Guide manual user acceptance testing of recently built features. Extract deliverables from SUMMARY.md, generate test checklist, guide user through each test, log issues to phase-scoped file. The USER performs all testing — Claude generates the checklist, guides the process, and captures issues. **Determine what to test:** If $ARGUMENTS provided: - Parse as phase number (e.g., "4") or plan number (e.g., "04-02") - Find corresponding SUMMARY.md file(s) If no arguments: - Find most recently modified SUMMARY.md ```bash find .planning/phases -name "*SUMMARY.md" -type f -exec ls -lt {} + | head -5 ``` Read the SUMMARY.md to understand what was built. **Extract testable deliverables from SUMMARY.md:** Parse for: 1. **Accomplishments** - Features/functionality added 2. **Files Created/Modified** - What changed 3. **User-facing changes** - UI, workflows, interactions Focus on USER-OBSERVABLE outcomes, not implementation details. Examples: - "Check-in menu item added to navigation" → User can see/click Check-in in nav - "HomePage refreshes after check-in" → After check-in, home shows updated state **Generate manual test checklist:** Create structured test plan: ``` # User Acceptance Test: [Plan/Phase Name] **Scope:** [What was built - from SUMMARY.md] **Testing:** Manual user validation ## Pre-flight - [ ] Application builds and runs without errors - [ ] Application launches to expected state ## Feature Tests ### [Feature 1 from deliverables] **What to test:** [User-observable behavior] **Steps:** 1. [Specific action to take] 2. [What to look for] 3. [Expected result] ### [Feature 2 from deliverables] ... ## Edge Cases - [ ] [Relevant edge case based on feature] - [ ] [Another edge case] ## Visual/UX Check - [ ] UI matches expected design - [ ] No visual glitches or layout issues - [ ] Responsive to interactions ``` Present this checklist to user. **Guide user through each test:** For each test item, use AskUserQuestion: - header: "[Feature name]" - question: "[Test description] - Did this work as expected?" - options: - "Pass" — Works correctly - "Fail" — Doesn't work as expected - "Partial" — Works but with issues - "Skip" — Can't test right now **If Pass:** Move to next test **If Fail or Partial:** Follow up with AskUserQuestion: - header: "Issue details" - question: "What went wrong?" - options: - "Crashes/errors" — Application error or exception - "Wrong behavior" — Does something unexpected - "Missing feature" — Expected functionality not present - "UI/visual issue" — Looks wrong but functions - "Let me describe" — Free-form description needed **Collect and categorize issues:** For each failed/partial test, gather: - Feature affected - What went wrong (from user input) - Severity: - **Blocker** — Can't use the feature at all - **Major** — Feature works but significant problem - **Minor** — Small issue, feature still usable - **Cosmetic** — Visual only, no functional impact **Log issues to phase-scoped file:** If any issues found: 1. Create `.planning/phases/XX-name/{phase}-{plan}-ISSUES.md` if doesn't exist 2. Use template from `@~/.claude/get-shit-done/templates/uat-issues.md` 3. Add each issue: ```markdown ### UAT-[NNN]: [Brief description] **Discovered:** [date] during user acceptance testing **Phase/Plan:** [phase]-[plan] that was tested **Severity:** [Blocker/Major/Minor/Cosmetic] **Description:** [User's description of the problem] **Expected:** [What should have happened] **Actual:** [What actually happened] ``` **Note:** Issues go to phase-scoped file, NOT global `.planning/ISSUES.md`. This keeps UAT findings tied to the specific work being tested and enables `/gsd:plan-fix` to address them. **Present test summary:** ``` # Test Results: [Plan/Phase Name] **Tests run:** [N] **Passed:** [N] **Failed:** [N] **Partial:** [N] **Skipped:** [N] ## Issues Found [List any issues with severity] ## Verdict [Based on results:] - ALL PASS: "All tests passed. Feature validated." - MINOR ISSUES: "Feature works with minor issues logged." - MAJOR ISSUES: "Significant issues found - review before proceeding." - BLOCKERS: "Blocking issues found - must fix before continuing." ## Next Steps [Based on verdict:] - If clean: Suggest proceeding to next phase - If issues: Suggest /gsd:plan-fix to address ``` **Offer next actions based on results:** Use AskUserQuestion: - header: "Next" - question: "What would you like to do?" - options (based on results): If all passed: - "Continue to next phase" — Proceed with confidence - "Test more" — Run additional manual tests - "Done" — Finish testing session If issues found: - "Plan fixes" — Create plan to address issues (/gsd:plan-fix) - "Log and continue" — Issues logged, proceed anyway - "Review issues" — Look at logged issues in detail - "Done" — Finish testing session - [ ] Test scope identified from SUMMARY.md - [ ] Checklist generated based on deliverables - [ ] User guided through each test via AskUserQuestion - [ ] All test results captured (pass/fail/partial/skip) - [ ] Any issues logged to phase-scoped ISSUES.md - [ ] Summary presented with verdict - [ ] User knows next steps based on results