1e3e1f7cd8dd6eca32c3ce93bb71fffea802b7ee
5 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tom Boucher
|
b956bb7c67 |
fix(#4834): gate the launcher PATH arm on runtime identity and prefer config-home installs (#4902)
* test(#4834): failing-first launcher hijack regressions * fix(#4834): gate the launcher PATH arm on runtime identity and prefer config-home installs A gsd_run on PATH that cannot prove it is @opengsd/gsd-core (a foreign package, or a release older than the runtime-identity verb) is no longer accepted by the launcher snippet's PATH arm; resolution falls through to the hard error when no path-based candidate matches. The runtime-config-home arm now precedes the PATH arm, restoring the documented prefer-local-over-PATH order, so an installer-managed install wins even against a genuine global. The 16-home probe list is factored into _gsd_homes() and the identity gate into _gsd_id_ok(), keeping the per-copy delta at +141 bytes. The files whose frozen ceilings had no headroom (gsd-executor, gsd-plan-checker, gsd-verifier, gsd-planner, execute-phase, execute-plan) now load the resolver by @-include from gsd-core/references/gsd-run-resolver.md (the onboard.md pattern) instead of carrying an inline copy. Propagated to all other inlined workflow/agent copies via scripts/sync-runtime-launcher.cjs; the resolver reference re-copied byte-equal (parity B2); the hard-error text, docs/how-to/diagnose-a-foreign-gsd-tools.md, and the CONTEXT.md launcher predicate updated to match (#4834); the quick-batch row-48 guard gains the canonical-preamble sweep carve-out (#4834, per its own #3730/#2529 precedents); the compact-content benchmark baseline regenerated. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-backlog.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-tests.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-todo.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ai-integration-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: audit-fix.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: audit-milestone.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: audit-uat.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: autonomous.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: check-todos.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: cleanup.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: code-review-fix.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: code-review.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: complete-milestone.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: debug.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: diagnose-issues.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: discuss-phase-assumptions.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: discuss-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: do.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: docs-update.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: edit-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: eval-review.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: explore.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: extract-learnings.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: fast.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: forensics.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: graduation.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-code-fixer.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-code-fixer.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-debug-session-manager.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-debug-session-manager.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-debugger.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-eval-auditor.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-eval-auditor.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-intel-updater.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-intel-updater.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-phase-researcher.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-project-researcher.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-project-researcher.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-research-synthesizer.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-research-synthesizer.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-ui-researcher.compact.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-ui-researcher.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: health.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: import.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: inbox.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ingest-docs.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: insert-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: list-seeds.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: list-workspaces.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: manager.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: map-codebase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: milestone-summary.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: mvp-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: new-milestone.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: new-project.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: new-workspace.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: next.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: pause-work.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-review-convergence.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plant-seed.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: pr-branch.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: profile-user.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: progress.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: quick-batch.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: quick.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: remove-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: remove-workspace.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: resume-project.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: review.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: scan.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: secure-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: settings-advanced.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: settings-integrations.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: settings.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ship.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: sketch-wrap-up.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: sketch.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: smart-entry.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spec-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spike-wrap-up.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: spike.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: stats.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: sync-skills.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: thread.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: transition.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-review.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ultraplan-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: undo.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: validate-phase.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: verify-work.md — launcher snippet resolution hardening propagates via sync-runtime-launcher (#4834) * docs(#4834): backfill the changeset PR number * test(#4834): regenerate the compact-content benchmark baseline after the rebase --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Dennis Alexis Valin Dittrich
|
1017898cb9 |
fix(#3771): make remediation examples non-binding and surface revision conflicts (#3916)
* fix(#3771): separate the binding property from the advisory remediation
Checker findings fused "what property failed" with "how to fix it" into a
single `fix_hint` and never marked which half binds. The checker rendered
every hint under a "must fix" heading, the orchestrators injected the issues
verbatim and ordered targeted updates, and the shared revision references
mapped each hint to a prescriptive strategy — so a contract-following planner
applied a hint literally even when a smaller mechanism satisfied the same
property, or when the hint contradicted a locked decision. There was no
channel to report that conflict, and every attempt burned a revision
iteration.
Checker side: every issue now carries a binding `required_property` (the
invariant that failed) plus its evidence and severity, and `fix_hint` is
labelled non-binding wherever it appears — including the human-facing blocker
rendering, so "must fix" unambiguously names the property and never the
example.
Planner side: revision re-checks locked decisions, capability guidance and
existing plan constraints before editing; satisfying a blocker through a
smaller valid alternative counts as addressing it; and a hint that conflicts
with any of those returns `REVISION_CONFLICT` carrying the conflict and the
alternatives considered. Orchestrators route that to user choice or the
configured plan-review convergence loop without consuming retry budget.
Also applied to the UI-spec revision loop and the gap-plan hint, and the
generic pattern's stray `suggested_fix` field name is reconciled to the
plan-checker's `fix_hint`.
Nothing legitimately binding is weakened: blockers still block, severity
still gates, iteration caps and stall escalation still fire, and required
task fields and decision coverage still hold.
Refs #3771
* test(#3771): pin the binding/advisory split across the revision chain
Locks the separation at every link that carries it: the checker's issue
schema and blocker rendering, the planner's constraint re-check and
REVISION_CONFLICT return, the generic pattern's reconciled field names, and
each orchestrator's conflict routing without retry-budget consumption. Also
pins what must not have been weakened — blockers, severity gating, iteration
caps and stall escalation.
Red against the pre-fix prose: 32 of 34 assertions fail (the 2 that pass are
the preservation checks, correctly).
Refs #3771
* chore(#3771): add changeset fragment for the remediation-binding fix
* chore(#3771): acknowledge the remediation-binding growth
Five runtime-loaded files grow: the two checkers carry the binding/advisory
split where the model reads it (a `required_property` on every dimension
example, since a schema the examples contradict teaches the examples), and
the three orchestrators carry the REVISION_CONFLICT route, which has to live
with the `iteration_count`/`revision_count` state it declines to spend.
Deletes tests/emitted-drift-acks/3172-stated-failing-direction.json: it is
fully spent on next and still owned plan-phase.md, so it walls off a key it
can no longer clear (#3078). Its removal is the documented remedy for the
duplicate-key collision, not drive-by cleanup.
* fix(#3771): close the review gaps in the conflict contract
Adversarial review (Codex, Antigravity) found four real defects in the first
pass, each confirmed against the source before acting:
- The UI checker's structured return still ordered `Fix: {exact fix required}`
and "list each BLOCK dimension with exact fix required". The dimension
examples had been marked non-binding but the rendering the researcher
actually reads had not — the same omission this issue is about.
- `ui-phase` and the canonical `revision-loop` flow incremented their counter
BEFORE dispatching the reviser, so "do NOT increment on REVISION_CONFLICT"
was unreachable prose: the iteration was already spent. The increment now
sits on the return path in both.
- The conflict gate offered "accept as-is", which is an early exit from a
still-failing blocker — a weakening the brief explicitly forbids. The three
options are now adopt an alternative / override the constraint / amend the
constraint; every one resolves the conflict. Accepting an unaddressed blocker
remains available only at the unchanged iteration-cap escalation.
- The convergence route was declarative: nothing in
plan-review-convergence.md could receive a conflict. plan-phase now records
it in REVIEWS.md — the channel that loop already consumes — convergence
refuses to declare convergence over an open entry, and routing back into a
run convergence itself started is explicitly excluded as a cycle. `quick` has
no REVIEWS.md and no phase, so its convergence branch was dead prose and is
deleted in favour of asking the user.
Also reconciles the last two drifted field names (`finding`, `affected_field`)
to the plan-checker schema, and repairs a silent no-op: the few-shot
`required_property` insertion never applied because those lines are
blockquoted, and the test's own block filter was anchored on indentation only,
so a vacuous loop passed over zero blocks. Both are fixed and the filter now
asserts it found blocks.
Refs #3771
* chore(#3771): extend the growth acknowledgment for the review round
plan-review-convergence.md joins the list: the conflict route needed a
receiving end, and it lands on the seam that loop already reads (REVIEWS.md)
rather than a new mechanism. The plan-phase, ui-phase and gsd-ui-checker
entries gain the second-pass reasoning — an executable convergence branch, the
increment moved onto the return path, and the structured return that still
ordered an exact fix.
* fix(#3771): make the conflict route bounded, ordered, and owned
Round-2 adversarial review found five more defects, each confirmed in the
source before acting:
- The convergence gate sat AFTER `gsd_run state planned-phase` and the success
banner, so a run could write and announce convergence over an unresolved
conflict. OPEN_CONFLICTS is now read from REVIEWS.md and is part of the
converged CONDITION, evaluated before any write.
- plan-phase's cycle-exclusion ("unless this run was invoked by convergence")
was not a question the orchestrator can answer at runtime. plan-phase now
never invokes convergence at all — it records the conflict when a phase
REVIEWS.md exists and resolves it with the user in-place, which removes the
cycle instead of describing it.
- Closure had no owner. plan-phase writes the row, so plan-phase strikes it
resolved; convergence only reads. An open row is a live blocker, never a
stale artifact.
- Declining to increment the counter removed the only bound on the conflict
path: an agent returning the same conflict forever would loop unattended. A
conflict naming the same `required_property` twice in a row is now a stall
and escalates through the existing gate.
- verify-work's gap-plan revision loop hands `<revision_context>` to
gsd-planner and so inherits the whole contract, but stated none of it and
could not handle the conflict return. It is now covered like the others, and
is in the test's orchestrator table.
Refs #3771
* chore(#3771): acknowledge the round-2 growth
verify-work.md joins the list — the flow the second review found missed — and
the plan-phase, ui-phase and plan-review-convergence entries gain the
round-2 reasoning: the gate moved ahead of the state write, the convergence
hand-off replaced with a runtime-checkable record-and-resolve, and the
recurrence bound that replaces the counter the conflict path stopped spending.
* fix(#3771): make the convergence gate countable and stop the conflict fall-through
Third adversarial round (Antigravity) found three defects:
- The OPEN_CONFLICTS pipeline had no `grep -v '~~'` despite its own comment
claiming one, and `grep -c '^| '` also counts a markdown table's header and
separator rows — every resolved conflict would have read as open and
convergence would have deadlocked instead of converging. plan-phase now
records each conflict as a `- [ ]` checklist line and flips it to `- [x]`, so
the gate is an exact fixed-string match with no table parsing.
- "then continue below" fell through to the checker spawn, so a SECOND
REVISION_CONFLICT would have been handed to the checker as though it were a
revised plan. plan-phase, quick and verify-work now re-evaluate the return
from the top of the conflict handler; ui-phase already looped back.
- revision-loop.md still described plan-phase routing a conflict to the
convergence loop instead of asking — the behaviour round 2 removed. Recording
is now stated as being in addition to asking, never instead of it.
Refs #3771
* chore(#3771): bring the changeset in line with what shipped
Two review rounds widened the change after the fragment was written:
verify-work's gap-plan revision and the convergence loop are covered, two
more drifted field names are reconciled, and the conflict path carries an
explicit recurrence bound.
* fix(#3771): declare and emit the REVISION_CONFLICT marker
check:contract-drift on CI caught what local lint never reached: four
workflows dispatch on `## REVISION_CONFLICT`, but no agent declared or emitted
it — an orphan consumer, matching a marker nothing produces. The shared
reference (planner-revision.md Step 7b) described the return; the agent
definitions did not carry it.
gsd-planner and gsd-ui-researcher now emit the marker in-fence alongside their
other return markers, and both registry rows in agent-contracts.md declare it.
gsd-planner's Consumed by gains the two workflows that dispatch on it and were
missing from the row.
The gate is right: a return contract belongs where the agent is defined, not
only in a reference the agent happens to load.
Refs #3771
* chore(#3771): acknowledge the return-marker growth
gsd-planner.md and gsd-ui-researcher.md each gain the REVISION_CONFLICT
marker that check:contract-drift requires them to emit.
* fix(#3771): hoist the shared conflict protocol out of the workflows
Two CI failures, both correct gates:
- tests/few-shot-calibration.test.cjs pins the plan-checker calibration file
at exactly 4 examples (2 positive, 2 negative). The example added in the
first pass broke that balance — and described PLANNER behaviour in the
CHECKER's calibration set, which is the wrong surface for it. Removed; the
smaller-alternative rule is already normative in gsd-plan-checker.md and
planner-revision.md, and pinned by the regression suite.
- tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs (ADR-857 phase 6, #1168) requires
plan-phase.md to stay BELOW its pre-phase-6 baseline of 94519 bytes. The
inline conflict block pushed it to 94988.
The fix for the second is the one that should have been made first: the
record/resolve/close protocol and the recurrence bound were identical in four
workflows, and revision-loop.md — which plan-phase already @-imports — is what
a shared contract is for. The protocol now lives there once; plan-phase states
only its bindings (which counter, which artifact, which next step) and points
at it. plan-phase.md: 94988 -> 92739, under the ratchet with headroom, and the
four-way duplication is gone.
quick, ui-phase and verify-work do not import the reference, so they keep their
inline statements. The suite asserts each rule against what the runtime
actually loads for that orchestrator, not against the file in isolation.
Refs #3771
* docs(#3771): state the shared-protocol relationship accurately
Three of the four revision-bearing workflows do not @-import revision-loop.md,
so 'follows it verbatim' overstated the coupling. Only plan-phase defers; the
others restate the rules inline and this section is the authority they must
agree with.
* refactor(#3771): name the authority instead of restating it four times
Self-review finding: the same ~700-byte reviser paragraph was inlined in four
prompts while gsd-planner already loads planner-revision.md whenever
<revision_context> is present (agents/gsd-planner.md:555, :588) — a fifth copy
of the same contract. Four places to edit in lockstep is precisely the drift
class this PR exists to fix; the generic pattern calling the field
suggested_fix while the checker emitted fix_hint is what that looks like after
a year.
Each prompt now carries only the load-bearing clauses and names the authority
it summarises. Deliberately NOT reduced to a bare pointer: these are LLM
prompts, and a contract stated only in a file the reader is supposed to fetch
is the failure mode of this very bug. The saving is modest (~50 bytes each) —
the point is the named source of truth, not the bytes.
Suite: dropped seven assertions that pinned heading text and bold-lead
phrasing a reword would break without changing what the runtime is told; their
neighbours already pin the same contract by content. 519 -> 499 lines, 61
tests. Red gate against origin/next: 56 of 61 fail.
Refs #3771
* fix(#3771): sanitize agent-authored conflict text and bound total conflicts
Cross-AI review (agy/Gemini) raised two security findings. I confirmed the
first by running the gate's own awk against a crafted file and reproduced it
exactly; the second is a real hole in my bound.
1. FAIL-OPEN in the convergence gate. The conflict text is agent-authored and
is appended to REVIEWS.md, which the gate scans with an awk that stops at
the next '## ' heading. One line of agent text beginning '## ' ends that
scan early, so conflicts below it are never counted and convergence declares
success over a live blocker. Measured: 3 open conflicts, awk returned 2.
Fixed at the write boundary, which is the trust boundary: every field has
newlines and tabs collapsed to spaces and a leading '#', '-', '|' or fence
stripped, so one conflict is exactly one line. Both producing agents now
declare their fields single-line plain text, and the reader states the
invariant it depends on so a later edit cannot silently break it. Verified:
3 open + 1 resolved now counts 3; missing file and absent section count 0.
2. The recurrence bound was 'same required_property twice in a row', which an
agent alternating property names never trips, leaving the un-incremented
conflict path unbounded. Now bounded twice: the repeat rule catches the
common case, and the THIRD conflict return of a loop escalates whatever
property it names. A conflict still never consumes a revision iteration;
this cap is separate from and additional to the revision cap.
Rejected from the same review: deleting 'a planner that reaches
required_property by a smaller or different mechanism has addressed the issue
in full' from the CHECKER prompt as misplaced. It is load-bearing exactly
there. A checker that does not know a different mechanism counts will re-flag
the issue on re-check, which is the revision loop that never terminates. The
argument offered for deleting it, that the checker evaluates the new state
independently, describes the failure mode.
Refs #3771
* fix(#3771): fail closed on an unverifiable convergence gate
Second cross-AI pass (agy, this time with the full files rather than the diff)
found two more, both real:
1. The gate read REVIEWS_FILE with `2>/dev/null || echo 0`, so an unreadable or
empty path counted as ZERO open conflicts and converged. That path is
resolved a few lines earlier by a pre-existing unquoted
`ls ${phase_dir}/${padded_phase}-REVIEWS.md` (line 346, not touched by this
PR), which yields an empty string rather than an error when the path
contains a space. Unverifiable is not clean: the gate now tests -z and -r
first and BLOCKS. Verified both branches.
The unquoted ls itself is left alone deliberately — it predates this change
and belongs to the reviews lookup, not the conflict gate. Fixing it at my
own boundary removes its effect on this gate without widening scope.
2. REVIEWS.md is writable by the review agent, which could flip a `- [ ]` to
`- [x]` or delete the section and forge the state of a blocking gate. The
section now declares a single writer: /gsd:plan-phase appends and closes,
every other agent leaves it byte-for-byte alone, readers read.
Also trimmed a clause that explained the increment ordering by reference to
what the file said before this PR. Commit history is not instruction, and
these files are prompts.
Rejected: the claim that quick's conflict gate deadlocks autonomous pipelines
by asking the user. Its existing max-iteration escalation in the same file
already asks the user the same way; this adds no new interaction class.
Noted but out of scope: the per-dimension YAML example blocks and the shim
boilerplate duplicated across agent prompts both predate this change.
Refs #3771
* fix(#3771): count conflicts by line shape, not by section
CodeRabbit review on the rehearsal PR. Five findings, all valid, all applied.
The best one is a deletion. The convergence gate scanned between
'## Plan-Revision Conflicts' and the next '## ' heading, and that scan stops at
the FIRST heading it meets — so one stray '## ' line hid every conflict beneath
it and returned 0, converging over a live blocker. Reproduced: section-scan 0,
shape-scan 1. Sanitizing at the write boundary does not cover a hand-edited,
legacy, or foreign-written REVIEWS.md, so the reader needed its own guarantee.
It now matches the conflict line SHAPE anywhere in the file:
grep -c '^- \[ \] .*required_property:'
No section bookkeeping, nothing a heading can truncate, and it composes with the
writer's sanitization (which strips a leading '-' from agent text, so agent prose
cannot forge the shape). Verified: injected heading -> 1, all resolved -> 0.
The other four:
- Both checkers told the author never to emit a contradictory fix_hint, then
offered an escape hatch that put the forbidden route in the hint anyway. They
now name NO route in that case and state only that the property conflicts with
the constraint. A hint carrying a forbidden route is applied by anyone who
trusts hints.
- The REVISION_CONFLICT marker description in gsd-planner.md was narrower than
planner-revision.md: it covered a contradictory hint but not an unreachable
required_property. A planner reading only the agent file would have burned
retry budget on the case the reference routes to a conflict.
- The few-shot calibration examples used uppercase BLOCKER/INFO while the schema
defines blocker/warning/info. Pre-existing, but it is the same schema-vs-example
disagreement this PR exists to end, and the file was already being edited.
- verify-work's re-entry instruction existed but sat after the Bounded clause, so
the paragraph read "re-spawn ... stop re-spawning ... after re-spawning". The
re-entry now immediately follows the re-spawn, and states that only a
non-conflict return may reach the checker or increment iteration_count.
Refs #3771
* fix(#3771): resolve the contradictory scope_sanity severity examples
Sixth CodeRabbit finding, posted outside the diff range and missed on my first
read — I had claimed all findings were addressed after reading only the five
inline comments. This one was in the review body.
agents/gsd-plan-checker.md carried TWO scope_sanity examples with identical
metrics (5 tasks, 12 files) and OPPOSITE severities: warning in Dimension 5,
blocker in <examples>. Line 872 states "2-3 tasks/plan good, 4 warning, 5+
blocker" and the severity table lists warning as "Scope 4 tasks (borderline)",
so the warning example contradicted both.
ADR-2629 Decision 5's "over budget is a WARNING, never a blocker" does not
excuse it: that rule governs the smart-zone TOKEN estimate (the estimate-check
verb, lines 299-306), which is a different axis from task count. Verified in
source before touching it.
The contradiction is pre-existing but this PR made it binding and visible:
severity is now declared part of the binding payload, and both examples were
given the same required_property, so they now disagree on the severity of an
identical finding about an identical property.
Deviating from the proposed correction, which was warning -> blocker: that
would duplicate the <examples> entry outright (same tasks, files, severity).
The Dimension 5 example is instead made a genuine 4-task borderline warning, so
the file keeps one worked example per severity and the thresholds, the severity
table and both examples finally agree.
Refs #3771
* fix(#3771): stop laundering a grep error into zero open conflicts
Seventh CodeRabbit finding — from a SECOND review round my own CR-4 push
triggered, which I had not looked for. This one is a regression I introduced
while fixing the previous fail-open.
CR-4 replaced the truncatable section scan with:
OPEN_CONFLICTS=$(grep -c '^- \[ \] .*required_property:' "$REVIEWS_FILE" || true)
`|| true` masks every grep failure. grep exits 1 for "no matches" (a legitimate
zero) but 2 for a read error, and `|| true` turns both into an empty capture
that `${OPEN_CONFLICTS:-0}` renders as 0. If REVIEWS.md is removed or becomes
unreadable between the -r check and the scan, the gate reports no conflicts and
convergence proceeds. Proven: unreadable file -> captured empty -> 0.
The status is now inspected, and only exit 1 counts as zero; anything else
blocks.
My first attempt at this fix was itself wrong and my own harness caught it: I
wrote `if ! grep ...; then grep_status=$?`, but `!` inverts the status, so `$?`
in that branch is 0 and every failure reads as success — the clean-file case
printed "BLOCKED (grep exit 0)". The status must be read in the ELSE branch of a
non-negated `if`, which is what CodeRabbit proposed. Both traps are now pinned
by tests.
Verified end to end: all resolved -> 0, no conflicts at all -> 0, injected
heading -> 1, unreadable file -> BLOCKED with grep exit 2.
Refs #3771
* test(#3771): execute the conflict gate instead of reading it
CodeRabbit round three: 0 actionable, 1 nitpick — "these assertions inspect
Markdown source only; they do not prove that grep status 1 produces zero
conflicts or that a scan error exits before convergence." Rated Trivial. It is
the most valuable finding of the three rounds.
This gate has been wrong three times: a section scan a heading could truncate, a
`|| true` that laundered grep's error status into zero, and an `if !` whose `$?`
reported the negation rather than the command. Every one of those passed the
text assertions that existed at the time. I proved each fix by hand in a shell,
and none of that proof lived in the suite.
The gate is one self-contained fenced block, so the test now extracts it from
the workflow — located by content, not line number — writes it to a script and
RUNS it against fixtures: two open plus one resolved counts 2; no matches counts
0 and does not fail; a conflict below an injected `## ` heading still counts; an
unreadable path and an empty path both BLOCK with a non-zero status and no zero
count on stdout.
Non-vacuity proven by mutation rather than asserted. Reverting the gate to each
of its three historical broken forms reds the suite:
section-scan awk -> 7 failures (5 in the gate cases)
|| true -> 4 failures (3 in the gate cases)
if ! (negated $?) -> 4 failures (3 in the gate cases)
restored -> 69 pass, 0 fail
The prose assertions stay: they are the right instrument for a prompt. This
covers the one part of the change that is real shell an orchestrator executes.
Refs #3771
* test(#3771): route the gate harness through the shared test helpers
ESLint's project rules caught three violations in the new harness: an unbounded
execFileSync (DEFECT.UNBOUNDED-SUBPROCESS — an unbounded spawn is an indefinite
hang, and on macOS CI that is how a stuck run stops reporting instead of failing)
and two raw fs.rmSync calls, which skip the Windows-EBUSY retry budget that
helpers.cleanup carries.
Now uses createTempDir/cleanup from tests/helpers.cjs and passes an explicit
30s timeout. Suppressing the rules was available and would have been the wrong
call: both exist because of real CI failure modes on platforms I am not testing
on.
* chore(#3771): backfill the changeset PR number
The pr: field is drift-checked against the PR event payload, so it cannot be
written before the PR exists. Set to 3916.
* fix(#3771): close revision conflict persistence gaps
Use the authoritative review artifact, keep conflict and normal retry paths disjoint, and enforce one writer-reader grammar so malformed state fails closed.
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: diagnose-issues.md — #3771 marks the gap-plan remediation hint non-binding while keeping root_cause authoritative
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-plan-checker.md — #3771 separates binding required_property evidence from advisory fix_hint examples across the checker contract
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-planner.md — #3771 declares the REVISION_CONFLICT return used when remediation contradicts governing constraints
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-ui-checker.md — #3771 applies the same binding-property and advisory-hint split to UI review findings
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-ui-researcher.md — #3771 defines the UI revision producer's structured REVISION_CONFLICT return
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — #3771 routes and persists bounded revision conflicts before spending the normal retry budget
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-review-convergence.md — #3771 adds the fail-closed owned-block parser and prevents convergence over open conflicts
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: review.md — #3771 emits and preserves the canonical writer-owned conflict block across review regeneration
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ui-phase.md — #3771 routes UI revision conflicts to resolution before consuming revision_count
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: verify-work.md — #3771 gives gap-plan revision the same bounded conflict route before iteration_count
* test(#3916): guard rebases against schema drift
Load the current-base progressive-disclosure examples so every integrated issue remains bound by required_property after branch reconciliation.
* test(#3916): skip the extracted-gate suite's bash spawns on win32
Third review round's sole survivor: runConflictGate()/withReviews() spawn
bash against a Node-native temp path built by createTempDir(), which is
backslash-separated on the Windows CI lane and not a path Git Bash is
guaranteed to accept (DEFECT.WINDOWS-TEST-PORTABILITY, matching the
observed CI failure at revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs:844,
ENOENT on a path Windows read as a directory separator). No eslint rule
catches it since the call has neither a chmod nor a `bash -c` form.
Guards the four call sites with the repo's existing skipOnWin32
convention (describe/test `{ skip: IS_WINDOWS }`) rather than
normalizing the harness path to forward slashes, which would defeat the
one test whose purpose is proving the production gate does NOT rewrite
a literal backslash in a POSIX filename.
* fix(#3916): backfill changeset pr field to the fork validation PR number
* fix(#3771): forbid silently accepting an open plan-revision conflict at max-cycles escalation
The max-cycles escalation prompt only surfaced HIGH_COUNT and ACTIONABLE_COUNT; an open
plan-revision conflict (OPEN_CONFLICTS > 0) was never disclosed there, and "Proceed anyway"
could exit successfully over it — exactly the failure mode this PR exists to close (a success
banner over an unresolved conflict nobody resolved). Blockers still block: withhold "Proceed
anyway" and route to Manual review whenever a conflict is open.
* fix(#3771): do not hard-block REVISION_CONFLICT persistence when no REVIEWS.md exists yet
A phase's first-ever revision cycle can return REVISION_CONFLICT before any REVIEWS.md has been
written — REVIEWS_PATH is then legitimately empty, not a corrupt or deleted file. The persistence
gate's own accompanying prose already says the record channel applies 'when REVIEWS_FILE is
non-empty', but the bash condition never checked that, so it hard-blocked every conflict on a
brand-new phase regardless of whether persistence was even expected to run. Require a non-empty
REVIEWS_FILE before treating a missing file as an error.
* chore(#3771): raise the plan-phase.md ADR-857 host-loop ceiling to 96700
The frozen pre-phase-6 ceiling (94519) collided on rebase: this PR's own
REVISION_CONFLICT persistence/routing gate is core planner control flow, not an
un-extracted optional feature, and landed alongside an unrelated, already-merged
same-file growth (the #4.6 context-drift pre-check) already on next. Same
rationale #1298 already established for execute-phase.md's ceiling.
* chore(#3916): backfill changeset pr field to the upstream PR number
* fix(#3771): make the writer-side REVISION_CONFLICT sanitize step real shell
The Conflict Return record channel sanitized agent-authored fields via a
prose instruction ("Sanitize each agent-authored field before appending")
for the orchestrator LLM to apply by hand, while the reader-side gate in
plan-review-convergence.md parses the same slot with real, executed awk.
Flagged Minor across two review rounds (round 4, round 6) since no code
performed the sanitize anywhere.
plan-phase.md's Conflict Return step now runs a real bash gate: sanitize
each field (collapse newline/tab to space, strip a leading #/-/|/fence),
build the one-line record, skip the append if an identical line already
exists (idempotent), insert before the writer-owned end delimiter, and
fail closed if that delimiter is missing rather than silently dropping
the conflict.
tests/revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs extracts and RUNS the new
fence (matching how the reader gate is already tested), composing it
with the existing reader gate: hostile-field fast-check fuzzing, a
repeated-conflict idempotency check, and a missing-delimiter fail-closed
check that the file is left byte-for-byte unchanged on failure.
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — #3916 turns the writer-side
REVISION_CONFLICT sanitize+insert step into real, executed shell instead
of a prose instruction, matching the reader gate's existing rigor
* fix(#3916): backfill changeset pr field to the fork validation PR number
Fork CI's changeset-lint reads the real PR number from its own event
payload; the fragment still carried the upstream number from the last
sync, so the DEFECT.CHANGESET-PR-FIELD-DRIFT check failed on this fork
PR. Re-backfill to the upstream number before the final push.
* fix(#3771): close the awk -v forgery and same-session close gaps agy found
Adversarial review (gemini-3.8-flash-high via the internal agy review
lane) on the full PR found two BLOCKERs against the just-added
writer-side conflict gate:
1. `awk -v line="${LINE}"` decodes escape sequences in its argument, so
a literal two-character `\n` in agent-authored text became a real
newline inside awk, splitting the appended record across two
physical lines. `tr` only strips actual control bytes, so it never
saw this — it defeated the exact forgery the gate exists to
prevent, both the reader's zero-count and the writer's own
idempotency check. Fixed by passing LINE/END through awk's
ENVIRON, which is not escape-decoded.
2. A conflict resolved and re-spawned within the same plan-phase
session was never flipped from `- [ ]` to `- [x]` — the record
channel bullet said "plan-phase closes it," but no step did. Only
a *separate* `--reviews` re-entry (line ~622, still prose-only)
closes conflicts; the in-session resolve path left them open
forever, permanently blocking convergence. Fixed by carrying the
just-written line in `PENDING_CONFLICT` and closing it in the
`Otherwise` branch before the checker re-spawns.
Also fixed a MAJOR: docs/COMMANDS.md described the `--max-cycles`
escalation gate as uniformly offering "proceed or review manually,"
but the code (this PR's own change) withholds "Proceed anyway"
specifically when a plan-revision conflict is open — only manual
review is offered in that case. Docs now say so.
Not applied: the reviewer's `\r` truncated to plain tr from a MINOR
that also asked for temp-file permission preservation across `mktemp`.
Applying `chmod --reference` is not portable to macOS/BSD `chmod`, so
this is left as a documented low-severity tradeoff — the temp file now
sits alongside REVIEWS.md (same filesystem, atomic `mv`), which was
the same finding's more substantive half. Also not applied: a
suggested `gsd_run review record-conflict` CLI subcommand to
deduplicate the two `awk` blocks — a new command plus wiring is out of
scope for a review-remediation fix.
tests/revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs adds regression coverage
for both BLOCKERs: a literal-backslash-n hostile field composed with
the reader gate, and a close-gate extraction that verifies the flip to
`[x]`, the reader's count dropping to 0, and a fail-closed path when
the pending line is missing.
Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-phase.md — #3916 fixes an awk -v escape-
decoding forgery and adds the missing same-session conflict-close step
an adversarial review found in the writer-side gate
* chore(#3916): backfill changeset pr field to the upstream PR number
Fork-validation CI needed pr: 1 to pass its own changeset-lint; restore
pr: 3916 before this push reaches open-gsd/gsd-core.
* fix(#3771): trim plan-phase.md prose back under the XL byte cap
Merging origin/next's unrelated growth pushed plan-phase.md 473 bytes
past the workflow-size-budget XL cap and the ADR-857 phase-6 baseline,
both tripped by CI after review approval. Removed an unpinned inert
bash comment and tightened connective prose in three REVISION_CONFLICT
bullets; no executable shell or test-pinned substring changed.
* chore(rehearsal): pin changeset pr field to fork rehearsal PR #25
Scratch-only commit for the rehearsal branch's own CI. Will not be
carried onto the branch backing upstream #3916 — that keeps pr: 3916.
* fix(#3771): address CodeRabbit findings on the REVISION_CONFLICT protocol
Fork rehearsal PR #25's first CodeRabbit pass surfaced 7 findings against
the already-approved #3916 diff; each verified against current code
before fixing (none hallucinated):
- plan-phase.md: writer-side awk gates now strip a trailing \r before
comparing lines, matching the reader gate (plan-review-convergence.md)
-- a CRLF REVIEWS.md previously made both writer gates fail closed.
- plan-phase.md: the close-fence's REVIEWS_FILE/PENDING_CONFLICT/
CONFLICT_RESOLUTION were read without ever being (re)defined in that
fence -- shell state does not survive across separate fenced blocks
(same convention already documented in review.md). Added the explicit
recompute/set instruction.
- revision-loop.md: previous_conflict_property was never reset after a
normal (non-conflict) revision, so a later, unrelated conflict on the
same property could be misread as a repeat and escalate prematurely.
- gsd-plan-checker.md / few-shot-examples/plan-checker.md: two example
required_property strings were unconditionally binding in a way their
own dimension's rules aren't (no-analog RESEARCH.md fallback; tasks
that create no functions), now scoped to match.
- quick/steps/plan-checker-loop.md: added the same disjoint
"Otherwise (not REVISION_CONFLICT)" branch plan-phase.md already had,
closing an ambiguity between the conflict and non-conflict return paths.
- revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs: the REVIEWS_PATH init-order
assertion used indexOf() without checking for -1, so it would pass
vacuously if either anchor were renamed away.
Also restores an "Export the row's CONFLICT_*" instruction I had cut in
the prior byte-budget trim -- checked non-pinned by tests, but it was the
only text telling the agent to set those vars before the awk block reads
them via ENVIRON.
Net growth from these fixes required reclaiming bytes elsewhere in
plan-phase.md (verified against every pinned substring in
revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs) to stay under the XL tier's
hard 98304-byte cap; final size 98245 bytes.
* fix(#3771): resync the #4079 shrink-only mirror to the current PRE_PHASE6 line
tests/plan-phase-background-wait-wakeup.test.cjs (landed on next via an
unrelated #4079 PR, merged in by this branch's next-sync) mirrored
plan-phase.md's phase6 shrink-only ceiling as a hardcoded local constant
(94519) rather than reading tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs's
PRE_PHASE6 value. That value has since been legitimately raised twice
during this PR's own review (94519 -> 96700 -> 98300) to accommodate the
REVISION_CONFLICT persistence/routing gate. The two branches' independent
histories left the mirror stale post-merge -- not a textual git conflict,
but the same class of thing. Resynced to 98300.
* fix(#3771): address round-2 CodeRabbit findings on the conflict gates
CodeRabbit's re-review of the previous remediation commit found two real
issues in what it had already flagged:
- Both writer-side awk CRLF fixes used \`sub(/\r$/, "")\` directly on \`\$0\`,
which mutates it in place -- \`{ print }\` then emitted the CR-stripped
copy for every passed-through line, silently rewriting an unrelated
CRLF REVIEWS.md to LF on any insert or close. Now compares against a
separate \`cur\` copy and prints the original, untouched \`\$0\`.
- The close-fence's "recompute REVIEWS_FILE/PENDING_CONFLICT" prose
implied in-fence derivation, but the fence has no such code and the
test harness (\`runCloseGate\`) deliberately supplies all three as
pre-set env vars -- matching how the open fence's "Export the row's
CONFLICT_*" instruction already works. Reworded to "export ... in the
same invocation", matching that established, test-verified pattern
instead of promising logic that isn't there.
Added a regression test proving the CRLF fix no longer touches
passthrough lines (red against the mutate-in-place version, green now).
* fix(#3771): use a CRLF-safe check in the new passthrough regression test
local/no-crlf-fragile-split forbids splitting readFileSync content on a
literal \n (Windows git-autocrlf checkouts yield \r\n). My CRLF
passthrough-preservation test from the previous commit did exactly that
to inspect the first line. Replaced with a direct startsWith() check
against the known CRLF-terminated header, which needs no split.
* test(#3771): assert the record itself is inserted in the CRLF passthrough test
CodeRabbit nitpick (round 3): the passthrough-preservation test checked
gate status and the pre-existing line's CRLF ending, but never asserted
the new REVISION_CONFLICT record was actually written.
* fix(#3771): address agy/gemini-3.8-flash-high adversarial review findings
Full-PR adversarial review (internal /gsd-review antigravity lane,
gemini-3.8-flash-high) surfaced 9 findings; each verified against current
code before fixing (none hallucinated):
HIGH:
- quick-batch/steps/plan-checker-loop.md never received the
required_property/fix_hint binding language or REVISION_CONFLICT
handling this PR added everywhere else -- a genuinely unmigrated
producing context. Migrated to match quick/steps/plan-checker-loop.md,
and added it to the ORCHESTRATORS consistency battery in
revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs so future drift is caught
automatically.
- The close-fence's PENDING_CONFLICT was an agent-supplied env var that
had to exactly reconstruct a five-field sanitized line across a
multi-minute subagent dispatch -- fragile, and a scalar var also meant
a second simultaneous conflict silently dropped the first on overwrite.
Redesigned to match the open conflict by CONFLICT_DIMENSION/
CONFLICT_PLAN identity instead: the agent re-supplies two short,
already-tracked identifiers rather than reconstructing the full
sanitized text, and each conflict resolves independently regardless of
how many are open. Updated the test harness's runCloseGate contract to
match, and added a two-open-conflicts regression test.
MEDIUM:
- plan-phase.md's `--reviews` replanning path told the reader to "flip
the matching line to [x]" in prose only, with no executable path to
it -- pointed it at the same close gate used in step 12.
- plan-review-convergence.md's reader-gate awk tolerated a blank line
before the opening delimiter but not before the heading that follows
it; a formatter or LLM writer inserting one would hard-abort
convergence on an otherwise well-formed REVIEWS.md. Added the same
tolerance already granted above it, with a regression test.
LOW:
- Clarified that the escalation destination for a stalled conflict is
the same iteration/revision-count cap gate already defined in each of
quick, quick-batch, ui-phase, and verify-work, rather than an
undefined "stall" concept.
- Clarified "twice in a row" means no successful revision intervened,
matching revision-loop.md's now-explicit previous_conflict_property
reset.
- Fixed gsd-ui-researcher.md's stale rationale text, copied verbatim
from planner-revision.md: ui-phase presents the conflict table
directly to the user, it does not persist to a shared file scanned by
heading.
Net growth again required reclaiming bytes in plan-phase.md (verified
against every pinned substring in revision-remediation-binding.test.cjs)
to stay under the XL tier's hard 98304-byte cap; removed a now-dead
PENDING_CONFLICT assignment in the process. Final size 98258 bytes.
* fix(#3771): scope row 48's quick/steps guard away from plan-checker-loop.md
tests/gsd-quick-batch-quick-regression.test.cjs's row 48 (#3676) flagged
this branch's quick-batch/steps/plan-checker-loop.md migration (the agy
HIGH finding) as a violation, because it also edits
quick/steps/plan-checker-loop.md for the same underlying #3771 protocol
fix.
Verified against git history before scoping:
|
||
|
JusticeWay
|
0fca71eaae |
enhance(#2529): cover every workflow with response-language directives + CI lint (#2558)
* enhance(#2529): cover every workflow with response-language directives + CI lint Every workflow now carries response-language coverage in one of three forms, and a CI lint keeps it that way. - 43 workflows load the new shared reference, `gsd-core/references/response-language-directive.md`, by eager `@`-import. - Lazy-loaded modes/steps/templates, which cannot rely on an eager import, carry an exact inline directive; 35 such paths are pinned by exact path. - Fragments dispatched by a covered parent inherit coverage, proven per file rather than granted per directory. The 45 workflows whose directive covered only "questions, prompts, and explanations" now name inter-tool narration, which is the defect #2529 reports: the running commentary between tool calls stayed English while the answers around it were translated. `scripts/lint-response-language-coverage.cjs` enforces it and fails closed on three independent discovery failures (unreadable catalog, empty catalog, unfollowed symlink). It resolves which reference a workflow imports and applies the same four-predicate test to that file, so a weakened shared reference uncovers its importers instead of passing silently, reported once as a systemic failure rather than 43 times. The walk follows symlinked subtrees with a realpath cycle bound. `lint:ci` invokes it by name. REQ-LANG-03 and REQ-LANG-04 state the contract in docs/FEATURES.md; REQ-LANG-04 names the two forms that satisfy it ("narration", "between tool calls") rather than enumerating class members an author cannot use verbatim, and a test pins that text to what the matcher accepts. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2529): register the coverage test in the docs-guard lane `107eb8c1` (#3787) landed the docs-guard lane on `next` while this PR was open: a test that reads a `docs/` path must be named in `scripts/docs-guard-registry.cjs` or carry a `docs-guard-exempt` marker, so the guards that read a doc run on the PR that changes it. `tests/response-language-coverage.test.cjs` reads `docs/FEATURES.md` -- it extracts every form REQ-LANG-04 offers an author and runs each through the matcher that enforces it. Registration, not exemption, is the correct side of that gate: a reword of the requirement with no code change is precisely the diff this test exists to catch, and it is the diff the lane would otherwise skip. Registered narrowly (`['docs/FEATURES.md']`) rather than with the `'*'` sentinel, so an unrelated docs change does not pull this test into the lane. Verified: lint-docs-guard-registration 0 violations, tests/ci-docs-guard-registry.test.cjs 51/51, lint:ci exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2529): consolidate this PR's emitted-growth acks into its own fragment This PR ripples emitted bytes across 85 workflow paths. Until now each ripple was acknowledged by appending to whichever live fragment owned that path, because two ack sources may never name the same path. `a84f7563` (#3078) swept all 45 fully-spent fragments off `next`. Forty-two of the paths this PR grows were owned by swept fragments, so those keys are now unowned and this PR's own fragment declares them directly -- one path, one source, and no dependence on a fragment that no longer exists. Each adopted entry keeps its measurement and records where it came from. Two paths are handled differently, because the sweep did not free them: - `review.md` is now owned by `3034-parallel-reviewer-lanes.json`, which landed on `next` after the sweep. Its entry is live, so the old route still applies: this PR's note is appended to that entry rather than declared a second time. - `plan-review-convergence.md` keeps the arrangement made in round 24. Result: 3 fragments in the directory, 85 keys in this PR's own, 0 cross-source duplicates. `lint-emitted-drift-ack` exit 0, `tests/emitted-attribution.test.cjs` green. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2529): move REQ-LANG-03/04 into the feature fragment that now generates them `36375513` (#3845) made docs/FEATURES.md a generated projection of docs/features/*.md, marked "do not edit by hand". This PR wrote REQ-LANG-03 and REQ-LANG-04 straight into the generated file, so the rebase left the requirement present in the projection and absent from its source -- the next regeneration would have deleted both, and `tests/features-index-gate.test.cjs` was already red on the mismatch. Both requirements now live in docs/features/response-language-config.md alongside REQ-LANG-01 and -02. Regenerating produces a docs/FEATURES.md that is byte-identical to the committed one, so the text this PR shipped is unchanged -- only its source of truth moved to where #3840 put it. The docs-guard registration is widened to name the fragment as well as the projection. The requirement's source is the fragment now, and an edit there that skips regeneration would otherwise reach this guard through neither path. Verified: features-index-gate 68/68, lint-docs-guard-registration 0 violations, ci-docs-guard-registry + response-language-coverage 142/142. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2529): hand the plan-phase ack back to its new live owner `c933184b` (#3825) landed `3172-stated-failing-direction.json` on `next` after fragment had adopted that path when the sweep left it unowned, so the merged tree named it from two sources -- a hard failure in `scripts/lint-emitted-drift-ack.cjs`. The path has a live owner again, so the append route applies: this PR's note joins that entry, carrying its own measurement, and the key is dropped from this PR's fragment (84 keys left, the others untouched). The provenance sentence written for the swept-fragment case is removed rather than reused -- this path was never orphaned, so that account of it would be false. Same shape as `review.md` and `plan-review-convergence.md`: ownership is a property of the merged tree, and a fragment landing upstream after a push can reclaim a key no local check would have flagged. Verified: lint-emitted-drift-ack exit 0, lint:ci exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2529): state byte figures that are true against the tree The reference claimed `execute-phase.md` has "2 bytes of headroom under the ceiling named below". That was true when the sentence was written -- the file sat at 93398 against the 93400 comfort assert -- and upstream has since shrunk it to 91493 against a 93600 hard ceiling, so the figure now understates the headroom by three orders of magnitude. The rationale the sentence supports does not depend on the number, so the number is gone rather than refreshed: a restated figure would go stale again on the next upstream edit, and nothing parses it. Audited every other numeric claim this PR ships the same way, mechanically against the merge base: all 82 FILE-delta claims in the ack fragment match the real per-file delta exactly, and the 1,629-byte reference and 63-byte import line check out. One class was imprecise: the 41 notes for workflows whose inline directive was rewritten in place quoted the conversion counterfactual as "+1,692 bytes more loaded context", which is the reference form's whole weight, not the increase over the inline directive those files already carry. Each now names both quantities and the net (+1,605 / +1,609 / +1,584). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2529): one rule for pinned vs inherited coverage, and the docs to pick it Review measured that 14 of the 35 pinned fragments would pass by inheritance anyway, and that the PR asserted both readings at once: inheritance is real coverage (so those 14 pins are noise) or it is not (so 30 inheriting fragments are green-but-uncovered). Only one can be true. Inheritance is real: the predicate proves it per file -- the parent must dispatch this exact path from a read/execute context AND be covered itself -- so the parent's directive is in the loaded context by the time the fragment is read. The 14 pins are therefore removed along with the directive lines they pinned, and those files inherit like the 30 structurally identical ones. The rule is now stated where the set is declared, and enforced from the other side by a test: no member of the pinned set may be one that would have inherited. That is what decides the form for the next fragment. - pinned set 35 -> 21; 14 workflow files revert to their base content - `findViolations` no longer returns early on a pinned path: a file that becomes eagerly loaded and takes the shared reference is strictly better off, and the gate must not red that. The reference form is admitted because its own wording is validated in turn; an arbitrary reworded inline line still fails. - the reference-directive cache is keyed by size and mtime, not by path alone, so a rewritten reference re-asked in one process no longer returns the stale verdict - `carriesInlineDirective` names its negation blindness: four independent hits read vocabulary, not polarity - the real-tree scan asserts each source produced files instead of `> 152`, a constant that read as the workflow count and would have passed a scan that lost one of its two directories - the pinned-set size assertion goes the same way: the size follows from the rule, so the rule is what the suite asserts Docs, for the gate that now governs every future workflow: - `docs/contributing/response-language-coverage.md` -- why the narration class is the discriminator, the four coverage forms, the decision order that picks one, the pinned line, and what each failure message means - a row in CONTRIBUTING.md's CI checks table, matching the docs-guard row - `docs/CONFIGURATION.md` points at it from the `response_language` entry Also: the changeset said 45 reworded workflows; it is 44 (42 @-reference + 21 pinned + 44 rewritten = 107 touched). That text ships to CHANGELOG.md. `3707-parse-gap-reporting.json` landed on `next` reclaiming `audit-uat.md` and `progress.md`; both handed back by the append route, leaving 82 keys here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2529): correct the reference-taker count, 43 -> 42 The ack notes said the import line is byte-identical "in each of the 43 workflows that take the reference" and that the alternative would be "43 inline copies". The shared reference has 42 importers; the 43rd file in review's table is `execute-phase.md`, which imports the OTHER reference. Corrected in all 41 notes that carry the sentence, across this PR's fragment and the two it appends to. Found by re-running the numeric audit from the previous round after the rebase, which also re-verified all 84 FILE-delta claims against the new base -- all exact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2529): migrate the emitted-drift ack from a fragment to commit trailers ADR-3942 (#3954) landed while this PR was open: the acknowledgment is now a commit trailer and tests/emitted-drift-acks/ no longer exists. The fragment is deleted and each key it declared becomes one trailer, reasons unchanged. The four keys this PR had handed to 3034-*, 3172-* and 3707-* under the one-source rule come home here. That rule was the whole reason for the hand-backs, and the trailer model has no shared namespace to collide in -- five of this PR's rounds were spent on exactly those collisions. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-backlog.md — #2529 — RESTATED in round 10, superseding this PR's earlier "+63 bytes, prose only" wording, which reported a file delta as if it were the whole cost. The workflow gains the shared response-language directive as a single `@`-reference line. FILE delta: +63 bytes, byte-identical in each of the 42 workflows that take the reference. LOADED-CONTEXT delta: +1,692 bytes per workflow — the 63-byte import line plus the 1,629 bytes of `gsd-core/references/response-language-directive.md`, because an `@`-import in this repo is EAGER (ADR-1610 Decision point 4; docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: moving prose into a file that is still eagerly `@`-imported "shrinks the measured file without shrinking loaded context"). The repo's size gates — the tier hard caps in `tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs` and this size ratchet — measure the FILE, not the transitive inline, so they see 63 of those 1,692 bytes; the remaining 1,629 are declared here because no gate reads them. The eager import is accepted on its merits, not hidden: 42 inline copies would be 43 places for the wording to drift, and the reference is the one place it is maintained. Prose only: no step, gate, tool invocation, or subagent dispatch shape changed. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-phase.md — #2529 — RESTATED in round 10, superseding this PR's earlier "+63 bytes, prose only" wording, which reported a file delta as if it were the whole cost. The workflow gains the shared response-language directive as a single `@`-reference line. FILE delta: +63 bytes, byte-identical in each of the 42 workflows that take the reference. LOADED-CONTEXT delta: +1,692 bytes per workflow — the 63-byte import line plus the 1,629 bytes of `gsd-core/references/response-language-directive.md`, because an `@`-import in this repo is EAGER (ADR-1610 Decision point 4; docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: moving prose into a file that is still eagerly `@`-imported "shrinks the measured file without shrinking loaded context"). The repo's size gates — the tier hard caps in `tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs` and this size ratchet — measure the FILE, not the transitive inline, so they see 63 of those 1,692 bytes; the remaining 1,629 are declared here because no gate reads them. The eager import is accepted on its merits, not hidden: 42 inline copies would be 43 places for the wording to drift, and the reference is the one place it is maintained. Prose only: no step, gate, tool invocation, or subagent dispatch shape changed. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-tests.md — #2529 MAJOR 1 (round 10): the workflow's pre-existing inline response-language directive is rewritten IN PLACE so the sentence names inter-tool NARRATION explicitly — narration between tool calls, status updates, progress notes, findings — instead of only "questions, prompts, and explanations". That older wording is the defect #2529 reports (it leaves the running commentary between tool calls in English while the answers around it are translated), and `scripts/lint-response-language-coverage.cjs` had been certifying it as coverage, so the gate legitimised the bug. +87 bytes, prose only: no step, gate, tool invocation, or subagent dispatch shape changed. FILE delta and LOADED-CONTEXT delta are both +87 here, and that identity is the point — the directive was deliberately NOT converted to an `@`-reference, because an `@`-import in this repo is EAGER (ADR-1610 Decision point 4; docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: moving prose into a file that is still eagerly `@`-imported "shrinks the measured file without shrinking loaded context"), so the conversion would have bought a smaller measured file at a cost of 1,692 bytes of loaded context per workflow — the 63-byte import line plus the 1,629-byte reference — against the 87 bytes this inline directive costs, a net +1,605. Stated plainly because the gates cannot state it: the repo's size gates — the tier hard caps in `tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs` and this size ratchet — measure the FILE, not the transitive inline, so an `@`-reference conversion would have READ as a smaller change to every gate in the repo while costing 1,605 bytes more loaded context per invocation. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: add-todo.md — #2529 MAJOR 1 (round 10): the workflow's pre-existing inline response-language directive is rewritten IN PLACE so the sentence names inter-tool NARRATION explicitly — narration between tool calls, status updates, progress notes, findings — instead of only "questions, prompts, and explanations". That older wording is the defect #2529 reports (it leaves the running commentary between tool calls in English while the answers around it are translated), and `scripts/lint-response-language-coverage.cjs` had been certifying it as coverage, so the gate legitimised the bug. +87 bytes, prose only: no step, gate, tool invocation, or subagent dispatch shape changed. FILE delta and LOADED-CONTEXT delta are both +87 here, and that identity is the point — the directive was deliberately NOT converted to an `@`-reference, because an `@`-import in this repo is EAGER (ADR-1610 Decision point 4; docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: moving prose into a file that is still eagerly `@`-imported "shrinks the measured file without shrinking loaded context"), so the conversion would have bought a smaller measured file at a cost of 1,692 bytes of loaded context per workflow — the 63-byte import line plus the 1,629-byte reference — against the 87 bytes this inline directive costs, a net +1,605. Stated plainly because the gates cannot state it: the repo's size gates — the tier hard caps in `tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs` and this size ratchet — measure the FILE, not the transitive inline, so an `@`-reference conversion would have READ as a smaller change to every gate in the repo while costing 1,605 bytes more loaded context per invocation. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: ai-integration-phase.md — #2529 MAJOR 1 (round 10): the workflow's pre-existing inline response-language directive is rewritten IN PLACE so the sentence names inter-tool NARRATION explicitly — narration between tool calls, status updates, progress notes, findings — instead of only "questions, prompts, and explanations". That older wording is the defect #2529 reports (it leaves the running commentary between tool calls in English while the answers around it are translated), and `scripts/lint-response-language-coverage.cjs` had been certifying it as coverage, so the gate legitimised the bug. +87 bytes, prose only: no step, gate, tool invocation, or subagent dispatch shape changed. FILE delta and LOADED-CONTEXT delta are both +87 here, and that identity is the point — the directive was deliberately NOT converted to an `@`-reference, because an `@`-import in this repo is EAGER (ADR-1610 Decision point 4; docs/ARCHITECTURE.md: moving prose into a file that is still eagerly `@`-imported "shrinks the measured file without shrinking loaded context"), so the conversion would have bought a smaller measured file at a cost of 1,692 bytes of loaded context per workflow — the 63-byte import line plus the 1,629-byte reference — against the 87 bytes this inline directive costs, a net +1,605. Stated plainly because the gates cannot state it: the repo's size gates — the tier hard caps in `tests/workflow-size-budget.test.cjs` and this size ratchet — measure the FILE, not the transitive inline, so an `@`-reference conversion would have READ as a smaller change to every gate in the repo while costing 1,605 bytes more loaded context per invocation. Re-homed in round 16: the fragment that carried this sentence (`3423-required-reading.json`) was retired on `next` by |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
515191f07d |
feat(#3677): quick-batch hardening and acceptance (#4240)
* chore(#3677): checkpoint design artifacts (gitignored, dev-only) * test(#3677): add failing regression test for the crash-window duplicate-dispatch gap (RED) Independently re-traces resume-mode.md/planner-wave.md/worktree-dispatch.md/ merge-wave.md and src/quick-batch.cts's resumeBatch (lines 894-899) and confirms the prior research pass's Open Question 1: a coordinator crash between Step 6 (executor commits, SUMMARY.md written) and Step 7 (merge) leaves BATCH.json at "pending" with no STATE.md row yet (only written in Step 9), so --resume's eligibility re-derivation would dispatch a second executor into a new worktree for the same item, orphaning the first. This test asserts worktree-dispatch.md's Step 6 excludes an item whose SUMMARY.md already exists from the spawn set, mirroring planner-wave.md's existing PLAN.md-existence check one layer earlier. Fails against the current worktree-dispatch.md, which has no such guard. See .gsd/phase/feat-3677-quick-batch-hardening-acceptance/40-design.md §1 for the full trace and fix-location rationale. * fix(#3677): guard worktree-dispatch.md against re-dispatching an already-executed item (GREEN) worktree-dispatch.md's Step 6 re-derives eligibility every dispatch round via the same quick-batch resume call resume-mode.md uses, but had no check for "did this item already finish executing" the way planner-wave.md already checks "did this item already get planned" (PLAN.md existence) before re-planning. A coordinator crash between Step 6 (executor commits, SUMMARY.md written) and Step 7 (merge) left the item eligible for a second dispatch on --resume, orphaning the first worktree's real, already- committed work and silently losing it once the second executor's SUMMARY.md write clobbered the first at the same item_dir path. Adds a SUMMARY.md-existence exclusion before spawn-plan is computed, symmetric to planner-wave.md's PLAN.md check. The excluded item is not lost: merge-wave.md's own mergeable-wave criterion (status=pending, SUMMARY.md on disk, not yet merged) already picks it up independently of this eligible/spawn list. Workflow-prose-only fix — touches no already-merged/reviewed .cts module. See .gsd/phase/feat-3677-quick-batch-hardening-acceptance/40-design.md §1 for the fix-location rationale (why not resumeBatch itself). * test(#3677): add real-git coverage for worktree-ownership tampering, scope drift, and submodules Closes the three coverage gaps identified in 40-design.md §2/§3 (#3677, epic #3344 Phase 5's own AC bullets: "arbitrary-worktree ownership attempts", "scope drift", "submodules"): - Arbitrary-worktree ownership tampering: a manifest entry naming a non-agent branch is silently dropped at normalization before any git subprocess runs; a manifest entry naming a plausible agent-branch that was never actually created by this repo's own worktree.create (a genuinely foreign repo/branch) is blocked via base_mismatch. Both leave the foreign location and repoRoot's HEAD provably untouched. - Advisory scope drift: a committed path outside declared files_modified still merges successfully (advisory, never blocking) while surfacing a scope_out_of_declared warning naming the drifted path; an exact declared-scope match produces zero warnings (boundary case). - Real .gitmodules submodule integration: a repo containing a real local git submodule merges cleanly through executeWorktreeWaveCleanupPlan for an unrelated plan; a real gitlink pointer bump (declared) merges cleanly with the superproject tree reflecting the new pinned commit; an undeclared bump is advisory-only and surfaces a scope warning naming vendor/sub, same as any other undeclared modification. No src/*.cts changes — all three gaps were coverage-only; the underlying primitives already behaved correctly (independently verified against real git subprocess output before writing each assertion). * docs(#3677): document how to diagnose a preserved quick-batch worktree Extends the one-sentence "worktree is preserved (never deleted)" mention into a concrete diagnosis procedure: where the preserved directory is, how to read the executor's real commits/diff against the plan's declared files_modified, how to read the item's own SUMMARY.md independent of merge outcome, how to manually merge-and-clean-up or discard, and how to re-run --resume afterward. Also documents that a SUMMARY.md-written-but-still- pending item (the crash-window case fixed in this same PR) needs no manual intervention — --resume routes it straight to the merge step. * chore(#3677): checkpoint final acceptance-evidence mapping (gitignored, dev-only) * fix(#3677): make crash-window duplicate-dispatch guard behaviorally provable and durably recoverable Orthogonal review (Spec finding): the crash-window regression test added earlier this phase only asserted readStep('worktree-dispatch.md') + regex matches against the markdown prose — proving the DOCUMENTATION says the right thing, never that the runtime condition (pending status + on-disk SUMMARY.md + absent STATE row) is actually handled correctly. #3677's own "Alternatives considered" explicitly rejects "document recovery without fault injection" for exactly this reason. Extracts the filtering decision into a pure, independently testable function, filterAlreadyExecuted(eligibleIds, executedIds) in src/quick-batch-dispatch.cts, wired to a new `quick-batch filter-executed` CLI verb (src/quick-batch-command-router.cts) — the same pure-decision- then-CLI-wired pattern computeSpawnPlan/computeMergeOrder already establish. worktree-dispatch.md now calls this verb explicitly instead of only describing the decision in prose. A genuine fixture-based test in tests/quick-batch.test.cjs constructs a REAL BATCH.json (createBatch), writes a REAL SUMMARY.md on disk at the item's real item_dir, calls the REAL resumeBatch, and proves both that resumeBatch alone still reports the item eligible AND that filterAlreadyExecuted (fed a real filesystem check) correctly excludes it. The prior prose-assertion tests are kept — they now prove the workflow markdown is correctly WIRED to the verb — but are no longer the only proof. Self-discovered defect while building that fixture (fixed inline, not deferred): tracing merge-wave.md against /gsd:quick's own prior art (QUICK_WORKTREE_MANIFEST=$(mktemp ...), quick.md:415) showed $QUICK_BATCH_WORKTREE_MANIFEST is a fresh PER-PROCESS temp file. A resumed coordinator correctly does not re-dispatch an already-executed item (this fix), but nothing durably recorded that item's worktree_path/branch/base either — Step 7 in the resumed process would have had no data to build its cleanup-wave entry from. Adds dispatched_worktree/dispatched_branch/ dispatched_base to QuickBatchItem (src/quick-batch.cts) — deliberately NOT a reuse of the pre-existing `worktree` field, whose loadBatch validation requires the path to exist on disk (verified empirically: reusing it made the batch permanently unloadable the moment a legitimately-merged worktree was removed). worktree-dispatch.md persists the triple once a worktree is created; merge-wave.md falls back to it when the ephemeral manifest lacks an entry, clears it after a successful merge, and fails closed rather than guessing if no record exists anywhere. See .gsd/phase/feat-3677-quick-batch-hardening-acceptance/40-design.md §9.1 and §9.3 for the full trace, empirical verification notes, and rejected alternatives (reusing `worktree` directly). * test(#3677): prove the arbitrary-worktree-ownership boundary against two real sibling worktrees Orthogonal review (Security finding): the two existing ownership-tampering tests didn't test ownership — one was trivially rejected by WORKTREE_AGENT_BRANCH_RE's shape check before any git call (proves branch- NAME filtering, not ownership), the other pointed at a wholly separate, never-linked foreign repo, so merge-base failed immediately because the branch didn't exist as a ref at all. Neither exercised the real scenario: a manifest entry whose worktree_path/branch are swapped to point at a DIFFERENT, GENUINELY-REGISTERED sibling worktree of the SAME repoRoot, with a branch name passing the shape check and a base in allowed_bases. Investigated executeWorktreeWaveCleanupPlan (src/worktree-safety.cts) directly: this is NOT a reachable gap. Git enforces branch-per-worktree uniqueness, so a swapped-in entry.branch can only match worktree_path's ACTUAL checked-out branch if it names that sibling's own real, uniquely- generated branch name — which manifest tampering confined to one batch's own record has no way to know (branch names are agent-<quick_id>[-<timestamp>]-shaped, and quick_id allocation is collision-checked GLOBALLY across every existing quick task and batch, not merely within one batch). Adds a stronger test that empirically proves this: two REAL, concurrently- alive sibling worktrees of the same repo (both via real `git worktree add`, both WORKTREE_AGENT_BRANCH_RE-passing, both sharing one merge-base), with worktree_path/branch swapped between them in both directions. Both attempts are blocked via branch_mismatch; both real worktrees, their branches, and one sibling's real uncommitted-to-main commit survive completely untouched. Supplements (does not replace) the original two tests, which still prove distinct, real boundaries. See .gsd/phase/feat-3677-quick-batch-hardening-acceptance/40-design.md §9.2 for the full trace, including the one explicitly-documented (not fixed) trust boundary this investigation surfaced: the primitive defends against fabricated data, not a caller bug that misattributes a real-but-wrong item's own triple to a different item. * chore(#3677): checkpoint design-doc addendum for review pass 2 findings (gitignored, dev-only) * docs(#3677): add changeset for PR 4240 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
2f64e6230a |
feat(#3676): quick-batch command, workflow, and isolation integration (#4212)
* test(#3676): add failing tests for quick-batch dispatch core Failing-first tests for Phase 4 of epic #3344 (ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding"): quick-batch-dispatch.test.cjs / .property.test.cjs cover the new pure decision-logic module (arg validation, effective concurrency, deterministic merge order, spawn backpressure, verification/merge routing, cleanup-entry construction — design doc rows 3-15,24,26-28, 30-36,39; property rows 51-53). quick-batch-update-items.test.cjs covers the new updateBatchItems export on src/quick-batch.cts (rows 15,22-23, including the negative cycle-rejection case). quick-batch-command-router.test.cjs covers the new gsd-tools quick-batch CLI family (rows 46-47). These reference modules/ exports that do not exist yet. * feat(#3676): implement quick-batch dispatch core, updateBatchItems, and command router Phase 4 of epic #3344 (ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding") CORE decision layer — CLI verbs and pure orchestration logic only; no workflow markdown, no Agent()/git-worktree I/O. - src/quick-batch-dispatch.cts (new): pure decision functions consumed by the (separate, follow-up) /gsd:quick-batch workflow markdown — parseQuickBatchArgs, computeEffectiveConcurrency, computeMergeOrder, computeSpawnPlan, routeVerificationOutcome, routeMergeOutcome, buildCleanupManifestEntry (the last parses caller-supplied plan text via the existing parsePlanDocument; no filesystem access). - src/quick-batch.cts: adds updateBatchItems, resolving the design doc's Open Question 1 as ONE additive export on this module instead of the second, independent BATCH.json writer the design doc originally proposed. Reuses the same withPlanningLock transaction shape, computeWaves, and platformWriteSync call resumeBatch/ completeQuickItem already use; fails closed without persisting on an unknown item, an unknown/self dependency, or an introduced cycle. - src/quick-batch-command-router.cts (new): gsd-tools quick-batch CLI family, wired into HOST_COMMAND_ROUTERS (gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs) as a first-party always-on command (like /gsd:quick), not the opt-in capability-registry path graphify uses. Verbs: create/update/resume/ complete (wrap quick-batch.cts) and effective-concurrency/ merge-eligible/spawn-plan/verification-routing/merge-routing/ cleanup-entry/parse-args (wrap quick-batch-dispatch.cts). Design doc rows covered: 3-15, 22-24, 26-28, 30-39, 46-47. Property rows 51-53. Rows covering workflow markdown / Agent() dispatch / `git worktree` behavior (16-21, 25, 29, 40-45, 48-50) remain for the follow-up markdown-authoring pass, per the phase brief's explicit scope boundary. * docs(#3676): register quick-batch-dispatch/command-router modules in bookkeeping surfaces New-.cts-module ripple for the two Phase 4 modules (epic #3344, ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding"): .gitignore (compiled .cjs artifacts, ADR-457 build-at-publish), eslint.config.mjs (lint the .cts source, not the emitted .cjs), docs/INVENTORY.md + docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json (via `node scripts/gen-inventory-manifest.cjs --write`, after `npm run build:lib`), and CONTEXT.md glossary entries for "Quick-Batch Dispatch Core Module" and "Quick-Batch Command Router Module", plus an update to the existing "Quick-Batch Core Primitives Module" entry documenting the new updateBatchItems export. * test(#3676): fold updateBatchItems tests into quick-batch.test.cjs (fix lint-test-file-count) scripts/lint-test-file-count.cjs buckets any quick-batch-*.test.cjs file under the quick-batch production module by longest-prefix match, and that module is already at its 2-file cap (quick-batch.test.cjs + quick-batch.property.test.cjs). The standalone tests/quick-batch-update-items.test.cjs added in the prior commit pushed it to 3 and failed `npm run lint:ci`. Fold its content into quick-batch.test.cjs (append-only — no existing test in that file is modified) and update the CONTEXT.md glossary reference to match. Surfaced while re-running `GITHUB_BASE_REF=next npm run lint:ci` after `npm ci` (this worktree previously had no local node_modules, which also made gen-scripts-cli-exit/gen-hooks-cli-exit/gen-exit-code-* unable to resolve typescript — resolved by npm ci, no code change needed there). `npm run lint:ci` and `npx tsc -p tsconfig.build.json --noEmit` are both green after this fix. * test(#3676): add failing tests for the quick-batch command/workflow markdown Failing-first tests for Phase 4's markdown-authoring pass (epic #3344, ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding"): gsd-quick-batch-workflow.test.cjs covers commands/gsd/quick-batch.md's frontmatter/objective/process, gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch.md's byte-size boundary (row 49, ADR 1610 NEW_FILE_CAP) and step-fragment count, the isolation model (rows 20-22), the executor single-writer invariant (row 18), merge validation reusing the existing bounded primitive (row 25), the optional research/plan-checker/verification leaves (rows 16,17,19, 30,31), planning-failure blocking execution (row 29), the submodule guard (rows 36,44), and the new agents/gsd-planner.md quick-batch mode (rows 13-15). gsd-quick-batch-quick-regression.test.cjs covers row 48 (ordinary /gsd:quick stays byte-identical). Named `gsd-quick-batch-*` (not `quick-batch-*`) so lint-test-file-count's longest-prefix bucketing doesn't fold these markdown-only tests into the already-capped quick-batch/quick-batch-dispatch/ quick-batch-command-router production-module buckets from the CORE pass. These reference files that do not exist yet. * feat(#3676): author the quick-batch command, workflow, and planner mode Phase 4 markdown-authoring pass (epic #3344, ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding") — the orchestration layer that calls into Pass 1's CLI verbs (src/quick-batch-command-router.cts). - commands/gsd/quick-batch.md (new): frontmatter/objective/process, delegates argument validation to `quick-batch parse-args` (parseQuickBatchArgs) rather than re-deriving the grammar. - gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch.md (new, 11843 bytes — under ADR 1610's 32768-byte NEW_FILE_CAP for a brand-new file) + 9 lazy-loaded step fragments under gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch/steps/: resume-mode, batch-init, research-phase (flag:--research), planner-wave (+ nested plan-checker-loop when --validate), worktree-dispatch, merge-wave, verification-wave (flag:--validate), completion. Covers design doc rows 3-45: capacity/isolation resolution (reusing dispatch-isolation-gate.md verbatim), per-DAG- layer planning with full-task-catalog prompts and always-required depends_on/files_modified frontmatter, serialized worktree create/ merge/cleanup via the existing worktree.cleanup-wave primitive, deterministic wave-order merging, verification routing (human_needed/gaps_found), the executor single-writer invariant, submodule fail-loud guard, and #1941 fork-base auto-degrade. - agents/gsd-planner.md: additive new `load_mode_context` bullet for `**Mode:** quick-batch`, pointing at the new gsd-core/references/planner-quick-batch.md reference (documents the always-required depends_on/files_modified contract, reusing the existing frontmatter grammar — no new keys). Existing modes byte-identical, only a new bullet added. - src/init.cts (+init-command-router.cts, +command-aliases.cts): cmdInitQuickBatch / `init.quick-batch` — model profiles, commit_docs, roadmap/planning existence checks, and the section_manifest field gating research-phase/verification-wave (reuses the existing flag:--research/flag:--validate WHEN_VOCABULARY atoms — no new atom needed). Rows 16-21, 25, 29, 36, 38, 39, 44, 46-50 covered structurally by the prior test(#3676) commit; rows 3-15, 22-24, 26-28, 30-35, 37, 40-43, 45 covered by construction (verb wiring, single-writer prompt constraints, crash-window resume via unmodified Phase 3 primitives). * docs(#3676): regenerate skills/inventory/section-manifest/install-tree; baseline the intentional word-splitting pattern npm run regen:derived output for the new command/workflow/reference (epic #3344, ADR-1239 "Quick-batch binding"): - skills/gsd-quick-batch/SKILL.md (generated from commands/gsd/quick-batch.md) - docs/INVENTORY.md rows for /gsd-quick-batch, quick-batch.md, planner-quick-batch.md, and the quick-batch-dispatch.cjs/ quick-batch-command-router.cjs CLI-module rows' now-live `/gsd-quick-batch` cross-reference (was "(separate, follow-up)") + docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json (`node scripts/gen-inventory-manifest.cjs --write`) - gsd-core/workflows/section-manifest.json (`npm run gen:section-manifest`) — research-phase/verification-wave gsd:section entries for the new quick-batch workflow - tests/fixtures/install-tree/*.json (`npm run gen:install-tree`) — the new command/workflow/skill/reference files now ship to every runtime scripts/lint-workflow-shellcheck-baseline.json: 3 new entries for gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch.md's intentional flag-token/$ARGUMENTS word-splitting (SC2046/SC2086) — the same deliberate unquoted-optional- flag pattern gsd-core/workflows/quick.md already carries baselined (e.g. `$DISCUSS_PARAM $RESEARCH_PARAM` in quick.md's own Step 2); quoting would break the intended "omit this arg when the flag is false" splitting. * fix(#3676): close prompt-injection and argv/glob-injection gaps in quick-batch leaf dispatch Security review pass findings, both confirmed real: 1. HIGH — prompt injection, no boundaries. Every leaf-dispatch fragment interpolated the raw, attacker-influenced task ${description} (and the shared ${TASK_CATALOG_TABLE}, broadcasting every item's raw description into every planner's prompt in the layer) straight into Agent() prompt bodies with no boundary. Fixed by wrapping every such interpolation in a <security_context> + DATA_START/DATA_END boundary, matching the CONCRETE convention already implemented in this repo (agents/gsd-debug-session-manager.md, agents/gsd-debugger.md, gsd-core/workflows/debug.md) — commands/gsd/quick.md's own <security_notes> only asserts this convention in prose, so the debug-agent files are the real precedent followed here. Added a new <security_notes> block to commands/gsd/quick-batch.md (it had none) documenting both this fix and the one below. 2. MEDIUM — unquoted $ARGUMENTS -> argv/glob injection. gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch.md and commands/gsd/quick-batch.md both ran `gsd_run quick-batch parse-args --raw -- $ARGUMENTS` UNQUOTED, causing shell word-splitting and pathname expansion on raw task-list text before the parser ever saw it. Fixed at the source: added a `--text <string>` form to the `parse-args` verb (src/quick-batch-command-router.cts) that accepts the ENTIRE $ARGUMENTS as ONE quoted argv element and does the whitespace split itself, in Node — which is never glob-aware, unlike the shell. Both call sites now use `--text "$ARGUMENTS"`. The `-- <tokens>` form is kept for direct/test callers that already have a real argv array. The SC2086 baseline entry added for the original unquoted line is now stale (`node scripts/lint-workflow-shellcheck.cjs` no longer reports it) and has been removed; the two SC2046 entries for the UNRELATED, still-unquoted `$([ "$VALIDATE_MODE" = true ] && echo --validate)`-style conditional-flag splitting remain — that line only ever expands to one of a few known-safe literal strings (never raw user text), matching quick.md's own already-baselined convention exactly. Tests: quick-batch-command-router.test.cjs covers the new --text form (token splitting, glob-shaped text passing through literally unexpanded, whitespace-only input). gsd-quick-batch-workflow.test.cjs asserts the DATA_START/DATA_END boundary on every leaf prompt (research-phase/planner-wave/plan-checker-loop/verification-wave, including the shared task catalog) and the quoted --text call sites. * fix(#3676): strengthen test-depth gaps in rows 9, 18, 24, 34, 35 Spec review pass findings — the test matrix claimed "yes" coverage these assertions did not actually support: - Row 9 (--jobs 0/-1/abc hostile case): previously asserted rejection only. Added an end-to-end assertion (tests/quick-batch-command-router.test.cjs, committed alongside the security fix that touches the same file) that .planning/quick-batches/ is never created for any rejected value — createBatch is genuinely never reached. - Row 18 (--resume <unknown-batch-id>): previously only exercised a hand-corrupted BATCH.json, never a genuinely nonexistent batch directory. Added the real nonexistent-id case (also in quick-batch-command-router.test.cjs). - Row 24 (post-planning updateBatchItems racing a concurrent completeQuickItem for a different item, both through withPlanningLock): zero test existed. Added a property test (tests/quick-batch.property.test.cjs, appended — Phase 3's own file, no existing test touched) exercising both call orders and asserting no lost update in the final on-disk manifest — the same technique Phase 3's own row-15 lock-contention property test uses (sequential calls through the real lock; a working mutex makes any interleaving equivalent to some serial order, so this is the same claim a literal concurrent-thread test would make without OS-level threading). - Row 34 (worktree preserved on merge_failed) and row 35 (undeclared- deletion detection): both were previously asserted only at the pure routeMergeOutcome level. Added tests/gsd-quick-batch-merge-integration.test.cjs using the SAME real-git-fixture pattern tests/worktree-safety.test.cjs already establishes for executeWorktreeWaveCleanupPlan (real repo, real worktree, a REAL merge conflict / a REAL file deletion diffed against declared_deletions) — asserting the actual worktree directory survives on disk, not just that a pure function returns a preserveWorktree:true field. Named gsd-quick-batch-* so lint-test- file-count's bucketing doesn't fold it into any capped module bucket. Row 48 (/gsd:quick regression) intentionally left as-is per the reviewer's own framing: the byte-identity claim is already mechanically proven by the changed-path diff (git diff --name-only empty on those two paths IS byte-identity), and a genuine execution- level regression test would require actually running the workflow — out of scope for this repo's unit-test model (no other quick.md regression test in this repo does that either). * docs(#3676): add the changeset and user-facing docs the command needed Standards review pass findings — both HARD: - Missing changeset. None of the 6 prior #3676 commits touched .changeset/*. /gsd-quick-batch is a new user-facing command; CLAUDE.md/CONTRIBUTING.md require one. Added .changeset/silly-rams-caper.md (type: Added, pr: 0 placeholder — backfilled after the PR opens, matching CLAUDE.md's own documented convention and Phase 3's own precedent, #4190's .changeset/mellow-yaks-squeak.md). Uses the docs-convention hyphen form `/gsd-quick-batch` throughout, never the source-artifact colon form (`scripts/lint-docs-command-form.cjs` confirms 0 violations; that check scans docs/**, not .changeset/, so it was never actually in scope for the fragment itself, but the wording still follows the doc convention for consistency, matching how Phase 3's own fragment named the not-yet-shipped command). - Missing docs. Added docs/how-to/batch-quick-tasks.md (Diátaxis how-to, matching docs/how-to/handle-quick-and-fast-tasks.md's existing convention for /gsd-quick /gsd-fast) covering --jobs, --validate, --research, --resume, --file, the capacity/isolation interaction, and resume/failure recovery. Cross-linked from docs/README.md's how-to index and from handle-quick-and-fast-tasks.md's own "Related" section. Added a /gsd-quick-batch section to docs/COMMANDS.md (same table format as the existing /gsd-quick entry) and docs/features/quick-batch.md (REQ-QB-01..12, same frontmatter shape as docs/features/quick-mode.md) — regenerated docs/FEATURES.md (179 features) and skills/gsd-quick-batch/SKILL.md via the standard generators. * fix(#3676): close docs-parity, attribution, and generated-registry gaps gsd-test caught gsd-test's real run against 155e8975b3 found 43 failures, all rooted in this phase's own new command/workflow never being registered across ~10 independent generated/hand-maintained registries this repo keeps in parity by convention. Root-caused each, no test weakened or special-cased. - help.md ↔ commands/gsd/ bidirectional parity (docs-parity-live- registry.test.cjs): added a /gsd:quick-batch entry to gsd-core/workflows/help/modes/full.md (the real help.md content; gsd-core/workflows/help.md is a thin dispatcher) documenting every flag (--file/--jobs/--validate/--research/--resume), matching the existing /gsd:quick entry's format. - gen-section-manifest.test.cjs: quick-batch.md's `gsd_run query init.quick-batch` invocation used inline `$([ ... ] && echo --flag)` substitutions, which never satisfy the test's exact-whitespace-token / assigned-variable detection (the trailing `))` glued onto `--research` in the compound substitution broke the "exact token" match). Rewrote to the same VALIDATE_PARAM/RESEARCH_PARAM two-line pattern gsd-core/workflows/quick.md's own Step 2 already uses. - runtime-launcher-parity.test.cjs: the 8 quick-batch/steps/*.md fragments that call gsd_run each needed their OWN embedded copy of the canonical shim preamble (every workflow .md that calls gsd_run carries its own copy — reading one file does not persist shell state into another). Ran `node scripts/sync-runtime-launcher.cjs`, which inserted it before each file's first gsd_run call. plan-checker-loop.md correctly has none — it never calls gsd_run directly. - Namespace routing (skill-manifest.test.cjs, install-nested- layout.test.cjs, runtime-artifact-layout-surface.test.cjs): added `quick-batch` to commands/gsd/ns-workflow.md's `requires:` array and routing table (same namespace `quick` already routes through), and to src/clusters.cts's `utility` cluster (same cluster `quick` already belongs to). Verified by hand-running installRuntimeArtifacts + applySurface for augment/cline against a real temp install: exactly 6 top-level gsd-ns-* router dirs, gsd-quick-batch correctly nested under gsd-ns-workflow/skills/, never re-flattened. - mcp-server-catalog.test.cjs: hardcoded command count 71 -> 72 (a brand-new command is a real count change, not a bug this test should hide). - model-omit-when-inherit-guard.test.cjs: added the canonical `<!-- #2517 model-omit-on-inherit -->` marker block to gsd-core/workflows/quick-batch.md (every leaf dispatch — planner/ researcher/checker/executor/verifier — lives in a steps/ fragment, read combined with the host by this test's own readWorkflowCombined, same as quick.md's own research-phase.md carries it for its gated section). Also fixed a genuine pre-existing inconsistency in the test's own "#2711: the guarded set is derived from dispatch sites" check: its `nonDispatching` computation read the BARE host file while `derived` (the set it's checked against) reads the combined host+steps content — inconsistent with that same test file's own #2994 doc comment explaining why the combined read is necessary. quick-batch.md is the first workflow whose EVERY model="{...}" dispatch site lives in a mandatory (never gated) steps/ fragment — extracted to stay under ADR-1610's tighter NEW_FILE_CAP for a brand-new file — which is what exposed the mismatch. Fixed by using the same readWorkflowCombined read in both places. - skill-frontmatter-contract.test.cjs: shortened commands/gsd/quick-batch.md's frontmatter `description` from 107 to 91 chars (<=100 budget), and added `quick-batch.md` to the hand- maintained KNOWN_SKILLS consolidation allowlist with a #3676 justification comment (a genuinely new first-party command, not a consolidation of an existing skill). - workflow-fragments-emission.install.test.cjs: added `quick-batch.md` to the hand-maintained MARKED_WORKFLOWS set (composeWorkflow is deliberately NOT a no-op for it — its research-phase/verification- wave sections are gated). - Regenerated all downstream artifacts (npm run build:lib && npm run regen:derived && npm run gen:plugin-skills -- --write && npm run gen:features -- --write): skills/gsd-quick-batch/SKILL.md, skills/gsd-ns-workflow/SKILL.md, install-tree fixtures for augment/cline/hermes/qwen/trae/zcode. - emitted-attribution.test.cjs: agents/gsd-planner.md's #3676 addition (one new `load_mode_context` bullet pointing at the new gsd-core/references/planner-quick-batch.md reference) grew the file 124 bytes without an acknowledgment trailer. Acknowledged below — the growth is the deliberate, additive, single-bullet change from the earlier feat(#3676) commit, not drift. Verified: npm run build:lib clean, npx tsc -p tsconfig.build.json --noEmit clean, GITHUB_BASE_REF=next npm run lint:ci fully green (includes lint-workflow-shellcheck, lint-test-file-count, lint-docs-command-form). The deep install/spawn/registry tests gsd-test actually runs (docs-parity-live-registry, gen-section-manifest, runtime-launcher-parity, install-nested-layout, runtime-artifact-layout-surface, skill-manifest, skill-frontmatter- contract, mcp-server-catalog, model-omit-when-inherit-guard, workflow-fragments-emission) are not part of lint:ci — each fix above was independently verified by hand-invoking the exact production function the failing test calls (installRuntimeArtifacts, applySurface, composeWorkflow, the CLUSTERS union, the section-manifest forwarding regex) against the real repo tree and confirming the expected shape. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-planner.md — additive #3676 quick-batch mode bullet in load_mode_context (one new line pointing at gsd-core/references/planner-quick-batch.md); not drift. * fix(#3676): trim the /gsd:quick-batch help.md entry to fit the LARGE tier line budget skill-frontmatter-contract.test.cjs's "feature #3039: tiered help — size budgets" enforces a SEPARATE line-count ceiling for gsd-core/workflows/help/modes/full.md (FULL_BUDGET = 844 lines, tighten-only ratchet, scripts/lib/allowlist-ratchet.cjs's assertTightCeiling) — independent of the skill-frontmatter description- length budget and consolidation allowlist I touched in the prior round; those are unrelated checks in the same test FILE, not the same check. Root cause: the /gsd:quick-batch entry I added to full.md in the docs-parity fix round was 17 lines, pushing the file from 834 to 851 lines — 7 over the 844 ceiling. Condensed the entry (merged the per-flag bullet list into one dense "Flags:" line, dropped from 3 Usage examples to 1) to 844 lines exactly — at the ceiling with zero slack, which assertTightCeiling accepts (it only fails on actualMax > ceiling, or on slack > grace when the ceiling is too LOOSE — zero slack triggers neither). Verified after trimming: full.md still contains a live /gsd:quick-batch reference (bidirectional parity) and all 5 argument-hint flags (--jobs/--validate/--research/--resume/--file) still appear as literal tokens (docs-parity-live-registry.test.cjs's own flag-coverage check, re-run by hand against the trimmed content). Verified: npm run build:lib clean, npx tsc -p tsconfig.build.json --noEmit clean, GITHUB_BASE_REF=next npm run lint:ci fully green. * docs(#3676): backfill changeset pr number to 4212 Follow-up to fix(#3676) commits — .changeset/silly-rams-caper.md's pr:0 placeholder backfilled with the real PR number now that gh api POST /pulls has returned it (#4212). Matches CLAUDE.md's PR Number Handling convention and Phase 3's own #4190 precedent (708c5a3f8c). Doc-only (root-level .changeset/*.md fragment), exempt from a fresh gsd-test run per pre-pr-gate.sh's DOC_ONLY_RE. * fix(#3676): resolve prompt-injection-scan false positive on test fixture tests/quick-batch.test.cjs:232's row 11b regression proves the task-list parser carries a prompt-injection-shaped task description through createBatch as inert data, never interpreted. The fixture has to be a real "ignore all previous instructions..." phrase or the test asserts nothing, but the full-file --diff scan flagged it once unrelated edits in the same file pulled it into the changed-file set. Add the file to prompt-injection-scan.sh's ALLOWLIST, matching the sanctioned, precedented exemption already used for other legitimate security-regression fixtures (tests/windsurf-conversion.test.cjs, tests/health-validation.test.cjs, tests/continuation-grammar-parity.test.cjs) per DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION. --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |