104fc76f70a843e9dddb42e00c2da4294fe3a9ea
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sim
|
7dd9e59f6b |
test(#3090): stop exempting violations under categories that do not fit
An allow-test-rule annotation citing a category that does not apply is worse than no annotation, because it reads as reviewed. Eight were confirmed by reading the assertions each one covered, and auditing the rest found five more plus one refutation — a converter test whose wording described the wrong mechanism while the covered assertion genuinely was deployed-text. The instructive one used the CANONICAL string for the same mistake: STATE.md command output labelled as a deployed artifact. A canonical string is not evidence the category fits, which is why normalising strings alone would have laundered the problem rather than fixed it. Every mapping the audit had inferred rather than code-verified was spot-checked before rewriting, and the ones that turned out not to fit were re-annotated rather than relabelled. Fourteen STATE.md assertions had a typed extractor available all along and now use it; their annotations came out because nothing needs exempting. Eight assertions genuinely need a production change first — CLI stdout and stderr with no structured mode — and are tagged pending-migration-to-typed-ir citing #3090, which is what that category is for. It had zero real uses before this, while one file carried a real citation to migration issue #2974 under a non-canonical tag. Six annotations covered assertions that do no text matching at all. An exemption for a violation that does not exist is noise that makes the real ones harder to audit; those are removed. atomic-write-coverage gains the annotation it always warranted — its own docstring describes a structural-regression-guard while the file carried none. Fifty-nine non-canonical strings across roughly thirty files are normalised, and the allow-test-rule allowlist is regenerated to match. 472 annotations became 463: every one now uses a canonical category, and the two remaining non-canonical strings are ESLint RuleTester fixtures, not annotations. Refs #3057 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
a3853472de |
fix(#2598): declare OpenCode subagent dispatch synchronous, not background (#2682)
* fix(#2598): declare OpenCode subagent dispatch synchronous, not background capabilities/opencode/capability.json advertised dispatch.background: true and dispatch.backgroundDispatch: true. negotiateHostCapabilities and every degradationFor / shouldFlattenDispatch consumer trusts these per-field values, so declaring a capability the host lacks OVERSTATES it — the opposite of the fail-closed posture the negotiation is built for. The issue's own citations needed checking before acting: the host-integration matrix (ADR-1239's designated deployment source-of-truth) documented `true` with NEWER evidence than the issue cited, and explicitly marked the issue's sst/opencode#5887 reference as a stale snapshot superseded by #2087. git log confirms #2087 deliberately flipped these from false to true, citing OpenCode v1.15.0/v1.17 as "background subagents enabled by default in all modes". Applying the issue as filed would, on that evidence, have REGRESSED a deliberate update. So the claim was verified against current upstream rather than either document. `packages/opencode/src/effect/runtime-flags.ts` on `dev` today reads: experimentalBackgroundSubagents: enabledByExperimental("OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_BACKGROUND_SUBAGENTS") `enabledByExperimental` falls back to the `experimental` flag and `bool()` defaults to false — the parameter is hidden from the model unless an operator opts in by env var. Upstream #29638 is still OPEN and confirms the session loop `tasks.pop()`s one subtask at a time. #2087's "default-on in all modes" reading does not hold against current dev. The issue's CONCLUSION is therefore right even though part of its evidence was superseded: concurrent dispatch cannot be relied on, so both fields are false. The matrix rows are corrected with the verified citation rather than reverted to the old #5887 quote, so the record shows why the value is false TODAY rather than re-asserting evidence that was legitimately superseded. Neighbouring sub-fields are untouched and pinned by test: namedDispatch, subagentToolkit, and isolation:'orchestrator-worktree' (which works via `opencode run --dir` at the OS process level and is unaffected — #2584 does not depend on this value either way). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015TCwhbMuY37DzRMCfzTABJ * fix(#2598): re-pin the dispatch contract tests to synchronous OpenCode dispatch gsd-test on the descriptor change came back FAILED (5 unique, both node versions). The failures were not incidental — they were deliberate contract-pin tests encoding #2087's decision, one named literally "background UPGRADE": tests/host-integration-descriptors.test.cjs - EXPECTED_FLATTEN[opencode] === false (background-eligible) - the derived background-eligible set pin tests/opencode-imperative-reference.test.cjs - "descriptor declares background dispatch true/true (v1.15/v1.17 upgrade)" - "background UPGRADE changes shouldFlattenDispatch: false now" So this is a recorded decision being reversed, not drift being corrected, and it is reversed on evidence: current upstream `dev` gates the capability behind OPENCODE_EXPERIMENTAL_BACKGROUND_SUBAGENTS (default false) and upstream #29638 (OPEN) confirms the session loop still handles one subtask at a time. The issue is filed by the maintainer and explicitly directs "update golden-parity / validator fixtures as needed", which sanctions re-pinning. Behavioral consequence, verified: shouldFlattenDispatch(opencode) now returns TRUE, so GSD serializes opencode dispatch instead of trusting concurrency it cannot get. That is the correct fail-closed direction and is safe today — no shipped GSD flow drives OpenCode background waves (per the issue), and isolation:'orchestrator-worktree' is unaffected because it works at the OS process level via `opencode run --dir`, not via the native subagent. Each re-pinned test now asserts the retracted contract in the opposite direction — feeding the #2087 axes back in must still yield "would not flatten" — so a silent re-flip of either field is caught rather than merely un-asserted. lint:ci exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_015TCwhbMuY37DzRMCfzTABJ * chore(#2598): backfill changeset pr number (#2682) --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |