* feat(#2982): extend no-source-grep lint to catch var-binding readFileSync.includes() The base lint (scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs) only catches readFileSync(...).<text-method>() chained directly. The much more common var-binding form escapes it: const src = fs.readFileSync(p, 'utf8'); // 50 lines later if (src.includes('foo')) {} // ← still grep, lint missed it Scan of the test suite found ~141 files using this pattern. Implementation built TDD per #2982 with structured-IR assertions: scripts/lint-no-source-grep-extras.cjs - detectVarBindingViolations(src) — pure detector, two passes: pass 1 collects vars bound from readFileSync, pass 2 finds any <var>.<includes|startsWith|endsWith|match|search>( on those vars. - detectWrappedAssertOkMatch(src) — flags assert.ok(<expr>.match(...)) which escapes the assert.match rule. - VIOLATION enum exposes stable codes for tests to assert on. scripts/lint-no-source-grep.cjs - Wires the new detectors into the existing per-file check; one additional violation row per file with the first 3 sample tokens. tests/bug-2982-lint-var-binding.test.cjs - 13 tests, all assertions on typed VIOLATION enum / structured records. Covers all 5 text-match methods, multi-var, no-bind, string literal (must NOT trigger), wrapped assert.ok(.match), and assert.match (must NOT double-flag). Migration backlog (#2974 expanded scope): - 42 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product` (legitimate — they read .md/.json/.yml files whose deployed text IS the product) - 3 files annotated `// allow-test-rule: pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]` (read .cjs/.js source — clear migration debt) - 95 files annotated `pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]` with `Per-file review may reclassify as source-text-is-the-product during migration` (mixed — manual review under #2974) After this lands the lint reports 0 violations on main; new violations in PRs surface immediately. Closes #2982 Refs #2974 * test(#2982): fix truncated test name per CR The label ended with a bare '(' from a copy-paste mishap. Now reads 'does NOT flag .matchAll(...) — matchAll is not match, so assert.ok(.matchAll(...)) is not flagged'. * chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985 * chore(#2982): add changeset fragment for PR #2985
183 lines
7.2 KiB
JavaScript
183 lines
7.2 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: pending-migration-to-typed-ir [#2974]
|
|
// Tracked in #2974 for migration to typed-IR assertions per CONTRIBUTING.md
|
|
// "Prohibited: Raw Text Matching on Test Outputs". Per-file review may
|
|
// reclassify some entries as source-text-is-the-product during migration.
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Phase Researcher Application-Aware Tests (#1988)
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that gsd-phase-researcher maps capabilities to architectural
|
|
* tiers before diving into framework-specific research. Also validates
|
|
* that gsd-planner and gsd-plan-checker consume the Architectural
|
|
* Responsibility Map downstream.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
const AGENTS_DIR = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'agents');
|
|
const TEMPLATES_DIR = path.join(__dirname, '..', 'get-shit-done', 'templates');
|
|
|
|
// ─── Phase Researcher: Architectural Responsibility Mapping ─────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('phase-researcher: Architectural Responsibility Mapping', () => {
|
|
const researcherPath = path.join(AGENTS_DIR, 'gsd-phase-researcher.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(researcherPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('contains Architectural Responsibility Mapping step', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Architectural Responsibility Map'),
|
|
'gsd-phase-researcher.md must contain "Architectural Responsibility Map"'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('Architectural Responsibility Mapping step comes after Step 1 and before Step 2', () => {
|
|
const step1Pos = content.indexOf('## Step 1:');
|
|
// Look for the step heading specifically (not the output format section)
|
|
const stepARMPos = content.indexOf('## Step 1.5:');
|
|
const step2Pos = content.indexOf('## Step 2:');
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(step1Pos !== -1, 'Step 1 must exist');
|
|
assert.ok(stepARMPos !== -1, 'Step 1.5 Architectural Responsibility Mapping step must exist');
|
|
assert.ok(step2Pos !== -1, 'Step 2 must exist');
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepARMPos > step1Pos,
|
|
'Step 1.5 (Architectural Responsibility Mapping) must come after Step 1'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
stepARMPos < step2Pos,
|
|
'Step 1.5 (Architectural Responsibility Mapping) must come before Step 2'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('step is a pure reasoning step with no tool calls', () => {
|
|
// Extract the ARM section content (between the ARM heading and the next ## Step heading)
|
|
const armHeadingMatch = content.match(/## Step 1\.5[^\n]*Architectural Responsibility Map/);
|
|
assert.ok(armHeadingMatch, 'Must have a Step 1.5 heading for Architectural Responsibility Mapping');
|
|
|
|
const armStart = content.indexOf(armHeadingMatch[0]);
|
|
const nextStepMatch = content.indexOf('## Step 2:', armStart);
|
|
const armSection = content.substring(armStart, nextStepMatch);
|
|
|
|
// Should not contain tool invocation patterns
|
|
const toolPatterns = [
|
|
/```bash/,
|
|
/node "\$HOME/,
|
|
/gsd-tools\.cjs/,
|
|
/WebSearch/,
|
|
/Context7/,
|
|
/mcp__/,
|
|
];
|
|
|
|
for (const pattern of toolPatterns) {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!pattern.test(armSection),
|
|
`Architectural Responsibility Mapping step must be pure reasoning (no tool calls), but found: ${pattern}`
|
|
);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('mentions standard architectural tiers', () => {
|
|
const armStart = content.indexOf('Architectural Responsibility Map');
|
|
const nextStep = content.indexOf('## Step 2:', armStart);
|
|
const armSection = content.substring(armStart, nextStep);
|
|
|
|
// Should reference standard tiers
|
|
const tiers = ['browser', 'frontend', 'API', 'database'];
|
|
const foundTiers = tiers.filter(tier =>
|
|
armSection.toLowerCase().includes(tier.toLowerCase())
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
foundTiers.length >= 3,
|
|
`Must mention at least 3 standard architectural tiers, found: ${foundTiers.join(', ')}`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('specifies output format as a table in RESEARCH.md', () => {
|
|
const armStart = content.indexOf('Architectural Responsibility Map');
|
|
const nextStep = content.indexOf('## Step 2:', armStart);
|
|
const armSection = content.substring(armStart, nextStep);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
armSection.includes('|') && armSection.includes('Capability'),
|
|
'ARM step must specify a table output format with Capability column'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Planner: Architectural Responsibility Map Sanity Check ─────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('planner: Architectural Responsibility Map sanity check', () => {
|
|
const plannerPath = path.join(AGENTS_DIR, 'gsd-planner.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(plannerPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('references Architectural Responsibility Map', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Architectural Responsibility Map'),
|
|
'gsd-planner.md must reference the Architectural Responsibility Map'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('includes sanity check against the map', () => {
|
|
// Must mention checking/verifying plan tasks against the responsibility map
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('sanity check') || content.includes('sanity-check'),
|
|
'gsd-planner.md must include a sanity check against the Architectural Responsibility Map'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Plan Checker: Architectural Tier Verification Dimension ────────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('plan-checker: Architectural Tier verification dimension', () => {
|
|
const checkerPath = path.join(AGENTS_DIR, 'gsd-plan-checker.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(checkerPath, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('has verification dimension for architectural tier', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Architectural Responsibility Map') ||
|
|
content.includes('Architectural Tier'),
|
|
'gsd-plan-checker.md must have a verification dimension for architectural tier mapping'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('verification dimension checks plans against the map', () => {
|
|
// Should have a dimension that references tier/responsibility checking
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('tier owner') || content.includes('tier mismatch') || content.includes('responsibility map'),
|
|
'plan-checker verification dimension must check for tier mismatches against the responsibility map'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// ─── Research Template: Architectural Responsibility Map Section ─────────────
|
|
|
|
describe('research template: Architectural Responsibility Map section', () => {
|
|
const templatePath = path.join(TEMPLATES_DIR, 'research.md');
|
|
const content = fs.readFileSync(templatePath, 'utf-8');
|
|
|
|
test('mentions Architectural Responsibility Map section', () => {
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
content.includes('Architectural Responsibility Map'),
|
|
'Research template must include an Architectural Responsibility Map section'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('template includes tier table format', () => {
|
|
const armStart = content.indexOf('Architectural Responsibility Map');
|
|
assert.ok(armStart !== -1, 'ARM section must exist');
|
|
|
|
const sectionEnd = content.indexOf('##', armStart + 10);
|
|
const section = content.substring(armStart, sectionEnd !== -1 ? sectionEnd : armStart + 500);
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
section.includes('|') && (section.includes('Tier') || section.includes('tier')),
|
|
'Research template ARM section must include a table format with Tier column'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|