Files
msd-core/tests/phase-id-drift-guard.test.cjs
Tom Boucher a1de52d71b fix(#2128): sanctions must be a dedicated // comment line (decoy-proof)
Re-review found the `// phase-id-owner:` suppression treated a `//` embedded in a
string literal as a comment — help/doc text quoting the sanction syntax (the exact
string the scanner's own main() prints) would silently suppress a real
re-derivation. Require the marker to LEAD its own comment line (`^\s*//…`), so a
`//` inside a string or trailing a code line never counts. All 5 real sanctions
are already dedicated lines (scanRepo stays green); trailing same-line sanctions
are no longer honored — put the comment on the line directly above.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-10 09:24:49 -04:00

173 lines
8.2 KiB
JavaScript

'use strict';
process.env.GSD_TEST_MODE = '1';
/**
* Anti-divergence guard for the phase-identifier parsing seam
* (epic #2121 Phase 4 / issue #2128, ADR-2121 Decision 7).
*
* `src/phase-id.cts` is the single canonical owner of phase-ID parsing. Two guards
* keep it that way:
* 1. DRIFT SCANNER (scripts/lint-phase-id-drift.cjs) — fails CI if any module
* outside phase-id.cts re-derives the canonical phase-number token as a
* literal without a `// phase-id-owner:` sanction.
* 2. IDENTITY guard — phase-id.cjs exports the complete locked surface, and no
* consumer re-exports a DIVERGENT copy of a canonical function (re-export,
* never re-implement).
*
* Behavioral throughout: assertions drive `findPhaseIdRegexDrift` / `scanRepo`
* and compare object identity — no `readFileSync().includes()` in a test body.
*/
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
const fs = require('node:fs');
const path = require('node:path');
const ROOT = path.join(__dirname, '..');
const { findPhaseIdRegexDrift, scanRepo } = require(
path.join(ROOT, 'scripts', 'lint-phase-id-drift.cjs'),
);
const phaseId = require(path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib', 'phase-id.cjs'));
// The locked canonical surface (ADR-2121 Decision 1/2; PHASE_NUMBER_TOKEN_SOURCE
// added in Phase 4). Every name is exported by phase-id.cjs; the identity guard
// forbids any other module from re-exporting a divergent copy of one.
const CANONICAL = [
'escapeRegex', 'OPTIONAL_PROJECT_CODE_PREFIX_SOURCE', 'OPTIONAL_PHASE_TAG_SOURCE',
'PHASE_NUMBER_TOKEN_SOURCE', 'stripProjectCodePrefix', 'normalizePhaseName',
'getMilestoneFromPhaseId', 'getPhaseDirFromPhaseId', 'phaseMarkdownRegexSource',
'phaseMarkdownRegexSourceExact', 'comparePhaseNum', 'extractPhaseToken',
'phaseTokenMatches', 'parsePhaseFromProse', 'stripConfiguredProjectCodePrefix',
'isForeignPrefixedPhaseQuery', 'roadmapPhaseLookupSources',
];
describe('#2128 phase-id drift scanner: findPhaseIdRegexDrift (pure)', () => {
test('a regex built from PHASE_NUMBER_TOKEN_SOURCE is NOT drift', () => {
assert.deepEqual(
findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const re = new RegExp(`Phase\\s+(${PHASE_NUMBER_TOKEN_SOURCE})`);'),
[],
);
});
test('a literal re-derivation of the canonical token IS flagged (fail-first)', () => {
const v = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const re = /Phase\\s+(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;');
assert.equal(v.length, 1);
assert.equal(v[0].found, '\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*');
});
test('a re-derivation inside a new RegExp template (\\\\d escaping) IS flagged', () => {
const v = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('new RegExp(`Phase\\\\s+(\\\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\\\.\\\\d+)*)`)');
assert.equal(v.length, 1);
});
test('the [A-Za-z], [.-] and [0-9] near-variants ARE flagged (no trivial evasion)', () => {
assert.equal(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/(\\d+[A-Za-z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/').length, 1, '[A-Za-z] letter class');
assert.equal(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:[.-]\\d+)*)/').length, 1, '[.-] separator');
assert.equal(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/([0-9]+[A-Z]?(?:\\.[0-9]+)*)/').length, 1, '[0-9] in place of \\d');
});
test('a dedicated preceding // phase-id-owner: comment line suppresses the flag', () => {
assert.deepEqual(
findPhaseIdRegexDrift(' // phase-id-owner: sanctioned exception\n const re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;'),
[],
);
});
test('a blank line between the // phase-id-owner: comment and the regex still suppresses', () => {
assert.deepEqual(
findPhaseIdRegexDrift(' // phase-id-owner: sanctioned exception\n\n const re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;'),
[],
);
});
test('a trailing same-line // phase-id-owner: is NOT a sanction (must be a dedicated line above)', () => {
// The marker must lead its own comment line; a trailing comment on a code
// line is not honored, so the regex is still flagged.
const v = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/; // phase-id-owner: not honored here');
assert.equal(v.length, 1);
});
test('a // phase-id-owner: embedded in a STRING literal does NOT suppress (decoy)', () => {
// A `//` inside a string is not a comment — help/doc text that quotes the
// sanction syntax must not silently suppress a real re-derivation.
const decoyLine = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const help = "use // phase-id-owner: <reason>"; const re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;');
assert.equal(decoyLine.length, 1);
const decoyPrev = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const help = "use // phase-id-owner: <reason>";\nconst re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;');
assert.equal(decoyPrev.length, 1);
});
test('a bare "phase-id-owner:" substring with no // does NOT suppress', () => {
const v = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('const msg = "ping the phase-id-owner for review"; const re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;');
assert.equal(v.length, 1);
});
test('non-token phase regexes are NOT flagged (no false positives)', () => {
assert.deepEqual(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/^Executing Phase\\s+\\d+/'), [], 'status-message bare \\d+');
assert.deepEqual(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/#{2,4}\\s*Phase\\s+(\\d+)[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*/'), [], 'digits-only capture is non-contiguous');
assert.deepEqual(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/Phase\\s+([\\w][\\w.-]*)/'), [], '\\w id grammar is not the canonical token');
assert.deepEqual(findPhaseIdRegexDrift('/\\|\\s*Phase\\s*\\|\\s*Plans\\s*\\|/'), [], 'pipe-table structure');
});
test('reports 1-based line numbers', () => {
const v = findPhaseIdRegexDrift('line1\nconst re = /(\\d+[A-Z]?(?:\\.\\d+)*)/;\nline3');
assert.equal(v[0].line, 2);
});
});
describe('#2128 phase-id drift scanner: the live repo is clean', () => {
test('scanRepo finds zero unsanctioned phase-token re-derivations', () => {
const violations = scanRepo(ROOT);
assert.deepEqual(
violations,
[],
'unsanctioned phase-token re-derivation(s) — build from PHASE_NUMBER_TOKEN_SOURCE or add // phase-id-owner:\n' +
violations.map((d) => ` ${d.file}:${d.line} ${d.found}`).join('\n'),
);
});
});
describe('#2128 phase-id single-owner identity guard', () => {
test('phase-id.cjs exports the complete locked canonical surface', () => {
for (const name of CANONICAL) {
assert.ok(name in phaseId, `phase-id.cjs must export the canonical member '${name}'`);
}
});
test('no consumer module re-exports a DIVERGENT copy of a canonical phase-id function', () => {
// Forward guard: if any built lib module re-exports a name that phase-id.cjs
// owns, it MUST be the identical reference — a re-export, never a local
// re-implementation. All consumers pass today (none re-export); the guard
// fails the moment a divergent copy ships.
const libDir = path.join(ROOT, 'gsd-core', 'bin', 'lib');
const consumers = fs.readdirSync(libDir).filter((f) => f.endsWith('.cjs') && f !== 'phase-id.cjs');
let checked = 0;
const requireFailures = [];
for (const f of consumers) {
let mod;
try {
mod = require(path.join(libDir, f));
} catch (e) {
// Surfaced, not silently skipped — a module that cannot be required
// would otherwise erode the guard's coverage without any signal.
requireFailures.push(`${f}: ${e.message}`);
continue;
}
if (!mod || typeof mod !== 'object') continue; // bare-function exports carry no named canonical member
checked++;
for (const name of CANONICAL) {
if (Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(mod, name)) {
assert.strictEqual(
mod[name],
phaseId[name],
`${f} re-exports '${name}' but it is NOT the phase-id.cjs reference — re-export the canonical, do not re-implement`,
);
}
}
}
assert.deepEqual(requireFailures, [], `consumer module(s) failed to require (guard coverage would silently degrade):\n ${requireFailures.join('\n ')}`);
// Coverage floor: the vast majority of the ~150 built lib modules export an
// object and must actually be inspected — not a token "at least one".
assert.ok(checked > consumers.length * 0.75, `expected to inspect most of the ${consumers.length} consumer modules, only inspected ${checked}`);
});
});