Research is now integrated into /gsd:plan-phase by default.
Remove standalone research command from "Also available" sections.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Closes#106 - Users didn't know what to type when presented with
test expectations. Now uses GSD checkpoint box format with explicit
"Type 'pass' or describe what's wrong" instruction.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Add ui-brand.md reference with visual patterns:
- Stage banners with GSD ► prefix
- Checkpoint boxes (62-char width)
- Status symbols vocabulary
- Next Up routing blocks
Update orchestrators to use branded output.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Research decisions made at roadmap creation time are:
- Premature: Can't know if research is needed before discuss-phase
- Redundant: --skip-research flag exists for explicit control
- Counterproductive: Gives Claude an excuse to skip research entirely
Removed:
- Research: Likely/Unlikely fields from roadmap template
- detect_research_needs step from create-roadmap workflow
- "If roadmap flagged Research: Likely" checks from gsd-planner
Research now always runs during plan-phase unless:
- RESEARCH.md already exists (silent reuse)
- --skip-research flag passed
- --gaps flag passed (gap closure mode)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Analyze phase to identify gray areas by category (UI, UX, Behavior, etc.)
- Present multi-select for user to choose which areas to discuss
- Deep-dive each selected area with focused questioning loop
- Explicit scope guardrail: clarify HOW, never expand WHAT
- Capture deferred ideas without acting on them
- Downstream awareness: CONTEXT.md feeds researcher and planner agents
- Template restructured for decisions (domain, decisions, discretion, deferred)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Replaced 868-line workflow with deprecation notice
- Points to agents/gsd-planner.md for methodology
- Documents historical content for reference
- Kept file for git history
Note clarifies relationship with gsd-planner agent:
- Planning methodology is in agents/gsd-planner.md
- This template defines the PLAN.md output format
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- principles.md: redirects to <philosophy> section
- plan-format.md: redirects to <plan_format> section
- scope-estimation.md: redirects to <scope_estimation> section
- goal-backward.md: redirects to <goal_backward> section
All content preserved in agents/gsd-planner.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reduces context exhaustion during /gsd:map-codebase by having agents
write documents directly instead of returning findings to orchestrator.
- Create gsd-codebase-mapper agent with embedded templates
- Agent understands downstream consumers (plan-phase, execute-plan)
- Parameterized by focus: tech, arch, quality, concerns
- Each focus writes specific documents directly to .planning/codebase/
- Orchestrator receives only confirmation + line counts
Context savings: ~40 lines returned vs potentially thousands of lines
of exploration findings previously transferred back to orchestrator.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Replaced 665-line workflow with 14-line redirect
- Points to agents/gsd-debugger.md for debugging expertise
- Preserves git history while marking content as moved
Unify gap handling - whether discovered by code verification or user
testing, gaps feed into the same plan-phase --gaps workflow.
Changes:
- Delete commands/gsd/plan-fix.md (redundant)
- Update verify-work to route to plan-phase --gaps
- Update progress Route E to detect UAT gaps
- Change UAT.md "Issues" section to "Gaps" with YAML format
- Extend plan-phase --gaps to read from both VERIFICATION.md and UAT.md
- Update diagnose-issues to output gaps in YAML format
- Update all references (debug, templates, workflows)
One path: gap discovered → diagnosed → plan-phase --gaps → fixed
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Phase completion commit now stages VERIFICATION.md alongside ROADMAP.md,
STATE.md, and REQUIREMENTS.md so verification results are tracked.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The ~/.claude/skills/expertise/ system was personal tooling
that doesn't exist for other users. Removed from:
- create-roadmap workflow (detect_domain step)
- plan-phase workflow (domain loading)
- roadmap template (Domain Expertise section)
- phase-prompt template (domain frontmatter)
- plan-format reference (domain field)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sync execute-plan command and workflow with improved checkpoint display:
- Box header with ╔═══╗ for visual prominence
- Progress indicator at top
- Separator line before unmissable "→ YOUR ACTION:" prompt
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Use double-line box for checkpoint headers with clear visual hierarchy:
- Progress and task info at top
- Content details in middle
- Separator line before unmissable "→ YOUR ACTION:" prompt
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add verify_phase_goal step to execute-phase workflow
- Verifier outputs structured gaps: YAML for planner consumption
- Add --gaps flag to plan-phase for gap closure mode
- Route by verification status: passed, gaps_found, human_needed
- Gap closure creates sequential plans (04, 05...) from verification gaps
- User stays in control at each decision point
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Deleted:
- subagent-task-prompt.md (baked into gsd-executor)
- subagent-verify-prompt.md (baked into gsd-verifier)
- continuation-prompt.md (baked into gsd-executor)
- checkpoint-return.md (baked into gsd-executor)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- gsd-verifier.md: dedicated verification subagent with all logic baked in
- Goal-backward verification: checks codebase, not SUMMARY claims
- Creates VERIFICATION.md, returns status to orchestrator
- execute-phase spawns gsd-verifier instead of general-purpose
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- execute-plan.md: spawn gsd-executor instead of general-purpose with template
- execute-phase.md: spawn gsd-executor for wave-based parallel execution
- Remove template filling, subagent has all logic baked in
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Research now loads concrete requirements (e.g., "AUTH-02: User receives
email verification") to inform research domains, not just high-level
roadmap descriptions.
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Remove phantom status.md command (background agent model abandoned)
- Remove agent-history.md template (unused)
- Remove _archive/ directory
- Add narration to execute-phase (describe what's being built before/after waves)
- Update new-project to offer define-requirements as fast path
- Make define-requirements work without research (gather through questioning)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Subagents can't determine if phase is complete. The orchestrator
(execute-plan and execute-phase commands) runs in main context,
can count plans vs summaries, and updates REQUIREMENTS.md when
phase completes.
- execute-plan: Step 2.5 updates requirements when summaries = plans
- execute-phase: Step 6 updates requirements (phase always complete)
- Removed duplicate from workflow (subagent can't run it anyway)
When all plans in a phase complete:
1. Look up phase's requirements from ROADMAP.md
2. Update REQUIREMENTS.md traceability table (Pending → Complete)
3. Include in metadata commit
Closes the loop on requirement tracking.
- Roadmap template now includes Requirements: field for each phase
- plan-phase loads REQUIREMENTS.md and extracts phase-specific requirements
- define-requirements shows full list inline before commit (not just counts)
Reduce principles.md from 158 to 73 lines:
- Remove duplicates (atomic_commits, tdd, deviation_rules)
- Remove version drag from claude_automates
- Keep core orientation: solo dev model, plans are prompts,
scope control, ship fast, anti-enterprise
Add principles.md to 9 core commands so Claude always
understands what GSD is.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Focus on what to extract, not what to avoid:
- What they're building
- Why it needs to exist
- Who it's for
- What done looks like
Remove version drag and redundant question categories.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Follow threads naturally instead of rigid step order
- Cleaner question techniques in questioning.md
- Background context checklist instead of forced checklist mode
- Updated next steps to show research flow
Adds /gsd:research-project to research domain ecosystem before creating roadmap.
Spawns parallel agents to investigate stack, features, architecture, and pitfalls.
New files:
- commands/gsd/research-project.md
- get-shit-done/workflows/research-project.md
- get-shit-done/templates/research-project/ (5 templates)
Modified:
- new-project.md: offers research vs direct roadmap options
- create-roadmap.md: loads research if exists
- workflows/create-roadmap.md: uses research to inform phases
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- execute-plan.md: Replace broken Task(resume=...) with fresh continuation agent
- execute-phase.md: Expand checkpoint handling with full continuation flow
- checkpoints.md: Restore ~500 lines of detailed examples and anti-patterns
Checkpoint presentation formats now documented for all three types.
Templates referenced: checkpoint-return.md, continuation-prompt.md
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Remove the global ISSUES.md deferred enhancement tracking system.
- Delete /gsd:consider-issues command (never used)
- Delete issues.md template (never instantiated)
- Remove Rule 5 from deviation rules (never triggered)
- Remove all ISSUES.md, ISS-XXX, and "deferred issues" references
- Update STATE.md to track pending todos instead
The ISSUES.md system was designed to capture non-critical enhancements
during plan execution via "Rule 5", but it never fired in practice
across 100+ projects. The system added ~350 lines of dead code.
The /gsd:add-todo and /gsd:check-todos system serves the same purpose
and is actually used.
Note: UAT *-ISSUES.md files (per-plan, created by /gsd:verify-work)
are unaffected - those are a separate, active system.
Closes#56
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>