12ee75a509cbfd8fe2ae2871056fa81777d7dcf5
3 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jakub Zych
|
a9a7a328e6 |
refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is. Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line, package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked (MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums); sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted. |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
bf4485ada2 |
enhance(#3717): make the edge probe's shape cues language-aware via an optional text_en field (#4156)
* test(#3717): add failing-first coverage for text_en language-aware classification Adds unit tests for the not-yet-implemented text_en field on Requirement (fallback selection, empty/whitespace/non-string rejection, shapes-override precedence), a SHAPE_CUES/VALID_SHAPES parity guard (RULESET.GENERATIVE-FIX), and workflow-prose contract tests asserting spec-phase.md Step 5.5 documents populating text_en for response_language projects. All new tests are RED until src/edge-probe.cts and the workflow docs are updated. * feat(#3717): make edge-probe shape classification read an optional text_en field Requirement gains an optional text_en; classifyShape's own signature stays untouched (a locked, directly-tested export), and the text_en ?? text selection is pushed to proposeEdges' single call site instead. text_en is validated fail-closed: an empty or whitespace-only value throws rather than silently winning the ?? fallback and degrading classification to zero shapes. This makes the #2773 doc-only translation convention an explicit, validatable field instead of an invisible instruction, per the approved Form-1 scope on #3717. * docs(#3717): document the text_en field across spec-phase, reference and how-to docs Updates Step 5.5's response_language instructions, the edge-probe reference Inputs contract, the FEATURES.md fragment, and the non-English how-to guide to describe the new text_en field: text keeps the requirement's own wording in all cases, text_en (when populated) is the engine-only English rendering the classifier prefers. * docs(#3717): record the text_en locked-surface change in CONTEXT.md and ADR-550 Updates the Edge Probe Module glossary entry to describe the text_en field and its fail-closed validation, and appends an ADR-550 amendment recording why this is additive and does not re-open the #652 LLM-classifier rejection (text_en is a plain field read by the existing deterministic regex classifier, not a new model-dependent surface). * docs(#3717): add changeset fragment and regenerate FEATURES.md pr:0 placeholder — backfilled with the real PR number after the PR opens. * docs(#3717): attribute the text_en machine check to engine-level validation, not prose tests Code-review (Spec axis) finding: the workflow-prose contract tests and the ADR-550 amendment overclaimed themselves as "the machine check the #2773 doc-only stopgap lacked." That check is actually engine-level (validateRequirement/classifyShape, covered in tests/edge-probe.test.cjs) — the prose tests are the same style of assertion #2773 already used. Reworded both to attribute the claim correctly. * fix(#3717): rewrap spec-phase.md so the id-unchanged sentence stays on one line The #3717 rewrite of Step 5.5's response_language paragraph moved a line break so "requirement `id`s" ended one physical line and "are never translated" started the next. The pre-existing #2773 regression test (tests/edge-probe-spec-phase-contract.test.cjs) asserts id + "never translated" on the SAME line (no \n in between, matching git's own line-oriented prose), so the reflow silently broke it. Rewrapped so the sentence lands on one line again, verified against every #2773/#3717 regex assertion in that test file. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spec-phase.md — #3717 adds text_en documentation to Step 5.5 (response_language paragraph + REQS_JSON heredoc comment); this growth is this PR's own diff, not incidental drift. * chore(#3717): backfill changeset PR number pr:0 -> pr:4156 now that the PR exists. --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
77fa08f1e8 |
fix(#2773): feed the spec-phase edge probe English-translated requirement text (#3713)
* test(#2773): failing-first contract and premise tests for translated edge-probe input Locks the Step 5.5 contract that a response_language project must feed the edge probe an English translation of each requirement's text, and binds that advice to measured engine behavior: the same requirement classifies to zero shapes in Portuguese and to collection/adjacency/empty/ordering in English. Also pins the honest limit — the issue's own repro sentence classifies to [] in English too, so translation is necessary but not sufficient and the authored shapes override is the documented fallback. Red before the doc change; the assertions are all false today. Refs #2773 * fix(#2773): feed the spec-phase edge probe English-translated requirement text The shape cues in src/edge-probe.cts are English word-boundary regexes, so a project running with response_language set wrote its SPEC requirements into the Step 5.5 $REQS_JSON heredoc in that language, matched no cue, classified to zero shapes, and landed every row in the unclassified sentinel (#1110). The taxonomy contributed nothing and --auto left it all unresolved — the probe was a silent no-op for exactly the spec type it exists to harden. Step 5.5 now states that the $REQS_JSON payload is engine input rather than user-facing output, so the response_language rule does not govern it: each requirement's text carries a faithful English translation, the SPEC keeps its original language, and requirement ids are never translated or renumbered. The instruction sits before the heredoc on purpose — the downstream APPLICABLE=0 warning fires only when every requirement is unclassified, so a partly-classified non-English spec would otherwise slip through with no signal at all. Measured against the compiled engine: the same requirement returns [] in Portuguese and collection -> adjacency/empty/ordering in English. Also measured: the issue's own repro sentence returns [] in English too, so translation is necessary but not sufficient — the instruction therefore points at the authored shapes override for prose carrying no cue in any language rather than promising that translation restores classification. Doc scope only, per the triage disposition on the issue. The compiled engine is untouched; the lang-hint / per-language cue-set fix is a separate follow-up. Closes #2773 * fix(#2773): clean up the edge-probe temp file on the placeholder-guard exit path Surfaced by the isolated security review of this branch. Between the mktemp and the unconditional cleanup, Step 5.5 has two sibling guards that disagreed about their own invariant: the engine-failure guard runs rm -f "$REQS_JSON" before exiting, while the empty/placeholder guard directly above it exited without one. A spec run that tripped the placeholder check therefore stranded a temp file holding the SPEC's requirement text in TMPDIR, once per failed run. The added contract test walks the region between the mktemp and the unconditional cleanup and asserts no exit path leaves the file behind, so the two guards can no longer drift apart. Proven to bind: run against the pre-fix file the walker reports the leaking exit; against the fixed file it reports none. Refs #2773 * docs(#2773): record the edge probe's English-cue input constraint in the predicate store The co-change gate flagged CONTEXT.md (13 co-changes with spec-phase.md) and docs/CONFIGURATION.md (11) as candidate-missing-updates, and both were real gaps rather than incidental coupling. CONTEXT.md's EdgeCompletenessProbeModule entry documents the input contract for classifyShape but did not record that SHAPE_CUES are English word-boundary patterns — so the predicate store implied text was language-agnostic, which is what a future agent reads before touching this seam. docs/CONFIGURATION.md's response_language row is what a non-English project reads when it turns the setting on; it now names the one deliberate exception and links to the FEATURES.md explanation, so the interaction is discoverable from the config key rather than only from the workflow. CONTEXT-INDEX.json regenerated via gen-context-index.cjs --write. The drift-ack fragment is updated for the final byte range and now also records the placeholder-guard cleanup fix folded into the same block. Refs #2773 * fix(#2773): append the growth rationale to the existing spec-phase.md ack entry The remote runner caught this: emitted-attribution.test.cjs pins the 0000-legacy-migration.json spec-phase.md entry permanently (the #2914 migration regression test asserts the exact '31987 -> 31997' delta text survives), so removing it to avoid a duplicate-key collision with a new fragment broke that test instead of satisfying the ratchet. The entry is an accreting log, not a single-use slot — #2733, #3132 and #3102 were each appended to the same reason string by later PRs, which is how a shared growth key coexists with the rule that two ack sources may never name the same path. This appends the #2773 rationale the same way and drops the separate fragment, whose spec-phase.md key was the collision. Verified locally by reproducing both affected tests against the real fragment before re-dispatching: the pinned delta survives, grown[0].acked is true, staleAcks is empty, and all 35 entries still read as spent. Refs #2773 * docs(#2773): add a how-to for probing edges in a non-English project The phase gate's enablementSequence check caught a wrong call of mine. I had recorded that no how-to was owed because the user takes zero extra steps — the workflow translates the probe input itself. Written out, though, the sequence from off to value is two steps and step 1 depends on response_language, a setting owned by a different capability than the edge probe, which is exactly the condition the how-to test names. There is also real task content a reference table cannot carry: the three-way split between a few unclassified rows (the classifier's recall gap), every row unclassified (the probe could not read the spec at all), and the silent partly-classified case where the APPLICABLE=0 warning never fires. That last one is what a user would otherwise misread as a clean bill of health. Shaped after the resolve-edge-coverage-findings / resolve-unreachable-guard siblings and indexed from docs/README.md next to its closest relative. Refs #2773 * chore(#2773): backfill the changeset PR number pr:0 placeholder replaced with the real PR number now that #3713 exists. Refs #2773 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |