/** * Tests for gsd:plan-review-convergence command (#2306) * * Validates that the command source and workflow contain the key structural * elements required for correct cross-AI plan convergence loop behavior: * initial planning gate, review agent spawning, CYCLE_SUMMARY contract for * unresolved review count extraction, stall detection, escalation gate, and STATE.md update * on convergence. * * v2 additions (#2306-v2): * - CYCLE_SUMMARY contract replaces raw grep (prevents false stalls from * accumulated REVIEWS.md history across cycles) * - workflow.plan_review_convergence config gate (disabled by default) * - --ws forwarded to review agent (symmetric with replan agent) * - PARTIALLY RESOLVED / FULLY RESOLVED definitions in contract * - HIGH_LINES validation warning when HIGH_COUNT > 0 but section absent * - Success criteria updated to reflect CYCLE_SUMMARY parsing * * v3 additions (#724): * - CYCLE_SUMMARY includes current_actionable for unresolved actionable MEDIUM/LOW findings * - convergence requires HIGH_COUNT == 0 and ACTIONABLE_COUNT == 0 * - reviews-mode planner/checker prompts require REVIEWS.md feedback to land in PLAN.md */ // allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product // The workflow markdown IS the runtime instruction. Testing its text content // tests the deployed contract — if the CYCLE_SUMMARY requirement is absent, // the false-stall bug is absent from defenses too. const { test, describe } = require('node:test'); const assert = require('node:assert/strict'); const fs = require('fs'); const path = require('path'); const COMMAND_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'commands', 'gsd', 'plan-review-convergence.md'); const WORKFLOW_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'plan-review-convergence.md'); const CONFIG_DOC_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'docs', 'CONFIGURATION.md'); const PLAN_PHASE_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'plan-phase.md'); const PLANNER_REVIEWS_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'gsd-core', 'references', 'planner-reviews.md'); const PLAN_CHECKER_PATH = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'agents', 'gsd-plan-checker.md'); // ─── Command source ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence command source (#2306)', () => { const command = fs.readFileSync(COMMAND_PATH, 'utf8'); test('command name uses gsd: prefix (installer converts to gsd- on install)', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('name: gsd:plan-review-convergence'), 'command name must use gsd: prefix so installer converts it to gsd-plan-review-convergence' ); }); test('command declares all reviewer flags in context', () => { assert.ok(command.includes('--codex'), 'must document --codex flag'); assert.ok(command.includes('--gemini'), 'must document --gemini flag'); assert.ok(command.includes('--claude'), 'must document --claude flag'); assert.ok(command.includes('--opencode'), 'must document --opencode flag'); assert.ok(command.includes('--all'), 'must document --all flag'); assert.ok(command.includes('--max-cycles'), 'must document --max-cycles flag'); }); test('command documents local model reviewer flags (--ollama, --lm-studio, --llama-cpp)', () => { assert.ok(command.includes('--ollama'), 'must document --ollama flag for local Ollama server'); assert.ok(command.includes('--lm-studio'), 'must document --lm-studio flag for local LM Studio server'); assert.ok(command.includes('--llama-cpp'), 'must document --llama-cpp flag for local llama.cpp server'); }); test('command references the workflow file via execution_context', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('@$HOME/.claude/gsd-core/workflows/plan-review-convergence.md'), 'execution_context must reference the workflow file' ); }); test('command references supporting reference files', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('revision-loop.md'), 'must reference revision-loop.md for stall detection pattern' ); assert.ok( command.includes('gates.md'), 'must reference gates.md for gate taxonomy' ); assert.ok( command.includes('agent-contracts.md'), 'must reference agent-contracts.md for completion markers' ); }); test('command declares Agent in allowed-tools (required for spawning review sub-agents)', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('- Agent'), 'Agent must be in allowed-tools — command spawns isolated agents for reviewing' ); }); test('command declares Skill in allowed-tools (required for inline plan-phase invocations)', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('- Skill'), 'Skill must be in allowed-tools — command invokes gsd-plan-phase inline via Skill() at depth 0 (#936 fix)' ); }); test('command has Copilot runtime_note for AskUserQuestion fallback', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('vscode_askquestions'), 'must document vscode_askquestions fallback for Copilot compatibility' ); }); test('--codex is the default reviewer when no flag is specified', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('default if no reviewer specified') || command.includes('default: --codex') || command.includes('(default if no reviewer specified)'), '--codex must be documented as the default reviewer' ); }); test('command documents the workflow.plan_review_convergence config key', () => { assert.ok( command.includes('workflow.plan_review_convergence') || command.includes('plan_review_convergence'), 'command must document the config key required to enable the feature (#2306-v2)' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: initialization ────────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: initialization (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow calls gsd-tools.cjs init plan-phase for initialization', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('gsd-tools.cjs') && workflow.includes('init') && workflow.includes('plan-phase'), 'workflow must initialize via gsd-tools.cjs init plan-phase' ); }); test('workflow parses --max-cycles with default of 3', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('MAX_CYCLES') && workflow.includes('3'), 'workflow must parse --max-cycles with default of 3' ); }); test('workflow displays a startup banner with phase number and reviewer flags', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('PLAN CONVERGENCE') || workflow.includes('Plan Convergence'), 'workflow must display a startup banner' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: config gate (disabled by default) ─────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: config gate (#2306-v2)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow checks workflow.plan_review_convergence config key before running', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('workflow.plan_review_convergence'), 'workflow must check workflow.plan_review_convergence config key — feature is disabled by default (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('workflow exits with enable instructions when config key is false', () => { // Must tell the user how to enable the feature assert.ok( workflow.includes('gsd config-set workflow.plan_review_convergence true') || workflow.includes('config-set workflow.plan_review_convergence'), 'workflow must show the user how to enable the feature when disabled (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('workflow defaults config key to false (opt-in, not opt-out)', () => { // The config-get call must default to false, not true const configGetMatch = workflow.match(/config-get\s+workflow\.plan_review_convergence[^\n]*/); assert.ok( configGetMatch, 'workflow must read workflow.plan_review_convergence via config-get' ); assert.ok( configGetMatch[0].includes('"false"') || configGetMatch[0].includes("'false'") || configGetMatch[0].includes('false'), 'workflow must default workflow.plan_review_convergence to false (disabled by default) (#2306-v2)' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: initial planning gate ────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: initial planning gate (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow skips initial planning when plans already exist', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('has_plans') || workflow.includes('plan_count'), 'workflow must check whether plans already exist before running inline planning' ); }); test('workflow runs gsd-plan-phase when no plans exist', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('gsd-plan-phase'), 'workflow must invoke gsd-plan-phase when no plans exist' ); }); test('workflow errors if initial planning produces no PLAN.md files', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('PLAN_COUNT') || workflow.includes('plan_count'), 'workflow must verify PLAN.md files were created after initial planning' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: convergence loop ──────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: convergence loop (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow spawns isolated review agent each cycle', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('gsd-review'), 'workflow must spawn Agent → gsd-review each cycle' ); }); test('workflow extracts HIGH and actionable counts from CYCLE_SUMMARY contract, NOT from grepping REVIEWS.md', () => { // Critical regression guard: REVIEWS.md accumulates history across cycles; // resolved HIGHs from cycle N remain in the file during cycle N+1 as audit trail, // inflating raw grep counts and causing false stalls. Counts must come from // the review agent's CYCLE_SUMMARY return message, not from the file. assert.ok( workflow.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY'), 'workflow must use CYCLE_SUMMARY contract from review agent return message, not raw grep (#2306-v2 false-stall fix)' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('current_high'), 'workflow must parse current_high from CYCLE_SUMMARY line' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('ACTIONABLE_COUNT') && workflow.includes('current_actionable'), 'workflow must parse current_actionable from CYCLE_SUMMARY line (#724)' ); }); test('workflow aborts if review agent omits CYCLE_SUMMARY contract', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('did not honor the CYCLE_SUMMARY contract') || workflow.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY contract'), 'workflow must abort with clear error when review agent omits CYCLE_SUMMARY (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('workflow distinguishes malformed CYCLE_SUMMARY from absent CYCLE_SUMMARY', () => { // Helps debugging: "present but malformed" vs "completely missing" are different errors assert.ok( workflow.includes('malformed') || (workflow.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY') && workflow.includes('present')), 'workflow must distinguish malformed CYCLE_SUMMARY from absent one for debuggability (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('workflow fails closed when current_actionable is missing or malformed', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('current_actionable is missing or malformed'), 'missing or malformed current_actionable must abort instead of silently treating actionable findings as zero (#724)' ); }); test('review agent spawn forwards --ws via GSD_WS (symmetric with replan agent)', () => { // Critical correctness bug: if GSD_WS is not forwarded to the review agent, // the review reads from the wrong workspace while replanning reads from the correct one. const reviewAgentBlock = workflow.match(/gsd-review['"`,\s][\s\S]{0,300}?GSD_WS/); assert.ok( reviewAgentBlock || (workflow.includes("'gsd-review'") && workflow.includes('{GSD_WS}') && workflow.indexOf('{GSD_WS}') < workflow.indexOf("'gsd-plan-phase'")), 'review agent spawn must forward {GSD_WS} — workspace flag must reach the reviewer (#2306-v2 --ws fix)' ); }); test('workflow exits loop only when HIGH_COUNT and ACTIONABLE_COUNT are zero', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('HIGH_COUNT == 0 and ACTIONABLE_COUNT == 0'), 'workflow must require both HIGH_COUNT and ACTIONABLE_COUNT to be zero before convergence (#724)' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('If HIGH_COUNT > 0 or ACTIONABLE_COUNT > 0'), 'current_high=0 with current_actionable>0 must continue to replan/escalation instead of converging (#724)' ); }); test('workflow updates STATE.md on convergence', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('planned-phase') || workflow.includes('state'), 'workflow must update STATE.md via gsd-tools.cjs when converged' ); }); test('workflow invokes inline replan with --reviews flag', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('--reviews'), 'inline replan must pass --reviews so gsd-plan-phase incorporates review feedback' ); }); test('workflow passes --skip-research to inline replan (research already done)', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('--skip-research'), 'inline replan must skip research — only initial planning needs research' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: CYCLE_SUMMARY contract definition ────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: CYCLE_SUMMARY contract definition (#2306-v2)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('review agent prompt defines CYCLE_SUMMARY current_high/current_actionable format', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY: current_high= current_actionable='), 'review agent spawn prompt must define the CYCLE_SUMMARY current_high/current_actionable output format (#724)' ); }); test('CYCLE_SUMMARY contract defines PARTIALLY RESOLVED (acknowledged, mitigation incomplete)', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('PARTIALLY RESOLVED'), 'CYCLE_SUMMARY INCLUDE list must define PARTIALLY RESOLVED — prevents under-counting of in-progress issues (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('CYCLE_SUMMARY contract defines FULLY RESOLVED (verified/closed)', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('FULLY RESOLVED'), 'CYCLE_SUMMARY EXCLUDE list must define FULLY RESOLVED — prevents over-counting of closed issues (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('CYCLE_SUMMARY contract requires ## Current HIGH Concerns section in review return', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('## Current HIGH Concerns'), 'review agent must provide ## Current HIGH Concerns section so escalation gate can show specific issues (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('CYCLE_SUMMARY contract defines ACTIONABLE non-HIGH findings and requires their section', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('ACTIONABLE') && workflow.includes('Current Actionable Non-HIGH Concerns'), 'review agent must define actionable non-HIGH findings and list current unresolved actionable items (#724)' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: HIGH_LINES validation ────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: HIGH_LINES validation (#2306-v2)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow warns when HIGH_COUNT > 0 but ## Current HIGH Concerns section is absent', () => { // Prevents silent UX degradation: escalation gate shows blank concern list assert.ok( workflow.includes('HIGH_LINES') && (workflow.includes('incomplete escalation') || workflow.includes('Current HIGH Concerns')), 'workflow must warn when HIGH_COUNT > 0 but HIGH_LINES is empty (contract partially violated) (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('workflow warns when ACTIONABLE_COUNT > 0 but actionable section is absent', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('ACTIONABLE_LINES') && workflow.includes('Current Actionable Non-HIGH Concerns'), 'workflow must warn when ACTIONABLE_COUNT > 0 but actionable details are empty (#724)' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: stall detection ───────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: stall detection (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow tracks previous unresolved count to detect stalls', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('prev_unresolved_count'), 'workflow must track the previous total unresolved review count for stall detection (#724)' ); }); test('workflow warns when unresolved count is not decreasing', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('stall') || workflow.includes('Stall') || workflow.includes('not decreasing'), 'workflow must warn user when unresolved review count is not decreasing between cycles' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: escalation gate ──────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: escalation gate (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow escalates to user when max cycles reached with HIGHs remaining', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('MAX_CYCLES') && (workflow.includes('AskUserQuestion') || workflow.includes('vscode_askquestions')), 'workflow must escalate to user via AskUserQuestion when max cycles reached' ); }); test('escalation offers "Proceed anyway" option', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('Proceed anyway'), 'escalation gate must offer "Proceed anyway" to accept plans with remaining HIGH concerns' ); }); test('escalation offers "Manual review" option', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('Manual review') || workflow.includes('manual'), 'escalation gate must offer a manual review option' ); }); test('workflow has text-mode fallback for escalation (plain numbered list)', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('TEXT_MODE') || workflow.includes('text_mode'), 'workflow must support TEXT_MODE for plain-text escalation prompt' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: stall detection — behavioral ─────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: stall detection behavioral (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow surfaces stall warning when unresolved count stops decreasing', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('prev_unresolved_count'), 'workflow must track prev_unresolved_count across cycles (#724)' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('UNRESOLVED_COUNT >= prev_unresolved_count') || workflow.includes('not decreasing'), 'workflow must compare current unresolved count against previous to detect stall (#724)' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('stall') || workflow.includes('Stall') || workflow.includes('not decreasing'), 'workflow must emit a stall warning when unresolved review count is not decreasing' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: --max-cycles 1 immediate escalation — behavioral ──────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: --max-cycles 1 immediate escalation behavioral (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow escalates immediately after cycle 1 when --max-cycles 1 and HIGH > 0', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('cycle >= MAX_CYCLES') || workflow.includes('cycle >= max_cycles') || (workflow.includes('MAX_CYCLES') && workflow.includes('AskUserQuestion')), 'workflow must check cycle >= MAX_CYCLES so --max-cycles 1 triggers escalation after first cycle' ); assert.ok( workflow.includes('HIGH_COUNT > 0') || workflow.includes('ACTIONABLE_COUNT > 0') || workflow.includes('HIGH concerns remain') || workflow.includes('Proceed anyway'), 'escalation gate must be reachable when unresolved findings remain after a single cycle' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: REVIEWS.md verification ──────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: artifact verification (#2306)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow verifies REVIEWS.md exists after each review cycle', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('REVIEWS.md') || workflow.includes('REVIEWS_FILE'), 'workflow must verify REVIEWS.md was produced by the review agent each cycle' ); }); test('workflow errors if review agent does not produce REVIEWS.md', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('REVIEWS_FILE') || workflow.includes('review agent did not produce'), 'workflow must error if the review agent fails to produce REVIEWS.md' ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: success criteria ──────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: success criteria (#2306-v2)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('success criteria references CYCLE_SUMMARY parsing, not grep findings', () => { const successBlock = workflow.slice(workflow.lastIndexOf('')); assert.ok( (successBlock.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY') || successBlock.includes('parse')) && successBlock.includes('actionable non-HIGH'), 'success_criteria must reflect that orchestrator parses HIGH and actionable CYCLE_SUMMARY counts, not greps REVIEWS.md (#724)' ); assert.ok( !successBlock.includes('grep HIGHs'), 'success_criteria must NOT say "grep HIGHs" — that was the false-stall bug (#2306-v2)' ); }); }); // ─── Config schema registration ─────────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence config schema registration (#2306-v2)', () => { // After Cycle 5 (#3536), config-schema.cjs is a thin adapter sourcing from // the manifest. Use the runtime Set instead of text-parsing the source file. const { VALID_CONFIG_KEYS } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/config-schema.cjs'); test('workflow.plan_review_convergence is registered in config-schema.cjs', () => { assert.ok( VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('workflow.plan_review_convergence'), "workflow.plan_review_convergence must be registered in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS in config-schema.cjs so gsd config-set accepts it (#2306-v2)" ); }); }); // ─── CONFIGURATION.md documentation ────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence CONFIGURATION.md documentation (#2306-v2)', () => { const configDoc = fs.readFileSync(CONFIG_DOC_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow.plan_review_convergence is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('workflow.plan_review_convergence'), 'workflow.plan_review_convergence must be documented in docs/CONFIGURATION.md — schema/docs parity test enforces this (#2306-v2)' ); }); test('CONFIGURATION.md entry documents disabled-by-default behavior', () => { const row = configDoc.match(/workflow\.plan_review_convergence[^\n]*/); assert.ok(row, 'workflow.plan_review_convergence row must exist in CONFIGURATION.md'); assert.ok( row[0].includes('false') || row[0].includes('disabled'), 'CONFIGURATION.md entry must document that the feature defaults to false (disabled by default) (#2306-v2)' ); }); }); // ─── Reviews-mode incorporation contract (#724) ──────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence reviews-mode incorporation contract (#724)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); const planPhase = fs.readFileSync(PLAN_PHASE_PATH, 'utf8'); const plannerReviews = fs.readFileSync(PLANNER_REVIEWS_PATH, 'utf8'); const planChecker = fs.readFileSync(PLAN_CHECKER_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow replans while actionable non-HIGH findings remain', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('Actionable MEDIUM/LOW findings must be incorporated into executable PLAN.md content'), 'inline replan must route actionable non-HIGH findings back through plan-phase --reviews (#724)' ); }); test('plan-phase planner prompt says REVIEWS.md is feedback input, not the execution contract', () => { assert.ok( planPhase.includes('') && planPhase.includes('REVIEWS.md is feedback input') && planPhase.includes('/gsd:execute-phase primarily consumes PLAN.md'), 'planner prompt must explain that actionable review feedback must land in PLAN.md for execute-phase (#724)' ); }); test('plan-phase checker prompt reads REVIEWS.md in reviews mode and fails hidden actionable findings', () => { assert.ok( planPhase.includes('{reviews_path}') && planPhase.includes('') && planPhase.includes('return `## ISSUES FOUND`'), 'checker prompt must read REVIEWS.md and fail if actionable findings remain only there (#724)' ); }); test('planner reviews reference requires actionable findings to appear in PLAN.md or be deferred there', () => { assert.ok( plannerReviews.includes('/gsd:execute-phase primarily consumes PLAN.md') && plannerReviews.includes('Every current actionable review finding') && plannerReviews.includes('deferral/rejection rationale in that PLAN.md'), 'planner reviews reference must keep REVIEWS.md from becoming a hidden execution contract (#724)' ); }); test('gsd-plan-checker has a Review Incorporation dimension for reviews mode', () => { assert.ok( planChecker.includes('Review Incorporation') && planChecker.includes('current_actionable=') && planChecker.includes('remains only in REVIEWS.md'), 'plan checker must validate review incorporation when REVIEWS.md is present (#724)' ); // The current_actionable= reference must appear in a prohibition context, // not as an instruction to parse machine-readable fields from REVIEWS.md. // The CYCLE_SUMMARY line exists only in the convergence orchestrator's return message. assert.ok( planChecker.includes('Do NOT look for') || planChecker.includes('do NOT look for'), 'plan checker must explicitly prohibit looking for CYCLE_SUMMARY/current_actionable= in REVIEWS.md — those machine-readable fields are only on the orchestrator return message, never in the file' ); assert.ok( planChecker.includes('CYCLE_SUMMARY') && (planChecker.includes('Do NOT look for') || planChecker.includes('do NOT look for')), 'CYCLE_SUMMARY must appear in plan-checker only as a prohibited pattern, not as a parsing instruction' ); }); }); // ─── Local model reviewer support ──────────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence local model reviewer flags (#2306-local)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow parses --ollama flag into REVIEWER_FLAGS', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('--ollama'), 'workflow must parse --ollama flag so it is forwarded to the review agent' ); }); test('workflow parses --lm-studio flag into REVIEWER_FLAGS', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('--lm-studio'), 'workflow must parse --lm-studio flag so it is forwarded to the review agent' ); }); test('workflow parses --llama-cpp flag into REVIEWER_FLAGS', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('--llama-cpp'), 'workflow must parse --llama-cpp flag so it is forwarded to the review agent' ); }); }); describe('plan-review-convergence local model config schema registration (#2306-local)', () => { // After Cycle 5 (#3536), config-schema.cjs is a thin adapter sourcing from // the manifest. Use the runtime Set instead of text-parsing the source file. const { VALID_CONFIG_KEYS } = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/config-schema.cjs'); test('review.ollama_host is registered in config-schema.cjs', () => { assert.ok( VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('review.ollama_host'), "review.ollama_host must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS so gsd config-set accepts it" ); }); test('review.lm_studio_host is registered in config-schema.cjs', () => { assert.ok( VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('review.lm_studio_host'), "review.lm_studio_host must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS so gsd config-set accepts it" ); }); test('review.llama_cpp_host is registered in config-schema.cjs', () => { assert.ok( VALID_CONFIG_KEYS.has('review.llama_cpp_host'), "review.llama_cpp_host must be in VALID_CONFIG_KEYS so gsd config-set accepts it" ); }); }); // ─── Workflow: source-grounding pass (#22) ─────────────────────────────────── describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: source-grounding reviewer pass (#22)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); test('workflow documents plan_review.source_grounding config key (default on)', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('plan_review.source_grounding'), 'workflow must document the plan_review.source_grounding config key that gates the source-grounding pass (#22)' ); }); test('workflow defines all four symbol verdicts: VERIFIED, MISSING, AMBIGUOUS, UNCHECKABLE', () => { assert.ok(workflow.includes('VERIFIED'), 'workflow must define VERIFIED verdict'); assert.ok(workflow.includes('MISSING'), 'workflow must define MISSING verdict'); assert.ok(workflow.includes('AMBIGUOUS'), 'workflow must define AMBIGUOUS verdict'); assert.ok(workflow.includes('UNCHECKABLE'), 'workflow must define UNCHECKABLE verdict'); }); test('workflow specifies needs-acknowledgement gating for MISSING symbols', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('needs-acknowledgement'), 'workflow must specify needs-acknowledgement (not hard block) for MISSING at grep/intel authority (#22)' ); }); test('workflow instructs reviewer to exclude symbols declared under "Artifacts this phase produces"', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('Artifacts this phase produces'), 'workflow must exclude new artifacts declared by the plan from symbol verification (#22)' ); }); test('workflow requires "Verification coverage" section appended to REVIEWS.md', () => { assert.ok( workflow.includes('Verification coverage'), 'workflow must require a Verification coverage section in REVIEWS.md listing every UNCHECKABLE/skipped symbol (#22)' ); }); }); describe('plan-review-convergence local model CONFIGURATION.md documentation (#2306-local)', () => { const configDoc = fs.readFileSync(CONFIG_DOC_PATH, 'utf8'); test('review.ollama_host is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.ollama_host'), 'review.ollama_host must be documented in docs/CONFIGURATION.md' ); }); test('review.lm_studio_host is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.lm_studio_host'), 'review.lm_studio_host must be documented in docs/CONFIGURATION.md' ); }); test('review.llama_cpp_host is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.llama_cpp_host'), 'review.llama_cpp_host must be documented in docs/CONFIGURATION.md' ); }); test('review.models.ollama is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.models.ollama'), 'review.models.ollama must be documented so users know how to configure the local model name' ); }); test('review.models.lm_studio is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.models.lm_studio'), 'review.models.lm_studio must be documented so users know how to configure the local model name' ); }); test('review.models.llama_cpp is documented in CONFIGURATION.md', () => { assert.ok( configDoc.includes('review.models.llama_cpp'), 'review.models.llama_cpp must be documented so users know how to configure the local model name' ); }); }); // ─── Bug #936: plan-phase must run inline, not inside Agent() ───────────── // // Regression guard: inverted from the pre-#936 behavior that locked in the bug. // On Claude Code a depth-1 Agent has no Agent tool, so gsd-plan-phase wrapped in // Agent() cannot spawn gsd-planner / gsd-plan-checker → the replan loop breaks. // Fix: run plan-phase inline (bare Skill()) from the depth-0 convergence orchestrator. // // These tests FAIL on pre-fix code and PASS after the fix. describe('plan-review-convergence workflow: inline plan-phase dispatch (#936)', () => { const workflow = fs.readFileSync(WORKFLOW_PATH, 'utf8'); // Helper: extract Agent() block bodies from workflow text function extractAgentBlocks(content) { const blocks = []; let pos = 0; while (pos < content.length) { const start = content.indexOf('Agent(', pos); if (start === -1) break; let depth = 0; let i = start + 'Agent('.length - 1; for (; i < content.length; i++) { if (content[i] === '(') depth++; else if (content[i] === ')') { depth--; if (depth === 0) break; } } blocks.push({ start, end: i + 1, blockText: content.slice(start, i + 1) }); pos = i + 1; } return blocks; } test('initial planning does NOT wrap gsd-plan-phase inside Agent() (#936 fix)', () => { // Pre-fix: Agent( ... Skill('gsd-plan-phase') ... ) in step 4 // Post-fix: bare Skill(skill="gsd-plan-phase") at orchestrator level const blocks = extractAgentBlocks(workflow); const wrapping = blocks.filter((b) => /Skill\(\s*skill=['"]gsd-plan-phase['"]/.test(b.blockText) ); assert.deepStrictEqual( wrapping.map((b) => b.blockText.slice(0, 80).replace(/\n/g, '\\n')), [], 'Initial planning must NOT wrap gsd-plan-phase inside Agent() — run it inline so ' + 'it can spawn gsd-planner/gsd-plan-checker at depth 1. See: bug #936' ); }); test('replan step does NOT wrap gsd-plan-phase inside Agent() (#936 fix)', () => { // Same check as above; explicitly named for the replan site (step 5d) const blocks = extractAgentBlocks(workflow); const wrapping = blocks.filter((b) => /Skill\(\s*skill=['"]gsd-plan-phase['"]/.test(b.blockText) && /--reviews/.test(b.blockText) ); assert.deepStrictEqual( wrapping.map((b) => b.blockText.slice(0, 80).replace(/\n/g, '\\n')), [], 'Replan step must NOT wrap gsd-plan-phase inside Agent() — the replan loop can ' + 'never produce a plan on Claude Code when plan-phase is at depth 1. See: bug #936' ); }); test('workflow calls gsd-plan-phase inline (bare Skill outside Agent block) (#936 fix)', () => { // After the fix there must be at least one bare Skill(skill="gsd-plan-phase") // OUTSIDE any Agent() block. const blocks = extractAgentBlocks(workflow); let masked = workflow; const sorted = [...blocks].sort((a, b) => b.start - a.start); for (const b of sorted) { masked = masked.slice(0, b.start) + ' '.repeat(b.end - b.start) + masked.slice(b.end); } assert.ok( /Skill\(\s*skill=["']gsd-plan-phase["']/.test(masked), 'plan-review-convergence must contain at least one bare Skill(skill="gsd-plan-phase") ' + 'outside any Agent() block — the inline call that preserves depth-0 Agent availability. See: bug #936' ); }); test('success_criteria describes inline plan-phase, not Agent → Skill (#936 fix)', () => { const successBlock = workflow.slice(workflow.lastIndexOf('')); // The broken criterion said "Initial planning via Agent → Skill" assert.ok( !successBlock.includes('via Agent → Skill("gsd-plan-phase")'), 'success_criteria must NOT describe plan-phase as Agent → Skill — that was the broken pattern. See: bug #936' ); // The broken criterion said "isolated, not inline" for the replan assert.ok( !successBlock.includes('isolated, not inline'), 'success_criteria must NOT say "isolated, not inline" for plan-phase — the fix makes it inline. See: bug #936' ); }); });