Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Boucher
f96cb44f85 enhance(#3248): disclose capability skills as an instruction surface (#3253)
* test(#3248): failing-first suite for instruction-surface disclosure

28 matrix rows from 50-test-matrix.md. Rows requiring the new
Disclosure.instructionSurfaces field fail today; rows 18-20/23-25 (the
ADR-2363 D4 signature invariants) pass today by construction because the
current code never reads skills/agents at all, and stand as regression
guards for the implementation commit.

Refs #3248

* feat(#3248): disclose capability skills and agents as an instruction surface

ADR-2363 D5. A capability whose only contribution was skills disclosed
nothing at install: summarizeDisclosure early-returned "ships no executable
surfaces (declarative only)" because hasExecutable was false, while each
SKILL.md body landed verbatim in the agent's instruction context.

discloseExecutableSurfaces gains a fifth, NON-executable class,
instructionSurfaces, collecting declared skills/agents stems through the same
safeCollect wrapper as the four existing collectors, so a hostile value
degrades only this class and the function stays total for any manifest shape.
Nothing existing is edited: the collectors, hasExecutable, disclosureSignature
and missingArtifacts are untouched. get_impact rates the symbol CRITICAL at
196 affected, which is why the design is strictly additive.

D4 is implemented by omission and pinned rather than left incidental: adding,
changing or removing skills/agents leaves disclosureSignature byte-identical,
so no stored consent record is perturbed and no spurious re-consent fires.
ADR-2782's conditional-append trick is deliberately NOT reused - it worked
because no manifest could declare a reviewer body before that class existed,
whereas skills predate this one, so a conditional append would re-sign every
already-consented skill-bearing capability.

The renderer is extracted as summarizeInstructionSurfaces and called from BOTH
branches of summarizeDisclosure. Appending only at the end would never render
for skill-only capabilities - the ones that need it - since those take the
early return. That branch's "declarative only" claim is now conditional on
there being no instruction surface either. The renderer iterates rather than
spreading into push, so an unbounded stem count cannot throw RangeError, and
tolerates the bare {} the CLI edge passes via `res.disclosure || {}`.

Scope note: #3248's prose says "skill stems"; ADR-2363 D3 classifies
instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Shipping skills alone would leave an
ADR deliverable owned by no phase, and the epic has no Phase 2. Agents are the
same shape at no extra cost. Narrowing back is a two-line change.

Ratifies ADR-2363 (Proposed -> Accepted) and adds the owed ADR-1244 back-link.

Closes #3248

* fix(#3248): escape consent-prompt values and narrow disclosure to skills

Two review findings, both of which made the previous commit wrong.

BLOCKER (isolated adversarial review). Every manifest-supplied value
interpolated into a consent-prompt line was rendered unescaped. Those lines
are joined with \n and written RAW to stderr on the needs-consent path
(capability-command-router -> cli-exit runMain), so a stem carrying a newline
forged additional lines indistinguishable from genuine GSD disclosure text,
and an ANSI escape could clear or rewrite lines already printed. That defeats
the informed-consent guarantee this change exists to provide, and is a
prompt-injection vector against any agent that reads the stderr text to decide
whether to retry with --yes.

The hole was not unique to the new class - hook event/script, command
family/module/router, every MCP field, and every reviewer-lane field were
equally unescaped. Fixing only the new one would have created the
generative-fix divergence this repo tracks, so renderValueForPrompt is applied
to all five classes through one helper, guarded by a parity test that fails if
a future class skips it. Escaping is identity for ordinary names, so no
well-formed manifest's output changes. The disclosure OBJECT stays verbatim -
only the rendered LINE is escaped - because the signature and every consumer
reasoning about identity depend on the declared value.

NARROWED to skills only. The previous commit also collected agents, arguing
ADR-2363 D3 classifies instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Verified
against staging: stageSkillsForRuntimeAsSkills takes a registry and unions
third-party skills in via readInstalledCapabilitySkill, while
stageAgentsForRuntimeWithConverter takes only a source directory and has no
registry-aware path. Third-party agents are never staged into the instruction
context, so disclosing them would have put a false claim in a security prompt -
worse than the scope creep two reviewers flagged it as. D3's classification
stands; D5 now records that Phase 1 implements the skills half and that
whether agents should be staged at all is an open maintainer question.

Also reverts the premature ADR-2363 ratification. The previous commit flipped
it to Accepted and asserted "#3248 merged" while this branch IS #3248 and is
unmerged. Status returns to Proposed, and the ADR-1244 back-link - owed only on
ratification - is withdrawn.

Adds the fast-check property suite CLAUDE.md requires and the direct precedent
(reviewer-trust-disclosure) already had: totality, D4 signature invariance, D3
hasExecutable invariance, and renderer totality over adversarial manifests.

Refs #3248

* chore(#3248): correct changeset scope claim and backfill pr number

The fragment was written against the pre-narrowing commit and still
advertised 'skills and agents'. 4d26887e narrowed disclosure to skills
only - third-party agents are never staged into the instruction context -
but did not touch the fragment, so the release notes would have carried a
claim the code does not implement.

Also backfills pr:0 -> 3253 and names the prompt-escaping fix, which is
user-visible and was absent from the original body.

Changeset-only; no code or test changed, so the gsd-test pass recorded for
4d26887e still describes this tree's behavior.

Refs #3248

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
2026-08-09 13:52:29 -04:00
Tom Boucher
02c6491e61 docs(#1464): fix ADR-1244 capability doc set — followable tutorials, overlay-model + install tutorial, set/fragment/runtimeCompat reference, accuracy fixes 2026-06-20 13:02:24 -04:00
Tom Boucher
7c93d9e222 feat(#1463): add capability outdated (per-source update check); drop phantom slash-command docs
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 10:50:12 -04:00
Tom Boucher
08d1c57d6e fix(#1460): verify-or-reject capability --integrity per source; confine hook commands to the bundle
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 09:10:04 -04:00
Tom Boucher
e7855bc217 fix(#1459): user-owned consent store gates third-party capability activation; env/cwd in disclosure; loader validator parity (#1473) 2026-06-20 01:59:03 -04:00
Tom Boucher
c866ac1b24 fix(#1462): fail closed without data loss on a corrupt capability ledger; atomic ledger write (#1469) 2026-06-19 19:55:10 -04:00
Tom Boucher
34bc096ec2 feat(#1451): wire gsd capability install/update/remove/list/disable/enable management CLI (#1457)
* feat(#1451): wire gsd capability install/update/remove/list/disable/enable CLI

ADR-1244 D5/D6: the management command was built as a library (capability-lifecycle.cjs
install/upgrade/remove + capability-ledger.cjs) across Phases 3-5 but never wired to a
user-facing command — gsd-tools.cjs 'capability' only handled state/set. This adds the
six subcommands, dispatching to the existing lifecycle/ledger:

- install <spec> [--integrity] [--scope global|project] [--yes] [--shared-file <rel>]…
- update [<id>|--all] [--scope] [--yes] [--shared-file]  (re-resolves recorded source)
- remove <id> [--purge-data] [--scope]  (first-party rejected)
- list [--json]  (first-party + overlay, both scopes, JSON array)
- disable|enable <id>  (activation-state alias of capability set --off/--on)

Scope→runtimeDir mapping matches capability-loader exactly (global=$GSD_HOME||home,
project=project root; caps at <root>/.gsd/capabilities/<id>, ledger at <root>/.gsd-capabilities.json).
Consent is non-interactive: --yes grants; without it an executable install aborts after
printing the disclosure and writes nothing. Best-effort reconcile before each mutation.

Tests: tests/capability-cli.test.cjs (20 behavioral, real resolver via local specs,
GSD_HOME-sandboxed) — install consent/block/usage matrix, list, update round-trip,
remove round-trip + first-party guard, disable/enable, unknown subcommand.
Docs: docs/reference/gsd-capability-command.md reconciled to the real surface
(ledger paths, --shared-file, consent model, disable mechanism, outdated marked planned);
docs/COMMANDS.md gains the gsd capability entry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#1451): resolve adversarial-review findings + root-cause the --raw silent-output bug

Adversarial-review (Codex) fixes:
- capReadStrict passes a malformed strict_known_registries value THROUGH so the trust gate
  fail-closes on it (was silently downgrading to permissive)
- installCapability/upgradeCapability gain an expectedId guard + first-party-id rejection
  (capability-lifecycle.cts): an overlay can't shadow a first-party id, and 'update <id>' can't
  act on a different id if the recorded source was retargeted
- capability update: prints the consent disclosure, exits non-zero on --all partial failure,
  no longer masks the resolved id
- capability remove: ledger-first ordering so an overlay is removable even if it shadows a
  first-party name; first-party guard only fires for ids not in the ledger
- gsd-capability-command.md: disable/enable doc corrected (registry-known ids; overlay toggle
  not yet wired through this path)

Silent-output bug (root cause, not waved off as pre-existing):
- captureStdoutSyncWrites buffered fd-1 output and DISCARDED it on the throw path — any --raw
  command that emitted a result/error envelope then threw (to set a non-zero exit) lost ALL of
  stdout. Now it flushes the captured buffer before re-throwing (exit code preserved).
- cmdCapabilitySet threw via process.exit() (bypassing the capture wrapper entirely); now throws
  ExitError so the wrapper flushes — matches the repo's no-process-exit architecture.
- Regression test: capability disable <unknown> --raw must emit the JSON error envelope on stdout.

Verified: capability suite 165/165, @file/json-errors/phase 183/183, lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#1451): address adversarial-review R2 — shared-file confinement, MCP no-clobber, config fail-closed

- confinedSharedFile(): realpath-confine every shared-config write/strip to the scope root (mirrors
  safeRmUnder), so a --shared-file whose parent is a symlink escaping the scope can't write outside it.
- mcpServers shared edits: never overwrite an UNOWNED entry — a name collision with the user's (or
  another capability's) server is skipped, so install/remove can't silently clobber user MCP config
  (hooks already append; the map-keyed mcpServers path was the gap).
- capReadStrict: a PRESENT-but-unparseable .planning/config.json now fails CLOSED (lockdown) instead
  of silently downgrading the strict_known_registries policy to permissive.
- Tests: symlink-escape shared-file writes nothing outside scope; colliding user mcpServers entry
  preserved; unparseable config blocks an external install. capability suite 83/83, lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#1451): address code-review — aborted-status robustness + coverage + project-scoped strict doc

- install/update: handle an 'aborted' result independently of the requiresConsent flag so it can never
  fall through to the generic 'blocked: unknown reason' arm (aborted always means consent-needed per
  the lifecycle contract; latent today, hardened for future status additions).
- Clarify capResolveScope comment (project scope === already-resolved cwd) and document that
  strict_known_registries is a PROJECT-scoped policy (read regardless of --scope; no machine-wide
  allowlist) in gsd-capability-command.md.
- Tests: update --all over an empty ledger returns an empty result set (exit 0); a flag value that
  looks like another flag (--integrity --scope) is rejected, not swallowed. CLI suite 33/33, lint clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#1451): FEATURES.md entry #147 + Added/Fixed changesets for the capability CLI

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#1451): backfill changeset PR number → #1457

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-19 12:02:36 -04:00
Tom Boucher
f52a7a5f77 feat(#1245): add capability ecosystem ADR, PRD, and developer documentation (#1248)
Phase 0 of the Capability Ecosystem epic (#1244): the design record and the
third-party-author documentation set, with no runtime or code changes.

- docs/adr/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — architecture decision record
  (amends/extends ADR-857 Decisions 7 & 8)
- docs/prd/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — product requirements
- Diataxis docs: tutorial, how-to (publish/import/version/remove),
  reference (manifest schema, /gsd:capability command, capability matrix),
  explanation (trust model); cross-links added to develop-a-capability.md

Refs #1244

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-14 17:51:43 -04:00