* fix(#4594): give dispatch identity one owner for the emitted format and its parser The isolation guards decided whether a run-scoped sentinel applied to a dispatch by regex-scraping model-authored prose. The scrape returned values in a different namespace from the ones the sentinel records, so the comparison could never succeed: sentinel { phase: "03", plan: "03-02-hardening" } <- $PHASE_NUMBER / $plan_id prose "Execute plan 02 of phase 03-auth." scraped { phase: "03-auth.", plan: "02" } <- greedy (\S+), both wrong #4594 reports only the phase half. Measured against a real phase-plan-index run, plans[].id is phase-prefixed, plan-numbered AND slugged, while the prose carries a bare in-phase plan number — so the plan field mismatches too, and the Claude path is dead rather than latent. A fresh sentinel was therefore discarded on every executor dispatch and every legitimate ISOLATION=none degrade was denied, leaving the work unrun. hooks/lib/dispatch-identity.js is now the single owner of both halves. The two prompt-body producers emit a canonical marker carrying the same shell values the sentinel records, so producer and consumer agree by construction. The prose frame stays as a fallback, bounded by the phase-token grammar ADR-2121 owns and deliberately reporting no plan — an absent identifier means "cannot compare" and is safe; a wrong one is a false mismatch and is not. The prose sentence itself is byte-identical: the executor agent reads it too, so the marker is purely additive (Hyrum's Law). An inapplicable sentinel is now named in the guards' deny reason instead of being dropped silently — the silence is why this survived three producers and two consumers unnoticed. Interpolated values come from a sentinel file and from prompt text, so both are length-bounded and stripped of control characters. ADR-4630 locks the seam and maps the epic's three phases. Refs #4630 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(#4594): resolve eight review findings across the dispatch-identity seam Three orthogonal review engines ran on 43418af144 — the code-review skill's Standards and Spec axes, and an isolated adversarial security pass — plus a self-review of the committed diff. Every finding is fixed here; none deferred. F1 (major, reproduced). A keyless or unknown-key-only marker — the literal "[gsd:dispatch]" or "[gsd:dispatch run=..]" — matched the marker grammar and returned source:'marker' with both fields null, suppressing the prose fallback entirely. Any prompt text containing that literal silently disabled identity narrowing, so a fresh sentinel applied to a dispatch it was never scoped to, defeating #3045 SECURITY F2. Prompt text is attacker-influenceable. A marker that yields neither recognized key is no longer a marker: the scan continues to later markers, then later texts, then prose. Forward-compatible tolerance of unknown keys is unchanged. F2/F3 (major). The first cut duplicated sanitizeForReason, describeSentinelDiscard and REASON_INTERPOLATION_MAX_LEN byte-for-byte across both guards — the exact defect class this epic exists to delete, and with no cold-load justification, since both hooks already require hooks/lib/. They now live in hooks/lib/isolation-deny-reason.js, and buildSentinelDiscard lives in isolation-sentinel.js beside the comparison it mirrors, returning the nested {sentinel:{phase,plan}, dispatch:{phase,plan}} shape instead of a bespoke four-field bag that renamed the pairs already flowing through the seam. F4 (hard violation). The visibility test asserted on the deny reason's prose. CONTRIBUTING.md prohibits raw text matching on hook output, which is why every deny carries a stable reason_code. The discard is now a structured sentinel_discarded field on each hook's stdout JSON, and the test asserts that; the sentence stays for the operator but is no longer the contract. F5 (hard violation). The 64-character truncation limit had no boundary coverage. 63/64/65 are now exercised against the single consolidated helper. F6 (minor). sanitizeForReason stripped C0/C1 controls but not U+2028/U+2029 or the bidi overrides, so a crafted value could still reflow or reverse the message. Both classes are stripped, with a test each. F7 (major). The producer/template parity test was vacuous — it rendered a marker and re-parsed its own output, and would have passed with both templates deleted. It now reads the two workflow templates, extracts each marker line, substitutes the measured values and asserts the owner's parser returns them. Proven red by deleting one template's marker line before being proven green. F8 (doc). ADR-4630 and the design notes claimed the marker is guaranteed on the orchestrator-worktree path because that prompt is built in shell. It is not: executor-isolation-dispatch.md:131 says plainly that those are template placeholders, not shell variables, so {plan_id} is model-substituted there too. A false guarantee in a design lock is worse than a stated limit. Both documents now say the marker is model-substituted on both paths and that the prose fallback is the real floor everywhere. The "3 workflow templates" count was also wrong — 3 prose sites across 2 files, 2 of which carry the marker. Refs #4630 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4594): refresh the compact-content baseline and acknowledge execute-phase.md growth Refs #4630. The dispatch-identity marker and its substitution note grew gsd-core/workflows/execute-phase.md by 525 bytes (91846 -> 92371), which drifts two real-tree guards that lint:ci does not run: - tests/benchmark-compact-content.test.cjs asserts the committed baseline is "up to date"; the split for execute-phase.md moved off 25827 -> 25952 and on 23576 -> 23701, taking its compaction reduction 8.72% -> 8.67%. Baseline regenerated with scripts/benchmark-compact-content.cjs --write. - tests/emitted-attribution.test.cjs requires a growth acknowledgment trailer for any emitted file that grows, keyed on the bare filename. Added below. The growth is two additions and no rewrites: the [gsd:dispatch ...] marker line inside the Agent() prompt's <objective>, and the note telling the orchestrator to substitute {plan_id} with the plan's id verbatim. Both are load-bearing -- the marker is what lets a guard hook match a dispatch to the sentinel the per-plan gate wrote, and without the note the orchestrator has no instruction telling it the value must not be paraphrased. Emitted-Drift-Ack-Growth: execute-phase.md — adds the canonical [gsd:dispatch] identity marker and its {plan_id} substitution note, which the isolation guards compare verbatim against the run-scoped sentinel (#4594) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> * chore(#4594): set changeset fragment pr to 4693 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: sim <sim@local> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
GSD Core documentation
Documentation is organised into four quadrants: tutorials help you learn by doing, how-to guides solve specific tasks, reference states authoritative facts, and explanation explores concepts and design decisions.
Language versions: English · Português (pt-BR) · 日本語 · 简体中文
Tutorials
- Your first project — install to first shipped phase, one guaranteed path
- Onboarding an existing codebase — bring GSD Core to a brownfield repo
- Build your first capability — author a tiny declarative capability and watch it act in the loop
- Install your first capability — install a third-party capability end-to-end: consent, verify, check for updates, remove
How-to guides
- Install on your runtime — runtime-specific install steps for all 16 supported runtimes
- Install a minimal GSD and add skills later — install only the core skills, then grow the surface with profiles and
/gsd-surface - Attach a plugin-provided skill to a GSD agent — use the
global:plugin:skillentry form to load Claude Code plugin skills into agent prompts - Discuss a phase — capture implementation decisions before planning begins
- Resolve edge-coverage findings — turn the spec phase's surfaced domain-boundary edges into covered, dismissed, or backstopped spec decisions
- Probe edges in a non-English project — get real edge coverage on a spec written in another language, and tell "no edges here" apart from "the probe could not read it"
- Resolve prohibition findings — turn the spec phase's surfaced must-NOT constraints into resolved, dismissed, or deferred spec decisions
- Resolve an unreachable-workflow finding — wire or fully sweep a shipped workflow that no command, agent, or skill references
- Acknowledge emitted-artifact drift — declare a deliberate emitted-byte ripple or workflow/agent growth in a commit trailer, and migrate an older ack fragment
- Change the STATE.md schema — add, change or remove a STATE.md frontmatter key and keep the template and all five reference documents in step
- Resolve verify-command path findings — fix an
<automated>verify command whose target directory does not resolve from the executor's cwd - State a failing direction — say what output constitutes failure for an
<automated>verify command, and migrate a phase planned before the rule - Resolve a contract-drift finding — bring an agent's completion contract, read-tag gate, or deleted-file test reference back into agreement with the registry
- Resolve unreachable-guard findings — fix shell guards whose fallback arm cannot run, and tell "nothing to report" apart from "could not look"
- Declare a hook's crash policy — terminate a GSD hook with
allow/deny/crash, declare itsON_CRASHpolicy, and tell a hook's own crash apart from a check that could not run at all - Resolve a skipped capability probe — act on a coverage gate that held your phase for an unestablished scope, or a planning checkpoint that reported
skippedinstead of a verdict - Diagnose which gsd-tools is running — tell this package's tool apart from the predecessor's colliding binary and from a gsd-core too old to identify itself
- Resolve an ESLint glob-coverage finding — bring a source file that matches no lint rule under coverage, or record a reasoned exemption
- Resolve a raw-terminator finding — pick
runMain/ExitError,terminateNow, orprocess.exitCodefor alocal/require-registered-exitfinding, and know the two allowlist entries and the rule's documented evasions - Adopt the v2 exit contract — turn on
gsd-tools's versioned exit-code projection, read the code table including what80(DEGRADED) means, and migrate a CI gate that treats any non-zero exit as fatal - Read the statusline freshness marker — turn on
state ~N commits back, and tell "STATE.md is fresh" apart from "freshness could not be established" - Consume the planning snapshot — read
planning inspectfrom a dashboard or harness, and tell "nothing to report" apart from "could not look" - Read CI timeout budget signals — find the near-cap warning on a run, read the accumulated
tests/ci-timeout-budget-history.jsonltrend, and know which lever (cap, shard balance, shard-1 contents) a repeatedly-near-cap lane calls for - Consume the state contract — read
.planning/state.jsonfrom a workbench or editor extension, gate on the contract version, and tell "nothing to show" apart from "could not look" - Keep planning docs out of a shared repo — make
.planning/local-only, including untracking files git already tracks (the step.gitignorealone cannot do) - Publish PRs without planning artifacts — keep
.planning/committed locally, so worktrees and/gsd-undokeep working, whileplanning.pr_strictkeeps every planning path out of the branch you push - Plan a phase — run research, decompose work, and verify plan quality
- Verify a dependency-compatibility claim — act on a compatibility claim the researcher left
[ASSUMED], and tell "nothing declared" apart from "a constraint is declared" and "the lookup failed" - Execute a phase — run plans in parallel waves with fresh-context subagents
- Enable parallel reviewer lanes — cut a multi-reviewer
/gsd-reviewpass toward its slowest lane, and tell a rate-limited lane apart from one that was never selected - Enable concurrent per-plan planners in chunked mode — dispatch chunked
/gsd-plan-phase's per-plan Tasks together within one outline Wave instead of one at a time, and know when the setting has no effect - Verify and ship — walk through completed work, diagnose failures, and create the PR
- Catch complexity before it compounds — enable the post-execute refactor hook, read a proposal's score vs. anchor delta, and accept or decline it
- Run phases autonomously — use autonomous mode for unattended phase execution
- Handle quick and fast tasks — use
/gsd-quickand/gsd-fastfor ad-hoc work outside the phase loop - Batch quick tasks — run several
/gsd-quick-shaped tasks together with/gsd-quick-batch, understand capacity/isolation, and recover a failed or interrupted batch - Configure model profiles — switch between quality, balanced, and budget model tiers
- Control which host runtime GSD reports — read the
agent_runtimeladder, understand what host detection looks at, and pin the runtime when detection is not what you want - Set up cross-AI review — configure a second AI to review code produced by the primary agent
- Scope code review depth by path — escalate
/gsd-code-reviewtodeepfor sensitive directories while the rest of the repo stays at the default depth - Work in parallel with workstreams — run independent lines of work simultaneously using workstreams
- Isolate work with workspaces — use workspaces to sandbox experimental or risky changes
- Debug a failed execution — diagnose and recover from broken or incomplete phase execution
- Interpret scope-conformance warnings — read the advisory the worktree-wave merge emits when a plan branch commits outside its declared scope
- Interpret install-shadow warnings — read the advisory GSD Core emits when a
/gsd-*trigger is installed at both scopes and one silently wins, and tell "nothing to report" apart from "could not look" - Interpret
state validateresults — read thescopereason codes and tell "nothing to report" apart from "could not look" - Spike and sketch — use
/gsd-spikeand/gsd-sketchfor exploratory work before committing to a plan - Design a UI phase — use the UI phase loop for frontend and visual work
- Enable live-DOM verification — opt a project into browser-backed UI acceptance checks during execution, handle the browser-profile lock, and tell "nothing to report" apart from "could not look"
- Develop a Capability for GSD 1.5+ — add feature Capabilities, hook fragments, and registry entries
- Develop a task-content resolver capability — declare a
taskContentResolversoexecute-plan.mdresolves per-task content from your external issue tracker instead ofPLAN.md - Ship a reviewer lane in your capability — declare a
reviewerbody so/gsd-reviewdiscovers, invokes, and renders your external review CLI or model endpoint - List your reviewer lane in the registry — publish a lane you have built to the Reviewer Lane Registry so other people can find and install it
- Take over a capability or EoS integration — assume maintainership of an existing third-party capability, reviewer lane, or EoS host integration through a handoff, an adoption fork, first-party absorption, or a de-listing
- Add or update a host's integration — set a host's documentation-sourced
runtime.hostIntegrationaxes (ADR-1239 Phase A), with theundocumentedsentinel rule - Migrate an install test to the executed plan — convert an
fs.existsSync-probing install test group to a value assertion againstinstallRuntimeArtifacts's executed-plan return, and test against a fake fs adapter - Vendor a dependency — add a third-party package
gsd-core/bin/**needs at runtime as a verbatim vendored artifact, keep it out ofdependencies, and pick the right upstream bundle - Turn a capability off (and keep it off) — disable a capability via the surface, or gate individual hooks off without removing the capability
- Drive GSD from a tracker issue — start a phase from a GitHub, Linear, or Jira issue
- Migrate from GSD 2 — upgrade an existing GSD 2 project to GSD Core
- Update GSD — re-run the installer to pick up the latest release
- Clean up get-shit-done-cc — remove leftover old-package artifacts that cause a spurious
⬆ /gsd-updateindicator after migrating to@opengsd/gsd-core - Fix the worktree base-mismatch (exit 42) error — resolve the branch-divergence condition that halts parallel phase execution
- Recover and troubleshoot — fix common problems, rebuild context, and uninstall
Reference
- Commands — every command with flags and examples
- Configuration — full config schema, model profiles, git branching strategies
- CLI tools —
gsd-tools.cjsprogrammatic API for workflows and agents - JSON error mode —
gsd-toolsfailure channels: faults (stderr, exit 1) vs degraded results (stdout, exit 0), and the reason-code taxonomy - Features — complete feature index
- Inventory — installed skills and surface map
- STATE.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/STATE.md - CONTEXT.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/phases/<N>/CONTEXT.md - PLAN.md schema — field-by-field reference for
.planning/phases/<N>/PLAN.md - Planning artifacts — all
.planning/files and their roles - Review and verification capabilities — code review, security, and Nyquist capability ownership and hook contracts
- Gate predicates — canonical specification of the phase-gate predicate vocabulary
- Capability matrix — generated catalogue of every capability's role, tier, extension points, hook kinds, and
engines.gsd - Exit code reference — generated catalogue of every registered process exit code, its name, meaning, and owning module, plus the reserved bands and the v1/v2 exit contract
- Capability manifest — the full
capability.jsonschema and validation rules gsd capabilitycommand — install / update / remove / list reference for third-party capabilities- Workflow fragments — in-file
<!-- gsd:section -->marker grammar for fragmentizing workflow markdown at emission time - Partition rules for compact-content splits — the protected-content list, sentinel syntax, and the five CI checks a
workflow.compact_contentspine/detail split must obey - Reviewer Lane Registry — generated catalogue of third-party reviewer lanes, with their flags, transport, and install commands
Explanation
- Context engineering — how context rot forms and how GSD Core prevents it
- The phase loop — design rationale for the Discuss → Plan → Execute → Verify → Ship cycle
- Multi-agent orchestration — how subagents are spawned, scoped, and coordinated
- Security model — trust boundaries, permissions, and safe automation
- The capability trust model — why third-party capabilities are gated by consent + integrity + reversibility, not a sandbox
- How overlay capabilities compose — why first-party always wins and how the loader resolves precedence, conflicts, and fail-open load-failure warnings
- Architecture — system architecture, agent model, and data flow
- The Embeddable Orchestration System — one public, versioned contract for embedding GSD across many hosts
- Discuss modes — assumptions mode vs interview mode for
/gsd-discuss-phase - Context monitoring — context window monitoring hook architecture
- Issue-driven orchestration — recipe for driving GSD from a tracker issue using existing primitives
Related
- What's new in 1.7.0 — curated highlights of the 1.7.0 release
- Root README — landing page, quickstart, and documentation overview
- Changelog — release history