23e6d49929
* test(#3233): zero plans (0/0) is a no-op; plans-but-none-done still writes 0% cmdStateUpdateProgress mapped 0/0 through clampPercent to 0% and rewrote the shipped Progress record after milestone close. Replace the stale 'handles zero plans gracefully' test (which asserted the buggy percent:0) with a #3233 no-op regression (100% record preserved, updated:false), and add a negative-space guard: plans exist but none done must still write a legitimate 0%. RED — fails on next; fix follows. * fix(#3233): no-op state update-progress when the milestone scan finds zero plans cmdStateUpdateProgress mapped 0/0 through clampPercent to 0% and unconditionally rewrote the body Progress line, so after /gsd-complete-milestone archived the phases (.planning/phases/ empty, scope COMPLETE) a routine update-progress run destroyed the shipped record ([██████████] 100% → [░░░░░░░░░░] 0%). Add an early-return no-op when totalPlans === 0 — mirroring the established scope-withholding no-op (stderr WARNING + {updated:false, reason}) and computeProgressPercent's null-for-empty contract ('nothing to measure' ≠ '0% done'). The legitimate 0% case (plans exist, none summarized) is unaffected: totalPlans > 0 reaches clampPercent(0, N>0) = 0 and writes 0% as before. * test(#3233): unshadow 'Progress field missing' — clear the zero-plans guard The new totalPlans===0 no-op guard fires before the 'Progress field not found' branch, so the existing 'returns error when Progress field missing' test (no phase dirs → 0 plans) was passing for the wrong reason and that branch lost coverage. Give that test a phase dir + PLAN so totalPlans > 0 clears the guard and it reaches the branch it is named for. (Isolated review finding.) * chore(#3233): add changeset fragment * chore(#3233): backfill changeset PR number (#3375) --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local>
Changeset Fragments
This directory holds per-PR CHANGELOG fragments. Every PR with user-facing changes drops one (or more) <random-name>.md files here describing its CHANGELOG entry. Fragments are consolidated into the top-level CHANGELOG.md at release time.
Why
Two PRs that both edit the ### Fixed block of CHANGELOG.md always conflict on merge — git can't pick a serialization order without human input. Two PRs that each add a fresh .changeset/<unique-name>.md never conflict because they don't share lines.
See #2975 for the full rationale.
Adding a fragment
node scripts/changeset/new.cjs \
--type Fixed \
--pr 1234 \
--body "fix the thing — explain the user-visible change in one sentence"
This writes .changeset/<adjective>-<noun>-<noun>.md with frontmatter and a body. Three random words → concurrent PRs don't collide.
Format
---
type: Fixed
pr: 1234
---
**`/gsd-foo` no longer drops trailing slashes** — explain the user-visible change.
Allowed type: values follow Keep a Changelog: Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed, Security.
Opting out
PRs that legitimately have no user-facing impact can add the no-changelog label. CI honors it. When unsure, add the fragment.
At release time
Promotion is automatic. The release workflow's finalize job runs:
node scripts/changeset/cli.cjs render --version vX.Y.Z --date YYYY-MM-DD --allow-empty
This reads every fragment, groups bullets by type:, replaces ## [Unreleased] with a new ## [vX.Y.Z] - YYYY-MM-DD block, opens a fresh ## [Unreleased] above, and deletes consumed fragments. The --allow-empty flag ensures a no-change release still gets a dated heading (with a _No notable changes._ placeholder). A subsequent verify step confirms the promotion landed correctly. Maintainers do not run this by hand.
Archived fragments
.changeset/archived/ holds fragments for already-shipped releases (≤ 1.3.1), retained for provenance. Their content was hand-curated into the dated ## [1.x.y] sections of CHANGELOG.md during the #690 backfill — they were never consumed by render. All changeset tooling enumerates .changeset/ non-recursively, so archived fragments are never picked up or rendered. Do not move them back to the top level.