The submission process told an admin to create a `Registry` Discussions
category and never stated its format. Both were wrong in a way a correct
reading of the docs could not catch.
Name: the category is `EoS Registry`, and it carries threads for both
registries — `discussion` is a required field on Capability entries as well as
EoS entries. A reader following the old text would create a second, duplicate
category.
Format: `discussion` being required means the thread must exist before the
entry's PR, opened by the entry's author — an outside contributor holding
neither `maintain` nor `admin`. GitHub's Announcement format restricts starting
discussions to those two levels, so an admin could pick it, block every external
submission at the first step, and see nothing wrong. Records open-ended as the
required format, and why Announcement and Question/Answer do not work.
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds the discoverability-registry surface for issue #2182: JSON-sourced
capability/eos catalogs, a pure schema/vocab module (registry-schema.cjs)
with the ADR-857 loop points + ADR-1239 axes, thin validate/gen CLIs,
the registry-entry PR template, README spec, and CONTEXT.md glossary terms.
The three pure functions (isValidGsdRange/validateEntries/renderMarkdown)
are stubbed here so the comprehensive test suite fails first (red), per the
feature-implementation red-first directive; the next commit implements them.
Refs #2182
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
