* test(#4051): pin freeform routing specificity contract in do.md * fix(#4051): order freeform routing specific-first, confirm before dispatch, argument-aware forwarding * fix(#4051): regenerate FEATURES.md, satisfy docs-guard on new routing test Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: do.md — deliberate growth: specific-first routing table (code-review, plan review, ui-review, secure-phase, audit, docs-update, phase CRUD rows), a REQ-DO-03 confirm step, and argument-hint-aware dispatch. * chore(#4051): fold regression into non-bug-prefixed test filename per lint-regression-test-names * fix(#4051): review fixes — em-dash description style, split audit-fix route * chore(#4051): sync skill mirrors of execute-phase/phase descriptions * chore(#4051): add changeset (pr backfill to follow) * chore(#4051): backfill PR 4289 in changeset --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
201 lines
9.0 KiB
JavaScript
201 lines
9.0 KiB
JavaScript
// allow-test-rule: source-text-is-the-product (see #4051)
|
|
// Workflow .md and command .md files — their text IS what the runtime loads.
|
|
// Testing text content tests the deployed contract. Per CONTRIBUTING.md
|
|
// exception matrix.
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* GSD Tools Tests - #4051 freeform routing specificity contract
|
|
*
|
|
* Validates that the `/gsd:progress --do` dispatcher workflow
|
|
* (gsd-core/workflows/do.md):
|
|
* 1. Orders specific routing rules BEFORE the generic rules they shadow
|
|
* (brownfield onboarding before greenfield "set up"; spike/sketch
|
|
* wrap-up before generic spike/sketch).
|
|
* 2. Routes existing command families distinctly: code review, docs
|
|
* update, plan review, audit, UI review, security, SDD phase
|
|
* execution, and multi-phase (roadmap phase CRUD) management.
|
|
* 3. Confirms the displayed route before dispatch (REQ-DO-03 of the
|
|
* freeform-routing feature requirements), with a TEXT_MODE equivalent.
|
|
* 4. Forwards only arguments the selected command accepts.
|
|
*
|
|
* Also validates that the command frontmatter descriptions distinguish
|
|
* SDD execution (execute-phase) from multi-phase coordination (phase).
|
|
*
|
|
* Negative-space guard: generic fallback routes (greenfield setup, new
|
|
* spikes/sketches, verify-work quality concerns, debug, quick) MUST keep
|
|
* existing after the specific rows — this fix must not over-suppress.
|
|
*
|
|
* Closes: #4051
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
const { test, describe } = require('node:test');
|
|
const assert = require('node:assert/strict');
|
|
const fs = require('fs');
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
|
|
describe('#4051 freeform routing specificity', () => {
|
|
const repoRoot = path.join(__dirname, '..');
|
|
const doMd = () => fs.readFileSync(path.join(repoRoot, 'gsd-core', 'workflows', 'do.md'), 'utf8');
|
|
const commandMd = (name) =>
|
|
fs.readFileSync(path.join(repoRoot, 'commands', 'gsd', `${name}.md`), 'utf8');
|
|
|
|
test('do.md orders specific routes before the generic rules they shadow', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
|
|
// Specific brownfield onboarding BEFORE generic greenfield "set up" —
|
|
// "set up this existing codebase" must not first-match the greenfield row.
|
|
const onboardIdx = content.indexOf('/gsd:onboard');
|
|
const newProjectIdx = content.indexOf('/gsd:new-project');
|
|
assert.ok(onboardIdx > -1, 'do.md must route to /gsd:onboard');
|
|
assert.ok(newProjectIdx > -1, 'do.md must route to /gsd:new-project');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
onboardIdx < newProjectIdx,
|
|
'the brownfield onboarding (/gsd:onboard) rule must precede the greenfield (/gsd:new-project) "set up" rule so "set up this existing codebase" matches onboarding first'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Spike/sketch wrap-up BEFORE the generic spike/sketch rows —
|
|
// "wrap up the spike findings" must not first-match "start a new spike".
|
|
const spikeWrapIdx = content.indexOf('/gsd:spike --wrap-up');
|
|
const sketchWrapIdx = content.indexOf('/gsd:sketch --wrap-up');
|
|
assert.ok(spikeWrapIdx > -1, 'do.md must route spike wrap-up to /gsd:spike --wrap-up');
|
|
assert.ok(sketchWrapIdx > -1, 'do.md must route sketch wrap-up to /gsd:sketch --wrap-up');
|
|
const genericSpikeIdx = content.indexOf('| `/gsd:spike` |');
|
|
const genericSketchIdx = content.indexOf('| `/gsd:sketch` |');
|
|
assert.ok(genericSpikeIdx > -1, 'do.md must keep the generic /gsd:spike route');
|
|
assert.ok(genericSketchIdx > -1, 'do.md must keep the generic /gsd:sketch route');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
spikeWrapIdx < genericSpikeIdx,
|
|
'the spike wrap-up rule must precede the generic spike rule'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
sketchWrapIdx < genericSketchIdx,
|
|
'the sketch wrap-up rule must precede the generic sketch rule'
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Source review must be routable to /gsd:code-review, not only the
|
|
// generic verify-work fallback.
|
|
const codeReviewIdx = content.indexOf('/gsd:code-review');
|
|
const verifyWorkIdx = content.indexOf('| `/gsd:verify-work` |');
|
|
assert.ok(codeReviewIdx > -1, 'do.md must route source review to /gsd:code-review');
|
|
assert.ok(verifyWorkIdx > -1, 'do.md must keep the generic /gsd:verify-work route');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
codeReviewIdx < verifyWorkIdx,
|
|
'the source code review rule must precede the generic verify-work quality rule'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('do.md routes existing command families distinctly', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
const requiredRoutes = [
|
|
['/gsd:onboard', 'brownfield onboarding'],
|
|
['/gsd:code-review', 'source code review'],
|
|
['/gsd:review', 'plan review (cross-AI peer review)'],
|
|
['/gsd:docs-update', 'documentation update'],
|
|
['/gsd:audit-milestone', 'milestone audit'],
|
|
['/gsd:audit-fix', 'autonomous audit-to-fix pass'],
|
|
['/gsd:ui-review', 'UI review'],
|
|
['/gsd:secure-phase', 'security verification'],
|
|
['/gsd:execute-phase', 'SDD phase execution'],
|
|
['/gsd:phase', 'multi-phase (roadmap CRUD) management'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const [route, family] of requiredRoutes) {
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes(route), `do.md routing table must cover ${family} via ${route}`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('do.md confirms the route before dispatch (REQ-DO-03)', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
const displayIdx = content.indexOf('<step name="display">');
|
|
const confirmIdx = content.indexOf('<step name="confirm">');
|
|
const dispatchIdx = content.indexOf('<step name="dispatch">');
|
|
assert.ok(displayIdx > -1, 'do.md must have a display step');
|
|
assert.ok(dispatchIdx > -1, 'do.md must have a dispatch step');
|
|
assert.ok(confirmIdx > -1, 'do.md must have a confirm step (REQ-DO-03: confirm before executing)');
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
displayIdx < confirmIdx && confirmIdx < dispatchIdx,
|
|
'the confirm step must sit between display and dispatch'
|
|
);
|
|
const confirmSlice = content.slice(confirmIdx, dispatchIdx);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/AskUserQuestion/.test(confirmSlice),
|
|
'the confirm step must ask via AskUserQuestion'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/TEXT_MODE/.test(confirmSlice),
|
|
'the confirm step must provide a TEXT_MODE numbered-list equivalent'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/proceed|dispatch/i.test(confirmSlice) && /cancel|stop/i.test(confirmSlice),
|
|
'the confirm step must offer proceed and cancel choices'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('do.md forwards only arguments the selected command accepts', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
const dispatchIdx = content.indexOf('<step name="dispatch">');
|
|
assert.ok(dispatchIdx > -1, 'do.md must have a dispatch step');
|
|
const dispatchSlice = content.slice(dispatchIdx);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/argument-hint|accepted argument/i.test(dispatchSlice),
|
|
'the dispatch step must derive arguments from the target command argument-hint / accepted arguments'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!/passing \$ARGUMENTS as args/.test(dispatchSlice),
|
|
'the dispatch step must not forward $ARGUMENTS wholesale'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/freeform task description|freeform description/i.test(dispatchSlice),
|
|
'the dispatch step must carve out commands that explicitly accept a freeform task description'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('command descriptions distinguish SDD execution and multi-phase coordination', () => {
|
|
const executePhase = commandMd('execute-phase');
|
|
const executeDesc = /description:\s*(.+)/.exec(executePhase)?.[1] ?? '';
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/SDD|spec-driven|specification-driven/i.test(executeDesc) && /wave|parallel|dependency/i.test(executeDesc),
|
|
`execute-phase description must name SDD/spec-driven dependency-aware execution, got: "${executeDesc}"`
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
const phase = commandMd('phase');
|
|
const phaseDesc = /description:\s*(.+)/.exec(phase)?.[1] ?? '';
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/multi-phase|phase management|add, insert, remove, or edit phases/i.test(phaseDesc),
|
|
`phase description must name multi-phase management, got: "${phaseDesc}"`
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('do.md keeps generic fallback routes dispatching (no over-suppression)', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
const genericRoutes = [
|
|
['| `/gsd:new-project` |', 'greenfield project setup'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:spike` |', 'new spike'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:sketch` |', 'new sketch'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:verify-work` |', 'generic quality concern fallback'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:debug` |', 'bug investigation'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:quick` |', 'small actionable task'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:explore` |', 'research / how-does-X-work'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:progress` |', 'status check'],
|
|
['| `/gsd:capture` |', 'note capture'],
|
|
];
|
|
for (const [marker, family] of genericRoutes) {
|
|
assert.ok(content.includes(marker), `do.md must keep routing ${family} (${marker})`);
|
|
}
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
test('do.md success criteria require confirmation and argument-aware dispatch', () => {
|
|
const content = doMd();
|
|
const criteriaIdx = content.indexOf('<success_criteria>');
|
|
assert.ok(criteriaIdx > -1, 'do.md must have success criteria');
|
|
const criteria = content.slice(criteriaIdx);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/confirm/i.test(criteria),
|
|
'success criteria must require confirming the route before dispatch'
|
|
);
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
/argument/i.test(criteria),
|
|
'success criteria must require argument-aware dispatch'
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|