682eaae3f047280d69ce3da75fc35afafeca02ae
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
bc557f6876 |
chore(#3520): ratchet on effective exemptions, track unverified separately (#3529)
Phase 5 of #3464, following #3465, #3466, #3502 and #3508. Those cut the
ceiling 305 -> 278, made the rule accurate, and ended file-wide amnesty. This
one fixes the number itself.
scripts/lint-allow-test-rule-refs.cjs counted FILES CONTAINING MARKER TEXT.
Only 5 of those files carry a marker that actually suppresses a violation the
rule detects, across 10 sites. The ratcheted number was ~98% noise, which is
exactly why bumping it was frictionless: the metric was never coupled to the
thing it claimed to govern. That is the whole complaint this epic opened with,
stated precisely.
Verified directly rather than assumed: only eslint-rules/no-source-grep.cjs
functionally honors the marker. Four other rule files mention allow-test-rule
in prose only, and no-raw-rmsync-in-tests.cjs:24 explicitly states it does not
apply. So the large count was not legitimately large because several rules
share the annotation.
Now two numbers, only the first ratcheted:
EFFECTIVE EXEMPTIONS -- markers that actually suppress a detected violation.
10 sites across 5 files. Tightly ratcheted in both directions, as before:
over the ceiling fails, and slack beyond grace fails.
UNVERIFIED MARKERS -- marker-bearing files with no detectable violation. 273
files. Reported and given a loose ceiling so the pool cannot silently
balloon, but deliberately NOT tightly ratcheted, because shrinking it is a
rule-coverage problem and not a delete-the-markers problem.
A file with at least one effective site counts as effective and is not also
counted as unverified; the two numbers never double-count.
Reporting ONLY the effective count was considered and rejected. It would say
five files and look excellent while being falsely reassuring, because "no
detectable violation" is not "no violation". This phase's own measurement found
two genuine source-greps that are unsuppressed AND undetected --
tests/security-prompt-injection.security.test.cjs:852 and
tests/check-update-config-dir.test.cjs:91 -- each reading a real shipped file
and text-searching it, invisible only because the path is bound to a separate
const the rule never resolves back to its literal. Markers guarding that class
count as zero-effective and would look vestigial. Trading a number that is too
big and meaningless for one that is too small and falsely reassuring is not
progress, so the script prints the known-limit caveat alongside the numbers and
the two undetected violations are filed separately rather than lost.
Single source of truth is structural, not a matter of discipline. The script
does not re-implement detection or the site-scoped adjacency predicate -- that
is the generative-fix-divergence class this repo has shipped before. The rule
now exports MAX_MARKER_LOOKAHEAD_LINES, MARKER_COMMENT_RE,
collectMarkerAndCommentLines and isSuppressedAt (extracted verbatim, no logic
change), plus a default-off neutralizeSuppression option so the counter can
enumerate every site through the real rule via ESLint's Linter API and then
classify each with the rule's own predicate, replicating reportUnlessSuppressed's
search-line-OR-read-line check exactly. Default rule behavior is byte-identical:
tests/eslint-rules.test.cjs passes 168/168 unchanged. A parity test asserts the
script's suppressed/not verdict equals the rule's own report/no-report outcome
for every site in a fixture corpus.
A real silent-failure bug surfaced and was fixed while building this: ESLint's
flat-config Linter reports "No matching configuration" and returns ZERO messages
for any filename resolving outside its cwd. That would have quietly
misclassified every sandboxed test fixture as having no violations -- a test
suite that passes while asserting nothing. Fixed by anchoring the Linter to the
tests dir, with a defensive throw if it ever recurs.
Two earlier claims of mine are corrected by this phase's measurement. Widening
the source-dir allowlist to include hooks/ -- the "fifth blind spot" recorded in
#3508 -- rescues ZERO sites; it is real in principle and has no practical
effect, because the hooks reads that exist are missed for other reasons
(.sh extension, identifier-indirection, dynamic filenames). And the #3508
correction that attributed those reads to the hooks/ gap rather than to variable
indirection was itself incomplete: both are independently sufficient, so fixing
either alone changes nothing. I accepted the reviewer's causal claim as
uncritically as I had made my own.
The unverified count is 273, not the ~289 in the phase design doc. That is
legitimate drift -- the baseline was measured at
|
||
|
|
5339dd60e5 |
feat(#3313): allow-test-rule total-file-count ratchet, F17 promotions (#3326)
Extends lint-allow-test-rule-refs.cjs with a second, independent check alongside the existing uncited-citation identity ratchet: the total number of distinct test files carrying any allow-test-rule marker (cited or not) is now checked against a tight ceiling via the previously-unwired assertTightCeiling primitive (allowlist-ratchet.cjs, 0 prior callers). A cited exemption is legitimate under ADR-456 but nothing stopped the raw total from growing forever - this closes that gap without duplicating the file walk (both checks consume one shared walkTestFiles pass). Ceiling introduced at the exact measured high-water mark (314 files, grace 3) rather than a padded estimate, per "budgets may only decrease." Also lands the two F17 pieces (absorbed from the now-closed #1885) that had no precondition: - --max-warnings 0 added to lint/lint:ci - local/no-source-grep promoted warn->error in the scripts/bin/ eslint-rules glob block (already error in the tests/ glob) Both promotions were pre-verified against a zero-warning tree (fresh non-cached eslint run) before flipping, per the maintainer's clean- tree-first decision. Not included: local/no-elapsed-assertion promotion, which stays warn pending #3314 (H2) - 10 of 19 clock-touching src modules have no sanctioned time-control mechanism until ADR-456 is amended there. H1 of epic #3053, absorbing #1885 F17. Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |