4a705cf19f2f2d22ff35878b5ce54fec334ce0ae
7 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Tom Boucher
|
80de48c319 |
enhance(#3914): every phase records a truthful guard ledger (#4018)
* fix(#3914): retire n/no-process-exit where its successor governs
Epic #3889 criterion 5 — no phase closes with a guard added and its
predecessor left standing — is violated in the tree by the epic that wrote it.
local/require-registered-exit was registered on gsd-core/bin/**/*.cjs and
scripts/**/*.cjs, while n/no-process-exit stayed 'error' over a nine-glob block
covering those same two. Only the hooks 'off' exemption ever came down; the
predecessor's registration never did. Both rules have been enforcing the same
property on the same surfaces since P6.
Narrowed, not deleted. Seven of those nine globs have NO successor —
eslint-rules/, bin/lib/, pi/, examples/, vscode/, .kilo/, .opencode/ — so
deleting the rule outright would silently drop enforcement on all seven. That
is the inversion this epic has already hit three times: removing a coarse guard
because a narrower one exists somewhere it does not reach. Flat config is
last-match-wins and both successor blocks come after the nine-glob block, so
'n/no-process-exit': 'off' in exactly those two retires the predecessor
precisely where the successor governs and nowhere else.
The successor is strictly more precise: it permits process.exit only inside
terminateNow in cli-exit.cts, the single sanctioned terminator (ADR-3889 §3),
where n/no-process-exit permits none and would flag terminateNow's own
generated copy.
Asserted at the consumer's altitude via ESLint.calculateConfigForFile on real
paths, with the positive control that matters: n/no-process-exit is still
'error' on six of the seven successor-less globs, so a future edit that turns
this into a blanket disable goes red. bin/lib/ has no file in this checkout and
is reported as untested rather than given an invented path. Severity is
normalized across the string/numeric/array forms the API can return, and the
normalized value asserted — not truthiness.
Verified by running calculateConfigForFile myself on both superseded globs and
four controls before trusting the test.
Found and fixed inline: the change made an eslint-disable directive at
gsd-tools.cjs:257 partially unused, which --max-warnings 0 rejects; narrowed to
the one rule still in force.
Verification runs on the remote runner.
Refs #3914
* docs(#3914): the epic added three guards, it did not remove one
The audit reconciled the epic ledger against what actually landed. The net is
+3, not -1: four lint:generated-sync --check arms (gen-scripts-cli-exit,
gen-hooks-cli-exit, gen-exit-code-registry, gen-exit-code-docs) plus one rule,
against two retirements.
An epic whose thesis was consolidation ended with a larger guard surface than
it started with. The additions are each defensible; the claim that the total
fell was never true.
Two of the three prior errors in this amendment are mine. It said "Net -1 by
count" above terms reading -1 -1 +1 +1 +1, which sums to +1 — an arithmetic
error in the paragraph directly below the sentence arguing that an ADR about
honest accounting must not pad its own ledger. And the term list omitted two of
the four --check arms, which is what turns that +1 into the real +3.
Recorded rather than quietly rewritten. This ledger has now been wrong three
times — the original -2, the -1 that replaced it, and #3914's own table, which
states -1 above terms summing to 0 — and a written claim nobody checked against
the thing it describes is the exact failure this epic exists to close.
Refs #3914
* fix(#3914): make the successor actually supersede before retiring the predecessor
An isolated security review found that the previous commit turned off a guard
that was still doing work. Reproduced by executing both rules against a
fixture, not inferred:
const exit = 'exit';
process[exit](1);
n/no-process-exit flags it; local/require-registered-exit did not, because it
early-returned on callee.computed. So retiring the predecessor on
gsd-core/bin/**/*.cjs and scripts/**/*.cjs un-guarded that shape on precisely
the two globs this epic's exit contract cares most about.
This is the third time in this epic I have removed a coarse guard on the claim
that a narrower one covered it, without checking construct-level parity — after
the allowlist key-to-prefix-to-exact-membership sequence and the band
ranges-to-categories one. The rule is the same every time: a narrower guard
supersedes a coarser one only where it demonstrably reaches at least as far,
and "demonstrably" means executing both against the constructs, not reading
either.
The successor now resolves computed property access for the statically
determinable cases — a string Literal, and an Identifier bound once to a string
Literal, resolved through scope — and leaves genuinely dynamic properties
alone so the rule does not over-fire. Measured after the fix: plain
process.exit flagged, process['exit']() flagged, process[exit]() flagged,
process[globalThis.k]() not flagged. That makes it a strict superset of the
predecessor on these globs, since process['exit']() was caught by NEITHER rule
before.
The second finding is worse than the first, because it was reasoning rather
than oversight. My justification comment claimed n/no-process-exit "would flag
terminateNow's own generated copy here". It would not — that file is in the
global ignore list, so neither rule ever lints it. There was no conflict to
resolve; I wrote a rationale I had not checked, in a change whose entire
subject is written claims nobody verified. Both comment blocks now state the
real basis.
The tests that should have caught this asserted only rule SEVERITY per glob and
never construct REACH, which is exactly how a coverage hole passed. A parity
matrix now pins all five shapes, including a RED/GREEN regression pin against
an inlined reproduction of the pre-fix rule — inlined rather than loaded from
HEAD, because HEAD resolves to the fixed commit under the remote runner and
would silently stop testing anything.
Verification runs on the remote runner.
Refs #3914
* fix(#3914): the two exit rules are complementary — keep both
Reverts this branch's retirement of n/no-process-exit. The premise was wrong
twice, and the second review proved the change itself was wrong.
I claimed local/require-registered-exit was a strict superset on
gsd-core/bin/**/*.cjs and scripts/**/*.cjs. Measured, successor vs predecessor:
function f(exit) { process[exit](1); } 0 vs 1
let exit='exit'; exit='exit'; process[exit]() 0 vs 1
const { exit } = ...; process[exit](1) 0 vs 1
plus for-of bindings, let-then-assign, var redeclaration, catch params, and an
undeclared global named exit. The predecessor matches any identifier NAMED
exit however it is bound; the successor resolves only a string literal or a
single-write const. It never was a superset — I asserted the relationship after
fixing one construct and did not re-check the rest.
The justification was independently false: all three generated cli-exit copies
are in the global ignore list, so n/no-process-exit was never flagging
terminateNow. There was no conflict to resolve. I wrote a rationale I had not
verified, in the phase whose subject is written claims nobody checked.
So criterion 5 does not apply to this pair. They are not predecessor and
successor — they are complementary, each catching constructs the other misses.
The epic's criterion assumed a replacement relationship that does not exist
here, and retiring either rule loses real coverage. The ADR ledger now says so
with the measured shapes.
What survives is the genuine improvement: the computed-property strengthening.
local/require-registered-exit now catches process['exit'](1) and optional-chain
terminators like process?.[k]?.(1), which NEITHER rule caught before, while
correctly ignoring a genuinely dynamic property so it does not over-fire.
The parity tests are rewritten to assert what is true rather than what I wanted
to be true: a bidirectional matrix where each rule is shown catching shapes the
other misses. The previous matrix tested only the four shapes where the
successor wins, which is precisely why the regression shipped — a test set
selected to confirm the thesis.
Also corrected: a stale ADR sentence claiming a third wrong ledger version that
does not exist (the table it described now reads +3 over terms summing to +3),
and a changeset whose stated motivation was the false generated-copy conflict.
Verification runs on the remote runner.
Refs #3914
* fix(#3914): the exemption term was a no-op — the net is +4
Fourth correction to this ledger, and a fourth error of the same kind.
Every version counted removing the n/no-process-exit 'off' entry from the hooks
block as -1. Measured: calculateConfigForFile returns undefined for that rule on
hooks/**. It was never registered there, and no broader block sets it globally,
so the 'off' entry overrode nothing and removing it changed no enforcement at
all. A no-op removal, not a guard removal — the same category error as counting
baseline acknowledgement entries: a thing that is not a guard, in guard units.
It is misattributed too; that block came down in
|
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
ac7587287b |
fix(#3812): document how Current Position actually resolves a duplicate field (#4017)
* docs(#3812): say that Current Position is single-valued, and pin the behavior that makes it true #3812 shipped CLOSED with half its acceptance unmet. #3873 delivered cardinality for FRONTMATTER keys - current_phase/current_plan render as optional at docs/reference/state-md.md:89,91, covered by tests/gen-state-md-docs.test.cjs:374. The issue's actual ask was the ## Current Position BODY section, and that never landed. Surfaced by an /adr-phase-coverage audit of epic #3473; the issue was reopened rather than noted. The section now states three things: every field is single-valued, the section is overwritten rather than appended to, and a duplicate resolves to the FIRST occurrence with no warning - so a line appended in good faith is silently ignored rather than winning. Progress history belongs in ## Performance Metrics, two headings down, and the text now points there. The third claim is a behavioral promise about the reader, so it was VERIFIED BY EXECUTION before being written rather than inferred from the issue title: stateExtractField(<"Phase: 1 of 5 (First)" ... "Phase: 9 of 9 (Appended later)">, "Phase") -> "1 of 5 (First)" The mechanism is state-document.cjs:405 - the plain-line pattern ^<field>:[ \t]*(.+) carries flags im with NO g, so String.match returns the first hit. Writing "first wins" without running it would have repeated the exact error I had to retract twice in this epic already. A test pins the reader, not the prose. Three rows in tests/state.test.cjs: T1 (load-bearing) asserts the duplicated case resolves first; T2 asserts the ordinary single-field case still works, so a fix that only functions when duplicated cannot pass; T3 puts a Plan: line BETWEEN the two Phase: lines and asserts it resolves independently - negative space, because a reader returning the first line of the SECTION rather than the first matching FIELD would satisfy T1 alone. Proven to discriminate: a last-match variant returns "9 of 9 (Appended later)" and T1 reds. No assertion checks that the document contains a sentence. That is what local/no-source-grep exists to stop, and it would pin wording that is allowed to improve. The point of the test is that if that regex ever gains g and a last-match walk, the test fails - instead of the documentation quietly becoming a lie with nothing to notice. Prose only, no new heading. docs-state-md-locale-parity compares heading-level sequences by LCS rather than text, so added paragraphs cannot fail it while an added HEADING would fail all four locales. The constraint is structural, not stylistic - confirmed by running that comparison after the edit. The four locale copies are translated rather than left stale. They are not gate-enforced for prose, so "nothing fails" was available and is not the same as correct: leaving four documents asserting something the English one now contradicts is a correctness problem. Code spans and the anchor link stay untranslated - they name real tokens. The whole approach rests on one fact, checked first: ## Current Position at :196-208 sits OUTSIDE every generated marker region (:81-104, :138-151), so a hand edit survives --write. Re-confirmed after all five edits - gen-state-md-docs --check reports all 6 targets up to date. Had that been false the fix would have belonged in the generator, and a hand edit would have been silently reverted. One real gate failure fixed inline rather than reported: the new test's comments referenced docs/reference/state-md.md, which was not in that file's registered exempt-docs paths, and lint-docs-guard-registration failed lint:ci correctly. Registered. Known limit, named rather than folded in: gsd-tools validate/health still do NOT warn on a duplicated Phase:. #3812 records that as a "consider", not a requirement, and confirms none of the nine rules in src/health-diagnostic-rules/{state-consistency,phase-structure}.cts counts occurrences. Documenting the silent first-match is the delivered scope; making it loud is new scope and stays unclaimed. Closes #3812 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#3812): the rule I documented was false — replace it with the measured one An isolated review returned two blockers. Both mine, and the first is the worse kind: I wrote a falsifiable rule into a reference page and got it wrong. 1. "A duplicate resolves to the FIRST occurrence" is FALSE. stateExtractField (src/state-document.cts:401-419) tries BOLD `**F:**` across the whole input, THEN plain `^F:`, THEN a pipe-table row. Form precedence beats document order. Measured against the built reader, all intra-section: Phase: A (plain) / **Phase:** B (bold, later) -> B LATER WINS Phase: A (indented) / Phase: B (plain, later) -> B LATER WINS Phase: A (plain) / | Phase | T (table) | -> A first wins My original verification tested plain-versus-plain, saw first-wins, and generalized to all forms. Measuring one case and claiming the general rule is the same error I have had to retract twice already in this epic. It is also worse than silence. The sentence told authors an appended line is safely ignored; a bold line appended "for emphasis" silently overrides the original. Someone trusting the doc would have corrupted their own state file. And #3812 never asked for a resolution rule - it asked for single-valued, overwrite-not-append, and where history goes. The rule was my unrequested addition. Replaced with the measured truth: resolution is by FORM (bold anywhere, then plain at line-start, then table row), and only WITHIN the winning form does the first occurrence win. Both consequences stated plainly - a higher-ranked form wins regardless of position, and an indented `Phase:` is invisible to the plain form. All five claims in the new paragraph verified by execution before being written, including the two I had wrong. 2. The tests tested the wrong case and passed for the wrong reason. T1/T3 put the second `Phase:` under `## Somewhere else` - the INTER-section case, which #2956 already fixed by scoping. #3812 says verbatim that #2956 "fixed the inter-section case and never addressed intra-section duplication", so the case the new prose describes was untested, and the fixtures passed because of section scoping rather than field resolution. They also called bare stateExtractField rather than the production chain, T2 could not discriminate first from last at all, and no fixture mixed forms - which is precisely why the false claim survived to review. Rewritten as four rows, all intra-section, all through the real stateCurrentPositionSlice -> stateExtractField path: plain-then-plain (first wins within a form), plain-then-bold (the bold LATER value wins - the row whose absence let the false claim ship), indented-then-plain (indented invisible), and sibling-field independence. Each proven to fail against a reader that disagrees. 3. Two dead anchors. pt-BR and zh-CN linked `#performance-metrics` while their own headings are `### Métricas de Desempenho` and `### 性能指标`. Both fixed to the anchor their own heading generates. ja-JP/ko-KR kept the English heading, so theirs already resolved. 4. A ja/ko sentence inverted its own meaning. Both rendered "which is the section designed to grow" with a bare demonstrative whose nearest referent read as Current Position - saying the opposite of the point. Rewritten so the clause attaches unambiguously to `## Performance Metrics`. 5. Cross-locale drift, flagged by the implementing agent rather than by me: after fixing EN, the four locales still stated the OLD false rule. Four documents asserting something measured to be wrong is worse than four saying nothing. All four now carry a faithful translation of the corrected paragraph, with code spans, each file's own anchor, and the ja/ko referent fix preserved. Verified: all five claims executed against the built reader; every rewritten test row proven to discriminate; gen-state-md-docs --check reports all 6 targets up to date, so the edits stay outside the generated marker regions; locale heading parity unaffected (prose only, no headings added); build:lib, lint and lint:ci all exit 0. Refs #3812 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#3812): second false rule on the same page — scope the ranking to the section A second isolated review found a second false falsifiable claim, and the failure mode is the same one twice in a row: attempt 1: verified plain-vs-plain, wrote a claim about ALL FORMS attempt 2: verified bare stateExtractField, wrote a claim about THE DOCUMENT Both times the claim covered a wider surface than what was actually executed. The fix each time was not a better sentence, it was executing the surface the sentence describes. BLOCKER — "bold `**Phase:**` anywhere in the DOCUMENT wins" is false. ## Current Position / Phase: 1 of 5 + ## Archive / **Phase:** 88 bare stateExtractField(whole doc) -> "88 (other section)" PRODUCTION (slice then extract) -> "1 of 5 (in section)" #2956's section slice means production never hands another section to the matcher; a bold line in `## Archive`, or in the YAML frontmatter, is simply not seen. The ranking is real but scoped: it applies WITHIN `## Current Position`. I verified against the bare function and wrote a claim about the system. Every existing test placed its bold line inside the section, which is exactly why nothing contradicted the claim. T5 now puts a bold `**Phase:**` in `## Archive` and asserts production returns the in-section plain value, with the unscoped reader asserted to DISAGREE so the row proves the scoping rather than assuming it. BLOCKER — the changeset still shipped the ORIGINAL retracted claim. I corrected the page and left the release note saying "resolves to the first occurrence ... a second entry added in good faith is silently ignored". The note contradicted the page it announces, and the release note is what most people actually read. Rewritten to the corrected rule. MEDIUM — the concession was inverted. It read "wins even if it comes FIRST in the file", which is the vacuous direction; the surprising case, and the one the very next clause illustrates with an APPENDED bold line, is "even if it comes LAST". All four locales reproduced the inversion faithfully, so it was an EN-source defect rather than translation drift. Two sharp edges now named, both measured: a bold `**Phase:**` followed only by trailing spaces resolves to an EMPTY STRING and does not fall through to a valid plain line below (T6 pins it); and `| **Phase:** | 3 of 4 |` short-circuits to the bold form and returns the literal `"| 3 of 4 |"`. A page that teaches form ranking has to say where the ranking bites. Also fixed: all five files labelled the link `## Performance Metrics` while the heading is `### Performance Metrics`. Anchors resolved correctly everywhere; only the label's level was wrong. Every clause in the final paragraph re-verified through the PRODUCTION chain (stateCurrentPositionSlice -> stateExtractField), clause by clause, before being written: bold in another section does not win; bold in frontmatter does not win; bold appended last does win; first wins within one form; trailing-space bold yields empty. All four locales carry the same corrected rule. gen-state-md-docs --check reports all 6 targets up to date; heading counts unchanged at 20/20 across all five files, so locale heading-parity is untouched; build:lib, lint and lint:ci all exit 0. Refs #3812 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3812): backfill changeset pr number Refs #3812 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
dd4f179672 |
feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam (#4000)
* feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam Implements ADR-3646 (Phase 1, #3970): a `<task tracker-id="...">` attribute plus a new optional `taskContentResolver` capability-manifest field let a capability resolve a task's action/verify/acceptance-criteria/read_first/done content from an external issue tracker instead of PLAN.md's inline body. - src/plan-document.cts: parses the `tracker-id` attribute into `PlanTask.trackerId` - src/task-content-resolution.cts: new leaf module — split/find/build/resolve, with a hard-halt (throw) contract on ambiguous/failed/timeout/malformed resolution, never a silent fallback to possibly-stale inline text - src/task-command-router.cts: new `task resolve-content --plan --task-id --raw` CLI verb wiring the module into a real process exit code - gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-validator.cjs: validates the new `taskContentResolver` manifest field (feature-role only, cross-capability trackerPrefix uniqueness) - gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md, gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md, docs/reference/capability-manifest.md: wire the seam into the per-task loop and document it as a new `execute:task` point outside the existing contribution/step/gate vocabulary (unconditional in autonomous mode) Closes #3970 * fix(#3970): gate checkpoint tasks out of content resolution, close trackerPrefix grammar parity gap, cover path-traversal guard Standards/Spec code-review pass on the task-content-resolution seam (ADR-3646 Phase 1) found three defects: 1. execute-plan.md's task-content-resolution bullet fired on any tracker-id-bearing task with no check that it wasn't type="checkpoint:*", contradicting ADR-3646 Decision 1 (a checkpoint task must never enter resolve-content). plan-document.cts already parses trackerId: null unconditionally for checkpoint tasks; only the workflow prose needed the fix, so the bullet now explicitly excludes checkpoint tasks. 2. task-content-resolution.cts's parseResolverDeclaration accepted any non-empty trackerPrefix with no grammar check, while capability- validator.cjs's KEBAB_RE enforces kebab-case at install time — a Generative Fix Divergence gap. Added the same grammar (as a literal regex, documented as intentionally not shared across the .cts/.cjs build boundary) plus a parity test asserting the two surfaces agree across a valid/invalid trackerPrefix table. 3. task-command-router.cts's routeResolveContent path-traversal guard on --plan had zero test coverage. Added a test exercising a ../../../etc/passwit-shaped path and asserting the USAGE rejection names the offending path. * fix(#3970): sanitize resolver diagnostics and cap resolver timeoutMs Two findings caught by an isolated security-review pass on the task content resolution seam: - ResolverFailedError/ResolverMalformedOutputError embedded raw, unsanitized subprocess stderr/stdout (attacker/model-influenced via the tracker-id argv token) into .message. A hostile or buggy resolver could smuggle a newline plus a forged "Error: " line, or terminal escape sequences, into a diagnostic io.cjs's error() writes verbatim to stderr. Fixed at the constructor (task-content-resolution.cts) via io.cjs's existing formatDiagnosticToken(), so every caller of resolveTaskContent gets a safe .message by construction. - capability-validator.cjs's validateTaskContentResolverFields had no upper bound on taskContentResolver.invoke.timeoutMs, letting a manifest declare an effectively unbounded value and defeat the "bounded subprocess" design intent. Added a 120000ms ceiling specific to this field, without touching the shared isPositiveIntegerMs() helper (still used unbounded by the reviewer lane's timeoutFloorMs and probe timeoutMs). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3970): fix gsd-test failures — stale prose allowlist line and stderr-vs-message assertion gsd-test (remote dockerized matrix) came back red with 5 failures on this PR; all five are real defects, fixed here. - tests/no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs: PROSE_ALLOWLIST's execute-plan.md entry pointed at line 415, which ffc190df4's checkpoint-exclusion caveat (added near line 221) shifted down by one line. The actual "validated downstream by gsd-tools uat classify-coverage" descriptive mention now sits at line 416. Updated the allowlist entry's line number to match. - tests/task-command-router-resolve-content.test.cjs: the path-traversal test asserted the outside-project-scope diagnostic against the thrown ExitError's own .message. io.cts's error() (ADR-3889) writes its human-readable message to fd 2 via writeAllSync and then throws a bare `new ExitError(1)` with no message argument — by design, so the exception carries no duplicate text and the thrown ExitError's message defaults to "process exit 1" (cli-exit.cts's ExitError constructor). Root cause was the test, not the source: task-command-router.cjs's outside-project-scope rejection already calls error() correctly and the diagnostic text is genuinely emitted, just on fd 2, not on the exception. Fixed the test to capture fd-2 writes (mirroring tests/estimate-calibrate.test.cjs's runCalibrateExpectError and this same file's own captureStdout for fd 1) and assert against the captured stderr text instead of err.message. This was masked locally because a manual `node -e` sanity check that only inspects the caught exception's .message cannot see what the real node:test run actually failed on. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-plan.md — adds the ADR-3646 task-content-resolution bullet and checkpoint-exclusion caveat to the per-task execute loop; a real behavioral prose addition, not incidental bloat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#3970): backfill changeset PR number (pr:0 -> pr:4000) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
c5f2b94b27 |
enhance(#3907): gates report no-input instead of a verdict they never reached (#3932)
* feat(#3907): gates report no-input instead of asserting a verdict they never reached The three stdin-reading gates bound 2 to a stdin read error only, with no arm for stdin closed at zero bytes - so empty input flowed into the detector, found nothing, and exited 1, which each module's own comment defines as a negative verdict. An unset PHASE_SECTION made the UI gate assert the phase has no UI. Empty and whitespace-only input now exit NO_INPUT, and a read error exits UNAVAILABLE rather than a locally-invented 2, both resolved through the registry and delivered by terminateNow. The exit code was only half of it: under --json the same input emitted {detected:false}, byte-identical to the fabricated payload #3909 exists to fix, and the blocking coverage gate reads that payload. Empty input now emits the in-tree {skipped:true,reason} form with no detected key at all. teams-status is excluded: it never reads stdin and has no invented 2, so the four-module framing in the issue and ADR is wrong. The dead root bin/lib/ui-safety-gate.cjs is deleted - no installer reference, no workflow invocation, and the live fallback chains are for other modules. Its removal restores the unit tests to the module that actually ships; they had been asserting the stale copy's two-field shape, which is why it drifted unnoticed. * fix(#3907): drive gate tests through the process seam, and make removed-but-needed basename-precise CONTRIBUTING requires every subprocess go through tests/helpers/process-seam.cjs; two of the three gate suites hand-rolled spawnSync while the third, added in the same change, used runNode correctly for the identical injection case. Converted the blocks this change added, leaving pre-existing ones alone. Deleting one of two files sharing a basename made lint-removed-but-needed report 14 references that were all to the surviving canonical module - the false-positive class its own docstring names. It now matches on the deleted file's full path when a surviving file shares its basename, which is more precise rather than weaker: a genuine full-path reference still fails, and behaviour is unchanged when no basename collides. It immediately caught a docstring on this branch that spelled the deleted path. * test(#3907): update the one existing assertion that pinned the old empty-stdin verdict A pre-existing test asserted exit 1 on empty stdin - the defect this phase removes - and was missed because the change added new blocks without auditing existing ones pinning the old contract. Audited the rest: the other three status-1 assertions in that file all feed real input and are the genuine-negative controls that must keep returning 1, so exactly one was stale. The retired 2 is gone from the describe's contract comment too. * chore(#3907): backfill changeset pr number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
e20744eacb |
enhance(#3884): failure is a value — strict argv, and --pick that signals absence (#3922)
* test(#3884): failing-first coverage for strict argv and absence-signalling --pick ADR-3473 §8.4 says failure is a value. Three families currently encode failure as success, and this commit pins each one RED before the fix lands. Measured on this tree, 2026-08-26: gsd-tools generate-slug "test" --pick nonexistent -> empty stdout, exit 0 (#3365) gsd-tools audit-open --pick nonexistent_field -> dumps the entire human-readable audit report, exit 0 gsd-tools generate-slug "Hello World" --raw --pick bogus -> prints "hello-world", another field's value, exit 0 gsd-tools query state.planned-phase 3 (positional, no --phase) -> exit 0; STATE.md's "Phase: 2 of 5 (Widget Support)" is overwritten to "Phase: null - READY TO EXECUTE" and the frontmatter gains a corrupted current_phase_name (#3358) tests/pick-flag.test.cjs:27 previously asserted the #3365 defect as the contract ("returns empty string for missing field", success === true). That assertion is replaced by the required behavior rather than deleted. The new parseNamedArgs block calls the spec-object signature that does not exist yet, so it fails today by construction. The 11 existing behavior-lock tests are left untouched here; they are corrected in the implementation commit. C1/C4 assert at the consumer's output - STATE.md's bytes - per ADR-3180 Decision 4(b). A unit assertion on the parser would have passed throughout this defect's life. Design: .gsd/phase/feat-3884-failure-is-a-value/40-design.md Test matrix: .gsd/phase/feat-3884-failure-is-a-value/50-test-matrix.md Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * enhance(#3884): failure is a value — strict argv, and --pick that signals absence Implements ADR-3473 §8.4. Absence, emptiness and failure stop being interchangeable ways to say "I could not answer". parseNamedArgs (src/command-arg-projection.cts) Takes a spec object with a REQUIRED `positionals: number | 'rest'` and returns the hub's Result shape instead of a bare Record. Declaring the positional arity is what makes #3358's call site unrepresentable rather than merely detectable: an unrecognized flag or a token past the declared boundary is now InvalidArgs, naming the offending token and listing the accepted flags. The legacy positional-array call shape throws a TypeError — an internal invariant violation per ADR-3473 Decision 2, so a stale hand-written .cjs call site fails loudly instead of destructuring undefined off a Result. parseNamedArgsOrExit projects a failure onto the caller's error(); it is a projection over the one parser, not a second parser. Measured before, against a STATE.md with a populated phase-2 block: query state.planned-phase 3 (positional, no --phase) -> exit 0; "Phase: 2 of 5 (Widget Support)" overwritten to "Phase: null - READY TO EXECUTE", frontmatter gains a corrupted current_phase_name After: exit 1, `unexpected positional argument "3"`, STATE.md byte-identical. The flag form is unchanged and still updates STATE.md. --pick <field> (gsd-core/bin/gsd-tools.cjs) extractField returns {found,value}, and the pick block no longer shares one catch between "output was not JSON" and "field was absent". An absent field exits 1 with pick_field_absent, naming the field and the keys that do exist; non-JSON output exits 1 with pick_output_not_json instead of dumping the command's entire output. A field that is PRESENT with value null, '', 0 or false still prints at exit 0 — that is an answer, not a failure, and it is what keeps `--pick count` printing 0 on a fresh project. Measured before: `audit-open --pick nonexistent_field` printed the whole human-readable audit report at exit 0, and `generate-slug X --raw --pick bogus` printed "hello-world" — a different field's value, confidently, at exit 0. ADR-3409 Decision 7 explicitly deferred this contract fix to #3473; this is it. The sub-issue's "returns 0 when the count is zero OR absent" wording is superseded by the ADR rule it implements: zero prints 0, absence exits non-zero. Defaulting absence to 0 would demote "could not answer" to "the answer is zero" — the hazard docs/how-to/resolve-unreachable-guard-findings.md already warns against. Guard ledger (ADR-3473 Decision 6) scripts/lint-unreachable-guard-drift.cjs Detector A is RETIRED. Its premise — that a `--pick ... || echo` arm can never fire — is now false, so the shape it forbade is the correct idiom and keeping it would forbid the fix. Detector B (glob-consuming cat/ls, a nullglob mechanism this change does not touch) is retained in full, as are the shared scanner, the escape-marker parser and the baseline. Net: -1 detector, 0 added. The file is not deleted. Call-site audit 45 prompt-layer --pick invocations, every one a plain X=$(...) assignment — none in an if test, && chain, or a pipeline whose status is consumed, and no shell block in workflows/commands/agents/references sets -e. Of the 13 (command, field) pairs the prompt layer reads, 10 are always present; the 3 sometimes-absent ones each sit behind a prior found/existence check. No ADR-3409-class "field the command never produces" remains. Design: .gsd/phase/feat-3884-failure-is-a-value/40-design.md Test matrix: .gsd/phase/feat-3884-failure-is-a-value/50-test-matrix.md Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3884): escape untrusted tokens in diagnostics, and cover five unpinned rows Two review findings, both fixed here rather than recorded as limits. 1. A newline in an untrusted token forged a second stderr line. Before, plain-text mode: $ gsd-tools query state.planned-phase $'foo\nError: forged second line' Error: unexpected positional argument "foo Error: forged second line" After: Error: unexpected positional argument "foo\nError: forged second line" --json-errors mode was never affected — io.error runs that payload through JSON.stringify. Plain-text mode writes 'Error: ' + message verbatim, and the three new InvalidArgs reasons plus the two new --pick diagnostics all interpolate a token that comes straight from argv. Fixed with ONE shared helper, formatDiagnosticToken (src/io.cts), applied at every interpolation site — not a copy per site. It is deliberately NOT applied inside error() itself: several callers in this tree emit intentional multi-line diagnostics, and escaping newlines there would mangle them. The available-top-level-keys list needed the same treatment for a reason the review did not anticipate: `frontmatter get <file>` reads an ARBITRARY user document and echoes that document's own keys into the diagnostic. Verified reachable — a frontmatter key containing a newline reaches the key list — so formatKeyForDiagnosticList is guarding a live path, not a hypothetical one. Ordinary keys still render plain and unquoted; a fix that merely dropped the key would also have passed a "one line" assertion, so the test pins the escaped key's presence too. 2. Five behavior-table rows were implemented but nothing pinned them: B7 a dotted path that dies partway B9 bracket syntax on a non-array B10 a negative array index, in and out of range B14 a JSON root that is not an object B17 an @file: payload over 50KB B17 is the load-bearing one. output() writes @file:<path> instead of inline JSON past 50000 characters, and --pick resolves that BEFORE parsing; with no test, a future reordering of those two steps turns every large result into a false pick_output_not_json. The fixture seeds 1200 phase directories and measures the payload at 62474 characters, asserting the spill actually happened rather than assuming it. Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3884): correct the strict-argv surface against a full verification run The first full run came back with 90 failures across 12 files, none in the new tests. They were the argv surface telling me what it actually is. Ten root causes; each classified before anything was changed. I over-implemented, and that is reverted. ADR-3473 §8.4 says parseNamedArgs rejects "unrecognized and positional tokens". It says nothing about a value flag whose value is missing. Making that an error was my design decision, not the rule, and it broke a deliberately recorded contract: `--prd` with no value resolving to null (tests/init.test.cjs emptyPrdValueIsFalsyAndTreatedAsAbsent, row B5; tests/section-manifest-init-facts.test.cjs "flag-shaped value"). The "requires a value" branch is deleted outright rather than kept behind an option — an unused strictness mode is speculative generality. Unknown-flag and unexpected-positional rejection, which is what §8.4 actually mandates, is unchanged. --wave needed a third flag kind the original design did not anticipate. `--wave N` is documented (commands/gsd/execute-phase.md:4,48) and the shipped workflow reconstructs and passes it (execute-phase.md:84), while #2932 records token-PRESENCE semantics: the CLI cares only that the flag appeared, and the value belongs to the workflow layer. That is neither a boolean flag nor a value flag, so `optionalValueFlags` now exists — presence-only in `data`, and the validation cursor consumes a following non-flag token so it is not reported as a stray positional. Every other declared boolean flag was checked against every argument-hint and prose usage in commands/, workflows/, agents/ and docs/; `--wave` is the only one of this shape. Five tests were pinning forms that never worked. tests/adr857-core-without-capabilities.test.cjs passed `init plan-phase --phase 01-stub`, but the documented form is positional (docs/CLI-TOOLS.md:776) and the handler reads args[2] — which for that form is the literal string "--phase". Measured on the pre-fix build against a real .planning/phases/01-stub/ directory: init plan-phase 01-stub -> phase_found=true init plan-phase --phase 01-stub -> phase_found=false The test asserted only exit 0 and key presence, so it had been green while proving nothing about phase resolution. Corrected to the documented form and strengthened to assert phase_found === true. Same class in state.test.cjs (`--plan-count`, a flag that does not exist; the real one is `--plans`), milestone-archive.test.cjs (`init new-milestone --json`, silently ignored), and concurrency-safety.test.cjs (a bare positional field name whose OR-assertion passed because a whole-document dump happens to contain the substring it looked for). Six handlers had no argv validation at all — the same #3358 shape this phase exists to close, found while fixing the rest: init verify-work / phase-op / review / todos / remove-workspace read args[2] with nothing checking the rest, and validate health read --repair/--backfill through a bare args.includes() scan that bypassed the parser entirely. All now go through the seam, so the flag has one owner. tests/init-debug.test.cjs rows C4/C5 asserted that an unrecognized flag must NOT fail. That is the behavior §8.4 removes, and Decision 8 says a caller's local expectation does not override §8, so they are inverted and renamed — a test still called "ignores an unrecognized flag" while asserting rejection would be its own defect. Row C6's point is its PWNED canary; that assertion is kept verbatim and only its exit-status expectation changed, because the hostile token is now rejected rather than absorbed. The blast-radius estimate in 40-design.md is corrected rather than quietly left wrong. get_impact reported MEDIUM / 8 symbols upstream, and that was accurate for what the graph can see — parseNamedArgs's callers. It cannot see that those callers' handlers accept argv shapes wider than the code reading args[2] suggests, which is where the real surface was. Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3884): withdraw the validate-health tightening, finish the A2/A3 revert Second full run: 46 failures, down from 90. Four causes, two of them mine. Reverted `validate health` entirely — it was scope creep, and it broke a real flag. ~30 of the 46 read `unknown flag "--json"; accepted: --repair, --backfill`. The previous commit routed `validate health` through the parser on the reasoning that a flag should have one owner. That was wrong twice over: §8.4 names parseNamedArgs and count queries, and `validate health` was never a parseNamedArgs call site — it read its flags, just not through the parser, so it had no silent-drop defect to fix. Tightening it omitted `--json`, which the health-diagnostic suites use heavily. The handler is now byte-for-behaviour back to its pre-branch form. `validate context` stays converted: it genuinely was a call site, and its `--json` is now declared rather than read by a second `args.includes` scan. The five handlers that had NO validation at all — init verify-work / phase-op / review / todos / remove-workspace — stay fixed. Those read args[2] with nothing checking the rest, which is the #3358 shape this phase owns. Finished the A2/A3 revert. Three tests still encoded the deleted "a value flag with a missing value is an error" rule, including one added by the previous commit for that rule. All three now assert the reverted null contract, and the ones whose titles said "rejected" are renamed — a test named for a contract it no longer asserts is its own defect. `--wave=` and `--wave --weird` are correctly rejected. Neither is documented in commands/gsd/execute-phase.md, gsd-core/workflows/execute-phase.md or docs/, and neither is emitted by the shipped prompt layer, so both are unrecognized tokens that §8.4 mandates rejecting. `doesNotConsumeFollowingFlagAsWaveValue` keeps the property it exists for — asserted directly now, at the parser, that `--wave` does not swallow a following flag as its value — and only its exit-status expectation changed. A contradiction inside this branch, surfaced by the audit and resolved the safe way. Two pre-existing #3573 tests call `state begin-phase '2'` and `state planned-phase '2'` with a bare positional, relying on the old permissive parser to ignore it. This branch's own #3358 regression test requires that exact argv to be REJECTED. The two are mutually exclusive. Widening the router to accept a bare positional — mirroring complete-phase — would have silently re-opened #3358, and was verified to do exactly that: with the widened router, `query state.planned-phase 3` returned exit 0 and wrote current_phase_name again. It is reverted. docs/CLI-TOOLS.md:116 and docs/COMMANDS.md:2192 document only the `--phase N` form for both verbs, so the two #3573 tests move to it. Their assertions were never about the call shape — only that total_phases survives the resync — and both still pass. complete-phase is untouched: its bare positional IS documented, and it keeps the dynamic boundary and the negative-space note that record why. The audit that produced this is in the PR body: for every handler whose declaration changed, the flags it reads anywhere in its body, the flags the shipped surface documents, and the shapes the suite passes, compared. The `--json` miss was a pattern, not an accident — declaring a handler's flags from its parseNamedArgs call alone misses whatever it reads elsewhere. Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#3884): backfill the changeset PR number Refs #3884 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
e40e9670f8 |
fix(#3705): consult model_policy in the install-time bake so agent frontmatter matches dispatch (#3863)
* test(#3705): failing-first coverage for model_policy in the install-time bake * fix(#3705): consult model_policy in the install-time bake so frontmatter matches dispatch * fix(#3705): inject the effective runtime into the policy so runtime_tiers is reached * test(#3705): use assert.doesNotMatch, the assertion that exists * chore(#3705): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
107eb8c1d9 |
feat(#3753): run docs guards on the PR that changes the docs they read (#3787)
A PR whose diff is entirely under docs/ runs zero tests, so a guard whose INPUT
is shipped prose cannot protect the PR lane of the diffs it exists to check. Its
only firing opportunity is after merge, on the shared branch -- which is how next
went red on
|