* fix(workflows): agent-skills query keys must match subagent_type Eight workflow files called `gsd-sdk query agent-skills <KEY>` with a key that did not match any `subagent_type` Task() spawns in the same workflow (or any existing `agents/<KEY>.md`): - research-phase.md:45 — gsd-researcher → gsd-phase-researcher - plan-phase.md:36 — gsd-researcher → gsd-phase-researcher - plan-phase.md:38 — gsd-checker → gsd-plan-checker - quick.md:145 — gsd-checker → gsd-plan-checker - verify-work.md:36 — gsd-checker → gsd-plan-checker - new-milestone.md:207 — gsd-synthesizer → gsd-research-synthesizer - new-project.md:63 — gsd-synthesizer → gsd-research-synthesizer - ui-review.md:21 — gsd-ui-reviewer → gsd-ui-auditor - discuss-phase.md:114 — gsd-advisor → gsd-advisor-researcher Effect before this fix: users configuring `agent_skills.<correct-type>` in .planning/config.json got no injection on these paths because the workflow asked the SDK for a different (non-existent) key. The SDK correctly returned "" for the unknown key, which then interpolated as an empty string into the Task() prompt. Silent no-op. The discuss-phase advisor case is a subtle variant — the spawn site uses `subagent_type="general-purpose"` and loads the agent role via `Read(~/.claude/agents/gsd-advisor-researcher.md)`. The injection key must follow the agent identity (gsd-advisor-researcher), not the technical spawn type. This is a follow-up to #2555 — the SDK-side fix in that PR (#2587) only becomes fully effective once the call sites use the right keys. Adds `sdk/src/workflow-agent-skills-consistency.test.ts` as a contract test: every `agent-skills <slug>` invocation in `get-shit-done/workflows/**/*.md` must reference an existing `agents/<slug>.md`. Fails loudly on future key typos. Closes #2615 * test: harden workflow agent-skills regex per review feedback Review (#2616): CodeRabbit flagged the `agent-skills <slug>` pattern as too permissive (can match prose mentions of the string) and the per-line scan as brittle (misses commands wrapped across lines). - Require full `gsd-sdk query agent-skills` prefix before capture + `\b` around the pattern so prose references no longer match. - Scan each file's full content (not line-by-line) so `\s+` can span newlines; resolve 1-based line number from match index. - Add JSDoc on helpers and on QUERY_KEY_PATTERN. Verified: RED against base (`f30da83`) produces the same 9 violations as before; GREEN on fixed tree. --------- Co-authored-by: forfrossen <forfrossensvart@gmail.com>
6.2 KiB
<required_reading> @~/.claude/get-shit-done/references/ui-brand.md </required_reading>
<available_agent_types> Valid GSD subagent types (use exact names — do not fall back to 'general-purpose'):
- gsd-ui-auditor — Audits UI against design requirements </available_agent_types>
0. Initialize
INIT=$(gsd-sdk query init.phase-op "${PHASE_ARG}")
if [[ "$INIT" == @file:* ]]; then INIT=$(cat "${INIT#@file:}"); fi
AGENT_SKILLS_UI_REVIEWER=$(gsd-sdk query agent-skills gsd-ui-auditor 2>/dev/null)
Parse: phase_dir, phase_number, phase_name, phase_slug, padded_phase, commit_docs.
UI_AUDITOR_MODEL=$(gsd-sdk query resolve-model gsd-ui-auditor --raw)
Display banner:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► UI AUDIT — PHASE {N}: {name}
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Detect Input State
SUMMARY_FILES=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-SUMMARY.md 2>/dev/null)
UI_SPEC_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-SPEC.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
UI_REVIEW_FILE=$(ls "${PHASE_DIR}"/*-UI-REVIEW.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
If SUMMARY_FILES empty: Exit — "Phase {N} not executed. Run /gsd:execute-phase {N} first."
Text mode (workflow.text_mode: true in config or --text flag): Set TEXT_MODE=true if --text is present in $ARGUMENTS OR text_mode from init JSON is true. When TEXT_MODE is active, replace every AskUserQuestion call with a plain-text numbered list and ask the user to type their choice number. This is required for non-Claude runtimes (OpenAI Codex, Gemini CLI, etc.) where AskUserQuestion is not available.
If UI_REVIEW_FILE non-empty: Use AskUserQuestion:
- header: "Existing UI Review"
- question: "UI-REVIEW.md already exists for Phase {N}."
- options:
- "Re-audit — run fresh audit"
- "View — display current review and exit"
If "View": display file, exit. If "Re-audit": continue.
2. Gather Context Paths
Build file list for auditor:
- All SUMMARY.md files in phase dir
- All PLAN.md files in phase dir
- UI-SPEC.md (if exists — audit baseline)
- CONTEXT.md (if exists — locked decisions)
3. Spawn gsd-ui-auditor
◆ Spawning UI auditor...
Build prompt:
Read ~/.claude/agents/gsd-ui-auditor.md for instructions.
<objective>
Conduct 6-pillar visual audit of Phase {phase_number}: {phase_name}
{If UI-SPEC exists: "Audit against UI-SPEC.md design contract."}
{If no UI-SPEC: "Audit against abstract 6-pillar standards."}
</objective>
<files_to_read>
- {summary_paths} (Execution summaries)
- {plan_paths} (Execution plans — what was intended)
- {ui_spec_path} (UI Design Contract — audit baseline, if exists)
- {context_path} (User decisions, if exists)
</files_to_read>
${AGENT_SKILLS_UI_REVIEWER}
<config>
phase_dir: {phase_dir}
padded_phase: {padded_phase}
</config>
Omit null file paths.
Task(
prompt=ui_audit_prompt,
subagent_type="gsd-ui-auditor",
model="{UI_AUDITOR_MODEL}",
description="UI Audit Phase {N}"
)
4. Handle Return
If ## UI REVIEW COMPLETE:
Display score summary:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
GSD ► UI AUDIT COMPLETE ✓
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
**Phase {N}: {Name}** — Overall: {score}/24
| Pillar | Score |
|--------|-------|
| Copywriting | {N}/4 |
| Visuals | {N}/4 |
| Color | {N}/4 |
| Typography | {N}/4 |
| Spacing | {N}/4 |
| Experience Design | {N}/4 |
Top fixes:
1. {fix}
2. {fix}
3. {fix}
Full review: {path to UI-REVIEW.md}
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
## ▶ Next
`/clear` then one of:
- `/gsd:verify-work {N}` — UAT testing
- `/gsd:plan-phase {N+1}` — plan next phase
- `/gsd:verify-work {N}` — UAT testing
- `/gsd:plan-phase {N+1}` — plan next phase
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Automated UI Verification (when Playwright-MCP is available)
If mcp__playwright__* tools are accessible in this session:
- Navigate to each UI component described in the phase's UI-SPEC.md using
mcp__playwright__navigate(or equivalent Playwright-MCP tool). - Take a screenshot of each component using
mcp__playwright__screenshot. - Compare against the spec's visual requirements — dimensions, color palette, layout, spacing scale, and typography.
- Report any dimension, color, or layout discrepancies automatically as additional findings within the relevant pillar section of UI-REVIEW.md.
- Flag items that require human judgment (brand feel, content tone) as
needs_human_review: truein the findings — these are surfaced to the user separately after the automated pass completes.
If Playwright-MCP is not available in this session, this section is skipped
entirely. The audit falls back to the standard code-only review described above.
No configuration change is required — the availability of mcp__playwright__*
tools is detected at runtime.
5. Commit (if configured)
gsd-sdk query commit "docs(${padded_phase}): UI audit review" "${PHASE_DIR}/${PADDED_PHASE}-UI-REVIEW.md"
<success_criteria>
- Phase validated
- SUMMARY.md files found (execution completed)
- Existing review handled (re-audit/view)
- gsd-ui-auditor spawned with correct context
- UI-REVIEW.md created in phase directory
- Score summary displayed to user
- Next steps presented </success_criteria>