Files
msd-core/.changeset
Michel Moreira 19b66c3ec8 fix(#4218): stop the orchestrator steering an executor that is still working (#4391)
* fix(#4218): stop the orchestrator steering an executor that is still working

An executor with recent RED/GREEN/REFACTOR commits and passing verification had
not yet written its SUMMARY because it was finishing closeout. The parent saw no
local OS test/build process, inferred an "idle tail", and sent "Finalize
immediately" into a working child; in CLI runs the same inference interrupted an
executor before GREEN, leaving a RED commit and an uncommitted edit.

The stall block said only "if no completion signal, no SUMMARY.md, and no
expected-branch commits appear for N minutes" — it never said what to do when
commits DO exist and only the SUMMARY is outstanding, never defined the
threshold as a period without progress rather than a total runtime, and never
ruled out a process listing as an idleness signal. Four rules close that:

- the threshold measures a period WITHOUT MEANINGFUL PROGRESS, from the last
  sign of progress, not from dispatch — a long verification tail is not a stall;
- commits + missing SUMMARY + recent activity resolves to KEEP WAITING, with
  steering, interrupting and re-dispatching each named and forbidden;
- urgency/finalization messages ("Finalize immediately" and family) are
  forbidden outright — they arrive mid-verification and truncate a correct run.
  The existing user-facing pause is the only sanctioned stop, and `kill and
  retry` is a clean restart, not a nudge;
- the absence of a local OS test/build process is NOT idleness: a native
  subagent runs in the runtime's own session, and an executor between two tool
  calls shows no process at all. Progress is judged only by the signals this
  workflow names.

Five prose-contract assertions in tests/execute-phase-wave.test.cjs, all red on
next.

* fix(#4218): extract the progress policy to a step fragment

CI's #1168 gate caught it: execute-phase.md sits 77 bytes under a frozen 93600
ceiling and the four rules added ~2.3 KB. "Extract, not bump" is the repo's
stated remedy, and this workflow already carries policy detail that way.

execute-phase/steps/executor-progress-policy.md owns the policy. The
worktree-recovery arm moved with it — `kill and switch to inline execution`
qualifies the stop this policy governs, so it belongs beside the rule about when
stopping is sanctioned at all, not stranded in the host. The #3212 recovery
OPTIONS stay in the host, where tests/config.test.cjs pins them.

The host keeps what must be read before the orchestrator acts: the verdict, the
threshold definition, and a pointer that fires before any message is sent to the
child. execute-phase.md is now 93475 bytes — 48 SMALLER than next.

* chore: add changeset for #4218

* chore(#4218): regenerate the inventory manifest for the new step fragment

docs/INVENTORY-MANIFEST.json is the authoritative per-file list behind
INVENTORY.md's `<workflow>/steps/*.md` row, so a new fragment has to appear
there or gen-inventory-manifest --check reds the lint-tests lane.

* chore(#4218): restore the issue ref on the allow-test-rule marker

ADR-456 requires a #NNN on a new exemption; the block rewrite that moved the
policy into the fragment dropped it.

* chore(#4218): regenerate the install-tree fixtures for the new step fragment

The fragment ships with the workflow, so every runtime's golden install tree
gains one path — gen:install-tree is the generator that owns those fixtures.

---------

Co-authored-by: Tom Boucher <trekkie@nomorestars.com>
2026-09-06 17:51:34 -04:00
..

Changeset Fragments

This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.

Why

Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.

See #2975 for the full rationale.

Adding a fragment

node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
  --type Fixed \
  --pr 1234 \
  --body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"

This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.

Format

---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.

Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.

Opting out

PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.

At release time

Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:

node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty

This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.

Archived fragments

.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.