Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Boucher
918f987a19 feat(#2982): extend no-source-grep lint to catch var-binding readFileSync.includes() (#2985)
* feat(#2982): extend no-source-grep lint to catch var-binding readFileSync.includes()

The base lint (scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs) only catches
readFileSync(...).<text-method>() chained directly. The much more
common var-binding form escapes it:

  const src = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8');
  // 50 lines later
  if (src.includes('foo')) {}        // ← still grep, lint missed it

Scan of the test suite found ~141 files using this pattern.

Implementation built TDD per #2982 with structured-IR assertions:

  scripts/lint-no-source-grep-extras.cjs
    - detectVarBindingViolations(src) — pure detector, two passes:
      pass 1 collects vars bound from readFileSync, pass 2 finds any
      <var>.<includes|startsWith|endsWith|match|search>( on those vars.
    - detectWrappedAssertOkMatch(src) — flags
      assert.ok(<expr>.match(...)) which escapes the assert.match rule.
    - VIOLATION enum exposes stable codes for tests to assert on.

  scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs
    - Wires the new detectors into the existing per-file check; one
      additional violation row per file with the first 3 sample tokens.

  tests/bug-2982-lint-var-binding.test.cjs
    - 13 tests, all assertions on typed VIOLATION enum / structured
      records. Covers all 5 text-match methods, multi-var, no-bind,
      string literal (must NOT trigger), wrapped assert.ok(.match),
      and assert.match (must NOT double-flag).

Migration backlog (#2974 expanded scope):

  - 42 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product`
    (legitimate — they read .md/.json/.yml files whose deployed text
    IS the product)
  - 3 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]`
    (read .cjs/.js source — clear migration debt)
  - 95 files annotated `pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]` with
    `Per-file review may reclassify as source-text-is-the-product
    during migration` (mixed — manual review under #2974)

After this lands the lint reports 0 violations on main; new
violations in PRs surface immediately.

Closes #2982
Refs #2974

* test(#2982): fix truncated test name per CR

The label ended with a bare '(' from a copy-paste mishap. Now reads
'does NOT flag .matchAll(...) — matchAll is not match, so
assert.ok(.matchAll(...)) is not flagged'.

* chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985

* chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985
2026-05-01 19:50:10 -04:00
Tom Boucher
7c6f8005f3 test: destroy 9 config-schema.cjs/core.cjs source-grep tests, replace with behavioral config-set (#2696)
* test: destroy 9 config-schema.cjs/core.cjs source-grep tests, add behavioral config-set tests (#2691, #2693)

Replace source-grep theater with config-set behavioral tests:
- execute-phase-wave: config-set workflow.use_worktrees replaces VALID_CONFIG_KEYS grep
- inline-plan-threshold: delete redundant source-grep (behavioral test at L36 already covered it)
- plan-bounce: config-set for plan_bounce / plan_bounce_script / plan_bounce_passes replaces 3 key-presence greps
- code-review: config-set for code_review / code_review_depth replaces 2 greps; removes CONFIG_PATH constant
- thinking-partner: config-set features.thinking_partner replaces two greps (config-schema.cjs AND core.cjs)

Behavioral tests survive refactors (no path constants, no file reads). The config-schema.cjs →
core.cjs migration commit 990c3e64 happened because these tests groped source paths.

Add allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product annotations to legitimate product-content tests:
autonomous-allowed-tools, agent-frontmatter, agent-skills-awareness, bug-2334, bug-2346,
execute-phase-wave (MD reads), plan-bounce (workflow reads). Annotations explain WHY text
inspection is the right level of testing for AI instruction files.

Closes #2691
Closes #2693

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: address CodeRabbit findings on #2696

- agent-frontmatter.test.cjs: move allow-test-rule annotation from block comment
  to standalone // line comment so rule scanners can detect it
- thinking-partner.test.cjs: strengthen config-set test with config-get read-back
  assertion to verify the value was persisted, not just accepted (exit 0)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test: tighten thinking_partner config assertion per CodeRabbit (#2696)

Replace config-get output substring check (includes('true') false-positive
risk) with a direct JSON read of .planning/config.json, asserting the
exact persisted value via strictEqual. This also validates the config file
was created, catching silent key-acceptance without persistence.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-25 10:50:54 -04:00
Tom Boucher
990c3e648d fix(tests): update 5 source-text tests to read config-schema.cjs (#2480)
VALID_CONFIG_KEYS moved from config.cjs to config-schema.cjs in the
drift-prevention companion PR. Tests that read config.cjs source text
and checked for key literal includes() now point to the correct file.

Closes #2480

Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-20 09:54:35 -04:00
Tibsfox
e5cc0bb48b fix(workflow): correct grep anchor and add threshold=0 guard (#1979)
Two correctness bugs from @trek-e review:

1. Grep pattern `^<task` only matched unindented task tags, missing
   indented tasks in PLAN.md templates that use indentation. Fixed to
   `^\s*<task[[:space:]>]` which matches at any indentation level and
   avoids false positives on <tasks> or </task>.

2. Threshold=0 was documented to disable inline routing but the
   condition `TASK_COUNT <= INLINE_THRESHOLD` evaluated 0<=0 as true,
   routing empty plans inline even when the feature was disabled.
   Fixed by guarding with `INLINE_THRESHOLD > 0`.

Added tests/inline-plan-threshold.test.cjs (8 tests) covering:
- config-set accepts the key and threshold=0
- VALID_CONFIG_KEYS and planning-config.md contain the entry
- Routing pattern matches indented tasks and rejects <tasks>/</task>
- Inline routing is guarded by INLINE_THRESHOLD > 0

Review feedback on #2061 from @trek-e.
2026-04-11 03:33:29 -07:00