Files
msd-core/docs/ko-KR/how-to/execute-a-phase.md
Tom Boucher 5d4c98cde7 chore(#4729): guard the retired-runtime name, and finish the locale residue (#4753)
* chore(#4729): guard the retired-runtime name, and finish the locale residue

Phase 5 of 5 on epic #4709, and the phase that closes it. Two parts, one
concern: make the tree clean, and keep it clean. The guard is inert until the
tree is clean, and shipping the cleanup without the guard is the
one-bug-at-a-time pattern this epic exists to end.

WHY A GUARD, AND WHY LAST

Nothing in CI answered "does any shipped surface still present a retired
runtime as live?", and the two gates that look like they should cannot.
checkReviewerDocsParity is one-directional: it asserts the PRESENCE of every
declared reviewer flag and never the ABSENCE of a retired one, so in #4716 it
reported 0 violations while all four locale mirrors still documented --gemini
as a live reviewer flag, with usage examples. And
tests/gemini-runtime-removed.test.cjs is scoped by construction - its own
docblock limits it to the installer CLI contract and the runtime-name-policy
exports; it never reads docs/**, gsd-core/workflows/**, commands/** or
agents/**. Every extension to it during this epic was a hand-added assertion
for a surface somebody had already noticed.

A guard written earlier would have red-flagged the very references phases
1b-4b were removing, which is why it lands last.

PART A - THE RESIDUE, INCLUDING WORK I SHIPPED INCOMPLETE

Each site was judged against its ENGLISH counterpart, not on its own:

  README.{ja-JP,ko-KR,pt-BR,zh-CN}.md :9 :24 :46  English README.md has ZERO
                                                  occurrences -> substituted
                                                  "Antigravity CLI, Kimi CLI"
  how-to/execute-a-phase.md:88  x4 locales        fixed in #4728 -> substitute
  how-to/verify-and-ship.md:89  x4 locales        fixed in #4728 -> substitute
  FEATURES.md cross-AI CLI list                   :1419 no Gemini -> DELETE
  FEATURES.md REQ-MULTI-RT-01                     :1709 -> substitute
  FEATURES.md REQ-SKILLS-03                       :1952 -> rewrite
  FEATURES.md REQ-QUOTA-02                        :3256 deleted upstream -> delete
  VERSIONING.md:133                               stale manifest -> see below

The twelve README occurrences were an adversarial reviewer's BLOCKER, and the
reason they survived my own sweep is structural: root-level *.md was outside
the guard's scan set, so the repo's most-read runtime-advertising surface was
invisible to the guard meant to police it. :46 is a live installer-runtime
claim - it tells the reader the installer will offer a runtime that no longer
exists. Checked for the duplicate-name trap before substituting: neither
Antigravity nor Kimi appears anywhere in those four files.

Two of these are mine to own: I fixed the ENGLISH execute-a-phase.md and
verify-and-ship.md in #4728 and left all four mirrors behind. Unfinished work,
not a deferral.

Two more show why "substitute Gemini -> Antigravity" is the wrong default: in
the cross-AI list and REQ-QUOTA-02 English DELETES the name, because
Antigravity was already in the list or the classifier had dropped it.
Substituting would have duplicated a name - the identical trap
ARCHITECTURE.md:24 set in #4728, where English holds Kimi CLI in that slot.

VERSIONING.md:133 is a different and worse defect than translation lag. Under
"Manifest Version Sync" it listed gemini-extension.json as a version-synced
manifest. That file is ABSENT from the repo, and
scripts/sync-manifest-versions.cjs says so in its own comment - "#1928:
gemini-extension.json was removed with the gemini runtime ... it is no longer
a registered manifest" - while VERSIONED_MANIFESTS holds plugin.json,
marketplace.json and vscode/package.json. So the doc named a manifest that
does not exist AND omitted the one that replaced it. Both fixed, verified
against the owning code rather than inferred from the name. The replacement
bullet cites #1942, the issue that actually registered vscode/package.json,
matching the convention of its neighbours.

pt-BR/FEATURES.md is a 77-line stub genuinely lacking two sites, and ko-KR has
no REQ-QUOTA-02 line. Skipped and recorded, never invented.

PART B - THE GUARD

scripts/lint-retired-runtime-name.cjs, modelled on
scripts/lint-legacy-dir-name.cjs - the repo's own precedent for this problem
shape (forbid a retired token, allowlist frozen content, self-exempt via a
split literal, a REPO_ROOT test seam, lib/cli-exit.cjs, exit 0/1).

Case sensitivity IS the mechanism, not an accident. The naive guard - "the
string gemini must not appear" - is WRONG, not merely noisy: that string is
load-bearing across Antigravity's real on-disk contract. A case-sensitive,
standalone, capitalised name works because every legitimate reference is
spelled differently and therefore cannot match: lowercase config homes
(~/.gemini/antigravity, ~/.gemini/config, #3738), lowercase hyphenated model
ids (gemini-2.5-flash-lite), uppercase env vars (GEMINI_API_KEY), and
GEMINI.md. Table-driven, so the next retired runtime costs one row.

THE ALLOWLIST IS THE ENTIRE RISK SURFACE, so it is three tiers, not one. Two
rounds of isolated adversarial review reshaped it; both are recorded in
.gsd/bug/chore-4729-gemini-drift-guard/60-review.json.

ROUND 2 FOUND ONE ROOT CAUSE BEHIND TWO SEPARATE HOLES, and it was mine: both
Tier-1 rules treated the ABSENCE of a runtime word as a GRANT. A veto list can
never be complete, so "no runtime word found" silently exempted every phrasing
nobody had enumerated. Demonstrated: `The installer now offers Gemini 3.`,
`Supported agents include Gemini 3, Kimi, and Cursor.` and three more exited 0,
as did `Suportamos Gemini, no estilo padrao, como runtime de instalacao.` and
`Gemini 兼容,并且是受支持的运行时之一。`, both of which literally contain `runtime`
or `运行时`. The fix was to stop enumerating exceptions and invert the evidence
direction:

  Tier 1(a) - the hook DIALECT Antigravity inherits. Position is
  language-dependent and MEASURED: en Gemini-style/-compatible, ja Gemini
  スタイル, ko Gemini 스타일/호환, zh Gemini 风格 / 与 Gemini 兼容的, pt "no estilo
  Gemini" / "compatível com Gemini" where the qualifier PRECEDES the name. The
  marker must now form an ADJACENT COMPOUND with the name, not merely sit in a
  +/-24-character window - that window let `| Antigravity | Gemini-style hooks
  | Gemini support is live |` exit 0, one legitimate reference licensing a
  fresh live claim 21 characters later. The runtime-word veto is now
  LINE-GLOBAL. Ten real lines legitimately pair a dialect compound with a
  runtime word (`~/.gemini/antigravity-cli` in a table cell, "runtime files"
  in the same sentence); each is an explicit pin rather than a reason to
  loosen the veto for everyone. Measured: widening it surfaced exactly those
  ten and no others.

  Tier 1(b) - the provider/model axis. A version optionally followed by a
  qualifier, including full-width digits and CJK punctuation, AND positive
  model-axis evidence on the line, AND no runtime word. The positive
  requirement is the part that matters: all eight real model-axis lines in the
  repo name a model explicitly, so requiring it costs nothing on the real tree
  while flagging every laundering attempt. It is also the honest resolution of
  the agent/target tension below - rather than guess at an exhaustive veto
  list, stop treating an empty veto as evidence.

  Tier 2 - PINNED OCCURRENCES, now SPAN-SCOPED. A pin excuses only a match
  falling INSIDE an occurrence of its own snippet. Line-level containment let
  `Known provider menu update: Gemini CLI is once again a selectable GSD
  runtime.` and `Install target: Google (Gemini) - choose Gemini CLI as your
  GSD runtime.` both exit 0, because a short snippet elsewhere on the line
  pre-approved a brand-new claim. Span scoping makes short snippets safe:
  `Google (Gemini)` can only ever excuse the match inside those 15 characters.
  A LOAD-TIME validator now requires every pin to contain a retired name, and
  it immediately caught five of MY OWN pins whose snippets sat BESIDE the name
  rather than covering it - each would have shipped permanently inert and
  permanently reported stale. All pins were then reconciled in one pass.

  A pin is also marked used by PRESENCE on the line now, rather than only on
  the Tier-2 branch. Previously a pinned line that a general rule also matched
  never marked its pin used, producing a provably FALSE "no line matches
  pinned snippet" whose printed remedy told the maintainer to delete a pin
  that was still needed.

  Tier 3 - blanket trust, and a new occurrence inside it IS invisible.
  CHANGELOG.md and `.changeset/` - the rendered changelog and its source, one
  surface - plus six append-only directories. All 21 `.changeset/` hits were
  measured to be fragments DESCRIBING the retirement or a fix to it, 464 of
  them under archived/; a fragment can only describe what already shipped and
  is deleted at release, so pinning them would be friction with no signal. The
  cost is stated in the guard's own header rather than hidden.

THE SCAN SET IS NOW EVERY TRACKED *.md FILE (1165 read). The original prefix
list left `.github/`, `.changeset/`, `capabilities/`, `playbooks/` and
`references/` invisible - and `.changeset/*.md` renders into CHANGELOG.md, so a
live claim introduced there was invisible at BOTH ends.

The escape hatch must now carry a justification
(`gsd-allow-retired-runtime-name: <reason>`). A bare marker is rejected: it is
checked first, excuses the whole line, and the failure message advertises it,
so an unexplained one is indistinguishable from a silenced defect.

Plus an anti-vacuity floor counting files actually READ, not files listed - a
candidate count stays healthy-looking even if every read failed.

A FALSE NEGATIVE I INTRODUCED, AND CLOSED

The model-display escape began as a blanket /^ \d/ - "space then a digit" -
which also matched "Install for Gemini 2.5 CLI as a supported runtime.",
laundering a genuine stale-runtime claim through an attached version number.

That was the THIRD appearance of one failure shape in this epic: an exclusion
added to suppress false positives creating a false negative. #4716's sweep
excluded lines matching gemini-[0-9] to spare Google's model ids, and thereby
hid a stale review.models.gemini row whose example value was "gemini-2.5-pro"
ON THE SAME LINE. Round 2 then produced the FOURTH and FIFTH instances, which
is why the fix this time was to invert the rule's evidence direction rather
than to enumerate more exceptions.

The veto is word-anchored for Latin terms - unanchored, case-insensitive "CLI"
matched inside "client" and would have vetoed legitimate model lists - and raw
for CJK terms, where \b is ASCII-word-based and would never fire beside an
ideograph, so anchoring them would silently disable the veto in ja/ko/zh.
"agent" and "target" were deliberately left OUT: both occur throughout
ordinary prose ("AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini 2.5 Pro)"), so
vetoing on them would red correct content instead of catching runtime claims.
The reasoning is in the guard's comment, not just the omission - and Tier
1(b)'s positive-evidence requirement is what makes that omission safe, since
the rule no longer depends on the veto list being complete.

COVERAGE

tests/lint-retired-runtime-name.test.cjs drives the guard through its
GSD_LINT_RETIRED_RUNTIME_REPO_ROOT seam against fixture repos, mirroring
tests/lint-legacy-dir-name.test.cjs. A guard never observed failing is not a
guard, and this epic already shipped one that was vacuous for 2 of its 5
files, so properties are paired against BOTH failure modes - too broad
silently absorbs a future defect, too narrow reds on legitimate content. Floor
boundaries are covered at 149/150/151.

The round-2 reviewer's sharpest point was about that claim, and it was right:
the first matrix's pairing was "true of the properties chosen, not of the
predicate's actual surface" - not one of its twenty properties could see the
dialect adjacency hole, a non-adjacent runtime word, pin shadowing, or an
over-broad pin colliding with a new line. Every one of those is now a
committed regression using the reviewer's own attack line verbatim, and the
local fixture harness went from 14 cases to 35 (PASS=35 FAIL=0).

That harness earned a finding of its own. Its first run reported PASS=2
FAIL=12 with BOTH passes VACUOUS: `git add` has no -q flag on this build, so
nothing staged, every fixture hit the empty-walk error path, and the two
checks that assert an ABSENCE passed off that error path rather than off real
guard logic. A staging failure is now fatal and every absence-asserting check
first proves the walk ran and the expected violation was flagged. Later, one
case failed because its fixture supplied only one of a pinned file's two
approved lines, so the stale-pin check fired correctly - the expectation was
wrong, not the guard. Telling those two apart is the whole value of running a
matrix rather than reasoning about one.

On the two orthogonal reviews: the isolated adversarial pass executed a great
deal of code, across two rounds, against its own fixture repos. The security
pass did NOT - it self-discloses that it verified by reading only, because
node --test is hard-blocked here. Saying so plainly, because "two orthogonal
reviews" without that caveat overstates what the second one established. It
also raised, and I cleared by measurement, a concern that importing
escapeRegex from a gitignored build artifact would break lint:ci on an unbuilt
clone: six other tracked scripts already require that exact path, three of
them already in lint:ci, and .github/workflows/test.yml:192-193 runs
`npm run build:lib` immediately before it for exactly this reason.

Part A has no new test deliberately - those edits are covered by the guard
itself inside lint:ci, and a separate per-locale assertion would duplicate it
and then drift from it. The one exception is the root README case, which IS
pinned: that residue was invisible to the guard rather than merely unasserted,
so the fix is a scan-set change and needs its own regression test.

No mode-bit read-failure fixture was added on purpose: the benches run as
root, where chmod-based IO injection is vacuous, so such a test would assert
nothing.

The test's fixture helpers write throwaway docs/ paths, which trips
lint-docs-guard-registration's reader-name heuristic. Resolved the way that
lint documents - a header `// docs-guard-exempt:` marker plus a baseline entry
- because the fixtures only WRITE scratch data and never read shipped docs;
the baseline was re-confirmed, not merely extended, each time locale and
adversarial fixtures were added. scripts/lib/macos-conformance-tier.generated.cjs
regenerated through its own --write path, since a new test file changes the
count lint:generated-sync reads.

Fixes #4729

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* chore(#4729): backfill changeset PR number (#4753)

---------

Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 20:50:26 -04:00

4.0 KiB

페이즈를 실행하는 방법

목표: 기획된 페이즈를 웨이브 기반 병렬 실행으로 처리하고 각 계획을 원자적 git 커밋으로 완료합니다.

전제 조건: 페이즈에 최소 하나의 PLAN.md 파일이 있어야 합니다. 기획이 아직 완료되지 않았다면 먼저 /gsd-plan-phase N을 실행하세요 — 페이즈 기획을 참고하세요.


전체 페이즈 실행

/gsd-execute-phase 1

GSD는 페이즈의 계획 파일을 읽고 의존성 웨이브로 그룹화한 후 계획당 새 실행자 에이전트를 실행합니다. 각 실행자는 다음 웨이브가 시작되기 전에 작업을 원자적으로 커밋합니다.

에이전트가 실행되기 전에 GSD는 웨이브 테이블을 출력합니다:

## Execution Plan

Phase 1: Core middleware — 3 plans across 2 wave(s)

| Wave | Plans          | What it builds            |
|------|----------------|---------------------------|
| 1    | 01-01, 01-02   | Core validation function  |
| 2    | 01-03          | Express middleware wrapper |

웨이브 1 계획은 병렬로 실행됩니다(각각 독립된 git 워크트리에서). 웨이브 2는 모든 웨이브 1 커밋이 병합될 때까지 기다립니다.

기본 에이전트 조정 모델에 대해서는 멀티 에이전트 오케스트레이션을 참고하세요.


단일 웨이브 실행

예를 들어 웨이브 2로 넘어가기 전 웨이브 1 출력을 검사하고 싶은 경우 --wave N을 사용하세요:

/gsd-execute-phase 1 --wave 2

GSD는 웨이브 2 계획만 실행합니다. 먼저 이전 웨이브가 완료되었는지 확인하며, 웨이브 1 계획이 아직 미완료인 경우 이전 웨이브를 먼저 완료하도록 알립니다.


중단된 실행 재개

실행이 도중에 중단된 경우(할당량 오류, 네트워크 끊김, 세션 충돌 등) 웨이브 레벨 진행 상황은 보존됩니다. GSD는 각 계획의 SUMMARY.md 파일을 확인합니다. 이미 파일이 있는 계획은 재실행 시 자동으로 건너뜁니다:

/gsd-execute-phase 1

GSD는 SUMMARY.md가 이미 존재하는 계획을 건너뛰고 첫 번째 미완료 계획에서 재개합니다.

커밋은 존재하지만 SUMMARY.md가 없는 경우(실행자가 커밋했지만 세션이 종료되기 전 요약을 작성하지 못한 경우), GSD는 안전 재개 게이트를 표시하고 세 가지 옵션을 제공합니다:

  • 수동으로 마무리 — 커밋을 검사하고 SUMMARY.md를 작성한 후 재실행
  • 처음부터 재실행 — 부분 커밋을 되돌리거나 대체한 후 새 실행자 실행
  • 표시하고 건너뛰기 — 명시적 확인 하에 이상을 기록하고 진행

체계적인 실패 진단에 대해서는 실패한 실행 디버그를 참고하세요.


출력 위치

모든 웨이브가 완료되면 페이즈 디렉터리에 다음이 포함됩니다:

.planning/phases/01-<name>/
  01-01-SUMMARY.md    # 계획 01이 구축한 것, 핵심 파일, 편차
  01-02-SUMMARY.md
  01-03-SUMMARY.md
  VERIFICATION.md     # 요구 사항별 통과/실패 상태

STATE.md와 ROADMAP.md는 모든 웨이브가 완료되면 자동으로 업데이트됩니다. VERIFICATION.md는 페이즈가 완전히 완료된 경우에만 작성됩니다.

Git 히스토리에는 각 실행자의 태스크당 커밋 하나와 오케스트레이터의 추적 커밋이 표시됩니다.


크로스 AI 실행

workflow.cross_ai_command에 설정된 외부 AI CLI(Codex, Antigravity 등)에 실행을 위임하려면:

/gsd-execute-phase 2 --cross-ai

설정에 크로스 AI가 활성화된 경우에도 로컬 실행을 강제하려면:

/gsd-execute-phase 2 --no-cross-ai

관련 문서