Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tom Boucher
c5e0371775 feat(#1951): reversibility tagging — gate one-way-door decisions (#2471)
* test(#1951): add failing-first tests for reversibility tagging

Red phase for issue #1951 (reversibility tagging: classify decisions by
undo cost, gate one-way doors behind a checkpoint:decision).

Tests assert, per the issue's acceptance criteria:
- discuss-phase CONTEXT.md template records a **Reversibility:** field with
  a rationale on captured decisions, and states it is optional
- gsd-planner @-references planner-reversibility.md and stays under the
  49152-char agent cap (LARGE_CAP, tests/agent-size-budget.test.cjs)
- a one-way rating inserts a checkpoint:decision before the dependent task;
  reversible inserts none; costly is flagged but never blocks
- the taxonomy defaults to reversible when unsure (checkpoint-fatigue guard)
  and inserting a checkpoint implies autonomous: false
- docs/reference/plan-md.md documents <reversibility> as optional with all
  three ratings
- --no-reversibility-gates parses to REVERSIBILITY_GATES=false, is injected
  into the planner prompt, and is advertised in the command argument-hint
  and help full mode (argument-hint parity)
- the override suppresses the gate but still persists the rating
- cmdVerifyPlanStructure accepts every rating and the absent case
  (additive-validator guarantee, behavioral via runGsdTools)
- parity: thinking-models-planning.md #4 adopts the canonical three-level
  taxonomy and the binary REVERSIBLE/IRREVERSIBLE vocabulary is gone
- no content loss from the planner extraction made to fit under the cap

Prose-contract assertions are Red until the implementation lands. The
behavioral validator assertions pass immediately — regression guards
proving the validator already accepts unknown optional tags.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(#1951): reversibility tagging — gate one-way-door decisions

Classify planning decisions by what undoing them would cost, and give a
one-way door a human beat before the agent walks through it (issue #1951,
The Pragmatic Programmer Topic 15 'Reversibility'; Bezos's one-way/two-way
door framing).

Acceptance criteria met:
- discuss-phase records an optional reversibility rating with a rationale
  on <decisions> entries in the phase CONTEXT.md template. Unrated
  decisions are treated as reversible, so existing phases are unaffected.
- a one-way rating makes gsd-planner insert a checkpoint:decision before
  the task that implements the decision, reusing the existing checkpoint
  mechanism -- no new checkpoint machinery.
- reversible ratings trigger no checkpoint; costly ratings are flagged in
  the plan but never block.
- the rating persists on the task as the optional <reversibility rating=>
  element. cmdVerifyPlanStructure accepts every rating and the absent
  case; the structural validator does not reject unknown optional tags.
- --no-reversibility-gates (REVERSIBILITY_GATES=false) suppresses
  checkpoint insertion for intentionally-unattended runs while still
  recording ratings -- the override changes what stops the run, not what
  the plan remembers.

Single taxonomy, not two: references/thinking-models-planning.md #4
already shipped a binary REVERSIBLE/IRREVERSIBLE classification and is
loaded by both gsd-planner and gsd-plan-checker. It is rewritten onto the
canonical three-level vocabulary and now points at planner-reversibility.md
as the taxonomy owner, with a parity test that fails if the surfaces
diverge (DEFECT.GENERATIVE-FIX-DIVERGENCE).

agents/gsd-planner.md sat 47 chars under the 49152 LARGE_CAP, so the
checkpoint DO/DON'T guidance was relocated verbatim into
planner-antipatterns.md -- already @-referenced from the same section for
the same topic, so the planner still loads it and nothing was dropped. A
test guards the relocation against content loss.

Files: gsd-core/references/planner-reversibility.md (NEW, canonical
taxonomy + emission rules + anti-patterns), gsd-planner.md, plan-phase
workflow/command/help (flag wiring + parity), plan-md.md schema,
discuss-phase context template, CONTEXT.md glossary, INVENTORY + manifest,
size baselines, install goldens, plugin skills regen, changeset.

Closes #1951

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#1951): address orthogonal review findings

Two isolated reviewers (correctness + security), neither of which authored
the change. Every finding fixed:

Security — the rationale is untrusted input (ADR-1577). It originates in
conversation and flows CONTEXT.md -> planner -> PLAN.md -> executor, each
hop an LLM reading the previous hop's output, with no validation on the
path. planner-reversibility.md and the discuss-phase template now state
it is data and never instructions, and name the </reversibility>
early-termination hazard explicitly -- a rationale that closes its own
element injects sibling structure the executor reads as real tasks.
Four tests guard it.

Correctness 1 — nothing machine-enforced the feature's own promise: a task
rated one-way with no preceding checkpoint:decision validated as fully
clean, so a planner error silently reopened the gap this feature exists to
close. cmdVerifyPlanStructure now warns on an ungated one-way rating. A
warning, not an error: <reversibility> stays additive and the plan stays
valid. Four tests cover ungated (warns), gated (silent), still-valid, and
reversible/costly never flagged.

Correctness 2 — pass-always test. The --no-reversibility-gates parse test
substring-matched the whole workflow file, and plan-phase.md prose mentions
both tokens in one sentence, so it passed with the bash conditional
deleted: it was testing the documentation, not the parser. Now scoped to
the fenced bash blocks and matched as one physical line, with a negative
control confirming prose alone cannot satisfy it.

Correctness 3 — costly had no itemized emission rule, only one-way did, so
two agents could diverge on whether to tag costly at all.

Correctness 4 — template convention break: the example ratings were bare
while every sibling field uses [...] to signal substitution, inviting an
LLM to copy one-way/costly forward as boilerplate. Now bracketed.

Correctness 5 — latent false-green: .includes('reversible') also matches
inside irreversible/irreversibility, which appear in anti-pattern
prose, so a surface that dropped the real taxonomy entry would still pass.
Now word-boundary matched.

ADR-857 phase-6 ceiling — the first gsd-test run caught plan-phase.md
1216 bytes over its frozen 94519 ceiling (it had 49 bytes of headroom on
next). The ceiling may only rise for privileged host machinery, and
reversibility gating is optional-feature logic, so the wiring was slimmed
to its minimum and the explanatory prose moved to the reference files the
planner already loads. plan-phase.md is now 94400 bytes -- 119 under the
ceiling and 70 bytes SMALLER than on next, so the host loop shrank while
gaining the feature, which is what phase 6 ratchets toward. The tracer
contract (tests/tracer-bullet.test.cjs) is unchanged.

Lint — fixed an unnecessary non-null assertion in verify.cts and a
CRLF-fragile bare \n regex in the new test (DEFECT.WINDOWS-CRLF-TEST-
PORTABILITY, the #1658/#1668/#2206/#2449/#2450 class).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1951): checkpoint fixture must carry the common task elements

The gated-one-way fixture built a checkpoint:decision task from the
abbreviated skeleton in gsd-planner.md, which shows only the
checkpoint-specific elements (<decision>/<context>/<resume-signal>).
cmdVerifyPlanStructure requires <name> and <action> on EVERY task
regardless of type, so the fixture failed validation for reasons that had
nothing to do with reversibility:

  errors: ["Task missing <name> element", "Task 'unnamed' missing <action>"]

Caught by gsd-test on 14d14a39 (2 failures, both this fixture).

The canonical shape is in tests/verify.test.cjs:266 — a checkpoint task
carries <name>/<files>/<action>/<verify> like any other. Fixture corrected
to match. Verified behaviorally against the real gsd-tools CLI across all
four cases: gated one-way (valid, silent), ungated one-way (valid, warns),
costly (valid, silent), absent (valid, silent).

Not a product defect: the validator's every-task contract is intentional
and pre-existing, and docs/reference/plan-md.md scopes its required-element
list to type=auto/tracer only because those are the elements a planner must
author, not because checkpoints are exempt from <name>.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#1951): backfill changeset pr number to 2471

* fix(#1951): CodeQL incomplete-sanitization + prompt-injection scan collision

Both CI failures were real defects in code this PR added, not false
positives.

CodeQL js/incomplete-sanitization (high), reversibility-tagging.test.cjs:46 —
the namesRating helper built its regex with `rating.replace(/[-]/g, '\\-')`,
which escapes the hyphen but not backslash, so the escape was incomplete.
It was also unnecessary: `-` carries no special meaning outside a character
class. Replaced with a complete metacharacter escape (backslash included).
Word-boundary behavior verified unchanged across all three ratings — notably
that "irreversible" prose still does not satisfy a "reversible" match, which
is the false-green this helper exists to prevent.

Prompt injection scan — the checkpoint fixture used the human-verification
child element inside <verify>. That tag name is a fake-instruction-boundary
pattern in scripts/prompt-injection-scan.sh, and the scan runs over changed
files, so copying the shape from tests/verify.test.cjs (unflagged only
because it is not in this diff) tripped the gate. Switched to the documented
plain-prose <verify> form.

The first attempt at that fix failed the same gate a second time: the
comment explaining the collision quoted the offending tag literally. The
comment now names it in prose instead — the scanner does not care whether a
match is code or commentary, which is the whole point of the
DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION note in CLAUDE.md.

Verified locally before push: scan reports 0 findings across 57 changed
files, eslint clean, and both fixtures still validate as designed (gated
one-way silent, ungated one-way warns, neither errors).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1951): record measured cost and halve gsd-tools spawns

The Windows shard 1/3 job timeout was traced to the sharding layer, not to
this PR's assertions — see #2472. Two contributing factors were this file's
own, and are fixed here.

1. tests/test-timings.json had no entry for reversibility-tagging.test.cjs,
   so scripts/run-tests.cjs weighted it at the table's median fallback
   (~315ms) for LPT chunk packing. It actually measures 5595ms — an 18x
   under-weight. Recorded the measured value from the green gsd-test run
   (max across the node22/node24 lanes, per gen-test-timings.cjs's
   convention). Only this one entry: a full regen churns 634 entries of
   run-to-run drift, and the table is explicitly advisory and un-gated, so
   a 637-line diff does not belong in a feature PR.

2. Each verifyPlan() spawns gsd-tools, which dominates this file's cost.
   Spawns cut from 9 to 6 with no coverage lost:
   - the ungated-one-way warning and its stays-valid assertion now share
     one plan instead of building the same plan twice;
   - the reversible/costly never-flagged-as-ungated test was strictly
     subsumed by the additive suite, which already runs those two ratings
     ungated and asserts no /reversibilit/ warning at all — and the gate
     warning's text contains both "reversibility" and "one-way", so the
     broader assertion catches it. It only re-spawned gsd-tools twice to
     prove the same thing.

Both are symptom fixes. The shard imbalance itself (19/11/10 minutes
against a 20-minute cap, from a cost-blind round-robin partition that also
reshuffles downstream files whenever one is inserted) is tracked in #2472.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* test(#1951): checkpoint fixture adopts the #2444 type-branched contract

Surfaced by rebasing onto next, which gained #2444 (branch plan-structure
validation on task type=checkpoint:*) while this PR was in review.

cmdVerifyPlanStructure no longer applies one required-element set to every
task. A checkpoint:decision now requires <name> + <resume-signal> +
<decision> + <options>, and is exempt from the <action>/<verify>/<done>/
<files> set that auto and tracer tasks carry. The gated-one-way fixture
predated that split and failed on the new requirement:

  errors: ["Task 'Task 0: Confirm the on-disk format' missing <options>"]

Fixture rewritten to mirror the checkpoint:decision contract exactly — real
<options> with two <option> children — rather than padding it with fields
checkpoints no longer need. That also drops the plain-prose <verify> the
earlier revision carried purely to dodge the prompt-injection scan; a
checkpoint task has no <verify> requirement at all, so the workaround is
moot.

Verified against the real gsd-tools CLI across all four cases: gated one-way
(valid, silent), ungated one-way (valid, warns), costly (valid, silent),
absent (valid, silent).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-21 10:44:55 -04:00
Tom Boucher
953b8043ea fix(#2456): weight test chunks by measured cost and pack with LPT (#2463)
* fix(#2456): weight test chunks by measured cost and pack with LPT

scripts/run-tests.cjs guessed each test file's cost from its filename
(basename matching /^(?:install|codex-)/ scored 12, everything else 1).
Measured durations show that guess is wrong in both directions:
installer-migration-authoring.test.cjs scored 12 while running ~0.1s, and
the two most expensive files in the suite both scored 1 —
run-tests-harness.test.cjs never matched the prefix, and
release-tarball-smoke.install.test.cjs was missed because the regex is
anchored to the START of the basename.

Chunks were therefore balanced by file COUNT, not cost. On the real
shard 2/3 the two heaviest files packed into the SAME chunk, leaving the
slowest chunk 2.8x the lightest and sitting near the 600s per-chunk
timeout while other chunks idled.

Weight each file by its measured duration from a checked-in, regenerable
timings table and pack with LPT (heaviest first, into the lightest
chunk). On the same shard this drops the slowest chunk from 383s to 238s
and the imbalance from 2.79x to 1.00x, and separates the two heavy files.

Timings are advisory, never gated: an unknown file falls back to the
table's median weight, a missing or corrupt table falls back to uniform
weight, and a count-based floor guarantees the packer never produces
fewer chunks than plain count-based packing would.

Closes #2456

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2456): harden chunk packing against degenerate knobs and table keys

Follow-up hardening found while reviewing the packer, fixed inline.

The chunk knobs are read from the environment with Number(), so a typo
(RUN_TESTS_MAX_FILES_PER_CHUNK=abc) yields NaN and an explicit 0 yields
0. Both flow into the new chunk-count arithmetic: NaN made Math.ceil
return NaN, Array.from({length: NaN}) produce zero bins, and packChunks'
retry loop spin forever — a hung CI job with no output. Zero made the
count Infinity and threw RangeError: Invalid array length. The previous
count-based packer degraded to a single chunk instead, so this was a
regression introduced by the LPT rewrite.

Normalize the knobs at the environment boundary (positiveNumberEnv:
anything not a positive finite number falls back to the default) and
guard packChunks itself, since it is exported and cannot assume its
caller normalized. Non-finite weights from an arbitrary weightOf are
clamped too. RUN_TESTS_CHUNK_TIMEOUT_MS gets the same treatment.

Also resolve timing-table lookups with Object.hasOwn: the table is
JSON-parsed, so a bare index would walk the prototype chain and return a
function for a file named constructor.test.cjs or toString.test.cjs.
The typeof guard already rejected that, but the lookup now resolves
correctly rather than relying on the downstream check.

Refs #2456

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2456): correct prototype-lookup rationale and guard generator keys

Two findings from independent security review, fixed inline.

The makeFileWeigher comment claimed a bare table lookup "would return a
FUNCTION for a file named constructor.test.cjs". That premise is false:
basename('constructor.test.cjs') is 'constructor.test.cjs', which is not
an Object.prototype key, and walkTestFiles only ever collects *.test.cjs.
The prototype chain was never reachable from a real selection, and the
existing typeof guard already rejected the function it would return, so
Object.hasOwn is defense-in-depth rather than a behavior change. The
comment now says that instead of asserting something untrue.

The accompanying test inherited the same false premise: it fed
constructor.test.cjs and asserted a median fallback that would have held
with or without the guard, so it passed for a reason unrelated to what
it claimed to prove. It now uses BARE keys (constructor, toString,
valueOf, hasOwnProperty, __proto__) — the only inputs that actually
resolve on Object.prototype — and asserts the real exported contract:
any key absent from the table weighs the median, never a function.

gen-test-timings.cjs built its output object by computed-key assignment
from basenames taken out of a reporter stream it does not control — the
js/prototype-polluting-assignment shape, and this repo has a CodeQL
barrier for exactly that pattern. It was not exploitable (the value is
always a rounded number, so the __proto__ setter is a silent no-op), but
it silently DROPPED such an entry rather than reporting it. Validate every
key against a test-basename pattern and fail loudly instead, and build
the table with a null prototype.

Refs #2456

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* fix(#2456): replace tautological chunking tests and clamp chunk count

Six findings from independent correctness review, all reproduced and
fixed inline.

The two subprocess tests written to carry the #2088 guarantee forward
were tautological: every seeded file weighed exactly 1, so both passed
under the OLD prefix-heuristic packer and with the timings file deleted
entirely. Neither could fail for the reason it existed. Both are rebuilt
so the old algorithm produces a different packing and the assertion goes
red: the spread test now uses three expensive files named so the old
heuristic scored them 1 alongside three trivial `install-`-prefixed
files it scored 12 — inverted from real cost, giving {2,2,1,1} under the
old packer versus {2,2,2} under measured weights. The companion test
covers the other direction: four trivial `install-` files the old
heuristic split into four single-file chunks now stay in one.

packChunks clamped the chunk count from below but not above, so a
legitimate but tiny budget (RUN_TESTS_MAX_FILES_PER_CHUNK=1e-9, which
positiveNumberEnv accepts) asked for 637,000,000,000 bins and threw
RangeError. More chunks than files is never useful; the count now clamps
at one file per chunk.

The generator's basename-collision guard compared full dirnames, so two
OS lanes reporting the same file under different container roots
(/work/tests vs C:/work/tests) flagged every shared basename as a
collision — on the script's own documented multi-lane usage. Detection is
now scoped per stream, where the root is constant; a genuine same-lane
collision is still caught.

Also: the LPT tie-break compared raw paths, so a path separator (0x2F vs
0x5C) could order a subdir file differently per platform, contradicting
the documented byte-identical guarantee — it now normalizes separators.
loadTestTimings now honors schema_version instead of writing it and
never reading it, falling back to uniform weight on an unknown version.
A comment claiming an all-uniform suite "chunks exactly as it did
before" was false and contradicted by this PR's own test: the chunk
count is preserved, the composition is not. And the missing-table test
created a temp dir it never cleaned up, for a path that only needed to
not exist.

Refs #2456

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-20 16:51:35 -04:00