* test(#2847): add failing-first regression tests for gap-closure frontmatter schema gap --gaps did not load a machine-checked requirement for gap_closure: true. The planner's only validation gate (frontmatter.validate --schema plan) never required it, and plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer contract never mentioned it either, so gap-closure plans could pass validation while missing the field that /gsd:execute-phase --gaps-only filters on. These tests are RED against current production code: no plan-gap-closure schema exists yet, and neither agents/gsd-planner.md's validate_plan step nor plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer block references gap_closure conditionally. * fix(#2847): enforce gap_closure via plan-gap-closure schema --gaps did not load a machine-checked requirement for gap_closure: true. The planner's only validation gate (frontmatter.validate --schema plan) never required it, so a gap-closure plan could pass validation while missing the field /gsd:execute-phase --gaps-only filters on, silently spawning zero executors. Add a plan-gap-closure schema (every plan-required field plus gap_closure) and make the planner's validate_plan step select it when gap_closure mode is active, plan otherwise. Standard/reviews-mode plans are unaffected: plan's required fields are unchanged. plan-phase.md's downstream_consumer block was investigated for a symmetric mention but deliberately left untouched: it sits 36 bytes under the frozen ADR-857 PRE_PHASE6 ceiling and the validate_plan step in gsd-planner.md is the actual call site, needing no help from plan-phase.md's prose. * fix(#2847): compact validate_plan edit under gsd-planner.md size caps Merging origin/next (7 commits, including #2775's gsd-planner.md STRIDE-row edit) left only 22 chars of headroom under four separate hard-coded 49152-char caps on gsd-planner.md (planner-decomposition, precondition-element, reversibility-tagging, security.test.cjs). The verbose validate_plan prose from the previous commit overran all four. Compact the edit to a single line (net +17 chars vs origin/next) while keeping the functional content: schema name, mode condition, and the unchanged base required-fields list. Also: - Fix a real bug in the fix-2847 negative-assertion test: plan-phase.md mentions the literal string "<downstream_consumer>" twice in backtick-quoted prose before the actual opening tag, so a plain indexOf() grabbed the wrong start position and swallowed ~10KB of unrelated content (including a "gap_closure" hit in a Mode: enum line), producing a false failure. Anchor on the tag starting its own line instead. - Merge the emitted-drift-ack fragment for gsd-planner.md with the #2775 fragment brought in by the merge (both named the same path; two ack sources may never name the same path) and correct its byte delta to the actual final number. * fix(#2847): drop stale merge-inherited emitted-drift-ack fragments Merging origin/next brought in three new emitted-drift-ack fragments (1700, 2658, 2775) relative to this branch's fork point. #2775 collided with my own gsd-planner.md key and was already consolidated. #1700 and #2658 don't collide, but none of their entries name a path this branch's actual diff touches (git diff --name-only origin/next...HEAD) — the ripples they explain are already baked into the current next baseline, so they explain nothing here and the emitted-attribution gate correctly reports them as stale (verified live: spike-wrap-up.md from #1700). Delete both fragment files. Neither is referenced by any test beyond a stray comment pointing at an unrelated diagnosis artifact path, not the ack fragment itself. * fix(#2847): restore merge-inherited ack fragments deleted in error 1700-spike-manifest-idea-scoping.json and 2658-trae-instruction-file-path.json exist on origin/next (landed via other, already-merged PRs) and arrived on this branch unchanged via the origin/next merge. The previous commit deleted them to satisfy a stale-acknowledgment finding, but the finding was about the acks being MODIFIED in this diff, not about needing to stop existing — deleting them would have silently reverted two other PRs' already-merged, already-justified byte growth. Restored byte-identical to origin/next (git diff origin/next -- <path> empty for both). 2775-planner-package-legitimacy-gate.json stays consolidated into 2847-gap-closure-validate-plan-step.json: that one was a genuine hard key-collision (two fragments naming the same gsd-planner.md path, which lint-emitted-drift-ack hard-blocks), not a pass-through case. * fix(#2847): bind --schema to gap_closure mode, not hardcode it Prior revision left the validate_plan bash invocation unconditional (--schema plan)) while only the prose sentence above it described the gap_closure-mode branch. An agent executing the shown line literally always validated with the plan schema, so a gap-closure plan missing gap_closure: true still reported valid:true — #2847 reproducing unchanged. Existing tests didn't catch it: they checked for substring presence anywhere in the step, which the prose alone satisfied. Change the bash line to --schema "$SCHEMA" — a real shell-variable reference in the same placeholder convention this file already uses for "$PLAN_PATH" (never literally assigned; the agent resolves it from context, same as PLAN_PATH). A genuine if/then bash conditional already exists elsewhere in this file (load_project_state's INIT @file: check), confirming executed conditionals, not merely descriptive prose, are the established pattern here. Rewrite the regression test to assert on the bash block's literal --schema argument: reject a hardcoded plan) or plan-gap-closure) literal, require a variable reference, and require the step's prose to bind that same variable name. Verified RED against the prior revision and GREEN against this one before committing either state. * fix(#2847): CRLF-safe tests, drop unexplained ack, require gap_closure=true Four items from independent review, all landing together per request: 1. The #2847 regression test file had two CRLF-fragile regexes (local/no-crlf-fragile-split): a bare \n on readFileSync content means a real \r\n checkout returns invocationLine === null and all four executable-content assertions stop asserting anything while still reporting green. Both now use \r?\n. Prior lint report of exit 0 was a false green from a stale eslint cache. 2. The 2847 drift-ack fragment explained nothing: a direct edit to agents/gsd-planner.md is self-explaining, drift-acks exist for emitted-artifact ripple that cannot be traced to a changed source path. Deleted. Restored the 2775 fragment byte-identical to next (git diff --name-status next...HEAD -- tests/emitted-drift-acks/ now prints nothing) — it only conflicted with the now-deleted 2847 fragment, never needed touching itself. 3. plan-gap-closure validated gap_closure by PRESENCE only (unchanged since the original #2847 fix), so gap_closure: false satisfied it — --gaps-only filters strictly on gap_closure === true, so a false-valued plan still validates green and still spawns zero executors: #2847's exact reported symptom, one value away. Added an optional requiredValues map to FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS; plan-gap-closure now requires gap_closure to equal the string "true" (extractFrontmatter parses every scalar as a string) in addition to being present. Every other schema/field keeps the original presence-only contract. The row that had documented the hole instead of closing it now asserts the fix; a matching unit test locks requiredValues on FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS. 4. The "names the plain plan schema" assertion matched the bare substring "plan" anywhere in the step, which verify.plan-structure satisfies incidentally a few lines below — the assertion could not fail even if the plain-plan branch were deleted from the prose. Changed to match the standalone backtick-quoted plan token. * fix(#2847): remove contradictory leftover assertion in Row 6 test The gap_closure:false test asserted !present.includes('gap_closure') (correct — matches the implementation's fold-wrong-value-into-missing semantics) immediately followed by a stale, unedited leftover from an earlier draft of the same test asserting the opposite: present.includes('gap_closure'). The second could never pass once the first did; both were in the same diff. Verified before committing: searched every consumer of frontmatter.validate output (agents/gsd-planner.md, docs/CLI-TOOLS.md, all other test files) for any read of the present field — none exist. Nothing depends on "present" meaning "physically exists regardless of value correctness", so the implementation's fold (present/missing stay a full partition of required) is the right call; the test needed to agree with it, not the other way around. Manually replayed all six rows in the plan-gap-closure describe block against the built CLI to confirm each now passes. * fix(#2847): prototype-key guard, wrong-value diagnostic, doc fixes, vacuous tests Six items from an independent SHIP_VERDICT:no review, landing together per request: 1. Prototype-key crash (src/frontmatter.cts): FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS[schemaName] was an unguarded lookup, so --schema __proto__ (also constructor, toString, hasOwnProperty, valueOf) resolved to an Object.prototype member instead of undefined, the `!schema` check never fired, and the command crashed with an uncaught TypeError and a stack trace instead of "Unknown schema". Now reachable from prompt state (--schema is an agent-bound $SCHEMA), not just an unreachable literal. Guarded with Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call before the lookup, checked and rejected before assignment so `schema`'s type stays non-optional. Added a test for all five prototype keys. 2. Wrong-value diagnostic (src/frontmatter.cts, agents/gsd-planner.md): the strict gap_closure === "true" check from the previous fix was correct (fail-closed) but silent about WHY — a plan with gap_closure: True got "missing", indistinguishable from genuinely absent, even though the field is plainly in the file. Added an `invalidValue` field to the validate JSON (present but wrong-valued, disjoint from missing/present) and updated validate_plan's prose to state the exact required literal and explain invalidValue, within the remaining byte budget (49130/49152). 3. docs/reference/plan-md.md: fixed three inaccuracies in the gap_closure row — "this field plus every field above" implied `requirements` (documented Required: Yes) is schema-enforced, it is not; "Type: boolean" implied YAML True/TRUE/yes/1 are accepted, they are rejected (exact string match on literal lowercase true); "must never carry it" stated an unenforced rule as fact. Also switched /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase to the house-style hyphen form for docs/. 4. Vacuous negative assertions (tests/fix-2847-gap-closure-frontmatter.test.cjs): RegExp#test coerces a null invocationLine to the string "null", so both hardcoded-literal checks passed vacuously even if the step or its bash block were deleted entirely. Added a truthy precondition check first. 5. Deleted vacuous/pass-always tests: four in tests/frontmatter.unit.test.cjs strictly subsumed by (or, for the "superset" test, tautologically guaranteed by the same spread as) the deepEqual exact-list test; two describe blocks in the #2847 regression file that were already GREEN at the RED commit (5e5897cd2f17ebf2fc55757bae651bbbeb236289) and pinned untouched files rather than covering anything this change altered — one of them additionally forbade any future legitimate gap_closure mention in plan-phase.md, a trap for whoever frees up that file's byte budget later. 6. .changeset/clever-newts-wake.md: switched /gsd:plan-phase and /gsd:execute-phase to /gsd-plan-phase and /gsd-execute-phase — changesets render verbatim into CHANGELOG.md with no converter in the path, so the colon form would have reached readers naming a command no runtime registers. * chore(#2847): backfill changeset pr number (#3018) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
1360 lines
50 KiB
JavaScript
1360 lines
50 KiB
JavaScript
'use strict';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Unit tests for frontmatter.cjs
|
|
*
|
|
* Module: gsd-core/bin/lib/frontmatter.cjs
|
|
*
|
|
* Covers:
|
|
* - extractFrontmatter: all scalar types, quoted, arrays, nested, edge cases
|
|
* - reconstructFrontmatter: exact output for every branch
|
|
* - spliceFrontmatter: with/without existing frontmatter
|
|
* - parseMustHavesBlock: all branches
|
|
* - FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS: exact keys
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { describe, test } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const yaml = require('js-yaml');
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
extractFrontmatter,
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter,
|
|
spliceFrontmatter,
|
|
noOpObjectListSetError,
|
|
parseMustHavesBlock,
|
|
FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS,
|
|
} = require('../gsd-core/bin/lib/frontmatter.cjs');
|
|
|
|
// ─── extractFrontmatter ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: no frontmatter', () => {
|
|
test('plain text returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('just plain text'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty string returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter(''), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('--- not at start returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('content\n---\nkey: val\n---\n'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('--- block without closing delimiter returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: Hello\nauthor: World\n'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('only --- returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('---\n---'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty frontmatter block returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('---\n\n---\nBody'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('heading only returns {}', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(extractFrontmatter('# Just a heading\ncontent'), {});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: simple scalar values', () => {
|
|
test('single string key-value', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: Hello\n---\nBody');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('multiple string key-values', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: Hello\nauthor: World\n---\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello', author: 'World' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('numeric string value preserved as string', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ncount: 42\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { count: '42' });
|
|
assert.equal(result.count, '42');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('boolean string value preserved as string', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nflag: true\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { flag: 'true' });
|
|
assert.equal(result.flag, 'true');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('null string value preserved as string', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nnone: null\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { none: 'null' });
|
|
assert.equal(result.none, 'null');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('false string value preserved as string', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ndone: false\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { done: 'false' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value with internal spaces preserved', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nphase: phase one\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { phase: 'phase one' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('trailing whitespace in value is trimmed', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: Hello \n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('key with underscore', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nmy_key: val\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { my_key: 'val' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('key with hyphen', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nmy-key: val\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { 'my-key': 'val' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('key with digits', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nkey123: val\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { key123: 'val' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty line in frontmatter is skipped', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nkey1: val1\n\nkey2: val2\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { key1: 'val1', key2: 'val2' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('body content after closing delimiter is ignored', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: Hello\n---\n# Heading\nContent here');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello' });
|
|
assert.equal(Object.keys(result).length, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: quoted values', () => {
|
|
test('double-quoted value strips quotes', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle: "Hello World"\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello World' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('single-quoted value strips quotes', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter("---\ntitle: 'Hello World'\n---");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello World' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('double-quoted value containing colon', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nurl: "http://example.com"\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { url: 'http://example.com' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('unquoted value with no special chars', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nname: simple\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { name: 'simple' });
|
|
assert.equal(result.name, 'simple');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: CRLF line endings', () => {
|
|
test('CRLF frontmatter parses correctly', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\r\ntitle: Hello\r\nauthor: World\r\n---\r\nBody');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: 'Hello', author: 'World' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CRLF with array values', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\r\ntags: [a, b, c]\r\n---\r\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b', 'c'] });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: inline arrays', () => {
|
|
test('empty inline array []', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: []\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: [] });
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.tags));
|
|
assert.equal(result.tags.length, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('single item inline array', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [only]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['only'] });
|
|
assert.equal(result.tags.length, 1);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two item inline array', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [a, b]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('three item inline array', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [a, b, c]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b', 'c'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inline array with spaces around items', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [ a , b , c ]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b', 'c'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inline array with double-quoted item containing comma', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: ["a, b", c]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a, b', 'c'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inline array with single-quoted item containing comma', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter("---\ntags: ['a, b', c]\n---");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a, b', 'c'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('inline array with quoted item plus more items', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: ["a, b", c, d]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a, b', 'c', 'd'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('consecutive commas (empty items filtered)', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [a,,b]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('whitespace-only items filtered', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [ , ]\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: [] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('opening bracket only becomes empty array/object', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: [] });
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.tags));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: dashed list arrays', () => {
|
|
test('two-item dashed list', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags:\n - a\n - b\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b'] });
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.tags));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('single-item dashed list', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags:\n - solo\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['solo'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('dashed list with double-quoted item', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags:\n - "quoted value"\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['quoted value'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('dashed list with single-quoted item', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter("---\ntags:\n - 'single quoted'\n---");
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['single quoted'] });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('opening bracket followed by dashed list', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntags: [\n - a\n - b\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { tags: ['a', 'b'] });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: empty / missing values', () => {
|
|
test('empty value becomes empty object {}', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle:\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { title: {} });
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result.title, 'object');
|
|
assert.ok(!Array.isArray(result.title));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty value followed by next key', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntitle:\nother: val\n---');
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result.title, 'object');
|
|
assert.equal(result.other, 'val');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: nested objects', () => {
|
|
test('one level of nesting', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nmeta:\n key: val\n count: 10\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { meta: { key: 'val', count: '10' } });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested then back to top level', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nmeta:\n sub: val\ntop: parent\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { meta: { sub: 'val' }, top: 'parent' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('multiple nested objects', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\na:\n k1: v1\nb:\n k2: v2\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { a: { k1: 'v1' }, b: { k2: 'v2' } });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two levels of nesting', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\ntop:\n mid:\n deep: value\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { top: { mid: { deep: 'value' } } });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested numeric-string value', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nmeta:\n count: 42\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { meta: { count: '42' } });
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: return type invariants', () => {
|
|
test('always returns plain object', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('random content');
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result, 'object');
|
|
assert.ok(result !== null);
|
|
assert.ok(!Array.isArray(result));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('return value is not null', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('');
|
|
assert.ok(result !== null);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('top-level dash item (no parent key) is ignored', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\n- item\n---');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('key starting with digit still matches key pattern', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\n123key: val\n---');
|
|
assert.equal(result['123key'], 'val');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── reconstructFrontmatter ───────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: empty input', () => {
|
|
test('empty object returns empty string', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({}), '');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: scalar values', () => {
|
|
test('simple string value', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ title: 'Hello' }), 'title: Hello');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('numeric string value', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ count: '42' }), 'count: 42');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('boolean string value', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ flag: 'true' }), 'flag: true');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('null value is skipped', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ title: null }), '');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('undefined value is skipped', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ title: undefined }), '');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value containing colon is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ url: 'http://example.com' }), 'url: "http://example.com"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value containing hash is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ name: 'test#1' }), 'name: "test#1"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value starting with [ is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ val: '[thing]' }), 'val: "[thing]"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value starting with { is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ val: '{thing}' }), 'val: "{thing}"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plain value without special chars is unquoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ name: 'simple' }), 'name: simple');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('multiple keys produce newline-joined output', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ title: 'Hello', author: 'World' }),
|
|
'title: Hello\nauthor: World'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: arrays', () => {
|
|
test('empty array produces key: []', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: [] }), 'tags: []');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two-item short array uses inline format', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a', 'b'] }), 'tags: [a, b]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('three-item short array uses inline format', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a', 'b', 'c'] }), 'tags: [a, b, c]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('three items whose join is exactly < 60 chars uses inline format', () => {
|
|
const tags = ['aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc'];
|
|
// 'aaa, bbb, ccc' = 13 chars
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ tags }), 'tags: [aaa, bbb, ccc]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('three items whose join >= 60 chars uses block format', () => {
|
|
const tags = ['aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccc'];
|
|
// join is 61+ chars
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ tags }),
|
|
'tags:\n - aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\n - bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb\n - cccccccccccccccccccc'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('four-item array uses block format', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] }),
|
|
'tags:\n - a\n - b\n - c\n - d'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('array item with colon is double-quoted in block format', () => {
|
|
// Need >3 items to force block format where quoting applies
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a:b', 'c', 'd', 'e'] });
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - "a:b"'), `Expected quoted item, got: ${result}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('array item with hash is double-quoted in block format', () => {
|
|
// Need >3 items to force block format where quoting applies
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a#b', 'c', 'd', 'e'] });
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - "a#b"'), `Expected quoted hash item, got: ${result}`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two-item array uses inline regardless of special chars', () => {
|
|
// Note: inline format for <=3 items uses join without quoting
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['a:b', 'c'] }), 'tags: [a:b, c]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('array item without colon or hash is unquoted in block format', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ tags: ['plain', 'also', 'here', 'fourth'] });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'tags:\n - plain\n - also\n - here\n - fourth');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: nested objects', () => {
|
|
test('simple nested object', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { key: 'val', num: '42' } }),
|
|
'meta:\n key: val\n num: 42'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested null subvalue is skipped', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { key: null } }), 'meta:');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested undefined subvalue is skipped', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { key: undefined } }), 'meta:');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested subvalue with colon is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { url: 'http://x' } }), 'meta:\n url: "http://x"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested subvalue with hash is double-quoted', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { name: 'x#y' } }), 'meta:\n name: "x#y"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested empty sub-array', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { items: [] } }), 'meta:\n items: []');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested two-item short sub-array uses inline format', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { items: ['a', 'b'] } }), 'meta:\n items: [a, b]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested four-item sub-array uses block format', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { items: ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] } }),
|
|
'meta:\n items:\n - a\n - b\n - c\n - d'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested three-item short sub-array uses inline', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { items: ['a', 'b', 'c'] } }),
|
|
'meta:\n items: [a, b, c]'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested three-item long sub-array uses block', () => {
|
|
const items = ['aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa', 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb', 'cccccccccccccccccccc'];
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { items } }),
|
|
'meta:\n items:\n - aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa\n - bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb\n - cccccccccccccccccccc'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested nested object (3 levels)', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ top: { mid: { deep: 'value' } } }),
|
|
'top:\n mid:\n deep: value'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('deeply nested null subvalue skipped', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ top: { mid: { key: null } } }),
|
|
'top:\n mid:'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('deeply nested empty array', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ top: { mid: { items: [] } } }),
|
|
'top:\n mid:\n items: []'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('deeply nested array with items', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
reconstructFrontmatter({ top: { mid: { items: ['a', 'b'] } } }),
|
|
'top:\n mid:\n items:\n - a\n - b'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── spliceFrontmatter ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('spliceFrontmatter: no existing frontmatter', () => {
|
|
test('prepends frontmatter to plain body', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
spliceFrontmatter('body text', { title: 'Test' }),
|
|
'---\ntitle: Test\n---\n\nbody text'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('prepends frontmatter to empty string', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
spliceFrontmatter('', { title: 'Test' }),
|
|
'---\ntitle: Test\n---\n\n'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('prepends frontmatter with empty object', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
spliceFrontmatter('body text', {}),
|
|
'---\n\n---\n\nbody text'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('prepends multi-key frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter('# Body', { title: 'T', author: 'A' });
|
|
assert.equal(result, '---\ntitle: T\nauthor: A\n---\n\n# Body');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('spliceFrontmatter: existing frontmatter', () => {
|
|
test('replaces existing frontmatter, preserves body', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\ntitle: Old\n---\n\nBody here';
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
spliceFrontmatter(input, { title: 'New' }),
|
|
'---\ntitle: New\n---\n\nBody here'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('replaces existing multi-key frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\ntitle: Old\ncount: 5\n---\n\nBody text here';
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
spliceFrontmatter(input, { title: 'New', count: '5' }),
|
|
'---\ntitle: New\ncount: 5\n---\n\nBody text here'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CRLF existing frontmatter: body CRLF preserved', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\r\ntitle: Old\r\n---\r\nBody';
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter(input, { title: 'New' });
|
|
assert.equal(result, '---\ntitle: New\n---\r\nBody');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('new frontmatter uses LF even if original was CRLF', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\r\ntitle: Old\r\n---\r\nBody';
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter(input, { title: 'New' });
|
|
assert.ok(result.startsWith('---\ntitle: New\n---'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('return type is always string', () => {
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter('hello', { k: 'v' });
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result, 'string');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── parseMustHavesBlock ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: no frontmatter / no block', () => {
|
|
test('no frontmatter returns []', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock('just content', 'artifacts'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty string returns []', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock('', 'artifacts'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('frontmatter without must_haves returns []', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\ntitle: Hello\n---\nbody';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('must_haves present but requested block absent returns []', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n other:\n - val\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('block at same indent as must_haves is rejected', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\nartifacts:\n - val\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), []);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: string items', () => {
|
|
test('two plain string items', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - simple string\n - another string\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['simple string', 'another string']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('single string item', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - only one\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['only one']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('double-quoted string items strip quotes', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - "contains: colon"\n - "another: one"\n---';
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, ['contains: colon', 'another: one']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('single-quoted string items strip quotes', () => {
|
|
const doc = "---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - 'single quoted'\n---";
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['single quoted']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('item without colon treated as plain string', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - plain text here\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['plain text here']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('item with colon but no space (Class::Method) is plain string', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - Class::Method is used\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['Class::Method is used']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('item with db:seed (no space after colon) is plain string', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - db:seed task should run\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths'), ['db:seed task should run']);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: key-value object items', () => {
|
|
test('simple kv item on dash line', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n artifacts:\n - path: file.ts\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), [{ path: 'file.ts' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two kv items', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n artifacts:\n - path: file.ts\n - path: other.ts\n---';
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), [{ path: 'file.ts' }, { path: 'other.ts' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('kv item with continuation keys', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' provides: something',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), [{ path: 'file.ts', provides: 'something' }]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('kv item with multiple continuation keys', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' provides: exports X',
|
|
' confidence: 90',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 1);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result[0], { path: 'file.ts', provides: 'exports X', confidence: 90 });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('numeric value in continuation key is parsed as integer', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' line: 42',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(result[0].line, 42);
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result[0].line, 'number');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('non-numeric continuation value stays string', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' provides: some text',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(typeof result[0].provides, 'string');
|
|
assert.equal(result[0].provides, 'some text');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two full kv items with continuations', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' provides: something',
|
|
' - path: other.ts',
|
|
' provides: other',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts'), [
|
|
{ path: 'file.ts', provides: 'something' },
|
|
{ path: 'other.ts', provides: 'other' },
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: nested arrays in items', () => {
|
|
test('item with array continuation', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' tags:',
|
|
' - tag1',
|
|
' - tag2',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 1);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result[0].tags, ['tag1', 'tag2']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('item with three array elements in continuation', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' tags:',
|
|
' - tag1',
|
|
' - tag2',
|
|
' - tag3',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result[0].tags, ['tag1', 'tag2', 'tag3']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('two items where first has array continuation', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: file.ts',
|
|
' tags:',
|
|
' - tag1',
|
|
' - path: other.ts',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'artifacts');
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 2);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result[0].tags, ['tag1']);
|
|
assert.equal(result[1].path, 'other.ts');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: return type', () => {
|
|
test('always returns an array', () => {
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock('no content', 'anything');
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty content returns array', () => {
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock('', 'anything');
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result));
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS', () => {
|
|
test('plan schema has required field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok('required' in FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan schema has exactly 8 required fields', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required.length, 8);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan schema required fields are exact', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required, [
|
|
'phase', 'plan', 'type', 'wave', 'depends_on', 'files_modified', 'autonomous', 'must_haves',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summary schema has exactly 6 required fields', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.summary.required.length, 6);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summary schema required fields are exact', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.summary.required, [
|
|
'phase', 'plan', 'subsystem', 'tags', 'duration', 'completed',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification schema has exactly 4 required fields', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.verification.required.length, 4);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification schema required fields are exact', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.verification.required, [
|
|
'phase', 'verified', 'status', 'score',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('four schemas exist: plan, plan-gap-closure, summary, verification (#2847)', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS).sort(),
|
|
['plan', 'plan-gap-closure', 'summary', 'verification']
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan includes phase field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required.includes('phase'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan includes must_haves field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required.includes('must_haves'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summary includes completed field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.summary.required.includes('completed'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification includes score field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.verification.required.includes('score'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan does not include score field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required.includes('score'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification does not include completed field', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.verification.required.includes('completed'));
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS['plan-gap-closure'] (#2847) ──────────────────────────
|
|
//
|
|
// #2847: --gaps does not load planner-gap-closure.md's requirement into the
|
|
// only machine-checked gate — gap-closure plans could pass validation
|
|
// without `gap_closure: true`, so a subsequent `--gaps-only` execute run
|
|
// silently matched zero plans. Fix: a dedicated schema that requires every
|
|
// 'plan' field plus `gap_closure`, kept separate so standard/reviews-mode
|
|
// plans (validated against 'plan', asserted unchanged above) are unaffected.
|
|
|
|
describe("FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS['plan-gap-closure'] (#2847)", () => {
|
|
// #2847 review: "has required field", "has exactly 9 required fields",
|
|
// "includes gap_closure field", and "is a superset of every plan-required
|
|
// field" were deleted here. Each was strictly subsumed by the deepEqual
|
|
// exact-list test below (a 9-element array that deepEquals a literal
|
|
// containing 'gap_closure' trivially has 9 elements, a 'required' key,
|
|
// and includes 'gap_closure' — none of those checks could ever fail
|
|
// independently of the deepEqual one). The "superset" test was additionally
|
|
// tautological on its own: plan-gap-closure.required is LITERALLY
|
|
// `[...PLAN_REQUIRED_FIELDS, 'gap_closure']` (src/frontmatter.cts), so it
|
|
// cannot fail while that spread exists, regardless of what the deepEqual
|
|
// test above catches.
|
|
test('plan-gap-closure schema required fields are exact', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS['plan-gap-closure'].required, [
|
|
'phase', 'plan', 'type', 'wave', 'depends_on', 'files_modified', 'autonomous', 'must_haves', 'gap_closure',
|
|
]);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan schema (standard/reviews mode) does NOT include gap_closure — unaffected by #2847 fix', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(!FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.required.includes('gap_closure'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// requiredValues (#2847 review finding): presence alone let `gap_closure: false`
|
|
// validate as valid:true — --gaps-only filters strictly on gap_closure === true,
|
|
// so that was a live reproduction of #2847's reported symptom, one value away.
|
|
test('plan-gap-closure requires the value "true" for gap_closure, not mere presence', () => {
|
|
assert.ok('requiredValues' in FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS['plan-gap-closure']);
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS['plan-gap-closure'].requiredValues.gap_closure, 'true');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plan schema has no requiredValues — every field is presence-only, unaffected by #2847 fix', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.plan.requiredValues, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summary and verification schemas have no requiredValues — presence-only, unaffected', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.summary.requiredValues, undefined);
|
|
assert.equal(FRONTMATTER_SCHEMAS.verification.requiredValues, undefined);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Tight branch / boundary tests ───────────────────────────────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: array length boundary (<=3 vs >3)', () => {
|
|
test('exactly 3 items: uses inline format', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ x: ['a', 'b', 'c'] });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'x: [a, b, c]');
|
|
assert.ok(!result.includes('\n - '));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('exactly 4 items: uses block format', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ x: ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] });
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - a'));
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - b'));
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - c'));
|
|
assert.ok(result.includes(' - d'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('exactly 1 item: uses inline format', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ x: ['only'] });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'x: [only]');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: array join length boundary (< 60)', () => {
|
|
test('3 items joining to exactly 59 chars uses inline', () => {
|
|
// 59 chars: 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb, ccccccccccccccccccc' = 60 chars, need 59
|
|
const a = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'; // 18
|
|
const b = 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'; // 18
|
|
const c = 'ccccccccccccccccccc'; // 19 => join = 18+18+19 + 4 (', ', ', ') = 18+2+18+2+19 = 59
|
|
const joined = [a, b, c].join(', ');
|
|
assert.equal(joined.length, 59);
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ x: [a, b, c] });
|
|
assert.equal(result, `x: [${joined}]`);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('3 items joining to exactly 60 chars uses block', () => {
|
|
// 'x' repeated: 19, 19, 18 = 56 + 4 = 60
|
|
const x = 'aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa'; // 19
|
|
const y = 'bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb'; // 19
|
|
const z = 'cccccccccccccccccc'; // 18 => 19+2+19+2+18 = 60
|
|
const joined2 = [x, y, z].join(', ');
|
|
assert.equal(joined2.length, 60);
|
|
const result2 = reconstructFrontmatter({ x: [x, y, z] });
|
|
// 60 is NOT < 60, so should use block format
|
|
assert.ok(result2.startsWith('x:\n - '), `Expected block format, got: ${result2}`);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: subarray length boundary', () => {
|
|
test('nested 3 items short uses inline', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { x: ['a', 'b', 'c'] } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'meta:\n x: [a, b, c]');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested 4 items uses block', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { x: ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd'] } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'meta:\n x:\n - a\n - b\n - c\n - d');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('spliceFrontmatter: exact delimiter handling', () => {
|
|
test('output always starts with ---', () => {
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter('', { k: 'v' });
|
|
assert.ok(result.startsWith('---\n'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('existing frontmatter: output uses LF delimiters', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\ntitle: Old\n---\nbody';
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter(input, { title: 'New' });
|
|
assert.ok(result.startsWith('---\ntitle: New\n---'));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('no existing frontmatter: body follows after double newline', () => {
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter('body', { title: 'T' });
|
|
assert.equal(result, '---\ntitle: T\n---\n\nbody');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('existing frontmatter: body immediately follows closing ---', () => {
|
|
const input = '---\ntitle: T\n---\nbody line';
|
|
const result = spliceFrontmatter(input, { k: 'v' });
|
|
assert.equal(result, '---\nk: v\n---\nbody line');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// spliceFrontmatter per-key identity preservation + fail-closed (#1572). These exercise
|
|
// sliceTopLevelFrontmatterSegments, the per-key deepEqual/preserve/regenerate/drop/append
|
|
// loop, and regenerateFrontmatterKey's "[object Object]" fail-closed directly.
|
|
describe('spliceFrontmatter: per-key preservation + fail-closed (#1572)', () => {
|
|
const PLAN = [
|
|
'---', 'phase: 1', 'wave: 1',
|
|
'must_haves:', ' artifacts:', ' - path: src/foo.ts', ' provides: the foo',
|
|
'---', '# body', '',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
|
|
test('unchanged object-list key keeps its original raw text (provides survives) when a scalar sibling changes', () => {
|
|
const parsed = extractFrontmatter(PLAN);
|
|
parsed.wave = '2'; // mutate one scalar; must_haves flattened-projection unchanged
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, parsed);
|
|
// must_haves.artifacts raw preserved verbatim (provides intact) — NOT regenerated.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(out, 'artifacts'), [{ path: 'src/foo.ts', provides: 'the foo' }]);
|
|
// the changed scalar WAS regenerated.
|
|
assert.ok(/^wave: 2$/m.test(out), 'changed scalar wave must be regenerated to 2');
|
|
// original ordering preserved (phase before wave before must_haves).
|
|
const phaseIdx = out.indexOf('phase:');
|
|
const waveIdx = out.indexOf('wave:');
|
|
const mhIdx = out.indexOf('must_haves:');
|
|
assert.ok(phaseIdx < waveIdx && waveIdx < mhIdx, 'top-level key order preserved');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a changed scalar regenerates only that key (no other key touched)', () => {
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, { ...extractFrontmatter(PLAN), phase: '9' });
|
|
assert.ok(/^phase: 9$/m.test(out));
|
|
// wave unchanged → still 1
|
|
assert.ok(/^wave: 1$/m.test(out));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('keys absent from newObj are dropped (key set is defined by newObj)', () => {
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, { phase: '1' });
|
|
assert.ok(/^phase: 1$/m.test(out));
|
|
assert.ok(!/wave:/.test(out), 'wave (absent from newObj) must be dropped');
|
|
assert.ok(!/must_haves:/.test(out), 'must_haves (absent from newObj) must be dropped');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('genuinely-new keys (not in original) are appended', () => {
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, { ...extractFrontmatter(PLAN), brand_new: 'x' });
|
|
assert.ok(/^brand_new: x$/m.test(out), 'new key appended');
|
|
// existing keys still present
|
|
assert.ok(/^phase: 1$/m.test(out));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('a nested indented block stays attached to its parent key (segment slicer respects indentation)', () => {
|
|
const multi = '---\na: 1\nmust_haves:\n artifacts:\n - path: x\n provides: y\nb: 2\n---\n';
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(multi, { ...extractFrontmatter(multi), b: '3' });
|
|
// The indented artifacts block must be preserved as part of must_haves (not split off),
|
|
// and b regenerated. proves the slicer grouped the nested lines under must_haves.
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parseMustHavesBlock(out, 'artifacts'), [{ path: 'x', provides: 'y' }]);
|
|
assert.ok(/^b: 3$/m.test(out));
|
|
assert.ok(/^a: 1$/m.test(out));
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('whole-document no-op returns the input verbatim', () => {
|
|
const out = spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, extractFrontmatter(PLAN));
|
|
assert.equal(out, PLAN);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('changing must_haves to an unrepresentable object-list fails closed (throws, no [object Object])', () => {
|
|
const newObj = { ...extractFrontmatter(PLAN), must_haves: { artifacts: [{ path: 'p', provides: 'q' }] } };
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => spliceFrontmatter(PLAN, newObj),
|
|
/cannot faithfully serialize key "must_haves"/,
|
|
'a changed object-list key must fail closed rather than emit [object Object]',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('no-frontmatter path also fails closed for an unrepresentable object-list value', () => {
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => spliceFrontmatter('body only', { must_haves: { artifacts: [{ path: 'p' }] } }),
|
|
/cannot faithfully serialize the requested frontmatter/,
|
|
'generating fresh frontmatter with an object-list must fail closed',
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: complex real-world documents', () => {
|
|
test('plan document', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'phase: 1',
|
|
'plan: my-plan',
|
|
'type: feature',
|
|
'wave: 1',
|
|
'depends_on: []',
|
|
'files_modified: []',
|
|
'autonomous: true',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' artifacts:',
|
|
' - path: src/foo.ts',
|
|
' provides: foo',
|
|
'---',
|
|
'# Plan body',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.equal(result.phase, '1');
|
|
assert.equal(result.plan, 'my-plan');
|
|
assert.equal(result.type, 'feature');
|
|
assert.equal(result.wave, '1');
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.depends_on));
|
|
assert.equal(result.depends_on.length, 0);
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(result.files_modified));
|
|
assert.equal(result.autonomous, 'true');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('summary document', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'phase: 2',
|
|
'plan: my-plan',
|
|
'subsystem: auth',
|
|
'tags: [security, backend]',
|
|
'duration: 120',
|
|
'completed: true',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.equal(result.phase, '2');
|
|
assert.equal(result.subsystem, 'auth');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result.tags, ['security', 'backend']);
|
|
assert.equal(result['duration'], '120');
|
|
assert.equal(result.completed, 'true');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification document', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'phase: 3',
|
|
'verified: true',
|
|
'status: pass',
|
|
'score: 95',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.equal(result.verified, 'true');
|
|
assert.equal(result.status, 'pass');
|
|
assert.equal(result.score, '95');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: round-trip', () => {
|
|
test('simple key-value round-trip', () => {
|
|
const original = { title: 'Hello', author: 'World' };
|
|
const reconstructed = reconstructFrontmatter(original);
|
|
const doc = `---\n${reconstructed}\n---\n`;
|
|
const parsed = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.title, 'Hello');
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.author, 'World');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('value with colon round-trips through quoting', () => {
|
|
const original = { url: 'http://example.com' };
|
|
const reconstructed = reconstructFrontmatter(original);
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructed, 'url: "http://example.com"');
|
|
const doc = `---\n${reconstructed}\n---\n`;
|
|
const parsed = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.url, 'http://example.com');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('array round-trip (inline)', () => {
|
|
const original = { tags: ['a', 'b', 'c'] };
|
|
const reconstructed = reconstructFrontmatter(original);
|
|
const doc = `---\n${reconstructed}\n---\n`;
|
|
const parsed = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(parsed.tags, ['a', 'b', 'c']);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty array round-trip', () => {
|
|
const original = { tags: [] };
|
|
const reconstructed = reconstructFrontmatter(original);
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructed, 'tags: []');
|
|
const doc = `---\n${reconstructed}\n---\n`;
|
|
const parsed = extractFrontmatter(doc);
|
|
assert.ok(Array.isArray(parsed.tags));
|
|
assert.equal(parsed.tags.length, 0);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// #1779 — reconstructFrontmatter must emit valid YAML for scalars and block-
|
|
// array items that carry an embedded `"`/`\`, a control char, an empty string,
|
|
// a leading YAML indicator, or surrounding whitespace. The project's own lossy
|
|
// `extractFrontmatter` tolerates the broken output, which is exactly why these
|
|
// assert round-trip through a STRICT parser (js-yaml) instead — the strict path
|
|
// fails on the unescaped/bare emission and passes only once every wrap site
|
|
// escapes and every unsafe-bare value is routed through the quoted form.
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: strict-YAML round-trip (#1779)', () => {
|
|
// Serialize via the production path, then load with a strict YAML parser.
|
|
const strictRoundTrip = (obj) => yaml.load(reconstructFrontmatter(obj));
|
|
|
|
test('top-level scalar with indicator + embedded quotes (the reported case)', () => {
|
|
const obj = { upstream: 'https://x (Tom; "Git. Ship. Done")' };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested scalar with indicator + embedded quotes', () => {
|
|
const obj = { meta: { note: 'see: "the docs"' } };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('top-level block-array item with indicator + embedded quotes', () => {
|
|
// 4 items forces block form (the inline `[a, b]` branch caps at 3).
|
|
const obj = { tags: ['a: "1"', 'b: "2"', 'c: "3"', 'd: "4"'] };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested block-array item with indicator + embedded quotes', () => {
|
|
const obj = { meta: { tags: ['a: "1"', 'b: "2"', 'c: "3"', 'd: "4"'] } };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('embedded backslash is escaped (not just quotes)', () => {
|
|
const obj = { path: 'a:\\b\\c "x"' };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('control chars in a wrapped value are escaped (newline, tab, NUL)', () => {
|
|
const obj = { note: 'line1: a\nline2\twith\x00nul' };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('CRLF round-trips (locks the \\r escape for Windows-authored values)', () => {
|
|
const obj = { note: 'line1: a\r\nline2' };
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip(obj), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('empty string round-trips as "" (bare `k:` would reload as null)', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: '' }), { k: '' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('embedded/leading quote with NO indicator still round-trips', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: '"x' }), { k: '"x' });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: "'leading single" }), { k: "'leading single" });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: 'say "hi" there' }), { k: 'say "hi" there' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('leading YAML indicators with no `:`/`#` still round-trip', () => {
|
|
for (const v of ['>x', '|x', '&anchor', '*alias', '!tag', '[flow', '{map', '%pct', '@reserved', '`tick']) {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: v }), { k: v }, `value ${JSON.stringify(v)}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('leading/trailing whitespace is preserved (bare would be trimmed)', () => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: ' leading' }), { k: ' leading' });
|
|
assert.deepEqual(strictRoundTrip({ k: 'trailing ' }), { k: 'trailing ' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('plain values without indicators are unaffected (no spurious quoting)', () => {
|
|
const obj = { name: 'simple-value', label: 'plain' };
|
|
assert.equal(reconstructFrontmatter(obj), 'name: simple-value\nlabel: plain');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(yaml.load(reconstructFrontmatter(obj)), obj);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('extractFrontmatter: boundary — dash at start of file', () => {
|
|
test('--- at byte 0 is treated as frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('---\nkey: val\n---\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, { key: 'val' });
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('content before --- means no frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter(' ---\nkey: val\n---\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, {});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('newline before --- means no frontmatter', () => {
|
|
const result = extractFrontmatter('\n---\nkey: val\n---\n');
|
|
assert.deepEqual(result, {});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: item accumulation', () => {
|
|
test('last item pushed after loop ends', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - only item\n---';
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths');
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(result[0], 'only item');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('items are pushed in order', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - first\n - second\n - third\n---';
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths');
|
|
assert.equal(result[0], 'first');
|
|
assert.equal(result[1], 'second');
|
|
assert.equal(result[2], 'third');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('three items total count', () => {
|
|
const doc = '---\nmust_haves:\n truths:\n - a\n - b\n - c\n---';
|
|
assert.equal(parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths').length, 3);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('parseMustHavesBlock: indent stopping logic', () => {
|
|
test('items after block ends at same/lower indent are not included', () => {
|
|
const doc = [
|
|
'---',
|
|
'must_haves:',
|
|
' truths:',
|
|
' - item one',
|
|
'other_key: val',
|
|
'---',
|
|
].join('\n');
|
|
const result = parseMustHavesBlock(doc, 'truths');
|
|
assert.equal(result.length, 1);
|
|
assert.equal(result[0], 'item one');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: deeply nested subsubval null/undefined', () => {
|
|
test('3rd level null subsubval skipped', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ top: { mid: { key: null } } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'top:\n mid:');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('reconstructFrontmatter: nested subval plain string', () => {
|
|
test('nested subval without special chars unquoted', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { name: 'plain' } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'meta:\n name: plain');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested subval with colon quoted', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { ref: 'type: value' } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'meta:\n ref: "type: value"');
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('nested subval with hash quoted', () => {
|
|
const result = reconstructFrontmatter({ meta: { tag: 'issue#42' } });
|
|
assert.equal(result, 'meta:\n tag: "issue#42"');
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// noOpObjectListSetError (#1660) — pure detection helper, unit-tested directly because the
|
|
// cmdFrontmatterSet path is not in Stryker's property/unit set.
|
|
describe('noOpObjectListSetError (#1660)', () => {
|
|
const ORIG = '---\nphase: 1\n---\n';
|
|
test('changed content (real update) → null', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG + 'x', { must_haves: 1 }), null);
|
|
});
|
|
test('scalar value no-op → null (idempotent scalar sets are fine)', () => {
|
|
for (const v of [1, 'str', true, 0, '']) assert.equal(noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG, v), null, `scalar ${JSON.stringify(v)}`);
|
|
});
|
|
test('scalar-array value no-op → null (scalar arrays round-trip faithfully)', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG, ['a', 'b']), null);
|
|
assert.equal(noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG, []), null);
|
|
});
|
|
test('null value no-op → null', () => {
|
|
assert.equal(noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG, null), null);
|
|
});
|
|
test('dict value no-op → error message naming the object-list round-trip limit', () => {
|
|
const msg = noOpObjectListSetError(ORIG, ORIG, { artifacts: [{ path: 'p' }] });
|
|
assert.equal(typeof msg, 'string');
|
|
assert.ok(msg.includes('had no effect'), msg);
|
|
assert.ok(msg.includes('object-list'), msg);
|
|
assert.ok(msg.includes('Edit the file directly'), msg);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|