4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Tom Boucher	0763326ced	fix(#3780): serialize WINDOWS.md ledger mutations on a cross-process lock (#4681) ... * test(#3780): regression tests for parallel ledger-writer loss * fix(#3780): serialize WINDOWS.md mutations on a cross-process ledger lock * fix(#3780): keep the ledger-unavailable degrade contract intact under the lock wrapper * chore(#3780): backfill changeset PR number (4681) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>	2026-09-13 05:13:42 -04:00
Dennis Alexis Valin Dittrich	18c899def5	enhance(#4209): optional external source reviewer lanes for /gsd:code-review (#4323) ... * test(01-01): define reviewer-support trait contract Add failing coverage for step.supportsReviewerLanes (#4209 DISP-02): validator rejects non-boolean values with an exact field path, accepts missing/true/false, and the real code-review capability.json steps must declare supportsReviewerLanes: true. Add loop-resolver projection coverage proving the trait reaches activeHooks verbatim for a provider-neutral synthetic step (not code-review-specific), and that omitted/false values stay inert (no key on the active hook). All 8 new assertions fail today: the validator has no such field, and loop-resolver has nothing to project. RED before GREEN. * feat(01-01): declare reviewer-capable steps Add step.supportsReviewerLanes (#4209 DISP-02): a strict optional boolean opt-in trait, step-scoped (not capability-wide). Only a literal true validates and projects; false/omitted stay inert (no key on the projected active hook), and every non-boolean type fails capability-validator.cjs with an exact field-path error. Opt both existing code-review steps (execute:post, execute:wave:post) into the trait in capabilities/code-review/capability.json. Project the validated field through src/loop-resolver.cts into activeHooks so a provider-neutral generic interpreter can read it without any code-review-specific knowledge. Document the field in docs/reference/capability-manifest.md and regenerate gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-registry.cjs via the generator (never hand-edited). Makes all 8 RED assertions from the prior commit pass. * test(01-02): define shared reviewer dispatch - Add tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs covering dispatchReviewerLanes: inert when the supportsReviewerLanes trait is off or nothing is selected, exactly-once plan/invoke per selected lane, duplicate-alias dedup, the bounded metadata-only source-review prompt (repo root, paths+baseSha, depth, four fixed prohibitions), and capability-neutral reuse via a second synthetic step context. - RED: module under test (src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts) does not exist yet, so require() fails and every assertion is unreached. * feat(01-02): dispatch reviewers for opted-in steps - Add src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts: dispatchReviewerLanes(input, deps), ONE interpreter for a step's supportsReviewerLanes trait. Reuses resolveReviewerSelection for selection and resolveLanePlan for planning (both already-existing, pure building blocks); invocation is the one required, caller-injected seam (deps.invoke) since runLane needs OS-aware spawn plumbing this module does not own. - trait !== true, or a selection resolving to zero lanes, dispatches nothing (zero plan/invoke calls). Each selected lane is planned and invoked exactly once, in the selector's deduped/sorted order. - buildSourceReviewPrompt assembles a metadata-only bounded prompt (repo root, canonical paths + base SHA, depth, four fixed prohibitions) — never file contents — written once per dispatch and shared across every invoked lane. - GREEN: tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs now passes. * test(01-02): define reviewer dispatch failures - Extend tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs with the fail-closed matrix: an explicitly requested lane the selector could not resolve still lets the OTHER resolved lane run, but the aggregate result must never read as a clean success (and 'every explicit lane unavailable' must be distinguishable from the plain no-flags-passed inert case); request-level validation (path traversal, absolute paths outside repoRoot, empty/non-string paths, missing depth/base SHA) halts the whole dispatch before any lane is planned or invoked; a per-lane prompt-budget overflow hard-fails only that lane before invoke while its sibling still runs. - RED: src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts does not yet implement any of these guards, so 9 of the new assertions fail against the current (Task 1) implementation. * fix(01-02): fail closed in reviewer dispatch - src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts: add the fail-closed guards the prior commit deliberately left out. An explicitly requested lane the selector could not resolve no longer lets the aggregate read as a clean success — lanes that DID resolve still run and keep their results (never narrow the requested set), but selection.errors now flips the aggregate ok to false, and 'every explicit lane unavailable' is now distinguishable (SELECTION_FAILED) from the plain no-flags-passed inert case (NO_LANES_SELECTED). - Add request-level validation (validatePaths, depth/baseSha presence) that halts the WHOLE dispatch before any lane is planned or invoked: path traversal, absolute paths outside repoRoot, empty/non-string paths, and missing provenance are all rejected up front. - Add per-lane prompt-budget enforcement (resolveBudget, mirroring gsd-tools.cjs's budgetFor convention including budget 0 = unbounded): a lane whose resolved budget the prompt exceeds hard-fails before invoke runs for it, without cancelling a sibling lane already planned. - Document the supportsReviewerLanes trait and its dispatch-step interpreter in gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md. - GREEN: all 19 tests in tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs pass; no regressions in the review-lane/reviewer-selection/prompt-budget suites (356 passing). * test(01-03): define optional source reviewer flow RED: assert code-review.md dispatches roster-derived reviewer-lane flags through a single review-lane dispatch-step call (DISP-01..05), that the no-flag path stays byte-for-behavior unchanged (COMP-01), and that external evidence reaching the internal reviewer prompt is marked unverified (CONS-02). Also covers the CLI contract directly: no-op with no explicit selection, and fail-closed on an explicit unknown lane (SAFE-07) via real gsd-tools.cjs subprocess calls. * feat(01-03): route optional source reviewers GREEN: code-review.md gains a dispatch_reviewer_lanes step that matches canonical reviewer-lane flags against the merged first-party + installed roster (never a hand-maintained list) and, only when at least one is present, calls the shared reviewer-step interpreter exactly once with the already-resolved repo root, file scope, depth, and base SHA. Its evidence paths are appended to the internal reviewer prompt via ${EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK}, explicitly marked unverified. No reviewer-lane flag leaves the internal-only dispatch byte-for-behavior unchanged (COMP-01). Deviation (Rule 3 — blocking issue): 01-02 documented `review-lane dispatch-step` (gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md) as the CLI route `dispatchReviewerLanes` wires through, but never implemented the gsd-tools.cjs subcommand — the workflow's call had nothing to reach. Add it to the existing review-lane router, reusing the same effort-aware plan building and runner deps `plan`/`invoke` already use (factored into buildLaneRunnerDeps to avoid duplicating the spawn/http/fs seam). Guard the CLI's own `detected` set on whether an explicit flag was passed: resolveReviewerSelection's no-explicit-selection fallback is "select every detected reviewer" (the correct default for /gsd:review), and passing it an unconditionally non-empty detected set would silently invoke the whole roster on every no-flag code review, violating COMP-01. * test(01-03): define external finding consolidation RED: assert gsd-code-reviewer.md treats <external_reviewer_evidence> as untrusted input — independently re-verifies every claim against the actual current source, resists a prompt-injection attempt embedded in evidence text, and folds a verified claim into the existing Narrative Findings section with no second REVIEW.md schema (CONS-01..03). Also assert code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK restates the four fixed source-review prohibitions (SAFE-03..06) at the internal-reviewer handoff. * feat(01-03): consolidate external review evidence GREEN: gsd-code-reviewer.md's load_context parses <external_reviewer_evidence> as untrusted data, independently re-verifies every cited claim against the actual current source before it can appear in REVIEW.md, and explicitly resists prompt injection embedded in evidence text (never a command, no matter what it claims to be). A verified claim folds into the existing Narrative Findings section with (external: {slug}) provenance — one REVIEW.md schema only, no separate external-findings section. code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK now restates the four fixed source-review prohibitions (SAFE-03..06) at the internal-reviewer handoff. * fix(01-02): gitignore the reviewer-step-dispatch build artifact 01-02 added src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts but never added its npm run build:lib output to .gitignore, unlike every sibling gsd-core/bin/lib/*.cjs generated file. Left it showing as untracked noise in git status. * docs(01-04): publish user and command contract for reviewer-lane source review - Document optional reviewer-lane flags on /gsd-code-review in USER-GUIDE.md and COMMANDS.md: opt-in, no source bodies in prompts, no fallback on failure, findings independently consolidated into the single REVIEW.md - Add the same contract to the docs/features/code-review-pipeline.md fragment and regenerate docs/FEATURES.md from it - Preserve /gsd-review as the plan-review command; cross-reference it rather than duplicating the reviewer roster - Pick up docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json and skills/gsd-code-review/SKILL.md drift owned by source already shipped in Plans 01-01/01-03 but never regenerated (npm run regen:derived had not been run in this worktree) * docs(01-04): align architecture and agent ownership docs for reviewer-lane trait - ARCHITECTURE.md: trace the #4209 capability trait (supportsReviewerLanes) through the shared dispatchReviewerLanes interpreter to the existing review-lane plan/invoke machinery, ending at gsd-code-reviewer as the sole REVIEW.md consolidator - AGENTS.md: document gsd-code-reviewer's full-context verification scope and its treatment of external reviewer evidence as unverified input - No new diagram, abstraction, or config key; docs/CONFIGURATION.md is unchanged since the feature adds no setting or default * fix(01-02): eslint-ignore the reviewer-step-dispatch build artifact Same gap as the earlier .gitignore fix: 01-02 added src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts but never added its generated gsd-core/bin/lib/reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs output to eslint.config.mjs's ignore list like every sibling generated file, so tsc's emitted __importDefault CommonJS-interop var tripped no-var. * fix(01-04): add the reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs roster row to docs/INVENTORY.md 01-04 regenerated docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json (which now lists cli_modules/reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs) but the hand-written roster row in docs/INVENTORY.md — required by design, since a role sentence cannot be generated — was never added. * fix(01-01): update the code-review capability-step fixture for supportsReviewerLanes refactor-trigger-cli.test.cjs's preservesCodeReviewHookShapeAlongsideRefactorHook strict-deep-equals the code-review step's exact shape at execute:post; 01-01 added supportsReviewerLanes: true to that step and this fixture was not updated. * chore(01-03): acknowledge emitted-doc growth for code-review.md and gsd-code-reviewer.md Both files grew as a direct, intended consequence of wiring optional reviewer lanes into /gsd:code-review (the new dispatch_reviewer_lanes step and the untrusted-evidence consolidation contract) — not incidental drift. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: code-review.md — new dispatch_reviewer_lanes step and EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK wiring for optional reviewer lanes (#4209) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-code-reviewer.md — untrusted external-evidence consolidation contract for optional reviewer lanes (#4209) * test(01-05): define WR-01/WR-02 reliability contract for dispatchReviewerLanes From internal code review: dispatched must be false when zero lanes actually reached plan(), and a throwing plan()/invoke() for one lane must not discard results already collected for a sibling lane — matching the fail-closed pattern gsd-tools.cjs already uses for the same resolveLanePlan call (#2494/#2605/#1698/#1936/#2073/#2176/#2589/#2794). Refs: gsd-core-dks.16, gsd-core-dks.17 * fix(01-05): close WR-01/WR-02/IN-01/IN-02 from internal review - WR-01: dispatched now tracks whether any lane actually reached plan(), not results.length — an unresolvable selected slug no longer reports dispatched:true. - WR-02: plan()/writePromptFile()/invoke() wrapped per-lane so a throw for one lane can never discard results already collected for a sibling lane, matching the same guard gsd-tools.cjs already has around the identical resolveLanePlan call. - IN-01: documents the intentional budget===0-is-unbounded convention (#2797) the caller already relies on. - IN-02: review-lane dispatch-step no longer blocks indefinitely on an un-piped interactive TTY; fails closed to empty paths instead. Refs: gsd-core-dks.16, gsd-core-dks.17 * docs(01-05): add changeset fragment for PR #17 * fix(01-03): allowlist prompt-injection-scan false positive on the untrusted-evidence contract agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's untrusted-evidence section and its pinning regression test both quote injection phrases as the exact attack they defend against/detect — same DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION class as the existing allowlist entries, not an actual injection vector. * test(01-05): extend WR-02 coverage to writePromptFile/invoke throws; DIFF_BASE-empty skip From CodeRabbit review: WR-02's earlier fix only wrapped plan() — writePromptFile()/deps.invoke() still ran unguarded, so a throw there still aborted every later selected lane. Also covers the dispatch_reviewer_lanes DIFF_BASE-empty-provenance gap (explicit lanes silently not running when no prior review and no phase-start commit exist). * fix(01-05): skip dispatch_reviewer_lanes with a clear warning when DIFF_BASE cannot be resolved Previously an explicit reviewer-lane request with no prior review and no resolvable phase-start commit reached dispatch-step with an empty --base-sha, which fails closed via missing_provenance — correct, but silent about why explicitly requested lanes didn't run. Now skip dispatch entirely in that case with a stderr warning naming the actual cause. * fix(01-05): wrap writePromptFile/invoke in the same per-lane try/catch as plan() WR-02's original fix only guarded plan() — a throw from writePromptFile() or deps.invoke() still aborted the whole dispatch, discarding results already collected for lanes processed earlier in the loop. CodeRabbit caught the gap; WR-02b/WR-02c pin it. * fix(01-05): WR-02b mock must throw only on the first writePromptFile() call The committed mock threw unconditionally, so codex's retry also threw and failed for the same reason as claude's — the test could not distinguish 'sibling still runs' from 'sibling also breaks'. Gate the throw to the first call, matching WR-02/WR-02c's single-failure intent. * fix(#4209): close review findings from adversarial + critical-code-reviewer pass Two independent reviews (agy adversarial review, Opus critical-code-reviewer + ponytail) found 6 Blocking and 7 Required issues in the reviewer-lane dispatch wiring around dispatchReviewerLanes. All 13 tracked in gsd-core-dks.18-30 and fixed here: - dispatch-step's reducer silently swallowed whole-dispatch rejections (invalid paths, missing provenance, etc); it now checks parsed.ok/reason. - spawn_reviewer recomputed its own stale DIFF_BASE, diverging from the LAST_REVIEW_COMMIT-aware value dispatch_reviewer_lanes uses on re-review; now shares the single compute_file_scope derivation. - the external reviewer prompt had no actual review request or citation requirement, only prohibitions; added both. - removed the supportsReviewerLanes trait plumbing (capability registry, validator, loop-resolver, docs, tests) — it was never consulted by the real dispatch path, which gates on explicit CLI flags instead. - flag-resolution require() was a fragile cwd-relative literal that failed silently on non-vendored installs; now resolves via GSD_TOOLS's own directory and warns instead of swallowing failure. - reducer didn't unwrap the @file: overflow protocol for large payloads. - deduplicated resolveBudget/budgetFor into one resolveLaneBudget. - lane artifacts now write to a mktemp run dir instead of $PHASE_DIR, so a second dispatch can't overwrite prior evidence. - validatePaths rejects control characters, closing a markdown-injection vector into the external prompt via crafted filenames. - reworded the one line that tripped prompt-injection-scan.sh instead of allowlisting the whole production prompt file. - fixed a stale docstring range and a dispatched-field ordering bug. - added 3 integration tests executing the actual reducer against synthetic dispatch-step JSON, replacing markdown-substring-only assertions. 771/771 tests pass across every touched suite; tsc --noEmit clean. * fix(#4209): wire supportsReviewerLanes as the maintainer's required reusable trait The maintainer's approval on issue #4209 explicitly redirected implementation shape: reviewer-lane dispatch must be a reusable capability/step-dispatch trait ("supportsReviewerLanes"), not code-review.md hand-wiring the call itself. My previous commit (e2558326) deleted that trait entirely after finding it declared-but-never-consulted, which was backwards — the fix was to wire it, not remove it. Restores the trait (capability.json, generated registry, validator, loop-resolver.cts, docs, tests) and wires it for real: dispatch_reviewer_lanes now resolves its own active hook via `gsd_run loop render-hooks` for the configured workflow.code_review_point and only proceeds to CLI-flag matching when supportsReviewerLanes reads true. Explicit flags no longer bypass the trait; a matching flag with the trait false resolves zero slugs (proven by a new integration test executing the real fence with both trait states). Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-core/workflows/code-review.md — the dispatch_reviewer_lanes step grows a trait-resolution fence (#4209 maintainer redirect requires the capability layer, not the workflow, own the opt-in decision). * fix(#4209): dispatch-step self-verifies the reviewer-lane trait via --cap-id/--point Both an agy adversarial review and an Opus critical-code-reviewer pass independently found the same gap in my previous commit (9b2c3773d): the trait check I wired into code-review.md only protected code-review's OWN invocation — gsd-tools.cjs's dispatch-step handler still hardcoded `trait: true` unconditionally, so a second capability declaring supportsReviewerLanes would get zero enforcement from the shared CLI unless it correctly re-implemented the ~15-line render-hooks scrape itself. That is exactly the "each workflow.md hand-wiring the call" the maintainer's redirect said to eliminate. Moves the trait check into dispatch-step itself: given --cap-id/--point, it self-invokes `loop render-hooks <point>` (relocating the one subprocess code-review.md used to spawn for this, not adding a new one) and derives the real trait from that capId's active hook, rather than trusting a caller-passed boolean. code-review.md now only passes --cap-id code-review --point "$CODE_REVIEW_POINT" and no longer resolves or gates on the trait itself — the ~20-line scrape it previously carried is gone. Any other capability opts into the identical enforcement by declaring the trait and passing the same two flags. Replaced the two tests that stipulated SUPPORTS_REVIEWER_LANES as an input variable (they proved a bash branch honors a variable, not that the variable reflects the real capability manifest) with three integration tests that invoke the real dispatch-step CLI against the real first-party capability registry: the real code-review trait resolves true, an unknown --cap-id resolves false (trait_not_enabled, fail-closed), and omitting --cap-id/--point entirely resolves false (no context means no opt-in). Also: reject \x7f/U+2028/U+2029 in validatePaths' control-character check (agy-F1 was incomplete), and delete the promptWritten per-lane coupling flag — the prompt write is idempotent, so writing it once per lane instead of gating on "did any lane write it yet" removes a latent bug where a deps.plan override that ever varies promptPath per lane would silently skip writing for a later lane. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-core/workflows/code-review.md — net line count drops (the trait scrape moved into dispatch-step), but the file still grew this session across multiple commits; acknowledging per the growth-tracking convention. * fix(#4209): remove per-run token waste from the shipped prompts Runtime prompt content, not session tokens: two real, per-invocation token costs in the code that ships. 1. agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's critical_rules restated nearly all of load_context step 5's ~180-word untrusted-evidence contract in ~90 more words, breaking this section's own established terse one-liner style (every other rule here is 1-2 sentences). This prompt loads fresh on every /gsd:code-review invocation. Shrunk to a one-line cross-reference, matching how write_review's own reference to step 5 already does it. 2. buildSourceReviewPrompt repeated the base SHA on every single file line even though it is identical for every file and already stated once at the top of the prompt — O(files) wasted tokens on every dispatched lane for a 50-file review, for zero information gain. File lines are now bare paths. * fix(#4209): resolve reviewer-lane trait in-process, fix CI failures found in review round 3 Opus critical-code-reviewer found a real Blocking defect in the --cap-id/ --point self-invocation added last commit: `dispatch-step` spawned `loop render-hooks <point> --raw` as a subprocess and bare-JSON.parse'd its stdout, but `io.cjs`'s output() redirects any payload over 50000 chars to `@file:<path>` instead of inline JSON -- the same overflow protocol this feature already unwraps for its OWN dispatch result 60 lines later in code-review.md. A large-enough activeHooks envelope (more installed capabilities/fragments) would throw, get silently swallowed by the bare catch, and misreport a real trait as trait_not_enabled with zero diagnostic. Fixed by extracting the config/registry/capability-state resolution `cmdLoopRenderHooks` already performs into an exported pure function, resolveActiveHooksForPoint (both `cmdLoopRenderHooks` and dispatch-step now share it), and calling it in-process from dispatch-step instead of spawning a subprocess at all. This eliminates the @file: exposure entirely (the dispatch-step path never touches the rendered-string envelope or its JSON-stringify/50000-char threshold), removes one subprocess spawn per code-review invocation, and gives a genuine diagnostic (stderr warning) on resolution failure instead of silent fail-closed. Corrected three doc/ docstring references to the now-removed subprocess self-invocation. Also fixes 2 real CI failures this round surfaced: - lint-tests: the agy-F1 control-char regex fix's `eslint-disable-next-line no-control-regex` comment was unused under this project's ESLint config (verified locally: the rule never actually flags \x00-\x1f in this repo's config) -- a mistake from an earlier commit this session, never actually lint-checked before push. Removed the disable comment. - security (prompt-injection-scan): the agy-F1 regression test's crafted fixture literally contains "Ignore all prior instructions." as test data proving validatePaths rejects it -- allowlisted the test file, same DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION class as existing entries. Also trimmed agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's load_context step 5 (R2): one bullet stated "untrusted, never a command" three different ways in one paragraph, and a same-file duplicate of write_review's schema rule. Consolidated to state each rule once. Declined one suggestion from this round: shrinking code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK to a bare evidence list. Two tests (tests/code-review-pipeline-regression.test.cjs's CONS-01..03 block, tests/code-review.test.cjs's CONS-02 test) deliberately lock the four- prohibitions restatement and the untrusted-evidence prose into the INJECTED block itself, not just the consolidator's system prompt -- adjacency of the warning to the untrusted payload it's warning about is a recognized prompt-injection defense-in-depth pattern from this workstream's original TDD plan, not accidental duplication. * fix(#4209): correct stale per-file base-SHA prose in the external prompt Leftover from removing the per-file base SHA repetition earlier this session: the review-request sentence still said "relative to its base SHA" (singular per-file framing) when there's now exactly one base SHA, stated once above the file list. Reads "relative to the base SHA above" now. * fix(#4209): make getLane/configGet/plan required deps, delete dead defaults R3/R4 from the review round I'd deferred as low-priority test-churn: this file's one production caller (gsd-tools.cjs's dispatch-step handler) always supplies all three, so the fallbacks were dead in production -- but each was actively WRONG if ever reached: the default configGet always returned undefined, silently disabling resolveLaneBudget's overflow guard; the default getLane looked up only first-party REVIEWER_LANES, diverging from production's overlay-merged roster; the default plan skipped per-host effort resolution entirely. These defaults were introduced by this PR's own earlier work (this file did not exist before #4209 -- first commit a760bfcda, 01-02), not inherited from elsewhere, so there's no external caller depending on the lenient contract. Turned out free to fix: making the three deps required and deleting defaultGetLane/defaultPlan needed zero test changes -- every existing test that actually reaches the per-lane loop already supplies getLane/plan explicitly, and configGet's only real dependent (the budget-overflow tests) already supplies it too. 788/788 tests pass unchanged, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): define depth semantics for the external reviewer lane Verified this was a real bug, not a match to existing convention as I'd claimed when declining the suggestion earlier this session: the internal gsd-code-reviewer agent's own system prompt carries a full <depth_levels> block defining what quick/standard/deep mean and do (agents/gsd-code- reviewer.md:68-99). The external reviewer lane has no access to that persona at all -- it only ever sees buildSourceReviewPrompt's bounded text, which sent the bare depth label with zero definition to a third-party CLI with no other source of truth for what "standard" means. Added depthMeaning(), condensed from the internal reviewer's own <depth_levels> definitions so the two stay consistent, and interpolated it into the review-request sentence. 150/150 tests pass, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): merge dispatch_reviewer_lanes' split fences into one shell invocation CR-01 (Opus critical-code-reviewer, confirmed by direct execution): the roster-matching fence set EXPLICIT_JOINED/EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS, and a SEPARATE later fence read them via ${#EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS[@]} to decide whether to dispatch at all. This file's own documented rule (its depth-resolution guard, stated explicitly a few hundred lines earlier) is that a guard and the extraction it protects must run as one shell control-flow decision, because markdown-fenced blocks do not share shell state -- this step violated its own file's rule for the entire feature's gating condition. Merged the roster-resolution fence and the dispatch-decision fence into one continuous bash block, removing the intervening prose that split them. Fixed the stderr-based failure detection in the same edit (RQ-01: checking whether stderr is non-empty misfires on any benign Node warning; now checks the actual exit status of the roster-resolution command). Verified by extracting the merged fence and executing it standalone, driving both branches: --codex resolves EXPLICIT_JOINED=codex, SLUGS_COUNT=1, and a real dispatch-step call succeeds; no flags resolves EXPLICIT_JOINED empty, SLUGS_COUNT=0, dispatch-step never invoked (COMP-01). 141/141 workflow tests pass, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): depthMeaning accuracy, injection defense on all embedded fields, hoisted prompt write Batch of Required/Suggestion fixes from the Opus critical-code-reviewer + writing-for-agents pass: - CR-02/CR-03: depthMeaning() dropped real categories from quick (empty catch blocks, commented-out code) and deep (error propagation, state mutation consistency, circular dependencies) relative to the real <depth_levels> block, and had zero test coverage. Restored full accuracy and added tests that read the real agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md file directly, so drift between the two can't recur silently. Unrecognised depth now normalizes to standard's definition, matching that agent's own documented rule, instead of rendering an undefined bare label. - RQ-04: depth/baseSha/repoRoot/runDir land in the same markdown prompt `paths` does, but weren't checked for control characters like paths were (agy-F1's original finding). Hoisted CONTROL_CHAR to module scope and applied it to all four fields at the same provenance-check boundary. runDir previously had zero validation at all. - S1: deleted the dead `identity` parameter on `invoke` -- the one production caller already ignores it, no test read it by name. - S2: hoisted the shared prompt write above the per-lane loop -- promptPath is derived from runDir alone (constant across lanes by construction), so writing it once is both correct and cheaper than the per-lane write R1 introduced earlier this session. Discovered and fixed a real regression from the naive version of this hoist: an unguarded throw would have escaped dispatchReviewerLanes as an uncaught exception instead of a clean per-lane failure. Added a new PROMPT_WRITE_FAILED whole-dispatch reason, matching the existing validatePaths/MISSING_PROVENANCE halt pattern, with a dedicated regression test. - S3: moved `planned = true` past the budget-overflow gate, so `dispatched` only reports true once a lane has cleared BOTH plan and budget checks. - S5: relayed gsd-code-reviewer.md's own "performance issues are out of scope unless also correctness issues" policy into the external-lane prompt, which previously had no such guidance and could return findings the internal reviewer's own contract excludes. - RQ-05 (partial): shrunk this file's own header docstring's restatement of the trait-reuse architecture to a pointer at gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md, the canonical home. 234/234 tests pass across the full reviewer-lane test suite, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): dedupe roster-merge logic, consolidate trait architecture prose, add step completion criterion RQ-02: added a `review-lane explicit-from-argv` subcommand that reuses the SAME merged-roster logic (`laneBySlug`) `dispatch-step`/`plan`/`invoke` already share. code-review.md's ~18-line inline `node -e` reimplementing `loadRegistry`+`mergeReviewerLanes` (a rename-only copy of the block in gsd-tools.cjs) is now a single call to this subcommand -- the exact violation code-review-flags.cjs's own header warns against ("this is the canonical flag-parsing surface -- do not replicate inline bash parsing"). RQ-03: an empty --cap-id XOR --point now warns distinctly from the legitimate no-context opt-out (both absent) -- a caller that named a capability without its point was silently indistinguishable from a correct opt-out. Also hardened the CODE_REVIEW_POINT config-get fallback: it only ever fires when the config-get COMMAND ITSELF fails (config-get already resolves the manifest's own schema default in the normal case), but that failure was previously silent. RQ-05/W-01/W-12/W-13: the "supportsReviewerLanes is a reusable trait resolved inside dispatch-step" explanation was restated in full in 5 places across this session's own review cycles. Consolidated to ONE canonical statement in gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md; the other 4 (this file's own header, gsd-tools.cjs's comment, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md, code-review.md's step-opening comment) now point at it instead. W-05/W-06: loop-hook-dispatch.md described "false or non-boolean" as two inert cases when capability-validator.cjs already rejects non-boolean at load -- restated as the two cases that actually reach this code. Removed a "do not hand-roll trait resolution" prohibition whose target no longer exists once the positive description precedes it. W-04: deleted a no-op sentence in agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md ("missing block means proceed as normal") -- an absent optional block already means proceed as normal without being told. W-08/W-09: replaced longhand "zero selection/plan/invoke calls" and the made-up compound "byte-for-behavior [un]changed" with the token this session's own docs already coined for this concept (inert) and the word that means what byte-for-behavior was reaching for (unchanged). W-10: dispatch_reviewer_lanes had no completion criterion -- added one sentence naming the checkable end state (EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK is set, either populated or empty). This exact sentence would have caught the cross-fence bug fixed two commits ago at authoring time. Declined from this round, with reasoning: W-02/W-03 (trim the untrusted-evidence restatement in EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK/critical_rules) -- two tests deliberately lock this as intentional adjacency-based prompt-injection defense-in-depth, not accidental duplication (see this branch's own earlier commit). S4 (wrap LANE_RUN_DIR in a creation-site `trap ... EXIT`) -- would fire at the end of the CREATING fence, before spawn_reviewer's agent ever reads the evidence files, given this file's own documented fenced-block execution model; the existing named cross-reference between creation and cleanup already satisfies the co-location concern without introducing that regression. 853/853 tests pass across the full reviewer-lane test suite, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): merge CODE_REVIEW_POINT into dispatch_reviewer_lanes' one fence, stop test from spawning real codex Round-5 review (agy) found the same cross-fence-split bug CR-01 already fixed for EXPLICIT_JOINED/EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS: CODE_REVIEW_POINT's config-get fallback lived in an earlier, separate fence from the fence that consumes it via --point, split only by prose (not a guard, per this step's own documented rule). Merged into the single continuous fence and added a structural test asserting exactly one bash fence in the step. The new end-to-end regression test for this used --codex, which drives the fence's real `review-lane dispatch-step` call and, with the codex binary present on PATH, spawns the real external CLI — which then blocks on interactive auth with no stdin (BL-01). Stubbed gsd_run for `review-lane dispatch-step` only (captures argv instead of executing), keeping the real config-get/explicit-from-argv calls the test is actually about. * fix(#4209): split control-char vs missing provenance reason, realpath-check path escapes, stale comment Round-5 review (Opus) warning-tier findings: - WR-04: MISSING_PROVENANCE covered both "field absent" and "field present but a control-character injection attempt" — a caller distinguishing a config problem from a security event couldn't tell them apart. Split into MISSING_PROVENANCE (absent) and INVALID_PROVENANCE (present but invalid). - WR-05: validatePaths' containment check was lexical only (path.resolve), so a symlink whose own path sits inside repoRoot could still point outside it. Added an fs.realpathSync check (ENOENT-tolerant — a git-diff path can legitimately name a file already deleted in a stale worktree), realpathing repoRoot itself too so a symlinked repoRoot (e.g. /tmp on macOS) doesn't false-positive-reject its own real children. - WR-08: a comment in the per-lane loop still said a throwing writePromptFile() was caught there — stale since the prompt write was hoisted above the loop in an earlier round. WR-03 (validate depth against the quick/standard/deep enum) was considered and declined: this dispatcher is deliberately capability-neutral (see the existing "synthetic step context" test, which passes a non-code-review depth label on purpose to prove no code-review-specific special-casing exists). WR-01 (double registry load), WR-02 (trim-vs-hard-fail budget semantics), and WR-07 (reason omitted on the aggregate return) were verified against source and are not bugs — see review notes. * docs(#4209): document LANE_RUN_DIR's early-exit trade-off as accepted, not a gap Round-5 review (Opus, BL-03) flagged that an early exit between dispatch_reviewer_lanes and commit_review leaks the run-scoped temp dir. A trap-based cleanup was considered and rejected: if a step genuinely runs as a separate process, a trap set at creation time would fire at the end of that SAME fence, deleting the directory before spawn_reviewer/commit_review ever read it — worse than the leak it would fix. review.md's own gather_context/cleanup pair for the identical resource class (a run-scoped reviewer temp dir) already makes and documents this exact trade-off: cleanup runs only on a documented success path, and a leftover $TMPDIR entry is explicitly called cheaper than destroyed evidence. Recording that precedent here so this isn't re-raised as a live gap in a future review. * fix(#4209): register the WR-05 symlink-escape test's synthetic docs/ path reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs's "capability-neutral reuse" fixture passes paths: ['docs/spec.md'] as a synthetic, never-read path proving the dispatcher has no code-review-specific special-casing. lint-docs-guard- registration correctly flagged this as an unregistered docs/ path reference — add the docs-guard-exempt marker and its pinned baseline entry, the same pattern every other synthetic docs/ literal in this test suite already uses. * fix(#4209): backfill changeset pr: field with the real upstream PR number changeset-lint's fail_pr_field_drift caught the fragment still pointing at the fork PR (17) instead of the upstream one (open-gsd/gsd-core#4323) this branch is now also open against. * docs(#4209): amend ADR-2782 for the supportsReviewerLanes step-trait seam trek-e's review (2026-09-07, gsd-core#4323) found a real ADR gap: every decision in ADR-2782 (D1-D9) and every prior dated amendment governs the `role: "reviewer"` capability body and its one consumer, /gsd:review. This PR's actual new seam - a `supportsReviewerLanes: true` trait on an ordinary feature capability's `steps[]` entry, projected through loop-resolver.cts and resolved in-process via resolveActiveHooksForPoint - is a different capability axis (steps/gates/contributions) that the ADR's own scope note explicitly places out of reach. Per docs/contributor-standards.md's "Amending an accepted ADR", an in-place dated section is the established, lighter-weight path for an addition that stays within the ADR's existing decisions - used twice already in this same file - so this appends a third dated entry documenting the new seam, its consumer, and why it reuses the existing D1-D9-governed plan/invoke machinery rather than adding a second one. No decision is reversed; no new Amends/Amended-by pair is needed since the steps/gates/contributions axis already carries reciprocal links to ADR-857 and ADR-894. * fix(#4209): close two test-quality gaps trek-e's review found Minor 1: validatePaths (a path-shape parser guarding the prompt- injection/path-traversal trust boundary) had only example-based coverage, violating ADR-456's rule that parsers/budget limits carry at least one fast-check property test. Adds three: safe-segment paths are never rejected, a single leading "../" always escapes the one-segment repoRoot, and a control character anywhere is always rejected - one property per rejection reason validatePaths owns. Minor 2: the budget-overflow check (`estimatedTokens > budget`) was only ever exercised far below budget or at budget:0 (unbounded), never at the exact threshold crossing where a `>` vs `>=` off-by-one would hide. Adds three exact-boundary tests using the real estimateTokens/ buildSourceReviewPrompt the module calls internally, so the resolved token count is exact rather than approximated: budget == estimate (must pass), budget == estimate - 1 (must fail), budget == estimate + 1 (must pass). Also extracts okPlan()'s fixture timeoutMs into a named constant - local/no-adhoc-timeout-literal (#4446) landed on next after this branch was authored and flagged the pre-existing literal on rebase; it is fixture data for a synthetic plan object dispatchReviewerLanes never waits on, a distinct class from tests/helpers/timeouts.cjs's real subprocess norms. * fix(#4209): update docs-guard-registration baseline for the new ADR citation reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs's new fast-check property tests cite docs/adr/456-test-rigor-architecture.md in a justifying comment (never a real read). lint-docs-guard-registration fingerprints every docs/ path string an exempted test file mentions and fails on drift so a human re-confirms the exemption still holds - re-confirmed, and the baseline is updated to match. * fix(#4209): point changeset pr: field at the fork PR for CI validation changeset-lint's fail_pr_field_drift check compares the fragment's pr: field against the PR the CI run is actually attached to (GITHUB_EVENT_PATH), not a fixed target. Rehearsing this branch on fork PR davdittrich/gsd-core#17 needs pr: 17 to pass that check; the prior commit's pr: 4323 (the real open-gsd upstream PR number) is correct for that PR but fails here. Backfill to 4323 happens again, as the last commit, immediately before the approved push to open-gsd#4323 - never leaving pr: 17 on the branch that ships upstream. * fix(#4209): reject promptChannel:none lanes from source-review dispatch CodeRabbit found a real scope mismatch: coderabbit's lane declares promptChannel: 'none' and reviews the working tree on its own terms, fed nothing (review.md:367). Silently dispatching it through dispatchReviewerLanes would ignore the bounded paths/depth/baseSha scope buildSourceReviewPrompt promises and let the lane review whatever it independently sees fit, violating this interpreter's own scoped, metadata-only contract. Reject before plan()/invoke(), same as an unresolved slug. * fix(#4209): scope CONS-02 test to the evidence-block line, not the whole file CodeRabbit found the whole-file match on workflowContent would still pass if UNVERIFIED and re-open/reopen appeared in two unrelated parts of this 1000+-line workflow, proving nothing about the actual evidence block's contract. Line-filtered via splitLines (not a bare-\n regex spanning readFileSync content) so this stays CRLF-portable and passes local/no-unbounded-quantifier and local/no-crlf-fragile-split. * fix(#4209): guard DISPATCH_JSON substitution and capture its stderr CodeRabbit found the dispatch-step command substitution unguarded: a non-zero exit could leave DISPATCH_JSON empty (or halt the step under errexit with no warning), and the downstream reducer would only ever report the generic unparseable_dispatch_output reason, discarding the command's own diagnostic. Guarded like the existing CODE_REVIEW_POINT/ EXPLICIT_JOINED calls above it: capture stderr to a temp file, surface it in a warning on failure, and fall back to a parseable dispatch_ command_failed JSON stub so the reducer's existing reason-reporting path still fires. * docs(#4209): fix byte-for-behavior wording and missing colon, regenerate CodeRabbit found "byte-for-behavior" should read "byte-for-byte" (the established repo term for output-identical unchanged behavior) and a missing colon after the bold "Optional external reviewer lanes (#4209)" lead-in in docs/features/code-review-pipeline.md. Fixed in the two hand-authored sources (commands/gsd/code-review.md, docs/features/ code-review-pipeline.md) and regenerated the two derived projections (skills/gsd-code-review/SKILL.md via gen-plugin-skills.cjs, docs/ FEATURES.md via gen-features.cjs) so they stay in sync. * fix(#4209): drop the fabricated DISPATCH_JSON fallback stub (Windows CI) The prior fix's fallback `DISPATCH_JSON='{"ok":false,...}'` embeds double-quoted JSON keys inside a single-quoted shell literal. That extra quote density, inside an already quote-heavy ~8KB driver string, passed bash -n and the full local suite on Linux but broke Windows Git-Bash: `dispatch_reviewer_lanes computes CODE_REVIEW_POINT ... end to end (#4209 round 5)` failed on two Windows CI shards with `bash -c: unexpected EOF while looking for matching '''` — a Windows argv-to- command-line re-quoting edge case, reproducible on rerun, not a flake. Root-caused via gh api job logs plus a byte-identical local reconstruction of the test's own driver script. Fix: drop the fabricated stub. The downstream node -e reducer already falls back to reason `unparseable_dispatch_output` on any JSON.parse failure, so an empty/partial DISPATCH_JSON on command failure is still handled correctly, with zero new quoting risk. * revert(#4209): drop the DISPATCH_JSON stderr-guard nitpick (Windows CI) Two materially different mechanisms for the same CodeRabbit Nitpick ("Trivial | Quick win") both broke Windows Git-Bash reproducibly: a single-quoted JSON-literal fallback ("bash -c: unexpected EOF ... matching '''") and, after removing that, a plain `head -1 "$VAR"` inside a nested command substitution ("unexpected EOF ... matching '"'"). Both passed bash -n and the full local suite on Linux every time; both failed the SAME test deterministically on Windows CI. Two attempts at the same class of fix (nested-quote construction near this exact step) is the retry limit - reverting to the original, already-shipped, Windows-verified unguarded form rather than continuing to guess at a third quoting mechanism for a Trivial- severity nitpick. Logged as bug-221/bug-222 in .wolf/buglog.json for anyone attempting this again: the fix belongs outside this specific markdown-fence-driver test harness (e.g., a real .sh helper script) if it's worth doing at all. * fix(#4209): backfill changeset pr: field to the real upstream PR before push Fork validation (davdittrich/gsd-core#17) needed pr: 17 to satisfy changeset-lint's PR-number check while rehearsing there; this is the last commit before the approved push to the real upstream PR (open-gsd/gsd-core#4323), so the field points at that PR number again. --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@test.com> Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>	2026-09-07 22:52:33 -04:00
Tom Boucher	4f32209f78	enhance(#3267): reduce handleEvaluate complexity below refactor-trigger's own threshold (#3978) ... * fix(#3267): reduce handleEvaluate complexity below refactor-trigger's own threshold handleEvaluate scored 26 (then 21 after later #3261 commits) against the complexity-triggered-refactor feature's own default threshold of 15. Extracts the read-and-analyze loop (analyzeTouchedFiles) and the artifact/baseline/ ledger write path (finalizeEvaluation) into named helpers, per the issue's suggested direction. Behavior-preserving: every existing test in tests/refactor-trigger-cli.test.cjs is unchanged, and every degrade-path reason code (REFACTOR_INVALID_PHASE, REFACTOR_GIT_UNAVAILABLE, REFACTOR_NO_TOUCHED_FILES, REFACTOR_FILE_UNREADABLE, REFACTOR_ANALYZER_UNSUPPORTED, REFACTOR_ANALYZER_UNPARSEABLE, REFACTOR_BASELINE_WRITE_FAILED, REFACTOR_STRICT_NOT_ENFORCING) keeps its current value and emission path. The four complexity-trigger.cts lexer functions (scanFunctions, stripLiterals, skipTypeExpr, skipGenericParamList) are deliberately left untouched, per ADR-1953 D5 — they are a hand-rolled lexer state machine, densely branchy by construction, and refactoring them to lower the metric would be exactly the "split a coherent function to satisfy a metric" behavior D5 exists to prevent. Closes #3267 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs: backfill changeset PR number for #3978 Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-28 08:12:27 -04:00
Tom Boucher	b901d1e06f	feat(#1953): complexity-triggered refactor extension point (execute:post) (#3261) ... * test(#1953): failing-first suite for the complexity-triggered refactor hook 60 behavioral cases against src/complexity-trigger.cts, which does not exist yet: decision-point counting, the comment/literal stripping leak surface, threshold and jump-delta boundaries at limit-1/limit/limit+1, stable-anchor baseline semantics, and fs fault injection via mock.method. Two fast-check properties assert that stripping never manufactures a decision point and that comments and string literals are score-neutral. Also registers the refactor-trigger capability manifest (inert until refactor.trigger_enabled) and regenerates the capability registry and matrix. Verified RED on the remote runner before any implementation exists. * feat(#1953): complexity-triggered refactor extension point Adds the opt-in refactor-trigger capability. After a phase executes, an execute:post step measures per-function complexity for the files the phase touched and writes a scoped refactor proposal when a function crosses the configured threshold or drifts past its recorded anchor. Design notes worth carrying: - The signal is computed in-core (decision-point counting over comment- and literal-stripped source, Node builtins only) rather than via Memtrace or a shelled-out analyzer. The hook fires as a deterministic CLI, not an agent with MCP tools, and core takes no external dependencies — this is the only option a behavioral test can bind to. The metric sits behind a seam. - The baseline is a stable anchor, not a rolling value: set on first observation, moved only on disposition. A rolling baseline makes the delta the single-phase change, so a function creeping +2 per phase never trips a delta of 5 and the jump check adds nothing over the absolute threshold. - Strict mode records an open deviation window in the broken-windows ledger rather than declaring its own ship:pre gate. ship.md has no generic ship:pre gate dispatch — only two hardcoded branches — so a third gate of any kind would be declared and never evaluated. - The gate clears on the proposal being dispositioned, never on the score improving. A blocking complexity number is one an executor can satisfy by splitting a coherent function in two. execute-phase.md gains a generic execute:post step-dispatch contract; it previously matched only ref.skill == "code-review", so any other step registered there was declared and never run. The code-review branch is unchanged. Full rationale in ADR-1953. Closes #1953 * fix(#1953): close git option injection and symlink escape in the refactor hook Three findings from the isolated security review, all fixed inline. HIGH — changedFilesSince interpolated the --since value into a revision token placed before the -- separator. A -- only stops PATHSPEC parsing of arguments after it; git still option-parses what comes before. So --since '--output=/tmp/x' became --output=/tmp/x..HEAD, which git accepts as --output=<file> and uses to redirect diff output — an arbitrary write. Fixed with --end-of-options before the revision range plus a conservative ref validator. The validator deliberately permits ~ ^ @ { } because those are legitimate git REVISION syntax (HEAD~1, main@{yesterday}) as distinct from ref-NAME syntax; --end-of-options is the actual barrier. The doc comment asserting the trailing -- was sufficient was wrong and is corrected. MEDIUM — resolveConfinedPath confined by string prefix only, so a symlink committed inside the repo passed the check (its own path is under cwd) and readFileSync then followed it outside the root. Now lstat-checks for a regular file and skips anything else with REFACTOR_FILE_UNREADABLE, so one bad path skips one file and the run continues. LOW — the new execute:post dispatch contract showed the gsd_run example before the rule requiring ref.command be validated first. That prose is executed by an agent, so textual order is execution order. Reordered. Refs #1953 * fix(#1953): make the analyzer able to see TypeScript at all Found by running the shipped analyzer over its own source: it reported functions=1 for a 940-line module with 24 function forms. A return-type annotation or a generic parameter list made a function invisible — `function f(a): number {}` and `function f<T>(a: T): T {}` both detected as zero. Since gsd-core is written in .cts and the capability declares .ts/.cts/.mts analyzable, the feature silently found nothing in this repo's own primary language while reporting success. A safety net that reports "all clear" because it cannot see is worse than no safety net. All 98 tests passed over this, because every fixture was plain JS — the exact failure the test matrix's own "assert against the shape production uses" warning describes. Adds a TypeScript-shapes suite covering return types (including unions, generics, object literals and type predicates), generic parameter lists (constrained and defaulted), export/async/generator combinations, annotated arrows, class-method modifiers, and optional/ default/rest params — plus the two traps: an overload signature has no body and must not count, and `a < b && c > d` is a comparison, not a generic. Detection now reports 24/37/21 functions for the three source files, which matches a hand count exactly. Also from review: - The strict-mode ledger dedup identified entries by parsing a prose description string. That is banned by CONTRIBUTING's raw-text-matching rule and was a real bug: the "exactly one window per untriaged proposal" guarantee rested on prose matching, so rewording a description or editing WINDOWS.md by hand silently produced duplicates. Now matches structurally on kind + phase + file + line. - A property test asserted on the stripper's output text. Reframed to assert the same invariant through analyzeSource's score. - nextBaseline's `candidates` parameter has been dead since the anchor change; removed from the signature and all call sites. - Extracted the duplicated require-or-degrade and capability-check boilerplate. - ADR-1953's Implementation bullet still named a `refactor.ship-gate` in check-command-router.cts — a leftover from the design cut D6 rejects. That file is untouched and no such gate exists. Removed. Refs #1953 * fix(#1953): keep execute-phase.md under its byte ceiling; un-vacuum the large-file test Five of the seven remote-runner failures were one cause: the execute:post dispatch contract, written out inline, grew execute-phase.md 1876 bytes (93,400 -> 95,276) against a frozen PRE_PHASE6 ceiling of 93,600. A drift-ack does not clear that — tests/phase6-capstone-conformance.test.cjs and tests/fix-2285-claude-orchestration-wiring.test.cjs assert the file is literally under the cap. The contract now lives in gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md, which already claimed to be the point-agnostic dispatch reference and already documented ref.skill and ref.agent. It gains the ref.command shape, its in-context validation rule, the advisory-by-construction statement, and a note that a point whose workflow hand-rolls one kind is not implementing this contract. execute-phase.md now defers to it in one line: 145 bytes of growth, 55 B of headroom under the cap. Better placement than the first cut — the reference was overstating its coverage, and this makes the claim true rather than duplicating prose next to it. Acknowledged by appending to tests/emitted-drift-acks/2930-*.json rather than a new 1953-*.json: two ack sources may never name the same path, and that fragment is already the accumulating ack for this file. Sixth and seventh failures: analyzesLargeFileWithinBounds tripped its own vacuity guard — the fixture generated ~480 KB against a `> 500000` assert, so the guard fired and the three assertions after it never ran. The test has been vacuous since it was written. The matrix row specifies ~1 MB, so N goes 8000 -> 20000 (1.17 MB, 17% margin) and the guard to > 1_000_000. Verified by reproducing the exact body against the compiled module: 1168888 bytes, 118 ms, all four assertions hold. Refs #1953 * fix(#1953): fold the execute:post step deferral into the existing resolve line The remaining two failures were one test: execute-phase.md carries a SECOND, tighter assertion than the 93,600 ceiling — `<=93400`, which is exactly its current size. The file cannot grow by a single byte. My previous fix got it under 93,600 but not under 93,400, so it still failed. ("H." in the report is just the parent describe of that same test, not a separate defect.) Rather than add a paragraph, the deferral now REPLACES the existing hook resolution line. It read: Resolve active step hooks from `EXECUTE_POST_HOOKS_JSON` where `kind == "step"` and `ref.skill == "code-review"`. which is the bug itself written down — only code-review was ever dispatched. It now reads: Dispatch each `kind == "step"` hook per @gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md. For `code-review`: The following prose already begins "If no active code-review step hook exists", so it reads correctly and the code-review handling is untouched. Net effect on the file is -11 bytes: 93,400 -> 93,389, under the margin assertion rather than merely under the ceiling. That also removes the need for a drift-ack: the file shrank, so there is no growth to acknowledge, and the append to the shared 2930-*.json fragment is reverted. Leaving it would have shipped a claim of "145 bytes of growth" that is no longer true, on a file six other issues share. The test's own comment states the principle this ended up honoring: "the host loop must stay small — optional-feature detail belongs in the capability fragment, not the host workflow." Putting the dispatch contract in the reference rather than inline is that rule, applied. Refs #1953 * fix(#1953): keep the code-review hook literal the workflow test requires tests/code-review.test.cjs extracts the <step name="code_review_gate"> block and asserts it contains `ref.skill == "code-review"` verbatim. The previous commit replaced the line carrying that literal, so the token vanished and the test went red — a fair assertion: code-review IS the bespoke branch there and the workflow should still name it. Restored inside the same one-line deferral, which now reads: Dispatch `kind == "step"` hooks per @gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md. `ref.skill == "code-review"`: 93,396 bytes — still under the `<=93400` margin assertion and 4 bytes below the base, so the file continues to shrink rather than grow. Because three consecutive runs were each reddened by a different assertion on this one file, this change was verified by sweeping ALL of them at once rather than one run at a time: every test under tests/ that reads execute-phase.md or references/loop-hook-dispatch.md was located by resolving its path constants, and each content/size assertion was evaluated directly against the working tree — 22 assertions, plus two real executions (gen-section-manifest --check, and emitted-attribution's full real-tree differential). All pass. That sweep also confirms the earlier judgement call: the net change to execute-phase.md is a SHRINK, and the size ratchet only gates growth, so reverting the append to the shared 2930-*.json ack fragment was correct — an ack would have been both unnecessary and factually wrong. Refs #1953 * chore(#1953): backfill changeset pr number to 3261 * docs(#1953): add the missing how-to for acting on a refactor proposal Reference and explanation shipped (COMMANDS.md, CONFIGURATION.md, FEATURES.md 159, ADR-1953) but the Diataxis how-to quadrant did not, and that is the one a user reaches for. CONTRIBUTING's required-docs table is 'new command -> COMMANDS.md + FEATURES.md', so CI was green on a gap. Enabling this feature is genuinely multi-step and no single page walked it: turn it on, tune the threshold, understand advisory vs strict, discover that strict needs a SECOND toggle on a DIFFERENT capability, and know what to do when a proposal appears. The two-toggle subtlety in particular was a footnote in a config table; here it is a section with both commands. Follows the shape of its closest siblings, resolve-edge-coverage-findings and resolve-prohibition-findings — both 'the loop surfaced a finding, here is what to do with it'. Includes a reason-code table for the silent cases, since the analyzer is deliberately quiet in six situations and a user who expected a proposal needs to tell 'nothing to report' from 'could not look'. Indexed from docs/README.md beside the other loop how-tos. Docs-only: exempt from the push gate, no re-verification, pass marker on 2af188b4 untouched. Refs #1953 * feat(#1953): warn when strict mode is on but nothing will actually block Closes acceptance criterion 5, which I had wrongly marked satisfied. refactor.trigger_strict records an untriaged proposal as an open deviation window, but a ship only STOPS if workflow.windows_enforce is also on — a toggle owned by the broken-windows capability that this feature neither sets nor requires. So a user could enable strict, believe ship was gated, and find out otherwise at ship time. The split itself stays: requires:["broken-windows"] would force-install the ledger on advisory users who never enable strict, and a ship:pre gate of our own would never fire because ship.md has no generic ship:pre gate dispatch. What was missing was discoverability, so that is what this fixes. `refactor evaluate` now emits a typed REFACTOR_STRICT_NOT_ENFORCING warning, naming the exact remediation command, whenever strict is on and either workflow.windows_enforce is off or broken-windows is unavailable. It fires only on a run that produced a candidate — with nothing to block on there is nothing to warn about, and warning every run would be noise. Reads workflow.windows_enforce through the same resolveConfigKey walk the router already uses for its own keys rather than a second config reader. Four tests cover the matrix: strict+enforce-off warns, strict+enforce-on does not, strict+ledger-absent warns, strict-off never warns. Also corrects a user-facing message in this same file that told the user to run `gsd-tools config-set` — the wrong form. docs/CONFIGURATION.md and the broken-windows capability both use `gsd config-set`, and gsd-tools is invoked as `node gsd-tools.cjs`, so the bare form may not resolve. The two adjacent messages in this file now agree. Refs #1953 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>	2026-08-09 19:52:47 -04:00