Files
msd-core/docs/workflow-discuss-mode.md
Tom Boucher 3bb2f8f1c5 docs: rebrand to GSD Core and restructure docs with Diataxis (#605)
* chore: wire docs/agents config into AGENTS.md Agent skills section

Add the `## Agent skills` discovery block pointing the engineering
skills at the existing docs/agents/{issue-tracker,triage-labels,domain}.md
files (issue tracker, triage label mapping, single-context domain docs).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: rebrand to GSD Core and restructure docs with Diataxis

Reorganise the root README and docs/ around the Diataxis framework
(tutorials, how-to guides, reference, explanation), add new how-to
guides and schema references (STATE.md / CONTEXT.md / PLAN.md /
planning artifacts), and cross-link the whole set. Update the lone
legacy gsd-build reference to open-gsd; keep internal get-shit-done/
filesystem paths unchanged (directory rename tracked separately in
open-gsd/gsd-core#604). Regenerate the ja-JP, ko-KR, pt-BR and zh-CN
localised trees to mirror the new structure.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* docs: backfill changeset PR number (#605)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-02 08:13:09 -04:00

3.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

Discuss Mode: Assumptions vs Interview

GSD Core's discuss-phase offers two modes for gathering implementation context before planning begins. Understanding when to use each helps you move from question-answering to a confirmed CONTEXT.md with less back-and-forth.

For step-by-step instructions on running either mode, see the Discuss a phase how-to.

Modes

discuss (default)

The original interview-style flow. Claude identifies grey areas in the phase, presents them for selection, then asks approximately four questions per area. Good for:

  • Early phases where the codebase is new
  • Phases where the user has strong opinions they want to express proactively
  • Users who prefer guided, conversational context gathering

assumptions

A codebase-first flow. Claude deeply analyses the codebase via a subagent (reading 5–15 relevant files), forms assumptions with evidence, and presents them for confirmation or correction. Good for:

  • Established codebases with clear patterns
  • Users who find the interview questions obvious
  • Faster context gathering (~2–4 interactions vs ~15–20)

Configuration

# Enable assumptions mode
node gsd-tools.cjs config-set workflow.discuss_mode assumptions

# Switch back to interview mode
node gsd-tools.cjs config-set workflow.discuss_mode discuss

The setting is per-project (stored in .planning/config.json). See the CONTEXT.md schema for the full structure of the file both modes produce.

How Assumptions Mode Works

  1. Init — Same as discuss mode (load prior context, scout codebase, check todos)
  2. Deep analysis — Explore subagent reads 5–15 codebase files related to the phase
  3. Surface assumptions — Each assumption includes:
    • What Claude would do and why (citing file paths)
    • What goes wrong if the assumption is incorrect
    • Confidence level (Confident / Likely / Unclear)
  4. Confirm or correct — User reviews assumptions, selects any that need changing
  5. Write CONTEXT.md — Identical output format to discuss mode

Flag Compatibility

Flag discuss mode assumptions mode
--auto Auto-selects recommended answers Skips confirm gate, auto-resolves Unclear items
--batch Groups questions in batches N/A (corrections already batched)
--text Plain-text questions (remote sessions) Plain-text questions (remote sessions)
--analyze Shows trade-off tables per question N/A (assumptions include evidence)

Output

Both modes produce an identical CONTEXT.md with the same six sections:

  • <domain> — Phase boundary
  • <decisions> — Locked implementation decisions
  • <canonical_refs> — Specs/docs downstream agents must read
  • <code_context> — Reusable assets, patterns, integration points
  • <specifics> — User references and preferences
  • <deferred> — Ideas noted for future phases

Downstream agents (researcher, planner, checker) consume this file identically regardless of which mode produced it. See the CONTEXT.md schema for the full field reference.

  • Discuss a phase — step-by-step how-to for running /gsd-discuss-phase in either mode.
  • CONTEXT.md schema — full field reference for the file both modes produce.
  • The phase loop — how discuss fits into the broader discuss → plan → execute → verify → ship cycle.
  • docs index — full table of contents for GSD Core documentation.