07603df8f256df03a84d3dfa550fa83858b5ffa1
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
07603df8f2 |
fix(#2647): code-fixer worktree under .claude/worktrees/, not a hardcoded /tmp path (#2942)
* test(#2647): failing-first — fixer worktree path must be repo-relative not /tmp * fix(#2647): place code-fixer worktree under .claude/worktrees/, not /tmp The gsd-code-fixer agent hand-rolled its worktree at a hardcoded `/tmp/sv-${padded_phase}-reviewfix-XXXXXX` mktemp path. On Windows/Git Bash that landed OUTSIDE the project tree — outside the agent session's permission allowlist, so every Read inside the worktree prompted (~25/run) — and mktemp's MAX_PATH-avoidance substitute produced an un-removable `C:/mvwtNN` path. Place the worktree repo-relative under `.claude/worktrees/` (the same dir the harness-managed executor worktrees use: gitignored via `.claude/`, inside the session's permission scope), with a $$-PID + epoch suffix for concurrency uniqueness (replacing mktemp's XXXXXX). $main_repo is resolved the same way the cleanup tail already resolves it. Three sites updated: setup_worktree bash, concrete-steps prose, critical_rules. The #2990 `-b "$reviewfix_branch"` invariant is preserved (the folded test asserts it). Failing-first regression added to the #2990 suite in tests/agent-frontmatter.test.cjs. * test(#2647): update #2686 path assertion to expect .claude/worktrees/, not /tmp The #2686 regression test encoded the worktree location as a hardcoded `/tmp/sv-` path (matching sibling GSD agents at the time). #2647 showed that breaks Windows/Git Bash (worktree outside the project tree → permission prompts; mktemp MAX_PATH substitute un-removable). Update the #2686 path assertion to require the repo-relative `.claude/worktrees/` location and forbid `/tmp/sv-`. The #2686 isolation + cleanup assertions are unchanged. * fix(#2647): word-boundary wt= parse + ack the fixer growth vs next Two follow-ups to the #2647 GREEN run: - parseWtAssignments matched `prior_wt=` (no word boundary), polluting the set and tripping the repo-relative + concurrency-unique assertions. Anchor on (?:^|\s)wt= so only the real worktree-path assignment is captured. - emitted-attribution: gsd-code-fixer.md grew 1875 bytes vs origin/next. Update the emitted-drift-ack entry to attribute the #2647 worktree-path change (supersedes the prior #2825 attribution, whose growth is already in next). * fix(#2647): address review — validate padded_phase at the sink + tighten test Code-review + security-review both APPROVED with one actionable minor: padded_phase is interpolated into a worktree PATH and a git BRANCH NAME, but was only validated by the orchestrator (code-review-fix.md), not at the agent sink. The agent prompt is a literal bash contract any caller can spawn, so add a `[[ =~ ^[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)?$ ]]` self-defense check rejecting traversal/shell metachars (defense-in-depth; not a present vuln — the only caller validates). Also tighten the concurrency-uniqueness test to require BOTH $$ AND $(date +%s) (either-alone was too lax per review). Update the emitted-drift-ack reason to cover the added validation growth. * changeset(#2647): code-fixer worktree under .claude/worktrees not /tmp * changeset(#2647): backfill PR number 2942 * chore(#2938): regenerate stale docs/CONTEXT-INDEX.json on next #2938 (#2928) updated the CONTEXT.md RULESET prose for the new per-PR emitted-drift-ack fragment mechanism (#2914) but shipped a CONTEXT-INDEX.json generated from the OLD prose. lint:generated-sync fails on every PR that rebases onto next after #2938 (the regen produces a 3-line diff bringing three RULESET entries — AGENT_SIZE_BUDGET, EMITTED_ATTRIBUTION, WORKFLOW_SIZE_BUDGET — in sync with the prose already on next). Mechanical regen via `node scripts/gen-context-index.cjs --write`; idempotent; surfaced by the #2647 rebase. No behavioral change. --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@users.noreply.github.com> |
||
|
|
c043f2946c |
fix(#2914): per-PR ack fragments instead of one shared mutable file (#2923)
* fix(#2914): never persist a spent emitted-drift ack on next tests/emitted-drift-ack.json held 34 spent #2834 entries merged via #2900. Every entry is scoped to the diff that introduced it (#2789), so once merged to next it is at the base by definition -- spent and inert. Its presence is still load-bearing though: each PR rewrites the paths map wholesale, making a persistent base copy a shared cell. Five of six conflicting PRs in the open queue collided on this file and nothing else. Deletes the stale document and adds a push-to-next guard asserting it stays absent. The guard is deliberately NOT wired into lint:ci -- a PR-lane check against the base is the #2768 shape #2789 exists to end. Closes #2914 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2914): backfill changeset pr number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2914): per-PR ack fragments instead of one shared mutable file The emitted-drift acknowledgment lived in a single tests/emitted-drift-ack.json whose paths map every PR rewrote wholesale. That is a shared mutable cell: any two PRs needing an ack edit the same lines and conflict. Five of six conflicting PRs in the open queue collided on this file and nothing else. Acks now live as per-PR fragments under tests/emitted-drift-acks/, the same shape .changeset/ already uses to solve this exact problem. Two PRs pick different filenames, so they cannot collide, and fragments lingering on next are harmless rather than toxic. The legacy file's 35 entries are MIGRATED into a fragment, not deleted. An earlier delete-only attempt failed verification twice: the ratchet lost the spec-phase.md acknowledgment from #2779 and reported a 10-byte growth with no ack. Relocating preserves every acknowledgment. The legacy single file is still READ (unioned with the fragments) because five open PRs carry it; dropping support would break all of them. A duplicate path key across sources is a hard error, never last-wins. The push-to-next guard is retargeted accordingly: it now asserts only that the legacy SHARED file never reappears on next. Fragments may persist harmlessly. Closes #2914 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |