0d6bf19bf1
* test(#4600): pin explicit-flag-overrides-gate precedence * fix(#4600): explicit --converge overrides the convergence feature gate PLAN_STRATEGY=converge is set only by an explicit --converge/--cross-ai, so gating it on workflow.plan_review_convergence made an explicit operator flag lose to a config default and stop the run with a question-shaped success. The config remains the default for non-flag invocation; the flag now wins, and the step says so instead of gate-and-exit. * test(#4600): pin the precedence contract sentences as written * fix(#4600): keep the precedence sentence on one line The pinned contract phrase wrapped across a line break, so the writer-contract assertion could not match it. * fix(#4600): document the flag-overrides-gate precedence on user surfaces commands/gsd/autonomous.md and docs/COMMANDS.md still said --converge requires workflow.plan_review_convergence=true; both now state the override. Changeset typed Changed with the docs update alongside. * docs(#4600): backfill changeset PR number * fix(#4600): restore the convergence gate mention in user surfaces * test(#4600): pin the dispatched convergence run against the config gate * fix(#4600): override the convergence gate on the dispatched run Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: autonomous.md — #4600: the converge dispatch appends --override-gate inside the PLAN_STRATEGY conditional, and the precedence sentences replace the stale fail-fast instruction Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: plan-review-convergence.md — #4600: config gate 1.5 honors an explicit --override-gate dispatch (token-anchored) while the standalone veto and config-get default are preserved --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.