Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jakub Zych
a9a7a328e6 refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.

Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
2026-10-06 01:47:40 +02:00
Tom Boucher
49793465d7 docs(#2915): how-to for listing a reviewer lane, and correct the stale listing section (#2917)
* docs(#2904): how-to for listing a reviewer lane in the registry

#2912 shipped the Reviewer Lane Registry, which lands in 1.9.1. Two docs
consequences.

New: docs/how-to/list-your-reviewer-lane.md. A Diataxis how-to for the
publish task -- which of the three catalogs applies (and why a runtime
carrying a reviewer body lists under its primary install shape instead),
opening the required discussion thread BEFORE the PR, the three fields
that reject entries most often (slug grammar differs from id, flags stay
kebab when the slug is snake, install/uninstall must be copy-pasteable),
regenerate-don't-hand-edit, and register-once-then-Releases. Links the
registry README for the field table rather than duplicating it -- the
spec is reference, this is the task flow.

Corrected: ship-a-reviewer-lane.md said "Listing your lane is not wired
yet" and pointed at #2904 as future work. #2906 merged at 11:25Z and
#2912 at 12:11Z, so that section shipped false the moment the registry
landed. Replaced with the publish pointer.

Indexed the new guide and the generated catalog in docs/README.md, and
added the guide to develop-a-capability.md's ecosystem list.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs(#2904): caveat credential-bearing configKeys in both the guide and the spec

Isolated security review found the worked entry's `configKeys:
["acme.api_key"]` modelled storing a live credential with no note on
where that value ends up.

Verified: config values are written in plaintext to
.planning/config.json (docs/CONFIGURATION.md:227 -- masking is
display-only, "that file is the security boundary"), and
planning.commit_docs defaults to true (:466). So a credential declared
that way lands in the installing user's git repository unless they have
gitignored .planning/. None of the twelve first-party lanes does this --
they own only review.models.*, host, and prompt-budget keys.

The pattern originates in docs/registries/README.md:221, shipped by
#2912, so the caveat goes on BOTH surfaces rather than only on the copy
that inherited it -- the spec's example is what future authors will read
first.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#2915): backfill changeset PR number

pr: 0 -> 2917.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-31 09:29:51 -04:00