Mechanical rename produced by scripts/msd-rename.cjs: gsd/Gsd/GSD -> msd/Msd/MSD across contents and paths, upstream package/repo coordinates -> @golem15/msd-core and golem15com/msd-core. Deep links into upstream history, sibling upstream packages, the GSD-2 import feature, CHANGELOG.md and .changeset/ are kept as-is. Hand edits on top: MSD block-letter banner and logos, LICENSE copyright line, package/plugin identity, regenerated lockfile, install-tree fixtures, derived registries and benchmark baseline; migration checksum baseline re-locked (MSD keeps its own install state, so no install had applied the old sums); sort-order and regex-escaped expectations in tests adjusted.
4.6 KiB
Resolve verify-command path findings
/msd-plan-phase runs a deterministic probe over every <automated> verify command in a
phase's plans before the plan-check pass. When a command's target directory does not resolve,
the plan checker reports it and planning does not pass. This page is what to do with that
report.
The probe answers one narrow question — can this command's target directory be grounded from the executor's cwd? — and it answers it without ever running the command.
When you will see this
/msd-plan-phase N returns ## ISSUES FOUND with a blocker like:
Verify Command Path Resolvability — BLOCKER
Plan 02-PLAN.md, task "lint and build the frontend"
Command: cd ../../frontend && npm run lint && npm run build
rawTarget: ../../frontend
target: /Users/you/code/frontend
reason: missing_dir
Fix it in three steps
1. Read the prior phase's proven command first
The planner is handed prior_verify_commands — the <automated> commands from the nearest
prior phase that had any — at every context window. If a previous phase already lints or
builds the same tree, that command resolved in a real run. Reuse it verbatim.
msd-tools query init.plan-phase N --pick prior_verify_commands
If that returns commands, the fix is usually a copy-paste, not a new path.
2. Ground the path yourself if there is nothing to inherit
Check the target the probe reported:
ls -d <target>
ls <target>/package.json
Two forms are recognized. Prefer the second:
| Form | When it breaks |
|---|---|
cd <dir> && npm run <script> |
Depends on the executor's cwd; a relative climb resolves differently inside a worktree |
npm --prefix <dir> run <script> |
Independent of cwd — prefer this |
Rewrite the plan's <automated> block, then re-run /msd-plan-phase N.
3. Re-run the probe by hand to confirm
msd-tools check verify-command-paths N --raw
Every row should be severity: none, or carry a warning you have consciously accepted.
Reading the report
Act on severity, not on status — a row can be status: ok and still carry an advisory.
reason |
severity |
What to do |
|---|---|---|
missing_dir |
blocker | The directory is not there. Fix the path, or have an earlier task create it. |
no_manifest |
blocker | The directory exists but has no package.json / Makefile. You are almost certainly one level off — this is the #2401 case. |
script_missing |
warning | The manifest has no such script. Fine if this phase adds it; otherwise a typo. |
dynamic_path |
warning | The path uses a variable, glob, substitution, or ~. The probe refuses to guess. Replace it with a literal if you can. |
outside_root |
warning | A bare ancestor climb (cd ../..). Under parallel worktree execution the base differs, so this cannot be checked. Anchor it instead. |
manifest_unreadable |
warning | package.json is unparseable, not a JSON object, or over 512 KB. Fix the manifest. |
When the report says nothing
An empty report is not automatically a clean bill of health. Tell the two apart:
| What you see | What it means |
|---|---|
commands: [], readError: null |
The phase's plans contain no <automated> blocks to probe. |
commands: [...], every severity: none |
Every command's target resolved. This is the clean case. |
readError is a non-empty string |
The probe could not look — the phase directory or a plan file was unreadable. Not a pass. |
status: not_applicable rows |
Those commands have no cd or --prefix to resolve; they run at the project root. |
status: pending_creation rows |
An earlier task in this phase creates that directory. Correct and expected on a greenfield phase. |
What the probe deliberately will not do
- It will not run your command. PLAN.md is model-authored text; executing it from the checker would be arbitrary code execution, and would trigger the real lint/build as a side effect.
- It will not suggest a replacement path. Prescribing one is exactly the failure that
motivated this check — the checker previously guessed twice and was wrong both times, the
second time citing a
package.jsonthat did not exist. - It does not recognize every launcher.
pushd,make -C,yarn --cwd,pnpm -C, andcargo --manifest-pathreportunresolvablerather than being half-parsed. Refusing to guess is the design.
Related
- Verify Command Path Resolvability — the command reference
- Resolve edge-coverage findings
- Resolve prohibition findings