4b402b0325d73ac297088b8bc1b282c24b876d4e
1 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Brenden Smerbeck
|
e54d3aa159 |
enhance(#4401): register workflow.compact_content as a validated config key (#4441)
* feat(#4401): register workflow.compact_content as a validated config key - Add compact_content: false to the nested workflow object in gsd-core/bin/shared/config-defaults.manifest.json - Add 'workflow.compact_content': false to SCHEMA_DEFAULTS in src/config.cts so an absent key resolves to false via config-get --raw - validKeys entry in config-schema.manifest.json already present Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#4401): behavioral and boundary tests for workflow.compact_content - 19 behavioral tests covering config-set/config-get round trip, invalid-shape rejection (banana, 42, empty string), the corrected null-unset semantics (#2046), absent-key resolution against config-defaults.manifest.json, config-new-project wiring, and doc-row shape assertions - Drops the install-tree fixture-parity block (and its docstring item) that asserted gsd-core/references/compact-content-gate.md and gsd-core/workflows/compact/map-codebase.md fixture entries — those paths belong to #4402 and do not exist on this filtered branch Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#4401): document workflow.compact_content in both config references - One 4-cell row in docs/CONFIGURATION.md (workflow.* run) - One 5-cell row under Workflow Fields in gsd-core/references/planning-config.md - Both cross-reference ADR-4139 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4401): add changeset - Added-type fragment, pr: 4401 (issue number; backfill to the real PR number is a required follow-up once the PR is opened, per D-08 and CHANGESET-PR- FIELD-DRIFT) Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4401): backfill changeset pr field to #4441 Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4401): derive workflow.compact_content default from CONFIG_DEFAULTS SCHEMA_DEFAULTS['workflow.compact_content'] hardcoded the literal false instead of deriving it from CONFIG_DEFAULTS the way 3 of its 8 sibling entries do (smart_zone_tokens, pr_strict, inline_plan_threshold), leaving a single-source-of-truth drift risk: a future manifest-only edit to the default could silently diverge from this literal, only caught later by the D-03 test if it ever happened to manifest. Adds compact_content to CONFIG_DEFAULTS in src/config-loader.cts and derives SCHEMA_DEFAULTS from it in src/config.cts, matching the majority sibling pattern. Found during maintainer review (review-open-prs) of this PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4401): map compact_content in config-field-docs NAMESPACE_MAP The previous commit added compact_content to CONFIG_DEFAULTS in src/config-loader.cts but missed the matching entry in tests/config-field-docs.test.cjs's NAMESPACE_MAP, which maps flat CONFIG_DEFAULTS keys to their namespaced doc form before checking gsd-core/references/planning-config.md for a match. Without it, the test looked for a bare `compact_content` doc reference instead of the actual `workflow.compact_content` row, and failed: "CONFIG_DEFAULTS keys missing from planning-config.md: compact_content". Found by actually running gsd-test against the branch rather than trusting the plausible-looking fix. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * test(#4401): register compact-content-4139 test in the docs-guard lane tests/compact-content-4139.test.cjs's D-06 tests read docs/CONFIGURATION.md directly (fs.readFileSync) to assert the workflow.compact_content doc row's shape, which makes it a doc-reading test file under the #3753 docs-guard lane. It was never added to scripts/docs-guard-registry.cjs's DOCS_GUARD_TESTS map and carries no docs-guard-exempt marker, so tests/ci-docs-guard-registry.test.cjs's registration lint correctly failed: "compact-content-4139.test.cjs reads a docs/ path but is not registered in the docs-guard lane and carries no docs-guard-exempt marker". Registers it with ['docs/CONFIGURATION.md'] (the only real docs/-prefixed path it reads; gsd-core/references/planning-config.md is outside this registry's docs/ scope, matching the sibling config-field-docs.test.cjs entry's existing convention). Found by actually running gsd-test against the branch — this gap predates the maintainer's config-loader.cts fix and was already present in the original PR. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com> Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |