in (file-named failures are crashes). */
|
||||
targetFile?: unknown;
|
||||
@@ -90,6 +93,59 @@ function baseOf(p: unknown): string {
|
||||
return typeof p === 'string' ? (p.split(/[\\/]/).pop() ?? p) : '';
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* #4724 — Surefire/Failsafe XML summary parsed by TAG-BOUNDARY scanning, NOT
|
||||
* by a lazy `(.*?)<\/testcase>` regex: Surefire writes PASSING cases as
|
||||
* self-closing `<testcase … />` elements, so a lazy span from a green case to
|
||||
* the next closing tag swallows every case between and misreports names beside
|
||||
* the right failure message. The scanner walks `<testcase` start tags; each
|
||||
* case's extent is its own tag (self-closing) or the segment up to its
|
||||
* `</testcase>` closer (testcases never nest). A `<failure` or `<error` child
|
||||
* marks the case failing; the reported name is `classname#name`. Any parse
|
||||
* anomaly degrades to "case not failing" — the module stays fail-closed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
function parseSurefireSummary(output: string): {
|
||||
tests: number;
|
||||
pass: number;
|
||||
fail: number;
|
||||
failing_tests: string[];
|
||||
} {
|
||||
let tests = 0;
|
||||
let fail = 0;
|
||||
const failing_tests: string[] = [];
|
||||
let idx = output.indexOf('<testcase');
|
||||
while (idx !== -1) {
|
||||
const tagEnd = output.indexOf('>', idx);
|
||||
// #4724 review (HIGH): a `<testcase` with no `>` (truncated/stream-cut
|
||||
// output) must terminate the scan — resuming the search at -1 clamps to 0
|
||||
// and re-finds the same tag forever. Degrade to what was scanned so far
|
||||
// (fail-closed: an incomplete report proves nothing).
|
||||
if (tagEnd === -1) break;
|
||||
tests++;
|
||||
const tagText = output.slice(idx, tagEnd + 1);
|
||||
// Self-closing (`/>`): the case has NO body — a failing sibling after it
|
||||
// must never be attributed to this case (the #4724 spanning trap).
|
||||
const selfClosing = output[tagEnd - 1] === '/';
|
||||
const closeIdx = selfClosing ? -1 : output.indexOf('</testcase>', tagEnd);
|
||||
// CDATA sections are verbatim captured output (e.g. System.out echoing
|
||||
// test source) — their content must never be scanned for failure tags
|
||||
// (#4724 review: CDATA phantom failures).
|
||||
const body = (selfClosing
|
||||
? ''
|
||||
: output.slice(tagEnd + 1, closeIdx === -1 ? output.length : closeIdx)
|
||||
).replace(/<!\[CDATA\[[\s\S]*?\]\]>/g, '');
|
||||
const name = /name="([^"]*)"/.exec(tagText)?.[1] ?? '';
|
||||
const classname = /classname="([^"]*)"/.exec(tagText)?.[1] ?? '';
|
||||
if (body.includes('<failure') || body.includes('<error')) {
|
||||
fail++;
|
||||
failing_tests.push(classname ? `${classname}#${name}` : name);
|
||||
}
|
||||
idx = output.indexOf('<testcase', closeIdx === -1 ? tagEnd : closeIdx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return { tests, pass: tests - fail, fail, failing_tests };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Coerce and validate the raw record's scalar fields. Returns null exit_code only when absent/non-numeric. */
|
||||
function readInput(input: RedEvidenceInput): {
|
||||
command: string;
|
||||
@@ -131,8 +187,34 @@ export function classifyRedEvidence(input: RedEvidenceInput): RedEvidenceResult
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
const { command, exitCode, output, targetTest } = parsed;
|
||||
const summary = parseNodeTestSummary(output);
|
||||
const failing = tapFailedTestNames(output);
|
||||
|
||||
// #4724: format detection. Surefire/Failsafe XML (a `<testsuite>` element) is
|
||||
// parsed by tag-boundary scanning; everything else stays on the proven TAP
|
||||
// primitives. Unknown formats keep the TAP parse — which finds nothing — and
|
||||
// fail closed below.
|
||||
// #4724 review: BOTH element names must appear — a TAP error message that
|
||||
// merely quotes "<testsuite>" (e.g. "expected <testsuite> was 2") must not
|
||||
// flip a genuine TAP red into the XML path.
|
||||
const isSurefireXml = output.includes('<testsuite') && output.includes('<testcase');
|
||||
let summary: { tests: number; pass: number; fail: number };
|
||||
let failing: string[];
|
||||
if (isSurefireXml) {
|
||||
const sf = parseSurefireSummary(output);
|
||||
summary = { tests: sf.tests, pass: sf.pass, fail: sf.fail };
|
||||
failing = sf.failing_tests;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
summary = parseNodeTestSummary(output);
|
||||
failing = tapFailedTestNames(output);
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Surefire target matching is class-level (the plan names the class); the
|
||||
// entry's last classname segment or its test name must carry the target.
|
||||
const surefireTargetMatches = isSurefireXml
|
||||
? failing.some((entry: string) => {
|
||||
const cls = entry.split('#')[0] ?? '';
|
||||
const nm = entry.split('#')[1] ?? '';
|
||||
return cls === targetTest || cls.endsWith(`.${targetTest}`) || nm === targetTest;
|
||||
})
|
||||
: failing.includes(targetTest);
|
||||
const evidence = {
|
||||
command,
|
||||
exit_code: exitCode,
|
||||
@@ -153,14 +235,15 @@ export function classifyRedEvidence(input: RedEvidenceInput): RedEvidenceResult
|
||||
if (summary.tests === 0) {
|
||||
return { verdict: 'INVALID_RED', reason: 'zero_tests_discovered', evidence };
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Nonzero exit but TAP reports no failing test: harness/setup/parser crash
|
||||
// whose failure never reached a test assertion (or unparseable output).
|
||||
// Nonzero exit but the report shows no failing test: harness/setup/parser
|
||||
// crash whose failure never reached a test assertion (or unparseable output).
|
||||
if (summary.fail === 0 || failing.length === 0) {
|
||||
return { verdict: 'INVALID_RED', reason: 'nonzero_exit_without_test_failure', evidence };
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Fixture/load failure: every failing entry is named like the target FILE —
|
||||
// node reports a load-time crash (throw-on-require, syntax error, ENOENT
|
||||
// fixture) as a file-named `not ok 1 - <file>`, never the target test.
|
||||
// (TAP-only shape: Surefire failures carry class#method names.)
|
||||
const targetBase = baseOf(input?.targetFile ?? '');
|
||||
const distinctlyNamed = failing.filter((n) => (targetBase ? baseOf(n) !== targetBase : true));
|
||||
if (distinctlyNamed.length === 0) {
|
||||
@@ -168,7 +251,7 @@ export function classifyRedEvidence(input: RedEvidenceInput): RedEvidenceResult
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Unrelated failure: real tests ran and failed, but none is the target test
|
||||
// the plan named — an unrelated assertion must not authorize GREEN.
|
||||
if (!distinctlyNamed.includes(targetTest)) {
|
||||
if (!(isSurefireXml ? surefireTargetMatches : distinctlyNamed.includes(targetTest))) {
|
||||
return { verdict: 'INVALID_RED', reason: 'no_target_test_failure', evidence };
|
||||
}
|
||||
return { verdict: 'RED_EVIDENCE_OK', reason: 'target_test_failed', evidence };
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user