* test: phase-dir prefix parity across creation paths (#3287 RED)
Add failing tests asserting that init.phase-op and init.plan-phase
expose expected_phase_dir with the project_code prefix when the phase
directory does not yet exist — matching the prefix applied by phase.add.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix(phase): unify phase-dir naming via shared getPhaseDirName helper (#3287)
Both init.phase-op (discuss-phase workflow) and init.plan-phase
(plan-phase workflow) now compute expected_phase_dir — the canonical
directory name including the project_code prefix when set — and expose
it in their JSON bundle.
Workflow fallback mkdir calls are updated to use ${expected_phase_dir}
instead of constructing the path from padded_phase + phase_slug, which
was missing the project_code prefix.
This eliminates the two-headed naming convention where phase.add/insert
produced XR-01-foundation/ while the first-touch paths produced
01-foundation/ for the same project.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* refactor(phase): apply project_code prefix in scaffold phase-dir (#3287)
Audit finding: phase.scaffold (CJS commands.cjs + SDK phase-lifecycle.ts)
also constructed phase dir names without project_code prefix.
Both implementations now read config.project_code and apply the same
prefix logic as phase.add/phase.insert.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* changeset: pr=3292 for #3287
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* docs(changelog): add entry for #3287 phase-dir prefix parity fix
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
90b33d050c