f7df920681f233ae0fe064ee659550bdf41ff708
2 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
sim
|
7dd9e59f6b |
test(#3090): stop exempting violations under categories that do not fit
An allow-test-rule annotation citing a category that does not apply is worse than no annotation, because it reads as reviewed. Eight were confirmed by reading the assertions each one covered, and auditing the rest found five more plus one refutation — a converter test whose wording described the wrong mechanism while the covered assertion genuinely was deployed-text. The instructive one used the CANONICAL string for the same mistake: STATE.md command output labelled as a deployed artifact. A canonical string is not evidence the category fits, which is why normalising strings alone would have laundered the problem rather than fixed it. Every mapping the audit had inferred rather than code-verified was spot-checked before rewriting, and the ones that turned out not to fit were re-annotated rather than relabelled. Fourteen STATE.md assertions had a typed extractor available all along and now use it; their annotations came out because nothing needs exempting. Eight assertions genuinely need a production change first — CLI stdout and stderr with no structured mode — and are tagged pending-migration-to-typed-ir citing #3090, which is what that category is for. It had zero real uses before this, while one file carried a real citation to migration issue #2974 under a non-canonical tag. Six annotations covered assertions that do no text matching at all. An exemption for a violation that does not exist is noise that makes the real ones harder to audit; those are removed. atomic-write-coverage gains the annotation it always warranted — its own docstring describes a structural-regression-guard while the file carried none. Fifty-nine non-canonical strings across roughly thirty files are normalised, and the allow-test-rule allowlist is regenerated to match. 472 annotations became 463: every one now uses a canonical category, and the two remaining non-canonical strings are ESLint RuleTester fixtures, not annotations. Refs #3057 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
6a5fa59129 |
feat(3081): auto-trim review prompts for small-context model reviewers (#3708)
* feat(3081): auto-trim review prompts for small-context model reviewers Adds review.max_prompt_tokens and review.max_prompt_tokens_per_reviewer config keys. When configured, the /gsd-review workflow deterministically trims the assembled prompt before sending to each reviewer (drop CONTEXT → RESEARCH → REQUIREMENTS; head-shrink PROJECT.md; tail-truncate PLANs proportionally; reserve disclosure-note tokens upfront). Trim metadata is recorded in REVIEWS.md frontmatter. Reviewer is skipped with a warning if even the minimum review set exceeds the budget. Closes #3081 * fix(3081): register prompt-budget in SDK query registry and update inventory manifest review.md references `gsd-sdk query prompt-budget` at three call sites, but the command had no handler in the SDK registry — failing the registry-integration drift-guard test on all 6 CI matrix legs. Added a native TypeScript SDK handler (sdk/src/query/prompt-budget.ts) that ports the applyBudget logic from the CJS module, registered it in DOMAIN_STATIC_CATALOG, and regenerated docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json to include the new cli_modules/prompt-budget.cjs entry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3081): bump ws to 8.20.1 and allowlist prompt-budget sibling pair Two additional CI failures after the registry fix: 1. ws moderate CVE (GHSA-58qx-3vcg-4xpx, uninitialized memory disclosure): The advisory covers ws >=8.0.0 <8.20.1. Both root and sdk/package.json pinned ^8.20.0 which resolved to 8.20.0. Bumped both to 8.20.1 to clear the npm audit drift-guard test (bug-3588-npm-audit-clean.test.cjs). 2. lint-shared-module-handsync detected the new prompt-budget.ts / prompt-budget.cjs sibling pair without an allowlist entry. Added a cooperatingSiblings entry to scripts/shared-module-handsync-allowlist.json with classification and justification matching the established pattern. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3081): align prompt-budget skip semantics across CJS and SDK dispatch paths Replace brittle `[ $EXIT -eq 2 ]` guards with `[ $EXIT -ne 0 ]` in all three local-reviewer blocks (Ollama, LM Studio, llama.cpp) in workflows/review.md. Any non-zero exit from prompt-budget now triggers a skip with a descriptive warning — exit 2/11 prints "budget too small", any other non-zero prints "unexpected exit code". This ensures the SDK bridge dispatch path (exit 11 via GSDError(Blocked)) triggers the same skip as the CJS path (exit 2). The SDK handler (sdk/src/query/prompt-budget.ts) already writes both metadata and prompt files before throwing, so no change needed there. The Ollama block also gains the missing OLLAMA_SKIP guard so the reviewer invocation is actually skipped (previously the block only suppressed the OLLAMA_PROMPT_FILE update but still ran the curl invocation). SDK integration path (hardFailed via GSDError(Blocked) → exit 11) is covered by handler unit tests in tests/prompt-budget.test.cjs; no gsd-sdk-*.test.cjs exercising the full bridge dispatch for this command exists yet — that gap remains and is documented here. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix prompt-budget trim ordering and review guard follow-ups * perf: optimize prompt-budget and dedup reviewer trim workflow * fix(3708): drop source-grep theater tests to satisfy lint-no-source-grep All four test files added in commit 2df566ed were pure source-grep theater: they read .cjs / .ts / .md source files and asserted that specific string literals were present or absent. None exercised runtime behaviour. Deleted: - tests/gsd-tools-memory-optimizer.test.cjs — 7 includes() on gsd-tools.cjs - tests/prompt-budget-hotpath-optimizer.test.cjs — includes() on prompt-budget.cjs + .ts - tests/prompt-budget-io-optimizer.test.cjs — includes() on prompt-budget.ts + gsd-tools.cjs - tests/review-workflow-budget-dedup.test.cjs — includes() on review.md Behavioural coverage for the prompt-budget feature already exists in tests/prompt-budget.test.cjs and tests/prompt-budget-cli.test.cjs (also added by this PR). No replacement tests needed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(3708): correct budget-pressure threshold and minSet accounting Two bugs in applyBudget caused premature trimming and false hard-fails: 1. UNNEEDED_TRIM: budgetUnderPressure compared baseTokens against effectiveBudget - NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS, triggering trim pressure 80 tokens before the budget was actually exceeded. Fix: compare against effectiveBudget directly; NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS are still reserved in contentBudget once real pressure is confirmed. 2. FALSE_HARDFAIL: minSet included NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS unconditionally, treating the note as mandatory even when no trim would occur and no note would be injected. Fix: exclude NOTE_RESERVE_TOKENS from minSet; a prompt that fits untrimmed needs no note and must not hard-fail. Both fixes applied in CJS and TypeScript implementations. Two regression tests added (cycles 11 and 12) that reproduce each case behaviorally. --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> |