Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Lex Christopherson
3e8e5d537d fix: present new-project completion inline instead of as question
Show slash commands inline so users can copy them to fresh context,
matching pattern used by other GSD commands.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-16 07:38:42 -06:00
Lex Christopherson
77ea129fd5 refactor: research workflow as Claude Code context injection
Research is now optimized for Claude Code implementation quality:
- PROJECT.md-driven (features, constraints, questions, decisions)
- High-confidence only (no low-quality padding)
- 3 focused files: stack.md, implementation.md, risks.md
- Code examples with current vs deprecated patterns

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-15 23:23:15 -06:00
Lex Christopherson
c7a88a6ab0 feat(02-01): research-project command, workflow, and template
- Created /gsd:research-project slash command for pre-roadmap domain research
- Built batched subagent workflow (3-4 max parallel, 2 batches)
- Defined project-research template for ecosystem/architecture/pitfalls/standards

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-15 21:29:40 -06:00
Lex Christopherson
e8d68685c1 feat(gsd): add research-phase for niche domain ecosystem discovery
- Add /gsd:research-phase command for comprehensive ecosystem research
- Rename FINDINGS.md → DISCOVERY.md for clarity
- Rename research-phase.md → discovery-phase.md (shallow "which library")
- New research-phase.md for deep "how experts build this" research
- Creates RESEARCH.md with stack, patterns, pitfalls, don't-hand-roll
- plan-phase loads RESEARCH.md when present

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-15 18:15:22 -06:00
Lex Christopherson
bcc58add6a Prevent scope creep in discuss-phase command
Add explicit guardrails to ensure context gathering questions clarify
HOW to implement roadmap scope rather than suggesting WHAT to add.
Questions must never expand scope - if user adds scope, direct them
to update ROADMAP first instead.

Changes:
- Template: Replace "Secondary goals" with "Clarifications" (HOW, not WHAT ELSE)
- Workflow: Add CRITICAL block forbidding scope-expanding questions
- Workflow: Update decision gate to emphasize clarification over expansion
- Command: Add NO SCOPE CREEP rules

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-15 17:51:11 -06:00
Lex Christopherson
1fe3fa427e Initial commit: Get Shit Done - meta-prompting system for Claude Code
- NPX install: npx get-shit-done-cc
- Slash commands for project management
- Context engineering templates and workflows

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2025-12-15 07:44:41 -06:00