Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD
across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core
and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream
packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is.
Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line,
package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived
registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked
(MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums);
sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
* docs(#4722): record Kiro and Zoo Code runtime requests as out-of-scope
Both #4722 and #4746 asked to add a new first-party, in-tree runtime
(Kiro, Zoo Code). The repo's standing policy against expanding the
in-tree runtime set already covers this shape of request
(crush-runtime-in-core.md, omp-runtime-in-core.md); recording these two
so the same asks aren't re-litigated from scratch next time they land.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(#4722): correct ADR-857 D8 status in the new out-of-scope entries
Reviewer caught that the Re-open criteria section, inherited verbatim
from the crush/omp sibling entries, claimed the ADR-857 D8 external
capability loader "has not been delivered." ADR-1244 (Accepted,
ratified 2026-07-17) explicitly states it delivers that exact gate for
third-party role:"runtime" capabilities. Correct both new entries to
reflect that the mechanism exists today, while keeping the in-tree
non-acceptance verdict itself unchanged (a maintainer bandwidth/scope
call, not a tooling gap).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(#4722): match the newer out-of-scope house format
Orthogonal review (Standards axis) noted the two newest sibling KB
entries (crush-runtime-in-core.md, codex-native-plugin-skips-preproposal.md)
lead with a dedicated "## Policy (standing, not case-by-case)" section
before "Proposal summary"; these two files folded the same claim into
a bullet instead. Restructure to match, no content change beyond
de-duplicating the policy statement out of the bullet list it was
also stated in.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
