fe3ed0669103d6a8edd1caffaaa47caf6a4b7eba
20 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Jakub Zych
|
6cfa0c55d2 |
refactor: drop 12 runtimes, keep Claude, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, ZCode, Antigravity
Removes kilo, kimi, kimi-code, copilot, windsurf, augment, trae, qwen, hermes, cline, codebuddy and pi end to end: capability descriptors, installer branches and converters (bin/install.js 14.9k -> 11.2k lines), TypeScript converters, hook surfaces and runtime homes, review lanes qwen/kimi-code, the two pi migrations, Kimi payload normalization in the hook guards, dead hostBehaviors vocabulary, launcher home probes, fixtures, runtime-specific tests and the prose that presented them as supported. Installer output for the six kept runtimes is byte-identical to before the prune. The Kimi tool-vocabulary tests in workflow-guard, read-guard and read-injection-scanner are left in place pending a decision. |
||
|
Jakub Zych
|
a9a7a328e6 |
refactor: hard-fork GSD -> MSD (Make Software Done)
Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is. Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line, package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked (MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums); sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted. |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
06845717fe |
feat(#4740): make the Loop Host Contract role partition normative and enforced (#4742)
* test(#4740): pin the per-step role-family partition Failing-first coverage for the Loop Host Contract role partition. At this commit crossCheckRoleFamilies does not exist, so the rows throw "crossCheckRoleFamilies is not a function" -- the RED proof they bind to behavior rather than restating it. ADR-894 section 3 assigns roles per step but parenthesises the assignment as "(illustrative roles)", and nothing enforced it. The only thing standing in the way was a single deepEqual in this same file, which is editable prose. Rows cover: each step's own family accepted; a strict subset accepted; a foreign role rejected at every step; an unknown role rejected; an unknown step failing CLOSED; capitalization not silently matched; every offending role reported rather than only the first; and purity, because buildContract puts the same array into the generated contract. Two rows exist because an earlier cut of this suite was vacuous. The purity fixture is deliberately UNSORTED -- an alphabetically-sorted fixture cannot fail an in-place sort(), and the mutant was being killed by three unrelated rows instead. A parity row asserts ROLE_FAMILY and ROLE_TO_AGENT cover the exact same role-name domain, both directions: they are parallel constants over one domain, so divergence is the generative-fix class CLAUDE.md names. Every negative row asserts the offending ROLE NAME and the STEP NAME appear in the message. A count-only assertion survives a mutant that reports the wrong role, which the 80% Stryker gate would surface only after a full CI round-trip. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(#4740): reject a cross-family agent-role declaration Orchestration and execution are distinct functions of the loop and must not drift into one another. That partition was real but unenforced: ADR-894 section 3 calls its own role assignment "illustrative", and the generator accepted anything. Adding orchestrator to execute-phase.md's agent-roles line compiled, --check passed once regenerated, and capability-validator.cjs then began accepting into:"orchestrator" at every execute point. ROLE_FAMILY maps every role to one of orchestration, planning or execution. EXPECTED_FAMILY_BY_STEP gives each of the five steps exactly one family. crossCheckRoleFamilies rejects a cross-family role, a role outside the vocabulary, and an unknown step. It reports every offender, not the first. It fails CLOSED on an unknown step, deliberately diverging from assertPointsCoverage's "unknown step -- caught elsewhere". For points that is true: the canonical-set and duplicate checks catch it. For roles there is no second net, so failing open would leave an unknown step as the one input that bypasses the gate. crossCheckRoles' orchestrator exemption is untouched. ROLE_TO_AGENT maps roles to agent FILES and the orchestrator is the host, owning none -- admissibility and agent-file presence are separate concerns with separate checks. Additive to section 3's existing rule that contribution.into must be a member of the step's agentRoles, which is unchanged. That governs what a CAPABILITY may target; this governs what a WORKFLOW may declare. No capability is affected, and all five workflows already declare single-family sets, so the gate is green on the commit that introduces it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#4740): make the ADR-894 role assignment normative Section 3 parenthesises its per-step role assignment as "(illustrative roles)". That word was accurate about the list's PURPOSE -- it illustrated the shape of a generated contract entry -- and wrong about its STATUS, because the assignment was load-bearing from the moment the generator consumed it. Read literally it makes the partition an example rather than a rule. Appended as a dated in-place section per docs/contributor-standards.md, which records that an accepted ADR is never rewritten and names this the default pattern. Section 3's original body is untouched. The amendment states the three disjoint families, the one family each step admits, that a step may declare a strict subset but never outside it, and why this is a clarification rather than a new decision: the contract is generated from the workflow markers "so it cannot drift into a lie", and all five workflows have always declared single-family sets. What was absent was any statement that it is required, and any check that it holds. It also pins the distinction that is easy to re-merge: contribution.into being a member of agentRoles governs what a CAPABILITY may target and is unchanged; the family rule governs what a WORKFLOW may declare. The CONTEXT.md glossary entry for the Loop Host Contract records the same, beside the agent-reference drift guard it already documented. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4740): add changeset fragment pr:0 placeholder is backfilled with the real number once the PR exists. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4740): backfill changeset pr number Replaces the pr:0 placeholder with 4742 now that the PR exists. Verified with GITHUB_BASE_REF=next, the way CI runs them: changeset lint and lint:docs both go from invalid_pr(0) to ok. Without that env both report success without evaluating the branch at all. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4740): stop injecting the orchestrator procedure into executors claude-orchestration declared a contribution at execute:wave:pre with into:"executor". loop-hook-dispatch.md defines a contribution as "inject fragment.inline verbatim into the context for the role named in into", so its 267 lines were injected into EXECUTOR prompts whenever the capability was enabled. Those lines are orchestration end to end -- construct a wave manifest, resolve the dispatch backend, invoke the Workflow tool to spawn executors, bridge per-agent results into the merge chain. An executor can act on none of it. Retargeting to into:"orchestrator" would not have been a fix. ROLE_TO_AGENT carries no orchestrator entry by design: the orchestrator IS the host, and the host's procedure lives in execute-phase.md. A step's agentRoles enumerates agents a capability may inject context INTO, so adding orchestrator there would model the host as an injectable agent -- the same category error pointed the other way, and it would need an exception carved into the partition the same issue just made normative. So the defect is the mechanism, not the label. A contribution injects into an agent's context; "replace step 3's inline dispatch loop" is a change to what the HOST does. The contribution channel was serving as a host-behaviour directive because it was the only channel available at an execute point. The entry is removed. plan:post into:"planner" is correct and untouched. The procedure is preserved verbatim at docs/workflow-backend-dispatch.md inside the capability -- it is the only copy in the repo -- and is no longer injected anywhere. Consequence, not softened: the Workflow backend now has no loop wiring. Detection, emission and config remain and the design is intact, but nothing dispatches it. Under the separation ADR-1143 itself asserts it never had a legitimate channel; ADR-1143's own audit already records the end-to-end path has never been exercised. Wiring it properly needs a host-level mechanism that does not exist today. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4740): invert the stale execute:wave:pre registry assertions Removing the contribution left four surfaces asserting or describing the old state. Caught by an isolated review before a verification run was spent, which is the point of reviewing first: the first of these was a guaranteed CI red. execute-wave-post-gate-pipeline-e2e asserted against the REAL generated registry that byLoopPoint['execute:wave:pre'] held exactly one contribution with capId claude-orchestration. It now holds zero. Inverted to assert exactly 0 -- not a vague >= 0 -- and the #2285 comment above it now explains the current state rather than the one it was written for. CONTEXT.md's Claude Orchestration entry claimed two contributions at wired points. It is now one, and the entry's execute:wave:post label was already wrong before this change: the manifest said execute:wave:pre. Rewritten to one plan:post contribution, why the execute-point one was removed, and where the procedure now lives. One assertion in claude-orchestration.test.cjs could not fail. It tested for the prose "(into the executor)" while the doc says "(`into: executor`)", so no plausible wording matched it and the paired plan:post assertion was carrying the row. Replaced with a check on the structural claim, and proved RED by restoring the two-contribution wording before reverting. The moved procedure keeps section headings that speak as a live contribution -- "When this contribution is active", "Why execute:wave:pre". Preserving the body verbatim was deliberate, so the headings stay and an editor's note under the header explains why they read that way. A sweep of all 17 files referencing byLoopPoint found no further siblings: the remaining hits are a synthetic capability fixture and an empty-points test that already expected no active hooks, both correct before and after. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Dennis Alexis Valin Dittrich
|
18c899def5 |
enhance(#4209): optional external source reviewer lanes for /gsd:code-review (#4323)
* test(01-01): define reviewer-support trait contract Add failing coverage for step.supportsReviewerLanes (#4209 DISP-02): validator rejects non-boolean values with an exact field path, accepts missing/true/false, and the real code-review capability.json steps must declare supportsReviewerLanes: true. Add loop-resolver projection coverage proving the trait reaches activeHooks verbatim for a provider-neutral synthetic step (not code-review-specific), and that omitted/false values stay inert (no key on the active hook). All 8 new assertions fail today: the validator has no such field, and loop-resolver has nothing to project. RED before GREEN. * feat(01-01): declare reviewer-capable steps Add step.supportsReviewerLanes (#4209 DISP-02): a strict optional boolean opt-in trait, step-scoped (not capability-wide). Only a literal true validates and projects; false/omitted stay inert (no key on the projected active hook), and every non-boolean type fails capability-validator.cjs with an exact field-path error. Opt both existing code-review steps (execute:post, execute:wave:post) into the trait in capabilities/code-review/capability.json. Project the validated field through src/loop-resolver.cts into activeHooks so a provider-neutral generic interpreter can read it without any code-review-specific knowledge. Document the field in docs/reference/capability-manifest.md and regenerate gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-registry.cjs via the generator (never hand-edited). Makes all 8 RED assertions from the prior commit pass. * test(01-02): define shared reviewer dispatch - Add tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs covering dispatchReviewerLanes: inert when the supportsReviewerLanes trait is off or nothing is selected, exactly-once plan/invoke per selected lane, duplicate-alias dedup, the bounded metadata-only source-review prompt (repo root, paths+baseSha, depth, four fixed prohibitions), and capability-neutral reuse via a second synthetic step context. - RED: module under test (src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts) does not exist yet, so require() fails and every assertion is unreached. * feat(01-02): dispatch reviewers for opted-in steps - Add src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts: dispatchReviewerLanes(input, deps), ONE interpreter for a step's supportsReviewerLanes trait. Reuses resolveReviewerSelection for selection and resolveLanePlan for planning (both already-existing, pure building blocks); invocation is the one required, caller-injected seam (deps.invoke) since runLane needs OS-aware spawn plumbing this module does not own. - trait !== true, or a selection resolving to zero lanes, dispatches nothing (zero plan/invoke calls). Each selected lane is planned and invoked exactly once, in the selector's deduped/sorted order. - buildSourceReviewPrompt assembles a metadata-only bounded prompt (repo root, canonical paths + base SHA, depth, four fixed prohibitions) — never file contents — written once per dispatch and shared across every invoked lane. - GREEN: tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs now passes. * test(01-02): define reviewer dispatch failures - Extend tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs with the fail-closed matrix: an explicitly requested lane the selector could not resolve still lets the OTHER resolved lane run, but the aggregate result must never read as a clean success (and 'every explicit lane unavailable' must be distinguishable from the plain no-flags-passed inert case); request-level validation (path traversal, absolute paths outside repoRoot, empty/non-string paths, missing depth/base SHA) halts the whole dispatch before any lane is planned or invoked; a per-lane prompt-budget overflow hard-fails only that lane before invoke while its sibling still runs. - RED: src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts does not yet implement any of these guards, so 9 of the new assertions fail against the current (Task 1) implementation. * fix(01-02): fail closed in reviewer dispatch - src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts: add the fail-closed guards the prior commit deliberately left out. An explicitly requested lane the selector could not resolve no longer lets the aggregate read as a clean success — lanes that DID resolve still run and keep their results (never narrow the requested set), but selection.errors now flips the aggregate ok to false, and 'every explicit lane unavailable' is now distinguishable (SELECTION_FAILED) from the plain no-flags-passed inert case (NO_LANES_SELECTED). - Add request-level validation (validatePaths, depth/baseSha presence) that halts the WHOLE dispatch before any lane is planned or invoked: path traversal, absolute paths outside repoRoot, empty/non-string paths, and missing provenance are all rejected up front. - Add per-lane prompt-budget enforcement (resolveBudget, mirroring gsd-tools.cjs's budgetFor convention including budget 0 = unbounded): a lane whose resolved budget the prompt exceeds hard-fails before invoke runs for it, without cancelling a sibling lane already planned. - Document the supportsReviewerLanes trait and its dispatch-step interpreter in gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md. - GREEN: all 19 tests in tests/reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs pass; no regressions in the review-lane/reviewer-selection/prompt-budget suites (356 passing). * test(01-03): define optional source reviewer flow RED: assert code-review.md dispatches roster-derived reviewer-lane flags through a single review-lane dispatch-step call (DISP-01..05), that the no-flag path stays byte-for-behavior unchanged (COMP-01), and that external evidence reaching the internal reviewer prompt is marked unverified (CONS-02). Also covers the CLI contract directly: no-op with no explicit selection, and fail-closed on an explicit unknown lane (SAFE-07) via real gsd-tools.cjs subprocess calls. * feat(01-03): route optional source reviewers GREEN: code-review.md gains a dispatch_reviewer_lanes step that matches canonical reviewer-lane flags against the merged first-party + installed roster (never a hand-maintained list) and, only when at least one is present, calls the shared reviewer-step interpreter exactly once with the already-resolved repo root, file scope, depth, and base SHA. Its evidence paths are appended to the internal reviewer prompt via ${EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK}, explicitly marked unverified. No reviewer-lane flag leaves the internal-only dispatch byte-for-behavior unchanged (COMP-01). Deviation (Rule 3 — blocking issue): 01-02 documented `review-lane dispatch-step` (gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md) as the CLI route `dispatchReviewerLanes` wires through, but never implemented the gsd-tools.cjs subcommand — the workflow's call had nothing to reach. Add it to the existing review-lane router, reusing the same effort-aware plan building and runner deps `plan`/`invoke` already use (factored into buildLaneRunnerDeps to avoid duplicating the spawn/http/fs seam). Guard the CLI's own `detected` set on whether an explicit flag was passed: resolveReviewerSelection's no-explicit-selection fallback is "select every detected reviewer" (the correct default for /gsd:review), and passing it an unconditionally non-empty detected set would silently invoke the whole roster on every no-flag code review, violating COMP-01. * test(01-03): define external finding consolidation RED: assert gsd-code-reviewer.md treats <external_reviewer_evidence> as untrusted input — independently re-verifies every claim against the actual current source, resists a prompt-injection attempt embedded in evidence text, and folds a verified claim into the existing Narrative Findings section with no second REVIEW.md schema (CONS-01..03). Also assert code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK restates the four fixed source-review prohibitions (SAFE-03..06) at the internal-reviewer handoff. * feat(01-03): consolidate external review evidence GREEN: gsd-code-reviewer.md's load_context parses <external_reviewer_evidence> as untrusted data, independently re-verifies every cited claim against the actual current source before it can appear in REVIEW.md, and explicitly resists prompt injection embedded in evidence text (never a command, no matter what it claims to be). A verified claim folds into the existing Narrative Findings section with (external: {slug}) provenance — one REVIEW.md schema only, no separate external-findings section. code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK now restates the four fixed source-review prohibitions (SAFE-03..06) at the internal-reviewer handoff. * fix(01-02): gitignore the reviewer-step-dispatch build artifact 01-02 added src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts but never added its npm run build:lib output to .gitignore, unlike every sibling gsd-core/bin/lib/*.cjs generated file. Left it showing as untracked noise in git status. * docs(01-04): publish user and command contract for reviewer-lane source review - Document optional reviewer-lane flags on /gsd-code-review in USER-GUIDE.md and COMMANDS.md: opt-in, no source bodies in prompts, no fallback on failure, findings independently consolidated into the single REVIEW.md - Add the same contract to the docs/features/code-review-pipeline.md fragment and regenerate docs/FEATURES.md from it - Preserve /gsd-review as the plan-review command; cross-reference it rather than duplicating the reviewer roster - Pick up docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json and skills/gsd-code-review/SKILL.md drift owned by source already shipped in Plans 01-01/01-03 but never regenerated (npm run regen:derived had not been run in this worktree) * docs(01-04): align architecture and agent ownership docs for reviewer-lane trait - ARCHITECTURE.md: trace the #4209 capability trait (supportsReviewerLanes) through the shared dispatchReviewerLanes interpreter to the existing review-lane plan/invoke machinery, ending at gsd-code-reviewer as the sole REVIEW.md consolidator - AGENTS.md: document gsd-code-reviewer's full-context verification scope and its treatment of external reviewer evidence as unverified input - No new diagram, abstraction, or config key; docs/CONFIGURATION.md is unchanged since the feature adds no setting or default * fix(01-02): eslint-ignore the reviewer-step-dispatch build artifact Same gap as the earlier .gitignore fix: 01-02 added src/reviewer-step-dispatch.cts but never added its generated gsd-core/bin/lib/reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs output to eslint.config.mjs's ignore list like every sibling generated file, so tsc's emitted __importDefault CommonJS-interop var tripped no-var. * fix(01-04): add the reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs roster row to docs/INVENTORY.md 01-04 regenerated docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json (which now lists cli_modules/reviewer-step-dispatch.cjs) but the hand-written roster row in docs/INVENTORY.md — required by design, since a role sentence cannot be generated — was never added. * fix(01-01): update the code-review capability-step fixture for supportsReviewerLanes refactor-trigger-cli.test.cjs's preservesCodeReviewHookShapeAlongsideRefactorHook strict-deep-equals the code-review step's exact shape at execute:post; 01-01 added supportsReviewerLanes: true to that step and this fixture was not updated. * chore(01-03): acknowledge emitted-doc growth for code-review.md and gsd-code-reviewer.md Both files grew as a direct, intended consequence of wiring optional reviewer lanes into /gsd:code-review (the new dispatch_reviewer_lanes step and the untrusted-evidence consolidation contract) — not incidental drift. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: code-review.md — new dispatch_reviewer_lanes step and EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK wiring for optional reviewer lanes (#4209) Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-code-reviewer.md — untrusted external-evidence consolidation contract for optional reviewer lanes (#4209) * test(01-05): define WR-01/WR-02 reliability contract for dispatchReviewerLanes From internal code review: dispatched must be false when zero lanes actually reached plan(), and a throwing plan()/invoke() for one lane must not discard results already collected for a sibling lane — matching the fail-closed pattern gsd-tools.cjs already uses for the same resolveLanePlan call (#2494/#2605/#1698/#1936/#2073/#2176/#2589/#2794). Refs: gsd-core-dks.16, gsd-core-dks.17 * fix(01-05): close WR-01/WR-02/IN-01/IN-02 from internal review - WR-01: dispatched now tracks whether any lane actually reached plan(), not results.length — an unresolvable selected slug no longer reports dispatched:true. - WR-02: plan()/writePromptFile()/invoke() wrapped per-lane so a throw for one lane can never discard results already collected for a sibling lane, matching the same guard gsd-tools.cjs already has around the identical resolveLanePlan call. - IN-01: documents the intentional budget===0-is-unbounded convention (#2797) the caller already relies on. - IN-02: review-lane dispatch-step no longer blocks indefinitely on an un-piped interactive TTY; fails closed to empty paths instead. Refs: gsd-core-dks.16, gsd-core-dks.17 * docs(01-05): add changeset fragment for PR #17 * fix(01-03): allowlist prompt-injection-scan false positive on the untrusted-evidence contract agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's untrusted-evidence section and its pinning regression test both quote injection phrases as the exact attack they defend against/detect — same DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION class as the existing allowlist entries, not an actual injection vector. * test(01-05): extend WR-02 coverage to writePromptFile/invoke throws; DIFF_BASE-empty skip From CodeRabbit review: WR-02's earlier fix only wrapped plan() — writePromptFile()/deps.invoke() still ran unguarded, so a throw there still aborted every later selected lane. Also covers the dispatch_reviewer_lanes DIFF_BASE-empty-provenance gap (explicit lanes silently not running when no prior review and no phase-start commit exist). * fix(01-05): skip dispatch_reviewer_lanes with a clear warning when DIFF_BASE cannot be resolved Previously an explicit reviewer-lane request with no prior review and no resolvable phase-start commit reached dispatch-step with an empty --base-sha, which fails closed via missing_provenance — correct, but silent about why explicitly requested lanes didn't run. Now skip dispatch entirely in that case with a stderr warning naming the actual cause. * fix(01-05): wrap writePromptFile/invoke in the same per-lane try/catch as plan() WR-02's original fix only guarded plan() — a throw from writePromptFile() or deps.invoke() still aborted the whole dispatch, discarding results already collected for lanes processed earlier in the loop. CodeRabbit caught the gap; WR-02b/WR-02c pin it. * fix(01-05): WR-02b mock must throw only on the first writePromptFile() call The committed mock threw unconditionally, so codex's retry also threw and failed for the same reason as claude's — the test could not distinguish 'sibling still runs' from 'sibling also breaks'. Gate the throw to the first call, matching WR-02/WR-02c's single-failure intent. * fix(#4209): close review findings from adversarial + critical-code-reviewer pass Two independent reviews (agy adversarial review, Opus critical-code-reviewer + ponytail) found 6 Blocking and 7 Required issues in the reviewer-lane dispatch wiring around dispatchReviewerLanes. All 13 tracked in gsd-core-dks.18-30 and fixed here: - dispatch-step's reducer silently swallowed whole-dispatch rejections (invalid paths, missing provenance, etc); it now checks parsed.ok/reason. - spawn_reviewer recomputed its own stale DIFF_BASE, diverging from the LAST_REVIEW_COMMIT-aware value dispatch_reviewer_lanes uses on re-review; now shares the single compute_file_scope derivation. - the external reviewer prompt had no actual review request or citation requirement, only prohibitions; added both. - removed the supportsReviewerLanes trait plumbing (capability registry, validator, loop-resolver, docs, tests) — it was never consulted by the real dispatch path, which gates on explicit CLI flags instead. - flag-resolution require() was a fragile cwd-relative literal that failed silently on non-vendored installs; now resolves via GSD_TOOLS's own directory and warns instead of swallowing failure. - reducer didn't unwrap the @file: overflow protocol for large payloads. - deduplicated resolveBudget/budgetFor into one resolveLaneBudget. - lane artifacts now write to a mktemp run dir instead of $PHASE_DIR, so a second dispatch can't overwrite prior evidence. - validatePaths rejects control characters, closing a markdown-injection vector into the external prompt via crafted filenames. - reworded the one line that tripped prompt-injection-scan.sh instead of allowlisting the whole production prompt file. - fixed a stale docstring range and a dispatched-field ordering bug. - added 3 integration tests executing the actual reducer against synthetic dispatch-step JSON, replacing markdown-substring-only assertions. 771/771 tests pass across every touched suite; tsc --noEmit clean. * fix(#4209): wire supportsReviewerLanes as the maintainer's required reusable trait The maintainer's approval on issue #4209 explicitly redirected implementation shape: reviewer-lane dispatch must be a reusable capability/step-dispatch trait ("supportsReviewerLanes"), not code-review.md hand-wiring the call itself. My previous commit (e2558326) deleted that trait entirely after finding it declared-but-never-consulted, which was backwards — the fix was to wire it, not remove it. Restores the trait (capability.json, generated registry, validator, loop-resolver.cts, docs, tests) and wires it for real: dispatch_reviewer_lanes now resolves its own active hook via `gsd_run loop render-hooks` for the configured workflow.code_review_point and only proceeds to CLI-flag matching when supportsReviewerLanes reads true. Explicit flags no longer bypass the trait; a matching flag with the trait false resolves zero slugs (proven by a new integration test executing the real fence with both trait states). Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-core/workflows/code-review.md — the dispatch_reviewer_lanes step grows a trait-resolution fence (#4209 maintainer redirect requires the capability layer, not the workflow, own the opt-in decision). * fix(#4209): dispatch-step self-verifies the reviewer-lane trait via --cap-id/--point Both an agy adversarial review and an Opus critical-code-reviewer pass independently found the same gap in my previous commit (9b2c3773d): the trait check I wired into code-review.md only protected code-review's OWN invocation — gsd-tools.cjs's dispatch-step handler still hardcoded `trait: true` unconditionally, so a second capability declaring supportsReviewerLanes would get zero enforcement from the shared CLI unless it correctly re-implemented the ~15-line render-hooks scrape itself. That is exactly the "each workflow.md hand-wiring the call" the maintainer's redirect said to eliminate. Moves the trait check into dispatch-step itself: given --cap-id/--point, it self-invokes `loop render-hooks <point>` (relocating the one subprocess code-review.md used to spawn for this, not adding a new one) and derives the real trait from that capId's active hook, rather than trusting a caller-passed boolean. code-review.md now only passes --cap-id code-review --point "$CODE_REVIEW_POINT" and no longer resolves or gates on the trait itself — the ~20-line scrape it previously carried is gone. Any other capability opts into the identical enforcement by declaring the trait and passing the same two flags. Replaced the two tests that stipulated SUPPORTS_REVIEWER_LANES as an input variable (they proved a bash branch honors a variable, not that the variable reflects the real capability manifest) with three integration tests that invoke the real dispatch-step CLI against the real first-party capability registry: the real code-review trait resolves true, an unknown --cap-id resolves false (trait_not_enabled, fail-closed), and omitting --cap-id/--point entirely resolves false (no context means no opt-in). Also: reject \x7f/U+2028/U+2029 in validatePaths' control-character check (agy-F1 was incomplete), and delete the promptWritten per-lane coupling flag — the prompt write is idempotent, so writing it once per lane instead of gating on "did any lane write it yet" removes a latent bug where a deps.plan override that ever varies promptPath per lane would silently skip writing for a later lane. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: gsd-core/workflows/code-review.md — net line count drops (the trait scrape moved into dispatch-step), but the file still grew this session across multiple commits; acknowledging per the growth-tracking convention. * fix(#4209): remove per-run token waste from the shipped prompts Runtime prompt content, not session tokens: two real, per-invocation token costs in the code that ships. 1. agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's critical_rules restated nearly all of load_context step 5's ~180-word untrusted-evidence contract in ~90 more words, breaking this section's own established terse one-liner style (every other rule here is 1-2 sentences). This prompt loads fresh on every /gsd:code-review invocation. Shrunk to a one-line cross-reference, matching how write_review's own reference to step 5 already does it. 2. buildSourceReviewPrompt repeated the base SHA on every single file line even though it is identical for every file and already stated once at the top of the prompt — O(files) wasted tokens on every dispatched lane for a 50-file review, for zero information gain. File lines are now bare paths. * fix(#4209): resolve reviewer-lane trait in-process, fix CI failures found in review round 3 Opus critical-code-reviewer found a real Blocking defect in the --cap-id/ --point self-invocation added last commit: `dispatch-step` spawned `loop render-hooks <point> --raw` as a subprocess and bare-JSON.parse'd its stdout, but `io.cjs`'s output() redirects any payload over 50000 chars to `@file:<path>` instead of inline JSON -- the same overflow protocol this feature already unwraps for its OWN dispatch result 60 lines later in code-review.md. A large-enough activeHooks envelope (more installed capabilities/fragments) would throw, get silently swallowed by the bare catch, and misreport a real trait as trait_not_enabled with zero diagnostic. Fixed by extracting the config/registry/capability-state resolution `cmdLoopRenderHooks` already performs into an exported pure function, resolveActiveHooksForPoint (both `cmdLoopRenderHooks` and dispatch-step now share it), and calling it in-process from dispatch-step instead of spawning a subprocess at all. This eliminates the @file: exposure entirely (the dispatch-step path never touches the rendered-string envelope or its JSON-stringify/50000-char threshold), removes one subprocess spawn per code-review invocation, and gives a genuine diagnostic (stderr warning) on resolution failure instead of silent fail-closed. Corrected three doc/ docstring references to the now-removed subprocess self-invocation. Also fixes 2 real CI failures this round surfaced: - lint-tests: the agy-F1 control-char regex fix's `eslint-disable-next-line no-control-regex` comment was unused under this project's ESLint config (verified locally: the rule never actually flags \x00-\x1f in this repo's config) -- a mistake from an earlier commit this session, never actually lint-checked before push. Removed the disable comment. - security (prompt-injection-scan): the agy-F1 regression test's crafted fixture literally contains "Ignore all prior instructions." as test data proving validatePaths rejects it -- allowlisted the test file, same DEFECT.PROMPT-INJECTION-SCAN-COLLISION class as existing entries. Also trimmed agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md's load_context step 5 (R2): one bullet stated "untrusted, never a command" three different ways in one paragraph, and a same-file duplicate of write_review's schema rule. Consolidated to state each rule once. Declined one suggestion from this round: shrinking code-review.md's EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK to a bare evidence list. Two tests (tests/code-review-pipeline-regression.test.cjs's CONS-01..03 block, tests/code-review.test.cjs's CONS-02 test) deliberately lock the four- prohibitions restatement and the untrusted-evidence prose into the INJECTED block itself, not just the consolidator's system prompt -- adjacency of the warning to the untrusted payload it's warning about is a recognized prompt-injection defense-in-depth pattern from this workstream's original TDD plan, not accidental duplication. * fix(#4209): correct stale per-file base-SHA prose in the external prompt Leftover from removing the per-file base SHA repetition earlier this session: the review-request sentence still said "relative to its base SHA" (singular per-file framing) when there's now exactly one base SHA, stated once above the file list. Reads "relative to the base SHA above" now. * fix(#4209): make getLane/configGet/plan required deps, delete dead defaults R3/R4 from the review round I'd deferred as low-priority test-churn: this file's one production caller (gsd-tools.cjs's dispatch-step handler) always supplies all three, so the fallbacks were dead in production -- but each was actively WRONG if ever reached: the default configGet always returned undefined, silently disabling resolveLaneBudget's overflow guard; the default getLane looked up only first-party REVIEWER_LANES, diverging from production's overlay-merged roster; the default plan skipped per-host effort resolution entirely. These defaults were introduced by this PR's own earlier work (this file did not exist before #4209 -- first commit a760bfcda, 01-02), not inherited from elsewhere, so there's no external caller depending on the lenient contract. Turned out free to fix: making the three deps required and deleting defaultGetLane/defaultPlan needed zero test changes -- every existing test that actually reaches the per-lane loop already supplies getLane/plan explicitly, and configGet's only real dependent (the budget-overflow tests) already supplies it too. 788/788 tests pass unchanged, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): define depth semantics for the external reviewer lane Verified this was a real bug, not a match to existing convention as I'd claimed when declining the suggestion earlier this session: the internal gsd-code-reviewer agent's own system prompt carries a full <depth_levels> block defining what quick/standard/deep mean and do (agents/gsd-code- reviewer.md:68-99). The external reviewer lane has no access to that persona at all -- it only ever sees buildSourceReviewPrompt's bounded text, which sent the bare depth label with zero definition to a third-party CLI with no other source of truth for what "standard" means. Added depthMeaning(), condensed from the internal reviewer's own <depth_levels> definitions so the two stay consistent, and interpolated it into the review-request sentence. 150/150 tests pass, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): merge dispatch_reviewer_lanes' split fences into one shell invocation CR-01 (Opus critical-code-reviewer, confirmed by direct execution): the roster-matching fence set EXPLICIT_JOINED/EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS, and a SEPARATE later fence read them via ${#EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS[@]} to decide whether to dispatch at all. This file's own documented rule (its depth-resolution guard, stated explicitly a few hundred lines earlier) is that a guard and the extraction it protects must run as one shell control-flow decision, because markdown-fenced blocks do not share shell state -- this step violated its own file's rule for the entire feature's gating condition. Merged the roster-resolution fence and the dispatch-decision fence into one continuous bash block, removing the intervening prose that split them. Fixed the stderr-based failure detection in the same edit (RQ-01: checking whether stderr is non-empty misfires on any benign Node warning; now checks the actual exit status of the roster-resolution command). Verified by extracting the merged fence and executing it standalone, driving both branches: --codex resolves EXPLICIT_JOINED=codex, SLUGS_COUNT=1, and a real dispatch-step call succeeds; no flags resolves EXPLICIT_JOINED empty, SLUGS_COUNT=0, dispatch-step never invoked (COMP-01). 141/141 workflow tests pass, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): depthMeaning accuracy, injection defense on all embedded fields, hoisted prompt write Batch of Required/Suggestion fixes from the Opus critical-code-reviewer + writing-for-agents pass: - CR-02/CR-03: depthMeaning() dropped real categories from quick (empty catch blocks, commented-out code) and deep (error propagation, state mutation consistency, circular dependencies) relative to the real <depth_levels> block, and had zero test coverage. Restored full accuracy and added tests that read the real agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md file directly, so drift between the two can't recur silently. Unrecognised depth now normalizes to standard's definition, matching that agent's own documented rule, instead of rendering an undefined bare label. - RQ-04: depth/baseSha/repoRoot/runDir land in the same markdown prompt `paths` does, but weren't checked for control characters like paths were (agy-F1's original finding). Hoisted CONTROL_CHAR to module scope and applied it to all four fields at the same provenance-check boundary. runDir previously had zero validation at all. - S1: deleted the dead `identity` parameter on `invoke` -- the one production caller already ignores it, no test read it by name. - S2: hoisted the shared prompt write above the per-lane loop -- promptPath is derived from runDir alone (constant across lanes by construction), so writing it once is both correct and cheaper than the per-lane write R1 introduced earlier this session. Discovered and fixed a real regression from the naive version of this hoist: an unguarded throw would have escaped dispatchReviewerLanes as an uncaught exception instead of a clean per-lane failure. Added a new PROMPT_WRITE_FAILED whole-dispatch reason, matching the existing validatePaths/MISSING_PROVENANCE halt pattern, with a dedicated regression test. - S3: moved `planned = true` past the budget-overflow gate, so `dispatched` only reports true once a lane has cleared BOTH plan and budget checks. - S5: relayed gsd-code-reviewer.md's own "performance issues are out of scope unless also correctness issues" policy into the external-lane prompt, which previously had no such guidance and could return findings the internal reviewer's own contract excludes. - RQ-05 (partial): shrunk this file's own header docstring's restatement of the trait-reuse architecture to a pointer at gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md, the canonical home. 234/234 tests pass across the full reviewer-lane test suite, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): dedupe roster-merge logic, consolidate trait architecture prose, add step completion criterion RQ-02: added a `review-lane explicit-from-argv` subcommand that reuses the SAME merged-roster logic (`laneBySlug`) `dispatch-step`/`plan`/`invoke` already share. code-review.md's ~18-line inline `node -e` reimplementing `loadRegistry`+`mergeReviewerLanes` (a rename-only copy of the block in gsd-tools.cjs) is now a single call to this subcommand -- the exact violation code-review-flags.cjs's own header warns against ("this is the canonical flag-parsing surface -- do not replicate inline bash parsing"). RQ-03: an empty --cap-id XOR --point now warns distinctly from the legitimate no-context opt-out (both absent) -- a caller that named a capability without its point was silently indistinguishable from a correct opt-out. Also hardened the CODE_REVIEW_POINT config-get fallback: it only ever fires when the config-get COMMAND ITSELF fails (config-get already resolves the manifest's own schema default in the normal case), but that failure was previously silent. RQ-05/W-01/W-12/W-13: the "supportsReviewerLanes is a reusable trait resolved inside dispatch-step" explanation was restated in full in 5 places across this session's own review cycles. Consolidated to ONE canonical statement in gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md; the other 4 (this file's own header, gsd-tools.cjs's comment, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md, code-review.md's step-opening comment) now point at it instead. W-05/W-06: loop-hook-dispatch.md described "false or non-boolean" as two inert cases when capability-validator.cjs already rejects non-boolean at load -- restated as the two cases that actually reach this code. Removed a "do not hand-roll trait resolution" prohibition whose target no longer exists once the positive description precedes it. W-04: deleted a no-op sentence in agents/gsd-code-reviewer.md ("missing block means proceed as normal") -- an absent optional block already means proceed as normal without being told. W-08/W-09: replaced longhand "zero selection/plan/invoke calls" and the made-up compound "byte-for-behavior [un]changed" with the token this session's own docs already coined for this concept (inert) and the word that means what byte-for-behavior was reaching for (unchanged). W-10: dispatch_reviewer_lanes had no completion criterion -- added one sentence naming the checkable end state (EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK is set, either populated or empty). This exact sentence would have caught the cross-fence bug fixed two commits ago at authoring time. Declined from this round, with reasoning: W-02/W-03 (trim the untrusted-evidence restatement in EXTERNAL_EVIDENCE_BLOCK/critical_rules) -- two tests deliberately lock this as intentional adjacency-based prompt-injection defense-in-depth, not accidental duplication (see this branch's own earlier commit). S4 (wrap LANE_RUN_DIR in a creation-site `trap ... EXIT`) -- would fire at the end of the CREATING fence, before spawn_reviewer's agent ever reads the evidence files, given this file's own documented fenced-block execution model; the existing named cross-reference between creation and cleanup already satisfies the co-location concern without introducing that regression. 853/853 tests pass across the full reviewer-lane test suite, tsc/lint clean. * fix(#4209): merge CODE_REVIEW_POINT into dispatch_reviewer_lanes' one fence, stop test from spawning real codex Round-5 review (agy) found the same cross-fence-split bug CR-01 already fixed for EXPLICIT_JOINED/EXPLICIT_REVIEWER_SLUGS: CODE_REVIEW_POINT's config-get fallback lived in an earlier, separate fence from the fence that consumes it via --point, split only by prose (not a guard, per this step's own documented rule). Merged into the single continuous fence and added a structural test asserting exactly one bash fence in the step. The new end-to-end regression test for this used --codex, which drives the fence's real `review-lane dispatch-step` call and, with the codex binary present on PATH, spawns the real external CLI — which then blocks on interactive auth with no stdin (BL-01). Stubbed gsd_run for `review-lane dispatch-step` only (captures argv instead of executing), keeping the real config-get/explicit-from-argv calls the test is actually about. * fix(#4209): split control-char vs missing provenance reason, realpath-check path escapes, stale comment Round-5 review (Opus) warning-tier findings: - WR-04: MISSING_PROVENANCE covered both "field absent" and "field present but a control-character injection attempt" — a caller distinguishing a config problem from a security event couldn't tell them apart. Split into MISSING_PROVENANCE (absent) and INVALID_PROVENANCE (present but invalid). - WR-05: validatePaths' containment check was lexical only (path.resolve), so a symlink whose own path sits inside repoRoot could still point outside it. Added an fs.realpathSync check (ENOENT-tolerant — a git-diff path can legitimately name a file already deleted in a stale worktree), realpathing repoRoot itself too so a symlinked repoRoot (e.g. /tmp on macOS) doesn't false-positive-reject its own real children. - WR-08: a comment in the per-lane loop still said a throwing writePromptFile() was caught there — stale since the prompt write was hoisted above the loop in an earlier round. WR-03 (validate depth against the quick/standard/deep enum) was considered and declined: this dispatcher is deliberately capability-neutral (see the existing "synthetic step context" test, which passes a non-code-review depth label on purpose to prove no code-review-specific special-casing exists). WR-01 (double registry load), WR-02 (trim-vs-hard-fail budget semantics), and WR-07 (reason omitted on the aggregate return) were verified against source and are not bugs — see review notes. * docs(#4209): document LANE_RUN_DIR's early-exit trade-off as accepted, not a gap Round-5 review (Opus, BL-03) flagged that an early exit between dispatch_reviewer_lanes and commit_review leaks the run-scoped temp dir. A trap-based cleanup was considered and rejected: if a step genuinely runs as a separate process, a trap set at creation time would fire at the end of that SAME fence, deleting the directory before spawn_reviewer/commit_review ever read it — worse than the leak it would fix. review.md's own gather_context/cleanup pair for the identical resource class (a run-scoped reviewer temp dir) already makes and documents this exact trade-off: cleanup runs only on a documented success path, and a leftover $TMPDIR entry is explicitly called cheaper than destroyed evidence. Recording that precedent here so this isn't re-raised as a live gap in a future review. * fix(#4209): register the WR-05 symlink-escape test's synthetic docs/ path reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs's "capability-neutral reuse" fixture passes paths: ['docs/spec.md'] as a synthetic, never-read path proving the dispatcher has no code-review-specific special-casing. lint-docs-guard- registration correctly flagged this as an unregistered docs/ path reference — add the docs-guard-exempt marker and its pinned baseline entry, the same pattern every other synthetic docs/ literal in this test suite already uses. * fix(#4209): backfill changeset pr: field with the real upstream PR number changeset-lint's fail_pr_field_drift caught the fragment still pointing at the fork PR (17) instead of the upstream one (open-gsd/gsd-core#4323) this branch is now also open against. * docs(#4209): amend ADR-2782 for the supportsReviewerLanes step-trait seam trek-e's review (2026-09-07, gsd-core#4323) found a real ADR gap: every decision in ADR-2782 (D1-D9) and every prior dated amendment governs the `role: "reviewer"` capability body and its one consumer, /gsd:review. This PR's actual new seam - a `supportsReviewerLanes: true` trait on an ordinary feature capability's `steps[]` entry, projected through loop-resolver.cts and resolved in-process via resolveActiveHooksForPoint - is a different capability axis (steps/gates/contributions) that the ADR's own scope note explicitly places out of reach. Per docs/contributor-standards.md's "Amending an accepted ADR", an in-place dated section is the established, lighter-weight path for an addition that stays within the ADR's existing decisions - used twice already in this same file - so this appends a third dated entry documenting the new seam, its consumer, and why it reuses the existing D1-D9-governed plan/invoke machinery rather than adding a second one. No decision is reversed; no new Amends/Amended-by pair is needed since the steps/gates/contributions axis already carries reciprocal links to ADR-857 and ADR-894. * fix(#4209): close two test-quality gaps trek-e's review found Minor 1: validatePaths (a path-shape parser guarding the prompt- injection/path-traversal trust boundary) had only example-based coverage, violating ADR-456's rule that parsers/budget limits carry at least one fast-check property test. Adds three: safe-segment paths are never rejected, a single leading "../" always escapes the one-segment repoRoot, and a control character anywhere is always rejected - one property per rejection reason validatePaths owns. Minor 2: the budget-overflow check (`estimatedTokens > budget`) was only ever exercised far below budget or at budget:0 (unbounded), never at the exact threshold crossing where a `>` vs `>=` off-by-one would hide. Adds three exact-boundary tests using the real estimateTokens/ buildSourceReviewPrompt the module calls internally, so the resolved token count is exact rather than approximated: budget == estimate (must pass), budget == estimate - 1 (must fail), budget == estimate + 1 (must pass). Also extracts okPlan()'s fixture timeoutMs into a named constant - local/no-adhoc-timeout-literal (#4446) landed on next after this branch was authored and flagged the pre-existing literal on rebase; it is fixture data for a synthetic plan object dispatchReviewerLanes never waits on, a distinct class from tests/helpers/timeouts.cjs's real subprocess norms. * fix(#4209): update docs-guard-registration baseline for the new ADR citation reviewer-step-dispatch.test.cjs's new fast-check property tests cite docs/adr/456-test-rigor-architecture.md in a justifying comment (never a real read). lint-docs-guard-registration fingerprints every docs/ path string an exempted test file mentions and fails on drift so a human re-confirms the exemption still holds - re-confirmed, and the baseline is updated to match. * fix(#4209): point changeset pr: field at the fork PR for CI validation changeset-lint's fail_pr_field_drift check compares the fragment's pr: field against the PR the CI run is actually attached to (GITHUB_EVENT_PATH), not a fixed target. Rehearsing this branch on fork PR davdittrich/gsd-core#17 needs pr: 17 to pass that check; the prior commit's pr: 4323 (the real open-gsd upstream PR number) is correct for that PR but fails here. Backfill to 4323 happens again, as the last commit, immediately before the approved push to open-gsd#4323 - never leaving pr: 17 on the branch that ships upstream. * fix(#4209): reject promptChannel:none lanes from source-review dispatch CodeRabbit found a real scope mismatch: coderabbit's lane declares promptChannel: 'none' and reviews the working tree on its own terms, fed nothing (review.md:367). Silently dispatching it through dispatchReviewerLanes would ignore the bounded paths/depth/baseSha scope buildSourceReviewPrompt promises and let the lane review whatever it independently sees fit, violating this interpreter's own scoped, metadata-only contract. Reject before plan()/invoke(), same as an unresolved slug. * fix(#4209): scope CONS-02 test to the evidence-block line, not the whole file CodeRabbit found the whole-file match on workflowContent would still pass if UNVERIFIED and re-open/reopen appeared in two unrelated parts of this 1000+-line workflow, proving nothing about the actual evidence block's contract. Line-filtered via splitLines (not a bare-\n regex spanning readFileSync content) so this stays CRLF-portable and passes local/no-unbounded-quantifier and local/no-crlf-fragile-split. * fix(#4209): guard DISPATCH_JSON substitution and capture its stderr CodeRabbit found the dispatch-step command substitution unguarded: a non-zero exit could leave DISPATCH_JSON empty (or halt the step under errexit with no warning), and the downstream reducer would only ever report the generic unparseable_dispatch_output reason, discarding the command's own diagnostic. Guarded like the existing CODE_REVIEW_POINT/ EXPLICIT_JOINED calls above it: capture stderr to a temp file, surface it in a warning on failure, and fall back to a parseable dispatch_ command_failed JSON stub so the reducer's existing reason-reporting path still fires. * docs(#4209): fix byte-for-behavior wording and missing colon, regenerate CodeRabbit found "byte-for-behavior" should read "byte-for-byte" (the established repo term for output-identical unchanged behavior) and a missing colon after the bold "Optional external reviewer lanes (#4209)" lead-in in docs/features/code-review-pipeline.md. Fixed in the two hand-authored sources (commands/gsd/code-review.md, docs/features/ code-review-pipeline.md) and regenerated the two derived projections (skills/gsd-code-review/SKILL.md via gen-plugin-skills.cjs, docs/ FEATURES.md via gen-features.cjs) so they stay in sync. * fix(#4209): drop the fabricated DISPATCH_JSON fallback stub (Windows CI) The prior fix's fallback `DISPATCH_JSON='{"ok":false,...}'` embeds double-quoted JSON keys inside a single-quoted shell literal. That extra quote density, inside an already quote-heavy ~8KB driver string, passed bash -n and the full local suite on Linux but broke Windows Git-Bash: `dispatch_reviewer_lanes computes CODE_REVIEW_POINT ... end to end (#4209 round 5)` failed on two Windows CI shards with `bash -c: unexpected EOF while looking for matching '''` — a Windows argv-to- command-line re-quoting edge case, reproducible on rerun, not a flake. Root-caused via gh api job logs plus a byte-identical local reconstruction of the test's own driver script. Fix: drop the fabricated stub. The downstream node -e reducer already falls back to reason `unparseable_dispatch_output` on any JSON.parse failure, so an empty/partial DISPATCH_JSON on command failure is still handled correctly, with zero new quoting risk. * revert(#4209): drop the DISPATCH_JSON stderr-guard nitpick (Windows CI) Two materially different mechanisms for the same CodeRabbit Nitpick ("Trivial | Quick win") both broke Windows Git-Bash reproducibly: a single-quoted JSON-literal fallback ("bash -c: unexpected EOF ... matching '''") and, after removing that, a plain `head -1 "$VAR"` inside a nested command substitution ("unexpected EOF ... matching '"'"). Both passed bash -n and the full local suite on Linux every time; both failed the SAME test deterministically on Windows CI. Two attempts at the same class of fix (nested-quote construction near this exact step) is the retry limit - reverting to the original, already-shipped, Windows-verified unguarded form rather than continuing to guess at a third quoting mechanism for a Trivial- severity nitpick. Logged as bug-221/bug-222 in .wolf/buglog.json for anyone attempting this again: the fix belongs outside this specific markdown-fence-driver test harness (e.g., a real .sh helper script) if it's worth doing at all. * fix(#4209): backfill changeset pr: field to the real upstream PR before push Fork validation (davdittrich/gsd-core#17) needed pr: 17 to satisfy changeset-lint's PR-number check while rehearsing there; this is the last commit before the approved push to the real upstream PR (open-gsd/gsd-core#4323), so the field points at that PR number again. --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@test.com> Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
62b0d939b6 |
feat(#3274): make reviewer-lane timeout configurable via timeoutConfigKey (#4083)
* feat(#3274): make reviewer-lane timeout configurable via timeoutConfigKey Add an optional `timeoutConfigKey` field to the reviewer lane descriptor, resolved in `resolveLanePlan` at invocation time and falling back to the frozen `timeoutFloorMs` when unset or invalid, in the same spirit as the existing `promptBudgetKey`/`modelConfigKey` fields. All 12 shipped lanes declare `review.timeouts.<slug>` on both surfaces (the descriptor and their capability.json manifest), validated by capability-validator.cjs. For the antigravity lane, the native `agy --print-timeout` flag — previously a second hardcoded literal (`540s`) independent of the outer cap — is now derived from the same resolved outer timeout in `antigravityArgv`, preserving the existing 60-second buffer relationship (ADR-2782 D6: the outer bound is declared data, the inner one is handler-owned). The antigravity default timeoutFloorMs stays at 600s per the maintainer's disposition; users raise it through the new config key instead. * docs(#3274): document review.timeouts.* and extract resolveTimeoutMs helper Address code-review findings on the timeoutConfigKey change: extract the inline timeout-resolution logic into a named, exported, directly-tested resolveTimeoutMs helper (matching the file's existing configString/ normalizeHost convention); document the new review.timeouts.* federated config keys in docs/CONFIGURATION.md, docs/reference/capability-manifest.md, and docs/how-to/ship-a-reviewer-lane.md; add the changeset fragment. * fix(#3274): resolve native antigravity timeout in resolveLanePlan, not the runner gsd-test caught two design mistakes in the prior commits: 1. SpawnPlan.argv is documented and tested as fully resolved by resolveLanePlan (model/effort/output/prompt already folded in) — leaving the antigravity '{{nativeTimeout}}' marker unresolved until the runner's antigravityArgv violated that contract and broke tests that read plan.argv directly (tests/antigravity-reviewer.test.cjs, tests/review-default-reviewers-workflow.test.cjs). Fix: '{{nativeTimeout}}' is now a fifth ARGV_PLACEHOLDER member, resolved by resolveLanePlan itself via the new nativeTimeoutToken() helper, exactly like the other four. antigravityArgv reverts to its pre-#3274 four-argument form. Also missed updating capabilities/antigravity/capability.json's invoke.args to match the descriptor, which broke the manifest/descriptor parity test. 2. tests/reviewer-config-federation.test.cjs enforces a deliberate, narrow invariant (#3691 narrows #2797): qwen, cursor, and coderabbit — the three lanes with neither a model flag nor a host — may own no config key beyond their own prompt-budget key. Adding review.timeouts.<slug> to all 12 lanes violated it. Fix: those three keep timeoutConfigKey: null and own no review.timeouts.* key, matching their existing modelConfigKey: null. The other 9 lanes are unaffected. * chore(#3274): backfill changeset PR number (pr:0 -> 4083) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
dd4f179672 |
feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam (#4000)
* feat(#3970): per-task external-tracker content-resolution seam Implements ADR-3646 (Phase 1, #3970): a `<task tracker-id="...">` attribute plus a new optional `taskContentResolver` capability-manifest field let a capability resolve a task's action/verify/acceptance-criteria/read_first/done content from an external issue tracker instead of PLAN.md's inline body. - src/plan-document.cts: parses the `tracker-id` attribute into `PlanTask.trackerId` - src/task-content-resolution.cts: new leaf module — split/find/build/resolve, with a hard-halt (throw) contract on ambiguous/failed/timeout/malformed resolution, never a silent fallback to possibly-stale inline text - src/task-command-router.cts: new `task resolve-content --plan --task-id --raw` CLI verb wiring the module into a real process exit code - gsd-core/bin/lib/capability-validator.cjs: validates the new `taskContentResolver` manifest field (feature-role only, cross-capability trackerPrefix uniqueness) - gsd-core/workflows/execute-plan.md, gsd-core/references/loop-hook-dispatch.md, docs/reference/capability-manifest.md: wire the seam into the per-task loop and document it as a new `execute:task` point outside the existing contribution/step/gate vocabulary (unconditional in autonomous mode) Closes #3970 * fix(#3970): gate checkpoint tasks out of content resolution, close trackerPrefix grammar parity gap, cover path-traversal guard Standards/Spec code-review pass on the task-content-resolution seam (ADR-3646 Phase 1) found three defects: 1. execute-plan.md's task-content-resolution bullet fired on any tracker-id-bearing task with no check that it wasn't type="checkpoint:*", contradicting ADR-3646 Decision 1 (a checkpoint task must never enter resolve-content). plan-document.cts already parses trackerId: null unconditionally for checkpoint tasks; only the workflow prose needed the fix, so the bullet now explicitly excludes checkpoint tasks. 2. task-content-resolution.cts's parseResolverDeclaration accepted any non-empty trackerPrefix with no grammar check, while capability- validator.cjs's KEBAB_RE enforces kebab-case at install time — a Generative Fix Divergence gap. Added the same grammar (as a literal regex, documented as intentionally not shared across the .cts/.cjs build boundary) plus a parity test asserting the two surfaces agree across a valid/invalid trackerPrefix table. 3. task-command-router.cts's routeResolveContent path-traversal guard on --plan had zero test coverage. Added a test exercising a ../../../etc/passwit-shaped path and asserting the USAGE rejection names the offending path. * fix(#3970): sanitize resolver diagnostics and cap resolver timeoutMs Two findings caught by an isolated security-review pass on the task content resolution seam: - ResolverFailedError/ResolverMalformedOutputError embedded raw, unsanitized subprocess stderr/stdout (attacker/model-influenced via the tracker-id argv token) into .message. A hostile or buggy resolver could smuggle a newline plus a forged "Error: " line, or terminal escape sequences, into a diagnostic io.cjs's error() writes verbatim to stderr. Fixed at the constructor (task-content-resolution.cts) via io.cjs's existing formatDiagnosticToken(), so every caller of resolveTaskContent gets a safe .message by construction. - capability-validator.cjs's validateTaskContentResolverFields had no upper bound on taskContentResolver.invoke.timeoutMs, letting a manifest declare an effectively unbounded value and defeat the "bounded subprocess" design intent. Added a 120000ms ceiling specific to this field, without touching the shared isPositiveIntegerMs() helper (still used unbounded by the reviewer lane's timeoutFloorMs and probe timeoutMs). Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#3970): fix gsd-test failures — stale prose allowlist line and stderr-vs-message assertion gsd-test (remote dockerized matrix) came back red with 5 failures on this PR; all five are real defects, fixed here. - tests/no-bare-gsd-tools-command-position.test.cjs: PROSE_ALLOWLIST's execute-plan.md entry pointed at line 415, which ffc190df4's checkpoint-exclusion caveat (added near line 221) shifted down by one line. The actual "validated downstream by gsd-tools uat classify-coverage" descriptive mention now sits at line 416. Updated the allowlist entry's line number to match. - tests/task-command-router-resolve-content.test.cjs: the path-traversal test asserted the outside-project-scope diagnostic against the thrown ExitError's own .message. io.cts's error() (ADR-3889) writes its human-readable message to fd 2 via writeAllSync and then throws a bare `new ExitError(1)` with no message argument — by design, so the exception carries no duplicate text and the thrown ExitError's message defaults to "process exit 1" (cli-exit.cts's ExitError constructor). Root cause was the test, not the source: task-command-router.cjs's outside-project-scope rejection already calls error() correctly and the diagnostic text is genuinely emitted, just on fd 2, not on the exception. Fixed the test to capture fd-2 writes (mirroring tests/estimate-calibrate.test.cjs's runCalibrateExpectError and this same file's own captureStdout for fd 1) and assert against the captured stderr text instead of err.message. This was masked locally because a manual `node -e` sanity check that only inspects the caught exception's .message cannot see what the real node:test run actually failed on. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-plan.md — adds the ADR-3646 task-content-resolution bullet and checkpoint-exclusion caveat to the per-task execute loop; a real behavioral prose addition, not incidental bloat. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#3970): backfill changeset PR number (pr:0 -> pr:4000) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
86fa2917d7 |
enh(#3866): dispatch step and contribution hooks at verify:pre (#3869)
* test(#3866): pin that verify:pre must dispatch every hook kind verify-work.md's verify_pre_hooks step dispatches only `kind == "gate"`, so getWiredKinds reports verify:pre -> {gate} and gen-capability-registry rejects any capability declaring a step or contribution there. The verify lane is therefore closed to capabilities that want to contribute to what UAT covers rather than refuse to let it start. Failing-first: the step, contribution, and exact-kind-set rows are RED; the pre-existing gate row is a green regression pin so the new arms cannot orphan the arm verify:pre already had. Refs #3866 * feat(#3866): dispatch step and contribution hooks at verify:pre verify_pre_hooks dispatched `kind == "gate"` only, so getWiredKinds reported verify:pre -> {gate} and gen-capability-registry's validateHooksWired rejected any capability declaring a step or contribution there. A capability could refuse to let UAT start; it could not contribute to what UAT covers. Add contribution and step arms mirroring execute:wave:post, deferring to references/loop-hook-dispatch.md and carrying its ref.command in-context validation guard ahead of any shell-use prose. A verify:pre step is advisory: it never blocks the start of UAT and an erroring step is routed by its own onError. The gate arm and its check guard are untouched. Give extract_tests an additive consumption seam for the artefacts those steps declare via the existing steps[].produces field -- no new registry field, no new ordering, no invented filename. Manifest-supplied artefact names are validated in-context against an allowlist and resolved only inside PHASE_DIR. With no producing step the derivation is unchanged, pinned by test rather than asserted in prose. Review findings folded in: the artefact-name allowlist (isolated adversarial pass), the artefact-shape contract and the seam-inertness tests (spec axis), and the reference/how-to split so one constraint has one source of truth (standards axis). Closes #3866 * chore(#3866): backfill changeset PR number --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
0xdhx
|
0396d9cab1 |
enhance(#2483): stop the claude reviewer lane from inheriting CLAUDE.md + auto-memory (#2493)
* enhance(#2483): env-guard the claude reviewer leg against CLAUDE.md injection
The claude reviewer in workflows/review.md was a bare headless `claude -p`
spawn run from the project cwd, so it inherited the invoking user's global
CLAUDE.md, the project CLAUDE.md, and Claude Code auto-memory.
That made it the only reviewer leg seeing anything beyond the prompt file.
gather_context assembles PROJECT.md, the roadmap section, every PLAN file,
CONTEXT.md, RESEARCH.md and REQUIREMENTS.md into the prompt before any
reviewer runs; the gemini leg receives only that prompt and the codex leg
runs --ephemeral. Beyond the measured ~4k tokens/spawn, the asymmetry cuts
at the workflow's own premise: "independent review" meant something
different for the claude leg than for the other two.
Guard both dispatch lines with a per-invocation
`env CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_MDS=1`. `env`, never `export` — the flag
must not leak into the orchestrating session (which may itself be Claude
Code on the SELF_CLI="auto" path) or into any later spawn.
review.md is the only claude -p call site in the installed tree, so this is
two lines on one surface. The self-skip logic is untouched.
* enhance(#2483): fix CRLF-fragile split and regenerate workflow baselines
Two CI failures from the first push, both mine:
1. lint-tests: the new regression test split readFileSync content on a
literal "\n". On a Windows git-autocrlf checkout that leaves a trailing
"\r" on every line (local/no-crlf-fragile-split). Use .split(/\r?\n/).
2. golden-install-parity / workflow-size-budget / workflow-compat: editing
gsd-core/workflows/review.md changes its content hash and byte size, and
both are pinned in committed baselines. Regenerated via the repo's own
generators (npm run size:baseline, npm run gen:golden).
The regenerated diffs are review.md-only: exactly one hash line per
golden-install-parity fixture and one size entry in workflow-size-baseline
— no unrelated drift swept in.
Full suite now green locally: 2113 pass, 0 fail, 3 skipped (run with HOME
and CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR overridden to throwaway dirs; live profile verified
untouched afterward).
* enhance(#2483): adapt guard-test matcher to the effort-args dispatch reshape
The effortSurface wiring (#2481) reshaped the bare-model dispatch to
`claude $CLAUDE_EFFORT_ARGS -p -`; the invocation matcher's dash-first
form could no longer see it, and the count assertion failed exactly as
designed. The matcher now tolerates variable expansions between `claude`
and its first literal flag. Negative-controlled both ways: a stripped
guard and a deleted dispatch line each still fail.
* enhance(#2483): also guard the claude leg against auto-memory injection
CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_CLAUDE_MDS suppresses CLAUDE.md file loading;
auto-memory is an independently-toggled mechanism with its own flag.
Add CLAUDE_CODE_DISABLE_AUTO_MEMORY=1 to both dispatch lines, correct
the docs/COMMANDS.md and changeset claims that credited the first flag
with covering auto-memory, and extend the regression test to require
both flags on every claude invocation (negative-controlled: 2/4
assertions fail with the new flag removed).
* enhance(#2483): match the claude binary in command position, not argument position
The line-oriented invocation matcher counted any line where the token
`claude` was followed by a flag. #2589 (landed on next as
|
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
653f95e39f |
chore(#2801): remove the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli deprecated alias (#3272)
* test(#2801): failing-first suite for the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli alias removal Inverts the Phase 5a rows that assert the derived legacy alias still contributes a reviewer slug, and adds the removal-warning coverage the alias's exit needs (ADR-2782 D9). RED against unmodified production code, by design: the six shipped manifests still declare the key and collectReviewerWarnings emits nothing for hostBehaviors. Refs #2801 * chore(#2801): remove the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli deprecated alias ADR-2782 D9, Phase 7 — the final phase of epic #2782. The derived legacy alias survived one release (Phase 5a shipped in 1.9.0; 1.9.1 and 1.10.0 have since gone out), so it goes. A declared reviewer body is now the only route onto the reviewer roster. - deriveReviewerSlugs no longer reads runtime.hostBehaviors.reviewerCli - the key is stripped from the six manifests that carried it; each already declares a reviewer body whose slug equals its capability id, so the derived roster is unchanged at the same twelve slugs - collectReviewerWarnings emits a presence-based, non-fatal removal notice for any manifest still declaring the key, reaching both the build-time registry generation and the third-party overlay load path. The check runs before the reviewer-body early-return, because the manifest it exists for is the alias-only one that has no body. - hostBehaviors stays an open, unvalidated bag for its other 59 keys; this adds one keyed removal notice, not general validation Refs #2801 * refactor(#2801): give the reviewer-warning channel a typed IR Review finding: the new tests asserted with String#includes() on the warning prose, which CONTRIBUTING.md's 'Prohibited: Raw Text Matching on Test Outputs' bans in favor of a typed intermediate representation. Adds the IR beside the renderer rather than replacing it, which is the shape that section prescribes and bin/verify-reapply-patches.cjs already models: - REVIEWER_WARNING, a frozen code enum - REMOVED_REVIEWER_CLI_FIELD, so the emitting site and its test share one symbol instead of duplicating a literal - collectReviewerWarningRecords(cap), returning typed records collectReviewerWarnings(cap) keeps its exact string[] contract as a thin map over the records, so both production consumers are untouched. Every section-K row now asserts on record.code/field/capId and none on the rendered message. Locks the code surface, asserts the renderer stays one-to-one with the records, and migrates the pre-existing Phase 2 test on the same channel off prose matching. Refs #2801 * test(#2801): invert the section F alias fall-through regression row Caught by the remote runner: 2 unique failures on both Node lanes out of 31,692. tests/reviewer-lane-declarations.test.cjs section F — Phase 5a's isolated-security-review regressions — asserted that a blank reviewer.slug falls through to the hostBehaviors.reviewerCli alias rather than dropping the lane. That is the direct inverse of this phase's contract. The original rationale held only while the alias existed. With it gone there is nothing to fall through to: a blank body is not a declaration, and a declaration is the only route onto the roster. Inverted rather than deleted — the row carries the adversarial-review provenance for the slug trim, and removing a security regression guard to make a change pass is backwards. The duplicate row added earlier in section C is dropped instead; section F is its canonical home. Also corrects two count strings Phase 5b left at eleven while asserting twelve, which would misreport on failure. Refs #2801 * docs(#2801): give the removed reviewerCli flag a migration path The Reference edit alone satisfied CI — a file under docs/ moved, so lint-docs-required.cjs was green — while the task-oriented quadrant said nothing about the removal. A maintainer whose lane had just gone silent would have found the field documented as removed and no page telling them what to do about it. Adds a migration section to the how-to: the symptom, the verbatim warning they will see, the before/after manifest, and the note to keep the reviewer slug equal to the capability id so existing review.default_reviewers entries and --<slug> flags survive. Refs #2801 * chore(#2801): backfill changeset pr number to 3272 * feat(#2801): close the runtime.hostBehaviors vocabulary ADR-1016 closes twelve descriptor axes and rejects an open escape hatch in the descriptor. It never mentioned runtime.hostBehaviors, and that silence was read as permission: 59 keys across 18 manifests, 39 of them set by a single capability, validated by nothing. The reference docs went further and attributed the open seam to ADR-1016, which does not mention the field at all. KNOWN_HOST_BEHAVIORS enumerates the vocabulary. An undeclared key yields a non-fatal UNKNOWN_HOST_BEHAVIOR record on the same D4.3 channel as the alias removal notice, reaching both build-time generation and overlay install. Warning, never error, for the reason this phase exists: an error would hard-break an out-of-tree descriptor carrying a bespoke key with no deprecation window, which is what reviewerCli was given a release to avoid. Escalation is a separate decision. reviewerCli is excluded from the unknown-key sweep so it keeps its own notice with the migration pointer rather than drawing two records. A parity test binds the vocabulary to the shipped manifests in both directions, and a second asserts no shipped capability draws a notice, so the closure is provably inert in-tree. Records the decision and the miscitation as an ADR-1016 amendment. Refs #2801 * fix(#2801): bound and sanitize the unknown-key diagnostics Two findings from an isolated adversarial review of the closure commit, both proven by execution rather than asserted. MAJOR, introduced by the closure: the new Object.keys(hostBehaviors) sweep had no ceiling. An installed third-party manifest is bounded only by MANIFEST_MAX_BYTES, and an 8.69MB manifest with 800,000 keys produced 800,000 records and ~139MB of message text, retained for the registry's lifetime in OverlayMeta.diagnostics. Now capped at ten records plus a summary carrying omittedCount, mirroring capability-loader's existing slice(0,3) idiom. The same manifest now yields 11 records and 1748 chars. MINOR, newly reachable: manifest-supplied key names were interpolated raw. Unlike cap.id, which validateCapability gates on KEBAB_RE before these diagnostics run, hostBehaviors keys have no grammar check anywhere, so ANSI escapes and CRLF reached stderr and OverlayMeta.warnings intact. New describeKey replaces C0/C1 controls and clips at 80 chars. The file already had describeValue for this and applied it only to values. Both fixes land on the pre-existing reviewer.* sweep too — it carried the identical pair, and fixing only the new copy would leave the same defect one screen from its own fix. Refs #2801 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
f96cb44f85 |
enhance(#3248): disclose capability skills as an instruction surface (#3253)
* test(#3248): failing-first suite for instruction-surface disclosure 28 matrix rows from 50-test-matrix.md. Rows requiring the new Disclosure.instructionSurfaces field fail today; rows 18-20/23-25 (the ADR-2363 D4 signature invariants) pass today by construction because the current code never reads skills/agents at all, and stand as regression guards for the implementation commit. Refs #3248 * feat(#3248): disclose capability skills and agents as an instruction surface ADR-2363 D5. A capability whose only contribution was skills disclosed nothing at install: summarizeDisclosure early-returned "ships no executable surfaces (declarative only)" because hasExecutable was false, while each SKILL.md body landed verbatim in the agent's instruction context. discloseExecutableSurfaces gains a fifth, NON-executable class, instructionSurfaces, collecting declared skills/agents stems through the same safeCollect wrapper as the four existing collectors, so a hostile value degrades only this class and the function stays total for any manifest shape. Nothing existing is edited: the collectors, hasExecutable, disclosureSignature and missingArtifacts are untouched. get_impact rates the symbol CRITICAL at 196 affected, which is why the design is strictly additive. D4 is implemented by omission and pinned rather than left incidental: adding, changing or removing skills/agents leaves disclosureSignature byte-identical, so no stored consent record is perturbed and no spurious re-consent fires. ADR-2782's conditional-append trick is deliberately NOT reused - it worked because no manifest could declare a reviewer body before that class existed, whereas skills predate this one, so a conditional append would re-sign every already-consented skill-bearing capability. The renderer is extracted as summarizeInstructionSurfaces and called from BOTH branches of summarizeDisclosure. Appending only at the end would never render for skill-only capabilities - the ones that need it - since those take the early return. That branch's "declarative only" claim is now conditional on there being no instruction surface either. The renderer iterates rather than spreading into push, so an unbounded stem count cannot throw RangeError, and tolerates the bare {} the CLI edge passes via `res.disclosure || {}`. Scope note: #3248's prose says "skill stems"; ADR-2363 D3 classifies instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Shipping skills alone would leave an ADR deliverable owned by no phase, and the epic has no Phase 2. Agents are the same shape at no extra cost. Narrowing back is a two-line change. Ratifies ADR-2363 (Proposed -> Accepted) and adds the owed ADR-1244 back-link. Closes #3248 * fix(#3248): escape consent-prompt values and narrow disclosure to skills Two review findings, both of which made the previous commit wrong. BLOCKER (isolated adversarial review). Every manifest-supplied value interpolated into a consent-prompt line was rendered unescaped. Those lines are joined with \n and written RAW to stderr on the needs-consent path (capability-command-router -> cli-exit runMain), so a stem carrying a newline forged additional lines indistinguishable from genuine GSD disclosure text, and an ANSI escape could clear or rewrite lines already printed. That defeats the informed-consent guarantee this change exists to provide, and is a prompt-injection vector against any agent that reads the stderr text to decide whether to retry with --yes. The hole was not unique to the new class - hook event/script, command family/module/router, every MCP field, and every reviewer-lane field were equally unescaped. Fixing only the new one would have created the generative-fix divergence this repo tracks, so renderValueForPrompt is applied to all five classes through one helper, guarded by a parity test that fails if a future class skips it. Escaping is identity for ordinary names, so no well-formed manifest's output changes. The disclosure OBJECT stays verbatim - only the rendered LINE is escaped - because the signature and every consumer reasoning about identity depend on the declared value. NARROWED to skills only. The previous commit also collected agents, arguing ADR-2363 D3 classifies instruction surfaces as "skills, agents". Verified against staging: stageSkillsForRuntimeAsSkills takes a registry and unions third-party skills in via readInstalledCapabilitySkill, while stageAgentsForRuntimeWithConverter takes only a source directory and has no registry-aware path. Third-party agents are never staged into the instruction context, so disclosing them would have put a false claim in a security prompt - worse than the scope creep two reviewers flagged it as. D3's classification stands; D5 now records that Phase 1 implements the skills half and that whether agents should be staged at all is an open maintainer question. Also reverts the premature ADR-2363 ratification. The previous commit flipped it to Accepted and asserted "#3248 merged" while this branch IS #3248 and is unmerged. Status returns to Proposed, and the ADR-1244 back-link - owed only on ratification - is withdrawn. Adds the fast-check property suite CLAUDE.md requires and the direct precedent (reviewer-trust-disclosure) already had: totality, D4 signature invariance, D3 hasExecutable invariance, and renderer totality over adversarial manifests. Refs #3248 * chore(#3248): correct changeset scope claim and backfill pr number The fragment was written against the pre-narrowing commit and still advertised 'skills and agents'. 4d26887e narrowed disclosure to skills only - third-party agents are never staged into the instruction context - but did not touch the fragment, so the release notes would have carried a claim the code does not implement. Also backfills pr:0 -> 3253 and names the prompt-escaping fix, which is user-visible and was absent from the original body. Changeset-only; no code or test changed, so the gsd-test pass recorded for 4d26887e still describes this tree's behavior. Refs #3248 --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
ffd5370464 |
fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs (#3047)
* fix(#2903): use the command form that actually works in reader-facing docs Docs told readers to type the colon form, which no runtime registers -- 18 of 19 runtimes use slash-hyphen and the 19th uses shell-var -- so anyone copying an example got an unrecognized command. Swept 178 occurrences across 53 files, locale mirrors included so they do not re-diverge from English. The colon form is a source-authoring token, not a user-facing one: install-time converters key on it to produce the hyphen form runtimes actually register. So the sweep is scoped, and three things are deliberately left alone: - ADRs, which are a historical record; editing their prose falsifies what was written at the time. - The legacy release-notes archive, pending a maintainer decision on whether it follows the same historical carve-out. Excluding it keeps a later reversal additive rather than a revert. - Source artifacts under commands, workflows and agents, where the colon form is load-bearing. Rewriting those would break the installed-skill guarantee across every runtime -- the single largest hazard here. The plugin namespace form is a real, separate token and survives untouched. Adds a lint enforcing exactly that boundary, since the correct form genuinely differs by directory and nothing previously caught the drift. Also fixes a hardcoded colon form in the capability-matrix generator. The sweep alone would have left the generated matrix disagreeing with the template that produces it, so the fix is at the source and the output regenerated. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): stop the sweep misquoting source frontmatter Adversarial review caught three lines where the sweep rewrote a citation of the literal YAML name: key from a source command file. That key genuinely is the colon form -- this change's own carve-out logic says source-authoring tokens keep it -- so the docs ended up misquoting the real files. One of the three is an acceptance-checklist assertion, which the sweep turned into a false statement. Restored the three citations to match their sources verbatim, surgically: where a line carried both a name: citation and a real reader-facing slash command, only the citation reverted and the command stayed corrected. The guard needed the same distinction, or it would have flagged the restoration and reddened the build: a gsd:<cmd> token preceded by name: is a citation of a source token and is now permitted. The exemption is deliberately narrow -- a bare gsd:<cmd> anywhere else still fails -- with a test pinning that narrowness. Also makes the detection case-insensitive. Review found /GSD:next slipped through silently; no such casing exists in the tree today, so this closes a latent gap rather than fixing a live one. Swept the whole tree for further corrupted citations: none beyond the three. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#2903): retire the stale-next invariant and sweep next like every other command Maintainer decision on a genuine conflict between two contracts. Invariant #3054 banned the literal /gsd-next from user-facing docs because it named a retired workflow-advance command. But commands/gsd/next.md is a live command -- the state-aware smart-entry launcher -- and this issue requires docs to use the hyphen form every runtime actually registers. Both could not hold for this one command, so docs had been sidestepping the ban by keeping the colon form, which is exactly the defect this issue exists to remove. FEATURES.md already recorded the reassignment: the hyphen form "is not the retired workflow-advance command; it is reserved for the state-aware smart-entry launcher. Workflow advancement remains under /gsd-progress --next." With that reassignment the invariant's premise is obsolete and the guard now contradicts the documented command form, so it is retired with a comment recording why rather than deleted silently. next is now swept like every other command, and the earlier exemption added to the new guard is removed so nothing is special-cased. Four citations of the literal name: frontmatter key stay in colon form, because the source file really does carry name: gsd:next and a doc quoting it must reproduce it verbatim. Two of those lines were reworded to say which side is the frontmatter key and which is the slash command, since they previously conflated the two. Verified the retired scan would now genuinely fail against this tree -- the conflict was real and resolved, not dodged. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2903): backfill changeset pr number Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
557d46984e |
docs(#2782): how-to for declaring a reviewer lane in a capability (#2906)
* docs(#2782): how-to for declaring a reviewer lane in a capability ADR-2782 shipped the Reviewer Lane capability surface in 1.9.0, but the only documentation was reference (capability-manifest.md) and rationale (ADR-2782). A capability author had no task-oriented path from "I have a review CLI" to "/gsd:review invokes it". Adds docs/how-to/ship-a-reviewer-lane.md: role selection, the spawn and openai-http worked examples, federated config ownership, the review-lane query surface as the verification step, what the install disclosure and egress-host re-verification mean for the author, and the data-only boundary with the two named CLIs that do not fit today. Also corrects the manifest reference's `invoke` row, which understated three enums against the shipped validator: promptChannel omitted `argv`, effortChannel omitted `env`, and the openai-http sub-shape plus the required-with-file-arg `outputArg` were undocumented entirely. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): correct four claims found by the two orthogonal reviews Security review (1 major, 2 minor): - "a reserved slug" implied the gsd-/anthropic- namespace rule, which guards the capability id, not reviewer.slug. The slug guard is isReservedName (__proto__/constructor/prototype), a prototype-pollution barrier. Both rules are now stated and kept apart. - Added ADR-2782 D5's own caveat verbatim: disclosure and host pinning make the channel visible, pinned and revocable, not safe, and consent-at-install is a weaker gate for a standing egress channel than for a hook. - Named integrity/SHA pinning and engines.gsd as the controls that make the disclosure tamper-evident and the version range enforceable. Correctness review (1 major, 1 minor): - Claimed a name collision is "a hard failure at install". It is not. installCapability never runs validateCrossCapability; the check runs in loadRegistry, and a colliding overlay is dropped from acceptedMap with a warning while the install reports success. Documented as the quiet failure mode it is, with the symptom to look for. - The feature-only field list omitted hooks and activationKey, both of which FEATURE_FIELDS_FORBIDDEN_ON_REVIEWER rejects. Both worked examples re-validated against validateCapability() -> []. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): restore Kimi Code to the cross-AI reviewer list set-up-cross-ai-review.md named eleven reviewers; twelve lanes ship. The kimi-code lane (added by #2718, declared as manifest data by #2798) was never added here — the same roster-drift class as #2781, which #2800's parity gate covers for COMMANDS.md and FEATURES.md but not for how-to prose. Also points readers at the declared-lane model rather than a static list: the roster is now generated, a capability can ship its own lane, and `gsd-tools review-lane sections` answers "what do I actually have". Verified against the twelve declared bodies in capabilities/*/capability.json. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): use the invocation form the runtime descriptors actually declare The new guide used /gsd:review. Nothing in this repo produces that form. - capability-validator VALID_COMMAND_STYLES is {slash-hyphen, shell-var}; there is no colon/namespaced style in the vocabulary at all. - 18 of 19 runtime capabilities declare commandStyle "slash-hyphen", claude included; codex is "shell-var". Every artifactLayout prefix is "gsd-". - A plain-file command install never namespaces, so .claude/commands/ gsd-review.md is typed /gsd-review. - The Claude Code plugin surface would namespace on plugin.json "name", which is "gsd-core" -- so the plugin form would be /gsd-core:review. The commands/gsd/ subdirectory is cosmetic and contributes nothing to the invoked name. So /gsd:review is neither the installed form nor the plugin form. Uses /gsd-review, matching set-up-cross-ai-review.md and the 18 descriptors. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2782): state that lane listing is not wired yet The guide could describe authoring, validating, and installing a lane but implied a publishing path that does not exist. Neither discoverability catalog can accept one: a Community Capability Registry entry requires a non-empty loopExtensionPoints plus hookKinds, and a role:"reviewer" capability is forbidden from declaring steps/contributions/gates, so both fields are unsatisfiable rather than merely unset. The EoS Registry is ADR-1239 host integrations, which a lane is not. The registry schema predates the reviewer role by 17 days (#2182 Jul 11, ADR-2782 Jul 28) and registry-schema.cjs has zero occurrences of "reviewer". Tracked for a 1.9.x point release by #2904. Says so explicitly, and tells authors NOT to file a loop extension point they do not use to get past validation -- a schema satisfiable only by lying is one that will be lied to. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#2782): backfill PR number and fix the changeset invocation form pr: 0 -> 2906. Also corrects /gsd:review -> /gsd-review in the fragment body. The fragment renders into CHANGELOG.md, which is a reader-facing docs surface and is never passed through the install-time converter -- so the colon form would ship the #2903 drift into a permanent release artifact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * docs(#2907): propagate the invocation-form fix and restore lane order Two findings from an isolated review of the post-review delta. - docs/README.md and develop-a-capability.md still said /gsd:review in the cross-links added for the new guide. The form was corrected in the guide itself but not in the two entries pointing at it, leaving three docs making the same claim in two different forms. - set-up-cross-ai-review.md inserted Kimi Code between Antigravity and Ollama. REVIEWER_LANES is ordered by write_reviews order and kimi-code is 12th, appended after llama_cpp; the prose list mirrored declaration order before this change and now does again. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
7372d99a26 |
enhance(#2800): derive reviewer flag lists and gate reviewer lane docs across locales (#2882)
* chore(#2800): derive reviewer flag lists and gate reviewer lane docs across locales The reviewer lane roster was hand-enumerated across five documentation surfaces and three workflow files that had drifted apart: --kimi-code was missing from all four translated COMMANDS.md mirrors, --coderabbit from every workflow forwarding list, and --antigravity from FEATURES.md. Adds checkReviewerDocsParity, a second pure gate deliberately separate from checkReviewerLaneParity so a stale doc cannot make the runtime checker look red. Workflows now derive their flag lists from a new review-lane flags query instead of hand-enumerating them, which also retires the unanchored grep that matched --agy inside --antigravity. Documents the previously absent reviewer body and hostBehaviors field in the capability manifest reference. Closes #2800 Closes #2781 Closes #2272 * fix(#2800): key the docs parity table arm on first-cell position Review found the flag arm was file-scoped, so the forwarding row that lists every flag in its third cell satisfied it on its own. Deleting a lane's own reviewer-table row -- the #2781 regression this gate exists to prevent -- therefore passed undetected. Arm 4 keys on the FIRST table cell, which separates a lane row from the forwarding row structurally and in every locale. Regression test included. * fix(#2800): shape-filter the flags subcommand output All three consumers read review-lane flags through an unquoted command substitution so the output word-splits into loop items. Phase 2 admits third-party overlay lanes, so an overlay flag containing whitespace would inject a second loop item and one containing a glob would expand against the cwd. Emit only well-formed flags so neither reaches the shell. * fix(#2800): remove the regex length ceiling and count only prose mentions Review found two real defects in the docs parity gate. The never-throws contract was false: building a RegExp from a declared flag or section title throws SyntaxError past ~100k chars, and Phase 2 admits overlay lanes whose declared strings are untrusted in length. Every one of these matches is literal, so String.includes replaces the regex outright, which also deletes escapeLiteral and the llama.cpp escaping it existed for. Arm 1 was context-blind: a flag mentioned only inside a fenced example or a commented-out row counted as documented. Both are stripped before matching. Also advertises all 13 lane flags in the argument-hint and corrects a stale eleven-lane count in the slug grammar note. * test(#2800): repoint the convergence suite off deleted workflow text The derived flag loop deleted the literal per-flag grep lines four tests matched on. Two of those failed loudly. The behavioral and property tests failed SILENTLY instead: their end marker no longer resolved, so the parse block extracted empty and both passed vacuously, and the property test's gsd_run stub had a no-op default that hid it. All now share one extractor and execute the real deployed block through a gsd_run shim backed by the actual binary. The whitelist assertions become an anti-parity check: re-adding a hand-written flag list must fail. Also repairs two vacuous cases in the docs parity suite. The unreadable-doc test called its own mock rather than the reader, and the integration test bounded nothing, so a doc losing its marker would have been silently skipped and still passed green. * fix(#2800): run the derived flag loop after the launcher preamble The remote matrix caught a real runtime bug, not a test artifact. In autonomous.md and plan-review-convergence.md the launcher preamble that defines gsd_run lives in a separate, LATER bash fence than the derived loop. Each fence is its own shell, so gsd_run was undefined where the loop ran: the command substitution yielded nothing and zero reviewer flags would have been forwarded. Worse than the drift this epic fixes, and silent. The whole CONVERGENCE_ARGS construction moves as one unit, because the --max-cycles append sits between the loop and the preamble and would otherwise have run against an uninitialized variable and then been dropped by the relocated initializer. Also documents all 13 lane flags in help/modes/full.md, which the repo gates bidirectionally against each command's argument-hint. * test(#2800): repoint the two converge suites off deleted flag literals Both asserted workflow.includes('--codex') against the hand-enumerated list the derived loop removed. They now assert the derivation itself, keep --all and --text (convergence controls, still literal), and add an anti-parity guard so re-adding a hardcoded list fails. The lost pass-through proof is replaced with a real one: every flag the tests used to hardcode is asserted present in the actual roster emitted by the binary, which is the property the old assertion was protecting. * test(#2800): acknowledge the workflow byte growth from the derived flag loop * chore(#2800): backfill changeset pr number to 2882 * fix(#2800): strip HTML comments to a fixed point in the parity gate CodeQL js/incomplete-multi-character-sanitization (high) on PR #2882: the single-pass <!--...--> strip can leave a live <!-- behind, so a join-trick construction smuggles a commented-out row past the gate and it counts as documented. Not an injection risk here since nothing is rendered, but it is the exact false pass this helper exists to prevent. Strips to a fixed point, then treats any surviving opener as unterminated so the multi-line branch closes it on a later line. Terminates because every pass strictly shortens the string. * test(#2800): pin the comment-smuggling regression with a real reproducer The obvious fixture for this class does not reproduce it: <!--<!---->--> leaves a dangling --> rather than a live <!--, and is caught either way, so it would have passed with and without the fix. The join-trick construction (<!- + <!--DUMMY--> + -...-->), the <scr<script>ipt> shape, genuinely regresses on the single-pass strip and is what the test now uses. --------- Co-authored-by: Test <test@example.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
5695522d5f |
feat(#2096): migrate Antigravity onto EoS declarative adapter + permission-writer + MCP companion (ADR-1239)
Fold all antigravity literal branches into descriptor-driven reads: getConfigDirFromHome (→ configHome.kind 'dot-home-nested'), projectLocalHookPrefix (→ hostBehaviors.hookPathStyle 'raw'), applyAgentPathRewrites (→ noPathRewrite), getProjectInstructionFile (→ projectInstructionFile 'GEMINI.md'); removed the dead inline convertClaudeAgentToAntigravityAgent branch + dead isAntigravity destructures (antigravity is already on the descriptor-agents path). subagentToolkit flipped undocumented→full (Context7: antigravity.google/docs/cli/features); namedDispatch/nested/maxDepth/backgroundDispatch stay undocumented. Byte-identical golden parity for all 16 runtimes. UPGRADE 1 (permission-writer): permissionWriter 'antigravity' + configureAntigravityPermissions merges a scoped permissions.allow block (GSD's own tree + hooks) into Antigravity's settings.json — non-destructive, idempotent, symmetric uninstall. Added to VALID_PERMISSION_WRITERS + the FinishPermissionWriter union. UPGRADE 2 (MCP companion): configureAntigravityMcpConfig writes mcp_config.json registering the gsd-core companion MCP server (Gemini-successor mcpServers schema, best-effort — raw schema unpublished). Both writers dispatch from finishInstall. settings.json is golden-excluded (HOOK_CONFIG_FILES); mcp_config.json (portable, no absolute paths) is golden-tracked → only antigravity.json changes. Tests: declarative-reference-antigravity extended (source-grep guard across 4 modules, fail-closed for the 4 undocumented sub-axes, validator acceptance) + antigravity-upgrades (permission-writer + mcp_config live-install, idempotency, user-preservation). Matrix + ADR-1016 + capability-manifest + CONTEXT.md + connect-gsd-mcp-server docs updated; changeset (Changed). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
ab04916682 |
feat(#2095): migrate Kimi CLI onto EoS imperative adapter + native hook-bus + background dispatch (ADR-1239)
Fold all runtime==='kimi'/isKimi logic branches into descriptor-driven hostBehaviors (localInstallDeferred, verificationStyle, agentManifestStyle, reapplyCommand, doneBannerStyle) + add 'kimi' to _DESCRIPTOR_AGENTS_RUNTIMES. Kimi's skills/kimi-agents dispatch was already descriptor-driven (converter-by- name + kimi-agents kind). Zero isKimi/runtime==='kimi' branches remain. UPGRADE 1 (native hook bus): new hooksSurface 'kimi-hooks-toml' + a marker- delimited config.toml [[hooks]] emitter (buildKimiHooksTomlBlock/writeKimiHooksToml in runtime-hooks-surface.cts; resolveKimiHooksTomlDir in runtime-homes.cts). GSD's lifecycle hooks now wire into Kimi's native ~/.kimi/config.toml (Context7- confirmed path) at SessionStart/PreToolUse/Stop/PreCompact/SubagentStart/ SubagentStop — kimi becomes a hooks/ consumer (the 3 && !isKimi exclusion guards removed). config.toml holds absolute install paths so it's golden-excluded via an exact relative-path (.kimi/config.toml), not a basename (which would blind Codex's config.toml). New hooksSurface value added to the closed enum in capability-validator + runtime-config-adapter-registry. UPGRADE 2 (background dispatch): flip dispatch.backgroundDispatch true (Kimi's Agent tool takes run_in_background; root agent already gets the Agent tool), so negotiation no longer flattens dispatch. subagentToolkit stays 'undocumented' per AC (coder/explore/plan have distinct tool policies). MCP transport explicitly deferred (no installer-driven MCP for any runtime). Golden: only kimi.json changes (hooks/ scripts now installed); all 15 others + claude-local byte-identical (kilo/zcode keep their own exclusions). Tests: kimi-imperative-reference (adapter/axes/fail-closed/hostBehaviors + source-grep guard) + kimi-upgrades (config.toml [[hooks]] SessionStart + marker idempotency + backgroundDispatch negotiation). CONTEXT.md glossary + matrix + how-to updated; changeset (Added). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
a3d3c2a445 |
refactor(#1756): derive getDirName from a documented runtime.localConfigDir descriptor axis (#1757)
ADR-1239 Phase B (parent #1679). getDirName was a hand-maintained 15-branch if-chain mapping each runtime to its local content-rewrite dot-dir. Relocate those values into a documented runtime.localConfigDir descriptor field; derive getDirName from registry.runtimes[id].runtime.localConfigDir (fallback .claude). - 16 capability.json gain runtime.localConfigDir (byte-identical values) - capability-validator.cjs requires it (non-empty dot-dir); registry regenerated - docs/reference/capability-manifest.md documents the field + the three divergent values (copilot=.github, antigravity=.agents, kimi=.kimi-code) - drift-guard test: golden value map + key-set equality both ways Byte-identical install output for all 16 runtimes (golden-parity harness #1730). Closes #1756 Co-authored-by: review-bot <review-bot@gsd> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
02c6491e61 | docs(#1464): fix ADR-1244 capability doc set — followable tutorials, overlay-model + install tutorial, set/fragment/runtimeCompat reference, accuracy fixes | ||
|
Tom Boucher
|
08d1c57d6e |
fix(#1460): verify-or-reject capability --integrity per source; confine hook commands to the bundle
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Rezolv
|
dcceb1a004 |
fix(#1441): antigravity resolver prefers GSD-owned dir over first-existing (#1442)
* fix(#1441): antigravity resolver prefers GSD-owned dir over first-existing resolveConfigHomeFromDescriptor's dot-home-nested probe returned the first bare-existing candidate, so a CLI user (~/.gemini/antigravity-cli) who also had the IDE's ~/.gemini/antigravity dir was silently shadowed to the legacy dir (probed first). Regression from #217 — pre-#217 returned ~/.gemini/antigravity unconditionally. Add an optional probeMarker (gsd-core/VERSION) to the dot-home-nested descriptor: a two-pass probe prefers the candidate GSD installed into, then bare existence, then probe[0]. Behavior is byte-identical when probeMarker is absent (windsurf etc. unaffected). Adds detectAntigravityDirAmbiguity() for installer/operator guidance on already-misinstalled users (auto-relocation ruled out per ADR-0008's single-configDir migration bound). Regression tests fail before / pass after: coexistence + marker-priority cases, end-to-end through the registry descriptor. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JU2WB23JLE3QTysPXuFJjB * chore(#1441): add changeset for antigravity resolver fix Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JU2WB23JLE3QTysPXuFJjB |
||
|
Tom Boucher
|
f52a7a5f77 |
feat(#1245): add capability ecosystem ADR, PRD, and developer documentation (#1248)
Phase 0 of the Capability Ecosystem epic (#1244): the design record and the third-party-author documentation set, with no runtime or code changes. - docs/adr/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — architecture decision record (amends/extends ADR-857 Decisions 7 & 8) - docs/prd/1244-capability-ecosystem.md — product requirements - Diataxis docs: tutorial, how-to (publish/import/version/remove), reference (manifest schema, /gsd:capability command, capability matrix), explanation (trust model); cross-links added to develop-a-capability.md Refs #1244 Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> |