next
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jakub Zych
|
a9a7a328e6 |
refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is. Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line, package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked (MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums); sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted. |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
49793465d7 |
docs(#2915): how-to for listing a reviewer lane, and correct the stale listing section (#2917)
* docs(#2904): how-to for listing a reviewer lane in the registry #2912 shipped the Reviewer Lane Registry, which lands in 1.9.1. Two docs consequences. New: docs/how-to/list-your-reviewer-lane.md. A Diataxis how-to for the publish task -- which of the three catalogs applies (and why a runtime carrying a reviewer body lists under its primary install shape instead), opening the required discussion thread BEFORE the PR, the three fields that reject entries most often (slug grammar differs from id, flags stay kebab when the slug is snake, install/uninstall must be copy-pasteable), regenerate-don't-hand-edit, and register-once-then-Releases. Links the registry README for the field table rather than duplicating it -- the spec is reference, this is the task flow. Corrected: ship-a-reviewer-lane.md said "Listing your lane is not wired yet" and pointed at #2904 as future work. #2906 merged at 11:25Z and #2912 at 12:11Z, so that section shipped false the moment the registry landed. Replaced with the publish pointer. Indexed the new guide and the generated catalog in docs/README.md, and added the guide to develop-a-capability.md's ecosystem list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2904): caveat credential-bearing configKeys in both the guide and the spec Isolated security review found the worked entry's `configKeys: ["acme.api_key"]` modelled storing a live credential with no note on where that value ends up. Verified: config values are written in plaintext to .planning/config.json (docs/CONFIGURATION.md:227 -- masking is display-only, "that file is the security boundary"), and planning.commit_docs defaults to true (:466). So a credential declared that way lands in the installing user's git repository unless they have gitignored .planning/. None of the twelve first-party lanes does this -- they own only review.models.*, host, and prompt-budget keys. The pattern originates in docs/registries/README.md:221, shipped by #2912, so the caveat goes on BOTH surfaces rather than only on the copy that inherited it -- the spec's example is what future authors will read first. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2915): backfill changeset PR number pr: 0 -> 2917. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
90771ddf02 |
enh(#2904): add a reviewer entry type so third-party reviewer lanes are discoverable (#2912)
* feat(#2904): add a `reviewer` entry type so third-party reviewer lanes are discoverable ADR-2782 made a reviewer lane installable by a third party, but neither discoverability catalog could hold one. The Community Capability Registry requires a non-empty `loopExtensionPoints` and forbids a lane from declaring any hook kind, so a `role: "reviewer"` entry is unsatisfiable by construction; the EoS Registry is for ADR-1239 host integrations, which a lane is not. Adds a third catalog — `docs/registries/reviewers.json` → `docs/registries/reviewer-registry.md` — whose `interactions` describes the lane: slug, flags, transport, evidenceClass, reviewsSection, requiresBinaries, configKeys, runtimeCompat. The lane vocabulary is a hand-written mirror of `capability-validator.cjs` (the same pattern as `AXES` mirroring `HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES`), with parity enforced by tests/registry-reviewer-parity.test.cjs. `slug` deliberately uses the runtime `LANE_SLUG_RE` grammar rather than the registry's kebab-only `id` rule, so real lanes (`lm_studio`, `4o-mini`) are not rejected. Two binary type branches became three-way Map dispatch. Both now fail loudly on an unrecognized type instead of silently treating it as a capability — `renderMarkdown` in particular writes a committed catalog file, so a silent wrong-title render was the worst failure mode available. Also fixed while here: `gen-registry.cjs` parsed source JSON with no error handling, so a malformed or non-array `capabilities.json` surfaced as a raw SyntaxError/TypeError instead of an actionable CLI error. Closes #2904 * fix(#2904): bound and sanitize untrusted registry `interactions` strings Review findings from the pre-PR passes. Security (isolated pass): `interactions` string fields reached the generated, committed Markdown catalog with no control-character check and no length bound. A `reviewsSection` carrying ESC and a `requiresBinaries` element carrying NUL plus 5000 characters validated clean and landed verbatim in the rendered page — `mdInline` escapes Markdown metacharacters and collapses CRLF, but nothing else. The identical gap already existed on the capability type's `configKeys`/`requires`/`runtimeCompat`/`produces`/`consumes`, so it is fixed there too rather than inherited into a third type. `hasDisallowedControlChar` is lifted to module scope so exactly one implementation exists, and a shared `validateStringArrayField` enforces control-character rejection, a 200-character element cap and a 50-element array cap for both types. Correctness (standards pass): `renderMarkdown`'s per-entry summary builder was still an if/else-if chain whose final `else` was the capability branch — the one per-type dispatch point this change had not converted, and the same silent fallthrough it removes elsewhere. It now lives in `RENDER_META` alongside the title, so a fourth type cannot silently inherit capability's rendering. All three types' rendered output is byte-identical to before the refactor. Also corrects a test comment that still claimed the reviewer suites were failing-first against an unmodified module. * chore(#2904): backfill changeset PR number (#2912) |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
9624167eec |
fix(#2810): accept the documented effortSurface axis on EoS registry entries (#2813)
* fix(#2810): accept the documented effortSurface axis on EoS registry entries The EoS registry schema required an exact eight-key `interactions.axes` object, while `docs/registries/README.md` and `CONTEXT.md` both documented nine keys including `effortSurface`. An entry that faithfully mirrored its upstream descriptor's `effortSurface` key was rejected outright. `effortSurface` reached the runtime-descriptor vocabulary through ADR-1239 amendment #2481 (`HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES`), but the registry's hand-maintained copy of that vocabulary never picked it up. The runtime-descriptor surface is guarded by tests/host-integration-validator-parity.test.cjs; the registry copy had no equivalent guard, which is what let the two drift. Accept `effortSurface` as an OPTIONAL ninth axis validated against the canonical ['argv','none'] rather than a required one: registry entries mirror their upstream registry/eos-entry.json byte-for-byte, so requiring it would retroactively invalidate every entry published before the amendment. Adds tests/registry-axes-parity.test.cjs, which asserts that every key shared between the registry vocabulary and HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES has an identical enum array, plus limit-1/limit/limit+1 boundary coverage on the axes key set. Closes #2810 * test(#2810): fail when a canonical axis is added but never mirrored The enum-equality assertion compares only keys the registry and HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES already share, so it is blind to the exact drift that produced #2810: a new canonical axis appears and the registry copy is never told. Verified by simulation — mutating an enum is caught, adding a new canonical key is not. Assert instead that every HOST_INTEGRATION_AXES key is either modeled by the registry or named in an explicit NOT_MODELLED allowlist (subagentToolkit and isolation, both dispatch sub-fields the registry collapses into its free-form dispatch summary). Adding a canonical axis now fails until someone decides which bucket it belongs in. The allowlist is itself guarded against going stale. Refs #2810 * fix(#2810): harden the axis value lookup with the CodeQL barrier pattern Both orthogonal reviews flagged the same line: `AXES[key] !== undefined` is not an own-property test, and the bracket reads are shaped like a prototype-pollution sink even though the unknown-key gate above provably makes them unreachable. Switch the presence test to `Object.hasOwn` and add the repo's inline literal guards (`capability-state.cts:146-155`, "Prototype-pollution guard (inline literal, CodeQL barrier)"), which CodeQL can follow where it cannot follow the `.includes()` filter that actually does the work. Behavior is unchanged — re-verified all five axes key-count shapes plus a genuine own `__proto__` property built through JSON.parse (the shape a third-party registry PR would submit): it is rejected as an unknown key and Object.prototype is untouched. Refs #2810 * chore(#2810): backfill changeset PR number |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
1008aabd31 |
fix(#2615): document the effortSurface axis in the host-integration matrix (#2698)
* fix(#2615): document the effortSurface axis in the host-integration matrix #2481 added `effortSurface` as the ninth negotiated `hostIntegration` axis and wrote documentation-sourced values into 18 descriptors, but never touched `docs/reference/host-integration-capability-matrix.md`. The matrix that ADR-1239 designates the cited source of truth had zero occurrences of the axis: no entry in the axes legend, and no row in any of the per-runtime tables. `src/host-integration.cts` states "every value is documented or explicitly 'undocumented'" — for this axis that was false for every runtime. Adds the legend entry (the `argv` / `none` / `undocumented` vocabulary, plus why there is deliberately no config-file member) and an `effortSurface` row to all 19 per-runtime tables. Every citation is carried over from #2481's own commit message, where the values were sourced: - claude argv -- `claude --help` documents `--effort <level>` - opencode argv -- `opencode run --help` documents `--variant` - codex argv -- `model_reasoning_effort` is a config.toml key, not a dedicated flag, so the generic `-c key=value` override is the only argv route (still argv) - 15 hosts undocumented -- their docs state no reasoning setting kimi-code is the nineteenth section (added by #2603 after #2481) and is the one runtime with no declared value. Its row and a Documentation-gaps entry record why rather than inventing one: Kimi Code documents `/effort` (alias `/thinking`), but only as an INTERACTIVE slash command — `-m, --model` is the only model-adjacent argv. Neither vocabulary member is accurate (`none` would deny a mechanism the host has, `argv` would claim one it does not expose), so closing that gap needs a vocabulary decision, which is a negotiation change and not a documentation one. The absent value already degrades closed exactly as the sentinel does. The regression test derives its runtime list from the registry rather than hardcoding it, so a runtime added later fails until its matrix row exists — the ratchet whose absence let #2481 add an axis with nothing catching the missing docs. Closes #2615 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * docs(#2615): honest citations for the undocumented rows; fix the four stale 8-axis lists Two findings from the orthogonal review of the first commit. 1. The 15 `undocumented` rows shared byte-identical text — "searched the runtime's official docs (see Sources consulted above)" — which is weaker than this file's own convention ("no authoritative doc — searched: <url>") and, worse, implies a per-host targeted search that did not happen: each section's Sources-consulted list was gathered for OTHER axes and contains no CLI-reference or reasoning-effort source. The rows now say plainly what the finding is — an ABSENCE established by #2481's cross-host survey — and cite that survey rather than implying a URL was checked per host. 2. Four normative docs still described "the eight negotiated axes" and omitted effortSurface entirely. The worst of them is docs/how-to/add-or-update-a-host-integration.md — the maintainer's own guide for onboarding a host, whose Step 2 axis table would have a maintainer reproduce exactly the gap #2615 exists to close. Also fixed: docs/reference/host-integration-interface.md (which calls itself the normative reference and had no effortSurface row at all), docs/how-to/author-a-host-plugin.md, docs/registries/README.md ("**exactly** the eight … axes keys"), and CONTEXT.md's matching EoS-registry sentence. Deliberately NOT changed, because they are historical records rather than current contract: docs/whats-new-1.7.0.md and docs/FEATURES.md's 1.7.0 entry (effortSurface shipped in 1.8.0 via #2481 — rewriting them would falsify the release history), ADR-1239's pre-amendment body (already superseded by its own "Amendment (2026-07-21): effortSurface axis (#2481)"), and ADR-1016's "original eight axes", which refers to a different axis set entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QT3ibz5qJuDuGqpTGRYVGf * chore(#2615): backfill changeset PR number (#2698) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
f1a91072b6 |
docs(#2357): fix Registry Discussions category name and state its format (#2361)
The submission process told an admin to create a `Registry` Discussions category and never stated its format. Both were wrong in a way a correct reading of the docs could not catch. Name: the category is `EoS Registry`, and it carries threads for both registries — `discussion` is a required field on Capability entries as well as EoS entries. A reader following the old text would create a second, duplicate category. Format: `discussion` being required means the thread must exist before the entry's PR, opened by the entry's author — an outside contributor holding neither `maintain` nor `admin`. GitHub's Announcement format restricts starting discussions to those two levels, so an admin could pick it, block every external submission at the first step, and see nothing wrong. Records open-ended as the required format, and why Announcement and Question/Answer do not work. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
60e3c4988a |
feat(#2182): scaffold community capability + EoS registry (tests + stubbed core)
Adds the discoverability-registry surface for issue #2182: JSON-sourced capability/eos catalogs, a pure schema/vocab module (registry-schema.cjs) with the ADR-857 loop points + ADR-1239 axes, thin validate/gen CLIs, the registry-entry PR template, README spec, and CONTEXT.md glossary terms. The three pure functions (isValidGsdRange/validateEntries/renderMarkdown) are stubbed here so the comprehensive test suite fails first (red), per the feature-implementation red-first directive; the next commit implements them. Refs #2182 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |